Anal cytological abnormalities in HIV-infected homosexual men

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Sayers ◽  
A McMillian ◽  
E Mcgoogan
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Heterosexual Men ◽  
Homosexual Men ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cytological Abnormalities ◽  
Severe Degree ◽  
Hiv Seropositive

Summary: This study aimed to examine the prevalence of anal cytological abnormalities in groups of HIV-infected and non-infected homosexual men, and to monitor changes with time. Dyskaryosis suggestive of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) was noted in 24 (30%) of the 80 satisfactory anal smears from 66 HIV-seropositive homosexual men; such changes were found in only 7 (4.7%) of the 149 satisfactory smears from 181 HIV-seronegative homosexual men ( P 0.005), and in none of 34 satisfactory preparations from 51 HIV-seronegative heterosexual men. In the follow-up of 20 HIV-seropositive men, the severity of the cytological abnormalities found in 2 men increased, with the most recent smear showing changes suggestive of AIN III; one of these men subsequently developed anal cancer. Smears from 4 men showed apparent regression in the degree of dyskaryosis. Although the numbers of patients studied were small, there appeared to be a trend towards a more severe degree of dyskaryosis in those men with increasing immunodeficiency. There was no significant difference in the detection of human papillomavirus types 6b, 11, 16 and 18 between HIV-infected and noninfected men. <

Vroegtijdige opsporing van voorstadia van een anaal carcinoom bij hiv-seropositieve patiënten

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. GÖKCE ◽  
J. GELDOF ◽  
P. ROELANDT ◽  
J. VAN DORPE ◽  
S. CALLENS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Hiv Seropositive

Early detection of precursor lesions of anal cancer in HIV-seropositive patients Although anal cancer is rare in the overall population, its incidence is increasing in the last decades. Especially HIV-seropositive patients have an increased risk of developing anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), mainly because of the high prevalence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) among these patients. High-grade AIN is a precursor lesion for anal SCC associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Despite the lack of direct evidence demonstrating that AIN identification reduces the risk of anal cancer, experts think that screening and treatment of high-risk patients will prevent the disease. This article aims to review the current literature about AIN and discusses the screening options, including digital rectal examination, anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy.

Monitoring of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after excisional treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-120
Author(s):  
N.V. Zarochentseva ◽  
◽  
L.K. Dzhidzhikhiya ◽  
V.N. Nabieva ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
World Literature ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Routine Screening ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Almost Everywhere ◽  
Combined Test ◽  
Operative Monitoring

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) refers to precancerous changes in the cervix. After surgical treatment, a certain proportion of patients remain at risk of disease reccurence. Therefore, monitoring of patients after CIN surgery is an important and necessary part of their management tactics. Objective. Review of world literature on modern approaches to patients monitoring after using excisional methods of CIN treatment. Materials and methods. The information material includes data from scientific articles on the subject available in Pubmed and published over the past 20 years. Results. The analysis of data contained in modern literature on the frequency and risk factors for the development of reccurent CIN after excisional methods of treatment, diagnostic methods, the timing of follow-up examinations during post-operative monitoring, the main approaches to monitoring in different countries and the effectiveness of the proposed strategies for postoperative follow-up of patients after treatment was conducted. It was established that the approaches to the observation of this category of patients differ in various countries. Almost everywhere, the priority tool for monitoring of patients with CIN after treatment is a combined test, which involves a joint use of cytology and human papillomavirus tests. The main difference between countries is the timing of the first post-treatment follow-up visit. In some countries a follow-up visit is recommended within 24 months, while in others it is suggested to return to routine screening if the primary combined test is negative. Conclusion. Despite existing disagreements, the proposed post-operative monitoring strategies for CIN patients provide a fairly high percentage of “healing” and return to routine screening. Key words: human papillomavirus, monitoring, cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, excisional treatment

scholarly journals Ten-year follow-up of human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy against the most stringent cervical neoplasia end-point—registry-based follow-up ofthree cohorts from randomized trials

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e015867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Lehtinen ◽  
Camilla Lagheden ◽  
Tapio Luostarinen ◽  
Tiina Eriksson ◽  
Dan Apter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Vaccine Efficacy ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Link Type

