Two slow conduction systems co-ordinate shell-climbing behaviour in the sea anemone Calliactis parasitica

1976 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-445
Author(s):  
I. D. McFarlane
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Sensory Response ◽  
Pulse Interval ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Slow Conduction ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica ◽  
Climbing Behaviour ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Pulses in two slow conducting systems, the ectodermal SS 1 and the endodermal SS 2, were recorded during shell-climbing behaviour. The mean pulse interval of SS 1 pulses was 7–4 s and that of SS 2 pulses was 6-4 s. Activity in both systems may arise as a sensory response of tentacles to shell contact, but the SS 1 and SS 2 may not share the same receptors. 2. Electrical stimulation of the SS 1 and SS 2 together, at a frequency of 1 shock every 5 s, elicits shell-climbing behaviour in the absence of a shell. 3. Low-frequency nerve-net activity (about 1 pulse every 15 s) accompanies column bending during both normal and electrically elicited responses. This activity probably arises as a result of column bending and is not due to a sensory response to the shell.

scholarly journals Co-Ordination of Pedal-Disk Detachment in the Sea Anemone Calliactis Parasitica

1969 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-396
Author(s):  
I. D. MCFARLANE
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Electrical Activity ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Average Frequency ◽  
Conduction System ◽  
Identical Stimulus ◽  
Slow Conduction ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica ◽  
Behavioural Sequence ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Electrical activity has been recorded from the sphincter region of Calliactis parasitica during the behavioural sequence in which the anemone detaches from the substrate and attaches to a Buccinum shell. The ectodermal slow-conduction system (SS1) fires repetitively, the majority of observed pulses occurring in the period prior to detachment (a typical example is 25 SS1pulses at an average frequency of 1 pulse/7 sec.). Shell-tentacle contact is essential for stimulation of SS1activity. 2. Mechanical stimulation of the column excites the SS1, and 30 stimuli at a frequency of about one shock/5 sec. give pedal disk detachment. 3. Electrical stimulation of the ectoderm excites the SS1and about 30 stimuli at frequencies between one shock/3 sec. and one shock/9 sec. produce detachment. Detachment and the SS1 have an identical stimulus threshold. It is concluded that detachment is co-ordinated by the SS1.

Control of mouth opening and pharynx protrusion during feeding in the sea anemone Calliactis parasitica

1975 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-626
Author(s):  
I. D. McFarlane
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Reduced Glutathione ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Sea Anemone ◽  
Conducting System ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Activity in all three known conducting systems (the nerve net, SS1, and SS2) may accompany feeding in Calliactis. The most marked response is an increase in pulse frequency in the SS2 (the endodermal slow conducting system) during mouth opening and pharynx protrusion. 2. Electrical stimulation of the SS2 at a frequency of one shock every 5 s elicits mouth opening and pharynx protrusion in the absence of food. 3. A rise in SS2 pulse frequency is also evoked by food extracts, some amino acids, and in particular by the tripeptide reduced glutathione, which produces a response at a concentration of 10(−5) M. 4. Although the SS2 is an endodermal system, the receptors involved in the response to food appear to be ectodermal. 5. The epithelium that lines the pharynx conducts SS1 pulses, but there is some evidence for polarization of conduction.

scholarly journals Nerve Nets and Conducting Systems in Sea Anemones: Two Pathways Excite Tentacle Contractions in Calliactis Parasitica

1984 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-149
Author(s):  
IAN D. MCFARLANE
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Activity ◽  
Conduction System ◽  
Sea Anemones ◽  
Single Shock ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Slow Conduction ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica ◽  
Slight Movement ◽  
Pulse Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Single shocks to the column sometimes evoke tentacle contractions, ranging from slight movement of a few scattered tentacles to rapid bending or shortening of all the tentacles. Some individuals are more responsive than others. Complex bursts of electrical activity follow single shocks, but only in tentacles that contract. 2. These single shocks excite pulses in two conducting systems - the through-conducting nerve net (TCNN) and the ectodermal slow conduction system (SSI). When a single shock evokes contractions and bursts of electrical activity, these usually follow the SSI pulse, rarely the TCNN pulse. Stimulation of the SSI alone causes tentacle contraction in responsive anemones. 3. Fast tentacle contractions always follow the second of two closelyspaced TCNN pulses: the TCNN shows facilitation (Pantin, 1935a). An SSI pulse, however, does not facilitate subsequent pulses in either the SSI or TCNN. 4. There are two pathways for activation of tentacle contractions. The TCNN pathway is mechano-sensitive and normally requires facilitation. The SSI pathway is mechano- and chemosensitive, only requires a single SSI pulse to evoke contraction, but is very labile. It is proposed that the TCNN and the SSI do not excite the ectodermal muscles directly, but via a multipolar nerve net.

