scholarly journals Distinct Survival Outcomes in Subgroups of Stage III Pancreatic Cancer Patients: Taiwan Cancer Registry and Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry

Author(s):  
Tzu-Pin Lu ◽  
Chien-Hui Wu ◽  
Chia-Chen Chang ◽  
Han-Ching Chan ◽  
Amrita Chattopadhyay ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Pancreatic cancer is one of the most malignant cancers with poor survival. The latest edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system classifies the majority of operable pancreatic cancer patients as stage-III, while dramatic heterogeneity is observed among these patients. Therefore, subgrouping is required to accurately predict their prognosis and define a treatment plan. This study conducts a cohort study to provide a more precise classification system for stage-III pancreatic cancer patients by utilizing clinical variables. Methods We analyzed survival using log-rank tests, univariate Cox-regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves for stage-III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR). Patients were further divided into subgroups using classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm. All results were validated using the SEER database. Results Among stage-III PDAC patients, lymph node and tumor grade showed significant association with survival. Patients with N2 stage had higher mortality risks (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71–3.08, p < 0.0001) than N0 patients. Patients with grade 3 also had higher risk of mortality (HR = 3.80, 95% CI 2.25–6.39, p < 0.0001) than grade 1 patients. The CART algorithm stratified stage-III patients into four subgroups with significantly different survival rates. The median survival of the four subgroups was 23.5, 18.4, 14.5, and 9.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed with SEER data. Conclusions Lymph node involvement and tumor grade are predictive factors for survival in stage-III PDAC patients. This new precise classification system can be used to guide treatment planning in advanced-stage pancreatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Li ◽  
Yucheng Ma ◽  
Zhongyu Jian ◽  
Xi Jin ◽  
Liyuan Xiang ◽  
...  

Background and AimsThe current guidelines for the treatment of penile cancer patients with clinically non-invasive normal inguinal lymph nodes are still broad, so the purpose of this study is to determine which patients are suitable for lymph node dissection (LND).MethodsHistologically confirmed penile cancer patients (primary site labeled as C60.9-Penis) from 2004 to 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Results database were included in this analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to determine an overall estimate of LND on overall survival and cancer-specific survival. A 1:1 propensity matching analysis (PSM) was applied to enroll balanced baseline cohort, and further Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis was used to get more reliable results.ResultsOut of 4,458 histologically confirmed penile cancer patients with complete follow-up information, 1,052 patients were finally enrolled in this analysis. Age, pathological grade, T stage, and LND were identified as significant predictors for overall survival (OS) in the univariate Cox analysis. In the multivariate Cox regression, age, pathological grade, T stage, and LND were found significant. The same results were also found in the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for cancer-specific survival (CSS). After the successful PSM, further KM analysis revealed that LND could bring significant OS and CSS benefits for T3T4 patients without lymph node metastasis.ConclusionLymph node dissection may bring survival benefits for penile cancer patients without preoperatively detectable lymph node metastasis, especially for T3T4 stage patients. Further randomized control trial is needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Tadafumi Asaoka ◽  
Atsushi Miyamoto ◽  
Sakae Maeda ◽  
Naoki Hama ◽  
Masanori Tsujie ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaya Kitano ◽  
Tsutomu Sasaki ◽  
Yasufumi Gon ◽  
Kenichi Todo ◽  
Shuhei Okazaki ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chemotherapy may be a cause of cancer-associated stroke, but whether it increases stroke risk remains uncertain. We aimed to clarify the impact of chemotherapy on stroke risk in cancer patients. Methods: We investigated 27,932 patients enrolled in a hospital-based cancer registry at Osaka University Hospital between 2007 and 2015. The registry collects clinical data, including cancer status (site and stage), on all patients treated for cancer. Of them, 19,006 patients with complete data were included. A validated algorithm was used to identify stroke events within 2 years of cancer diagnosis. Patients were divided based on whether their initial treatment plan included chemotherapy. The association between chemotherapy and stroke was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and stratified Cox regression. Results: Of the 19,006 patients, 5,887 (31%) patients were in the chemotherapy group. Non-targeted chemotherapy was used in 5,371 patients. Stroke occurred in 44 patients (0.75%) in the chemotherapy group and 51 patients (0.39%) in the no-chemotherapy group. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that patients in the chemotherapy group had a higher stroke risk than patients in the no-chemotherapy group (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.23-2.75; Figure [A]). However, this difference was insignificant after adjustment for cancer status using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.76-1.91; Figure [B]). Similarly, in the stratified Cox regression model, chemotherapy was not associated with stroke after adjustment for cancer status (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.78-2.03). These findings were consistent with analysis wherein the effect of chemotherapy was treated as a time-dependent covariate (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.55-1.88). Conclusions: In this population, the elevated stroke risk in cancer patients who received chemotherapy was presumably due to advanced cancer stage; chemotherapy was not associated with the increased risk of stroke.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e76052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Luo ◽  
Linhai Xiao ◽  
Chunxiao Wu ◽  
Ying Zheng ◽  
Naiqing Zhao

