Is it necessary to differentiate tinnitus from auditory hallucination in schizophrenic patients?

2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 352-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eui-Cheol Nam
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Auditory Hallucination ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Hallucinations ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
High Frequencies ◽  
Subjective Tinnitus ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Underlying Causes

Although the definitions of subjective tinnitus and auditory hallucination are very similar, the origins and underlying causes of each symptom clearly differ. This study examined whether the differentiation of tinnitus from auditory hallucination is necessary for the proper management of these symptoms in schizophrenic patients. We investigated the characteristics of auditory hallucinations in 15 schizophrenic patients, and measured their pure-tone hearing levels and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). The average hearing level was 20.6 ± 16.2 dB, with a mild decrease at high frequencies. We classified the patients into three groups: pure hallucination, tinnitus, and hallucination plus tinnitus. Eight patients (53.3 per cent) complained of pure-hallucination and only one of them had a mild hearing loss. Hearing deficits were observed in six of seven tinnitus patients. Abnormal findings of ABR were found only in the pure-hallucination group. The results suggest that tinnitus should be differentiated fromauditory hallucination in the evaluation of schizophrenic patients.

Hearing recovery from deafness caused by bromate intoxication

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (11) ◽  
pp. 1039-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Suzuki ◽  
Y Takanashi ◽  
A Koyama ◽  
Y Katori
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
Continuous Haemodiafiltration

AbstractObjectivesSodium bromate is a strong oxidant, and bromate intoxication can cause irreversible severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. This paper reports the first case in the English literature of bromate-induced hearing loss with hearing recovery measured by formal audiological assessment.Case reportA 72-year-old woman was admitted to hospital with complaints of profound hearing loss, nausea, diarrhoea and anuria after bromate ingestion in a suicide attempt. On admission, pure tone audiometry and auditory brainstem responses showed profound bilateral deafness. Under the diagnosis of bromate-induced acute renal failure and sensorineural hearing loss, continuous haemodiafiltration was performed. When dialysis was discontinued, pure tone audiometry and auditory brainstem responses showed partial threshold recovery from profound deafness.ConclusionSevere-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss is a common symptom of bromate intoxication. Bromate-induced hearing loss may be partially treated, and early application of continuous haemodiafiltration might be useful as a treatment for this intractable condition.

Auditory Brainstem Responses and Clinical Follow-up of High-Risk Infants

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-392
Author(s):  
Steven J. Kramer ◽  
Dianne R. Vertes ◽  
Marie Condon
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Hearing Impairments ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Infant Program ◽  
High Risk Infants

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) evaluations were performed on 667 high-risk infants from an infant special care unit. Of these infants, 82% passed the ABR. Those infants who failed the ABR were classified into two groups, those who failed at 30 dB hearing level and those who failed at 45 dB hearing level. All of the infants were encouraged to return for otologic/audiologic follow-up in 1, 3, or 6 months, depending on the initial ABR results. All of the infants with severe hearing impairments came from the group who failed at 45 dB hearing level. The incidence of severe sensorineural hearing impairment in this population was estimated to be 2.4%. For the group that failed at 30 dB hearing level, 80% of those who were abnormal at follow-up were considered to have conductive hearing disorders and 20% had mild sensorineural hearing impairments. In addition, infants enrolled in a parent-infant program for hearing impaired by 6 months of age were from the ABR program; however, several infants entered the parent-infant program at a relatively late age because they did not meet the high-risk criteria, they were from other hospitals, or they were not detected by the ABR program.

Accuracy of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response with Hearing Level Unknown

1982 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee E. Smith ◽  
F. Blair Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Evoked Response ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Pure Tone Average ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram ◽  
Brainstem Response

We reported a comparison of auditory brainstem response (ABR)-estimated hearing levels with hearing levels by pure-tone audiogram for 84 ears of 42 children. Their average age was 34 months at the time of ABR and 73 months for the audiogram. Thus, all of these children were managed clinically on the basis of their ABR results. The ABR accurately predicted the pure-tone average (PTA) in 76% and was in error by no more than about ± 10–12 dB in another 18%.

scholarly journals Auditory evoked potentials: Differences by sex, race, and menstrual cycle and correlations with common psychoacoustical tasks

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251363
Author(s):  
Dennis McFadden ◽  
Craig A. Champlin ◽  
Michelle H. Pho ◽  
Edward G. Pasanen ◽  
Mindy M. Maloney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Behavioral Performance ◽  
The Waves