scholarly journals Nerve Net Pacemakers and Phases of Behaviour in the Sea Anemone Calliactis Parasitica

1983 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-246
Author(s):  
IAN D. McFARLANE
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Pulse Number ◽  
Sea Anemone ◽  
Sea Anemones ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Partial Activation ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica ◽  
Slow System ◽  
Stimulation Of

Bursts of through-conducting nerve net (TCNN) pulses, 20–45 min apart, were recorded from Calliactis attached to shells. Within 15–25 min of the anemones being detached the TCNN bursts suddenly became more frequent (only 4–11 min apart). Such bursts continued for several hours if re-attachment was prevented. In an attached anemone simultaneous electrical stimulation of the TCNN and ectodermal slow system (SS1) with 20–30 shocks at one every 5 s also led to more frequent TCNN bursts, whether or not detachment took place. If, however, the anemone remained attached, the intervals between bursts returned to the normal resting duration after about 90 min. In all cases the decay of the 4–11 min interval TCNN bursts involved a reduction in pulse number, not an increase in burst interval. Partial activation of the TCNN pacemakers followed stimulation of the SS1 alone. It is suggested that in sea anemones the change from one behavioural phase to another is associated with a change in the patterned output of nerve net pacemakers.

Excitatory and Inhibitory Control of Inherent Contractions in the Sea Anemone Calliactis Parasitica

1974 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-422
Author(s):  
I. D. MCFARLANE
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Circular Muscle ◽  
Muscular Activity ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Muscle Contractions ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica ◽  
Muscle Groups ◽  
Contraction Cycle ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Bursts of nerve-net activity are always followed by a contraction cycle involving parietal and circular muscle contractions in isolated preparations of Calliactis parasitica. Both muscle groups can, however, also contract in the absence of nerve-net activity. These contractions, termed inherent, seem to follow periods of reduced activity in the endodermal slow conduction system (SS2). 2. Electrical stimulation of the SS2 inhibits inherent contractions of parietal and circular muscle preparations. Electrical stimulation of the nerve net excites parietal muscles but seems to have both excitatory and inhibitory effects on circular muscles. 3. A model for control of parietal and circular muscle contractions proposes that both the nerve net and the SS2 are responsible for directing the inherent muscular activity into the observed contraction cycle. It is suggested that when the action of these antagonistic muscles is strongly opposed the SS2 pulse frequency rises, resulting in inhibition of further muscular activity.

scholarly journals Deep Brain Stimulation of the Posterior Insula in Chronic Pain: A Theoretical Framework

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 639
Author(s):  
David Bergeron ◽  
Sami Obaid ◽  
Marie-Pierre Fournier-Gosselin ◽  
Alain Bouthillier ◽  
Dang Khoa Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Brain Lesion ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Posterior Insula ◽  
Deep Brain ◽  
Stimulation Of

Introduction: To date, clinical trials of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory chronic pain have yielded unsatisfying results. Recent evidence suggests that the posterior insula may represent a promising DBS target for this indication. Methods: We present a narrative review highlighting the theoretical basis of posterior insula DBS in patients with chronic pain. Results: Neuroanatomical studies identified the posterior insula as an important cortical relay center for pain and interoception. Intracranial neuronal recordings showed that the earliest response to painful laser stimulation occurs in the posterior insula. The posterior insula is one of the only regions in the brain whose low-frequency electrical stimulation can elicit painful sensations. Most chronic pain syndromes, such as fibromyalgia, had abnormal functional connectivity of the posterior insula on functional imaging. Finally, preliminary results indicated that high-frequency electrical stimulation of the posterior insula can acutely increase pain thresholds. Conclusion: In light of the converging evidence from neuroanatomical, brain lesion, neuroimaging, and intracranial recording and stimulation as well as non-invasive stimulation studies, it appears that the insula is a critical hub for central integration and processing of painful stimuli, whose high-frequency electrical stimulation has the potential to relieve patients from the sensory and affective burden of chronic pain.