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 314-314
Author(s):  
Tobin Joel Crill Strom ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Shivakumar Vignesh ◽  
Jason Klapman ◽  
Cynthia L. Harris ◽  
...  

314 Background: Resectable pancreatic cancer patients often present with obstructive jaundice necessitating the placement of biliary stents or percutaneouse drainage catheters. We sought to evaluate whether preoperative biliary drainage affects recurrence and survival. Methods: An IRB-approved study was conducted on our institutional tumor registry to identify pancreatic cancer patients who were treated with upfront surgery between 2000 and 2012. Patients were then stratified by preoperative use of endoscopically placed stents (ERCP), percutaneous catheters (PTC), or no biliary drainage (NBD). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed with a Cox regression model. Results: We identified 202 patients for the study (21 PTC; 89 ERCP; 92 NBD). Key differences between the 3 groups were mean pathologic tumor size (p=0.005), pathologic T3/4 (p =0.01), and pathologic N1 (p=0.007) status, with more aggressive pathologic features in PTC patients. PTC patients had a non-significant increase in rate of hepatic recurrences compared with ERCP and NBD patients (47.4% vs. 26.6% vs. 28.7%, respectively; p=0.20). PTC patients also had worse median and 3 year survival (21 months and 16%) compared to ERCP (23.3 months and 39%) and NBD patients (29 months and 45%, p=0.02). MVA revealed that PTC was an independent predictor of worse overall survival (HR 2.3[95% CI 1.3-4.0], p=0.005), along with pathologic tumor size (HR 1.1[1.0-1.3], p=0.008), nodes positive (HR 1.1[1.1-1.2], p=0.001), and post-operative CA19-9 >90 (HR 2.6[1.5-4.4], p=0.001). Conclusions: Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who require a pre-operative PTC drain had a non-significant increase in hepatic recurrence rate and worse overall survival than patients who either had an ERCP stent placed or no biliary decompression prior to surgery. Given their worse prognosis, patients who require PTC placement might also benefit from neoadjuvant treatment with restaging prior to surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15787-e15787
Author(s):  
N. E. Iznaga Escobar ◽  
Patricia Lorenzo Luaces ◽  
Lizet Sanchez Valdes ◽  
Carmen Valenzuela Silva ◽  
Tania Crombet Ramos ◽  
...  