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and auditory middle-latency responses (AMLRs) to a click stimulus were measured in about 100 subjects. Of interest were the sex differences in those auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), the correlations between the various AEP measures, and the correlations between the AEP measures and measures of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and behavioral performance also measured on the same subjects. Also of interest was how the menstrual cycle affected the various AEP measures. Most ABR measures and several AMLR measures exhibited sex differences, and many of the former were substantial. The sex differences tended to be larger for latency than for amplitude of the waves, and they tended to be larger for a weak click stimulus than for a strong click. The largest sex difference was for Wave-V latency (effect size ~1.2). When subjects were dichotomized into Non-Whites and Whites, the race differences in AEPs were small within sex. However, sex and race interacted so that the sex differences often were larger for the White subjects than for the Non-White subjects, particularly for the latency measures. Contrary to the literature, no AEP measures differed markedly across the menstrual cycle. Correlations between various AEP measures, and between AEP and OAE measures, were small and showed no consistent patterns across sex or race categories. Performance on seven common psychoacoustical tasks was only weakly correlated with individual AEP measures (just as was true for the OAEs also measured on these subjects). AMLR Wave Pa unexpectedly did not show the decrease in latency and increase in amplitude typically observed for AEPs when click level was varied from 40 to 70 dB nHL (normal Hearing Level). For the majority of the measures, the variability of the distribution of scores was greater for the males than for the females.

Auditory Brainstem Responses in Children with Otitis Media with Effusion

1980 ◽  
Vol 89 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Fria ◽  
Diane L. Sabo
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otitis Media ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Otitis Media With Effusion ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Conductive Hearing

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were recorded in 14 infants and toddlers and 12 school-age children with a previous history of recurrent otitis media with effusion (OME), or otoscopic and tympanometric evidence of persistent OME, or both. ABR tests were performed immediately before and after myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion in the younger subjects. For the school-age children, ABR tests were performed following otoscopy, tympanometry, and pure tone audiometry. The results demonstrate that the latency of both wave I and wave V of the ABR was sensitive (82% and 100%, respectively) to the presence of OME. Wave I also identified the absence of OME (specificity = 100%) whereas wave V did not (specificity = 25%). ABR latency was significantly decreased postoperatively in ears found to have OME, but not in ears found to have no OME. In the school-age subjects the ABR was used to predict the conductive hearing loss at 4000 Hz with less than a 20 dB error in virtually all subjects. The ABR latency delay was also found to be related to conductive hearing impairment at lower pure tone frequencies and to the average conductive loss at a variety of pure tone frequencies. Predictions of the presence of a conductive hearing loss from these relationships promise to be impressively accurate. The results suggest that the ABR can be a valuable tool for detecting the presence of conductive hearing impairment in infants and young children suspected to have OME and perhaps as an estimate of the degree of impairment.

Comparison of ABR Stimuli for the Early Detection of Ototoxicity: Conventional Clicks Compared with High Frequency Clicks and Single Frequency Tonebursts

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 239-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Fausti ◽  
Christopher L. Flick ◽  
Alison M. Bobal ◽  
Roger M. Ellingson ◽  
James A. Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Efficient Manner ◽  
High Frequencies ◽  
Objective Testing ◽  
Testing Methodology

Effective objective testing methodology is needed for early detection of the effects of ototoxicity on hearing in patients. The requirements for such testing include responses that are: 1) reliable across test sessions; 2) sensitive to ototoxic change (> 8 kHz), and 3) recordable in a time-efficient manner. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) appear well suited to this task however, conventional clicks stimulate primarily mid-frequencies (1-4 kHz) and high frequency tonebursts require too much time. We hypothesized that delivery of a band of high frequencies (a high frequency "click"), would elicit reliable and useful ABRs. In the current study, flat and sloped HF (high frequency) clicks with a bandwidth of 8-14 kHz were used. The purpose was to compare brainstem responses elicited by tonebursts, two HF clicks and conventional clicks. The results show that the reliability of responses to the HF clicks were comparable to the tonebursts and further, both HF clicks produced responses slightly larger than tonebursts.

Accuracy of otoacoustic emissions, and automated and diagnostic auditory brainstem responses, in high-risk infants

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (05) ◽  
pp. 363-367
Author(s):  
W Khaimook ◽  
D Pantuyosyanyong ◽  
P Pitathawatchai
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Automated Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
High Risk Infants

AbstractObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the diagnostic reliabilities of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, automated auditory brainstem responses and brainstem auditory evoked responses for detecting hearing loss, and to use the information regarding hearing level of automated auditory brainstem responses for planning rehabilitation.MethodsA total of 144 high-risk infants (288 ears) completed the 3 hearing tests. The sensitivity and specificity of otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses were compared using the chi-square test.ResultsAutomated auditory brainstem response was the most reliable test of hearing levels, with a sensitivity of 91.7 per cent and specificity of 92.1 per cent; the sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions was 78.7 per cent and the specificity was 88.8 per cent.ConclusionAutomated auditory brainstem responses have acceptably high sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, the hearing level from automated auditory brainstem responses can help the screeners explain to the parents the importance of further diagnosis and rehabilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document