Effects of chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation of human knee extensor muscles exposed to static passive stretching

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Shenkman ◽  
E. V. Lyubaeva ◽  
D. V. Popov ◽  
A. I. Netreba ◽  
O. S. Tarasova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Human Knee ◽  
Passive Stretching ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Knee Extensor Muscles ◽  
Stimulation Of

Control of Preparatory Feeding Behaviour in the Sea Anemone Tealia Felina

1970 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
I. D. McFARLANE
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Feeding Behaviour ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Conduction System ◽  
Sea Anemone ◽  
Feeding Response ◽  
Slow Conduction ◽  
Oral Disk ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Dissolved food substances elicit preparatory feeding behaviour in the sea anemone Tealia felina. This behaviour takes the form of expansion of the oral disk and lowering of the margin of the disk. Food may also cause mouth opening and pharynx protrusion. This pre-feeding response may increase the chance of food capture. 2. The expansion and lowering of the oral disk can also be elicited by electrical stimulation of a slow conduction system, the SS1, thought to be located in the ectoderm. 3. SS1 activity is seen when the anemone is exposed to dissolved food substances. 4. It is concluded that preparatory feeding behaviour in Tealia is mediated in part by the SS1.

Control of the Pacemaker System of the Nervenet in the Sea Anemone Calliactis Parasitica

1974 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-143
Author(s):  
I. D. MCFARLANE
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Feedback ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Pulse Number ◽  
Pulse Action ◽  
Conduction System ◽  
The Body ◽  
Optimum Frequency ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Slow Conduction ◽  
Calliactis Parasitica

1. The rhythm of spontaneous nerve-net pulses is reset by intercalated evoked nerve-net pulses. 2. The origin of spontaneous nerve-net pulses can shift during a burst. There seem to be many potential pacemakers, widely distributed throughout the body, but apparently absent from the tentacles. 3. If a spontaneous or evoked pulse in the endodermal slow conduction system (SS 2) occurs during a burst, the nerve-net pulse intervals are increased during a 15-30 sec period following the SS 2 pulse. Additional SS 2 pulses cause a further increase in pulse intervals. 4. Nerve-net bursts are followed by a sequence of muscular contractions. The size of the contraction shown by any muscle group depends on nerve-net pulse number and frequency, the optimum frequency being different for different muscles. It is suggested that the SS 2 pulse action on nerve-net pulse frequency can significantly alter the behavioural output of nerve-net bursts. The SS 2 activity may represent sensory feedback on to the nervous pacemakers.

Expansion and Contraction of the Oral Disc in the Sea Anemone Tealia Felina

1972 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-649
Author(s):  
I. D. MCFARLANE ◽  
I. D. LAWN
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Period ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Sensory Response ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Oral Disc ◽  
Nerve Net ◽  
Slow Contraction ◽  
Slow Onset ◽  
Radial Muscle ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Electrical stimulation of the SS 1 of Tealia felina causes inhibition of spontaneousactivity and increase in length of oral disc radial muscle preparations. This response is elicited over a wide stimulus frequency range (1 every 2 sec to 1 every 30 sec). The response shows a slow onset and a long recovery period. 2. Stimulation of the nerve net at frequencies between 1 shock every 5 sec and 1 shock every 20 sec produces slow contraction. The radials also show fast contractions to shocks less than 2 sec apart. 3. Dissolved food substances excite the SS 1 in the column. The sensory response to application of food extract to a small area of the column shows evidence of sensory adaptation. 4. These observations are related to the pre-feeding response of Tealia and a model for oral disc expansion is described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document