ObjectiveDue to long lag time between infection/cancer diagnoses human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs will deliver vaccine efficacy (VE) estimates against cancer end-points late. Cancer registry follow-up of population-based, randomised trial cohorts of vaccinated and unvaccinated women was undertaken for the estimation of VE against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade three and invasive cancer (CIN3+).MethodsWe report interim results with 98 561 person years of Finnish Cancer Registry -based follow-up of individually and/or cluster randomised cohorts of HPV-16/18 vaccinated and unvaccinated adolescent women enrolled in June 2003/2005, and between May 2004 and April 2005, respectively. The cohorts comprised 15 627 18- to 19-year-old unvaccinated women (NCT01393470), and 2 401 and 64 16- to 17-year-old HPV-16/18 vaccinated women participating the PATRICIA (NCT00122681) and HPV-012 (NCT00169494) trials, respectively. The age-aligned passive follow-up started 6 months after the clinical trials’ end.ResultsDuring the follow-up of 4.5 to 10 years post enrolment we identified 75 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and 4 cases of invasive cervical cancer (ICC) in the unvaccinated cohort, and 4 CIN3 cases in the HPV-16/18 vaccinated women. Diagnostic blocks were available for HPV typing from 87% of the cases. CIN3+ lesions were detectable in 54 cases. HPV16 was found in 26 of 50 unvaccinated CIN3+ cases, and in 3 CIN3+ cases in the HPV-16/18 vaccinated women. The latter were all baseline positive for cervical HPV16 DNA. Baseline data was not available for the unvaccinated women. Intention-to-treat VE against any CIN3+ was 66% (95% CI 8, 88).ConclusionsTen years post vaccination the AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 vaccine shows continued efficacy against CIN3+ irrespectively of HPV type. Vaccine efficacy was not observed in baseline HPV16 DNA positive subjects.Trial registration numberNCT01393470.

Follow-up Findings for Women With Human Papillomavirus–Positive and Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Screening Test Results in a Large Women's Hospital Practice

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (9) ◽  
pp. 1426-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Armah ◽  
R. Marshall Austin ◽  
David Dabbs ◽  
Chengquan Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Squamous Cells ◽  
Hpv Test ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Abstract Context.—Reflex human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been designated in consensus guidelines as “preferred” for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) liquid-based cytology (LBC) results, and colposcopy is currently recommended for patients with HPV-positive ASC-US results. Data from large clinical practices using newer screening methods and current cytology terminology are limited. Objectives.—We analyzed data from patients with ASC-US LBC and positive HPV test results. We also assessed the impact of the presence or absence of an endocervical cell/ transformation zone sample (EC/TZS) on biopsy diagnoses. Design.—The information system of a large women's hospital serving an older-than-average population was searched over a 21-month period between July 1, 2005, and March 31, 2007, for HPV-positive cases interpreted as ASC-US (Bethesda System 2001) using computer-imaged LBC. Histologic diagnoses, patient ages, and presence or absence of an EC/TZS were analyzed. The average follow-up period was 7.5 months. Results.—Among 4273 women with HPV-positive ASC-US results, the cumulative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3) and CIN 1 rates for 2192 women with available biopsies were 5.1% and 43.6%, respectively. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 and CIN 1 rates for women with HPV-positive ASC-US results were not significantly different for women with and without an EC/TZS. Conclusions.—The risk of CIN 2/3 in the study population was significantly lower than reported in widely cited trial data. Neither presence nor absence of an EC/TZS, nor the age of the patient, had a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of biopsy diagnoses of CIN 2/3 and CIN 1 for patients with HPV-positive ASC-US test results.

scholarly journals Human papillomavirus and human telomerase RNA component gene in cervical cancer progression

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Pianping Fan ◽  
Yingying Yang ◽  
Changjun Xu ◽  
Yajuan Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Human Telomerase

