scholarly journals High-intensity Interval Training Low-volume Vs Moderate-intensity Continuous Aerobic Training On Insulin Resistance In Metabolic Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Juan C. Calderón ◽  
Daniel Aguirre-Acevedo ◽  
Esperanza Montoya ◽  
Manuela Yepes-Calderón ◽  
Camila Trillos ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Sajad Ahmadizad ◽  
Alireza Salimi Avansar ◽  
Khosrow Ebrahim ◽  
Mohsen Avandi ◽  
Mansour Ghasemikaram

AbstractExercise training is an effective method of weight management, and knowing about its influence on the hormones involved in the regulation of food intake and inflammation could be useful for body weight management. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 6 weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous exercise training (MCT) on nesfatin-1, interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).Thirty sedentary overweight men (Mean±SD; age, 25±1 years) were divided into three (n=10) body mass index-matched groups. The participants in the training groups performed either HIIT or MCT protocols 3 days per week for 6 weeks followed by a week of detraining.Plasma IL-6 and TNF-α did not significantly change after training, but nesfatin increased significantly only with HIIT compared with the control group (p<0.05). In addition, fasting glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), decreased significantly following both HIIT and MCT training (p<0.05). After a detraining period, the plasma nesfatin-1 did not return to pre-training levels in the HIIT group.Both the HIIT and MCT groups had similar effects on inflammatory markers and insulin resistance in men who are overweight, but the HIIT seems to have better anorectic effects (as indicated by nesfatin) compared with MCT.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce S. Ramos ◽  
Lance C. Dalleck ◽  
Fabio Borrani ◽  
Kassia S. Beetham ◽  
Matthew P. Wallen ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellie Toohey ◽  
Kate L. Pumpa ◽  
Leonard Arnolda ◽  
Julie Cooke ◽  
Desmond Yip ◽  
...  

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training and continuous low to moderate intensity training on quality of life, functional capacity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in cancer survivors.MethodsCancer survivors within 24 months post-diagnosis were randomly assigned into the low-volume high-intensity interval training group (n = 8) or the continuous low to moderate intensity training group (n = 8) group for 36 sessions (12 weeks) of supervised exercise. The low-volume high-intensity interval training (LVHIIT) group performed 7 × 30 s intervals (≥85% maximal heart rate) and the continuous low to moderate intensity training (CLMIT) group performed continuous aerobic training for 20 min (≤55% maximal heart rate) on a stationary bike or treadmill.ResultsSignificant improvements (time) were observed for 13 of the 23 dependent variables (ES 0.05–0.61,p ≤ 0.05). An interaction effect was observed for six minute walk test (18.53% [32.43–4.63] ES 0.50,p ≤ 0.01) with the LVHIIT group demonstrating greater improvements.ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that both interventions can induce improvements in quality of life, functional capacity and selected cardiovascular disease risk factors. The LVHIIT program was well tolerated by the participants and our results suggest that LVHIIT is the preferred modality to improve fitness (6MWT); it remains to be seen which intervention elicits the most clinically relevant outcomes for patients. A larger sample size with a control group is required to confirm the significance of these findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document