e15787 Background: Nimotuzumab, a unique and affinity differentiated anti-EGFR antibody had been used in combination with gemcitabine on the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate overall survival. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, KPS ≥ 70 %, 18-72 years old, with adequate renal and liver function were included. Pts received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2and nimotuzumab or placebo fixed dose of 400 mg once a wk, for 3 wks, followed by a 1-wk rest (d1, 8, 15, q28) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS and secondary PFS, ORR, CBR, safety and QoL. For OS determination, a KM log-rank test was used and a modified IPCW with a cox regression as a secondary analysis. On this evaluation using a modified IPCW model, 41.7% of pts from treatment arm and 42.7% from control arm who received 2nd and 3rd line treatment were censored after progression, while pts that did not receive 2nd and 3rd line treatment were weighted to compensate for the bias created by censoring switchers to 2nd and 3rd line treatment. Results: 192 pancreatic cancer pts were recruited. Ninety-six pts (62 male and 34 female) with a median age of 67 years, range (31, 83) were randomized to treatment arm and 96 pts (57 male and 39 female) with a median age of 64 years, range (41, 82) were randomized to control arm. In the primary analysis, median OS [95% CI] in the treatment arm was 8.57 mo [5.93, 10.90] vs 6.03 mo [4.97, 7.60] in the control arm. The HR [95% CI], 0.83 [0.62, 1.12] and p = 0.23 and when a modified IPCW model as a secondary analysis was used to remove the effect of 2nd and 3rd line therapies, the median OS was statistically significant with a HR [95% CI], 0.81 [0.67, 0.98] and a p = 0.030. The median PFS [95% CI] was 4.43 mo [3.67, 6.00] in the treatment arm vs 3.47 mo [2.60, 4.03] in the control arm with a HR [95% CI] 0.68 [0.51, 0.92] and p = 0.012. Conclusions: A modified IPCW model had proven that addition of nimotuzumab to gemcitabine increases median overall survival of newly diagnosed chemotherapy-naïve locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00561990.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17130-e17130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Klapdor ◽  
Peter Hillemanns ◽  
Linn Lena Woelber ◽  
Julia Kathrin Jueckstock ◽  
Felix Hilpert ◽  
...  

e17130 Background: Obesity is associated with worse patients’ survival in several cancer entities. Vulvar cancer as well as obesity show increasing incidence over the last years. The influence of obesity on prognosis of vulvar cancer patients is not clear. However, knowledge about this may have consequences on prevention, treatment, and follow-up. Methods: This is an analysis of the large AGO-CaRE-1 study. Patients suffering from squamous cell vulvar cancer (UICC stage IB and higher), treated in 29 cancer centers between 1998 and 2008, were categorized in a database, in order to analyze treatment patterns and prognostic factors in a retrospective setting. Results: In total, 849 patients with documented height and weight were divided into two groups depending on their body mass index (BMI, < 30 vs. ≥30 kg/m²). There was no difference in the baseline variables (age, tumor diameter, depth of infiltration, tumor stage, nodal invasion, tumor grade) between both groups (p > 0.05). However, we identified differences regarding ECOG status and preexistent comorbidities (cardiovascular, dementia) towards healthier patients with BMI < 30 kg/m². Treatment variables (R0 resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, continuation of adjuvant therapy) did not differ (p > 0.05). Patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² underwent radical vulvectomy more often (61.1 % vs. 51.8%, p = 0.042). During follow-up, there was a higher recurrence rate in the group having a BMI ≥30 kg/m² (43.4%, vs. 28.3%, p < 0.01) due to an increased rate of local recurrences (33.3% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.01). The rate of groin and distant recurrences was similar between both groups (p > 0.05). Noteworthy, we observed a significantly shorter disease free survival (DSF) of the obese patients in univariate analysis (HR 1.362, 95%CI 1.093-1.696, p = 0.006). Even in multivariate Cox-regression analysis including age, ECOG, tumor stage, type of surgery, nodal invasion, tumor grade, and comorbidities patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² had a significantly shorter DFS (HR 1.811, 95%CI 1.005-3.262, p = 0.048). Conclusions: In this first large study about the association between obesity and prognosis of vulvar cancer patients, we observed that a BMI ≥30kg/m² was associated with shorter DFS, mainly attributed to a higher risk for local recurrence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document