Abstract This study aimed to examine hTERC gene in different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer, and the association between hTERC and high risk-human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Patients who underwent cervical cancer screening at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between October 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled. All patients underwent liquid-based cytology test and hybrid capture 2 (HC2) for HPV detection. hTERC was examined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Cervical colposcopy biopsy was performed if any of the three results was positive. HC2, FISH, and pathology were compared. A total of 1200 women underwent screening, 150 patients underwent cervical biopsy: 32 in the normal group, 38 in the CIN1 group, 66 in the CIN2/3 group, and 14 in the invasive cervical cancer group. More patients had HR-HPV infection in the CIN2/3 group and ICC group compared with the CIN1 group. hTERC increased with increasing histological dysplasia. There was significant difference in hTERC positive rate between each of the three groups. More patients with hTERC gene amplification were observed in the positive HR-HPV group than in the HR-HPV negative group. In conclusion, hTERC is a potential marker for precancerous cervical cancer lesions. hTERC might be correlated with HR-HPV infection in cervical diseases.

Providing high quality information about human papillomavirus for women after treatment for high-grade cervical dysplasia

Sexual Health ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Dyson ◽  
Marian Pitts ◽  
Anthony Lyons ◽  
Robyn Mullins
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Cervical Dysplasia ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
General Information ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Hpv Testing

Background: The present study aimed to inform the production of a resource for women who have had a high-grade cervical abnormality and are scheduled to undergo testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) at their 12-month follow-up. Methods: Two rounds of semi-structured, qualitative interviews were held with women who were attending a gynaecological oncology clinic at a major teaching hospital for women in Melbourne, Australia, 6 months after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to receive a follow-up Pap test and colposcopy. In an initial round of interviews, we gauged the reactions of 16 women to an existing information brochure containing general information about HPV. Based on the findings from the interviews, a second brochure aimed specifically for women scheduled to undergo HPV testing as part of their post treatment follow-up was drafted. Feedback was then gathered from a further 12 women. Results: While all participants had received some information and counselling about HPV and HPV testing as part of their treatment, many still experienced high levels of stress and anxiety about cancer and the sexually transmissible nature of HPV. Many also still had unanswered questions about HPV, their treatment regime and future prognosis. Conclusion: For a brochure to provide an effective adjunct to counselling, it is essential that it is carefully developed and pilot tested to ensure that it is easily understood and meets the information needs of the target audience. Such materials need to provide both medical and psychosocial information about HPV and be presented in accessible, easy to understand language.

scholarly journals Subsequent prostate cancer detection in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moamen A. Amin ◽  
Suganthiny Jeyaganth ◽  
Nader Fahmy ◽  
Louis Bégin ◽  
Samuel Aronson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation ◽  
Psa Density ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Initial Biopsy

Introduction: To evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer in follow-up of patientsdiagnosed on initial biopsy with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia(HGPIN) or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP).Methods: We studied 201 patients with HGPIN and 22 patients with ASAPon initial prostatic biopsy who had subsequent prostatic biopsies. The meantime of follow-up was 17.3 months (range 1–62). The mean number of biopsy sessions was 2.5 (range 2–6), and the median number of biopsy cores was10 (range 6–14).Results: On subsequent biopsies, the rate of prostate cancer was 21.9% (44/201)in HGPIN patients. Of these, 32/201 patients (15.9%), 9/66 patients (13.6%)and 3/18 patients (16.6%) were found to have cancer on the first, second and third follow-up biopsy sessions, respectively. In ASAP patients, the cancer detectionrate was 13/22 (59.1%), all of whom were found on the first follow-upbiopsy. There was a statistically significant difference between the cancer detectionrate in ASAP and HGPIN patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showedthat the independent predictors of cancer were the number of cores in theinitial biopsy, the number of cores (> 10) in the follow-up biopsy and a prostate specific antigen (PSA) density of ≥ 0.15 (odds ratio 0.77, 3.46 and 2.7,8 respectively;p < 0.04). Conversely, in ASAP patients none of these variables werefound to be associated with cancer diagnosis.Conclusion: ASAP is a strong predictive factor associated with cancer when comparedwith HGPIN. The factors predictive of cancer on follow-up biopsy ofHGPIN are number of cores on initial biopsy, more than 10 cores in rebiopsyand elevated PSA density. As the cancer detection rate on repeated biopsy of HGPIN patients is the same as that of patients without HGPIN, perhaps the standard of repeat biopsy in all patients with HGPIN should be revisited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document