scholarly journals Estrutura Piramidal de Controle, Emissão de Duas Classes de Ações e Desempenho Financeiro das Empresas Brasileiras

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lelis Pedro Andrade ◽  
Aureliano Angel Bressan ◽  
Robert Aldo Iquiapaza
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Controlling Shareholder ◽  
Pyramidal Structure ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Pyramidal Ownership ◽  
Dual Class Shares ◽  
Dual Class

This study aims to identify whether there is a relationship between dual class shares issuance, pyramidal ownership structure and firms’ financial performance in the Brazilian market. To this end, univariate tests and panel data analysis were applied in a sample for the 2000 to 2012 period. The results indicate that there is a significant and negative relationship between dual class shares issuance and firm’s financial performance, regardless of whether there is a pyramidal ownership structure in firm. In other hand, we find positive effects from pyramidal structure on the firm’s financial performance, conditioned that there is no dual class shares issuance, and also on the absence of an excessive number of levels until the ultimate controlling shareholder in the pyramidal structure. These evidences suggest that the voting power matters to improve firms’ financial performance; and that there are benefits and costs from pyramidal ownership structure in Brazilian firms.

scholarly journals Dividend policy and ownership structure: A study of Russian dual-class stock companies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Berezinets ◽  
Yulia Ilina ◽  
Liudmila Alekseeva
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Trading System ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Dividend Payout ◽  
Dividend Payments ◽  
Dual Class Shares ◽  
Dual Class ◽  
The Relationship

This paper explores the relationship between ownership structure and dividend policy in Russian public companies with dual-class shares. The sample includes all companies issuing both ordinary (voting) and preferred (non-voting) shares traded on the Russian Trading System (RTS) in the period of 2003-2009. Using panel data and employing both linear and nonlinear regression modeling approach, we tested the relationship between ownership structure and dividend payout. One of the major conclusions is the existence of a negative relationship between the dividend payout on ordinary shares and institutional ownership, as well as between dividend payout on ordinary shares and offshore ownership. Unlike for ordinary shares, ownership structure is not related to dividend payments on preferred shares. Dividend policy on preferred shares is, instead, essentially related to a company’s performance.

scholarly journals Ownership Patterns and Control of Top 100 Turkish Listed Companies

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Aree Saeed Mustafa ◽  
Ayoib Che-Ahmad ◽  
Sitraselvi a/p Chandren
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Minority Shareholders ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Common Control ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Pyramidal Ownership ◽  
Dual Class Shares ◽  
Dual Class ◽  
And Control

This study aims to highlight the importance of protecting investors’ rights, and particularly those of minority shareholders. This study addresses the predominant control-ownership structure of the top 100 firms listed in Bursa Istanbul (BI) using the data for 2015. It shows the most common control-ownership structure within business groups, in which shareholders exercise control over a group of firms and maintain a small stake of firms’ equities. Turkish firms are categorised with highly concentrated ownership and families’ being the dominant shareholders owning more than 80% of all publically listed firms in BI. The study results indicate that the divergence between cash rights and control rights (wedge)in the top 100 Turkish firms is mainly achieved through pyramidal-ownership structure, dual class shares, and cross-ownership at about 41%, 40% and 11%, respectively, while approximately 8% of firms do not use wedge. Hence, wedge exacerbates Type II Agency Problems. This paper calls for future research to study the environment of wedge for Turkish firms listed in BI.

Investigating the Relationship Between Ownership Structure and Investment Efficiency in Emerging Markets: Evidence From the Egyptian Stock Market

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sayed Rashed ◽  
Ebitihj Mostafa Abd ◽  
Esraa Fathi Mohamed Ismail ◽  
Doaa Mohamed Abd El Samea
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Investment Efficiency ◽  
Outside Director ◽  
Director Ownership ◽  
The Relationship

This paper aims to examine the relationship between Ownership Structure Mechanisms (Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Block holder Ownership and Outside Director Ownership) and Investment Efficiency by using panel data analysis. To investigate this relationship used the multiple regression models. Findings of investigation of 35 firms listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange in the period 2006 to 2015 by balanced Panel model representative. Results indicated that Managerial Ownership isn’t related with investment efficiency. In contract, institutional ownership, block holder ownership and outside director ownership have a negative relationship with investment efficiency. In addition, the researcher found that control variables (Firm size, Debt ratio, Tobin’s Q) not related to investment efficiency. These findings imply that the Majority of Egyptians firms relies on institutional without individual ownership and then reduces much of possible from agency problems and decreasing information asymmetry and facilitating the monitoring of investment decisions.

Corporate Governance and Firm Performance

2015 ◽  
pp. 257-274
Author(s):  
Devanjali Nandi ◽  
Arindam Das
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Crisis Period ◽  
Price Performance ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Ownership structure is considered to be of prime importance in corporate governance of a firm. The ownership structure significantly varies across the nations. The main focus of this chapter is twofold: firstly to see the impact of ownership structure on performance of the firm and secondly to investigate the relationship between stock market performance and ownership structure during the crisis period. Panel data analysis of CNX 200 companies has been done for the time period of 2006-2013.The study also takes into account the relationship between crisis period stock return and ownership structure. The results of this study reveal a positive relationship of promoter's shareholding with performance while a negative relationship of performance is found with the non-promoters shareholding. The regression of stock price performance on ownership variable gives a significant negative relationship during the crisis period.

scholarly journals Pyramidal Ownership and Company Value: Evidence from Polish Listed Companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-498
Author(s):  
Maria Aluchna ◽  
Tomasz Kuszewski
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Warsaw Stock Exchange ◽  
Pyramidal Ownership ◽  
Dual Class Shares ◽  
Dual Class ◽  
Majority Shareholder

This paper examines the effects of pyramidal ownership. Using the sample of 162 non-financial companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange during the period 2010-2014, we verify the relation between the adoption of a pyramidal structure and company value. Specifically, we show that the link between pyramidal ownership and company value is more complex than previously thought addressing the aspect of ownership concentration and dual class shares. Our results indicate that the use of pyramids is associated with a higher value measured by Tobin’s Q, supporting the efficient monitoring hypothesis. Contrary to our expectations the combination of pyramidal ownership and dual class shares is correlated with lower Q. Finally, while the adoption of a pyramid by a majority shareholder does not impact firm value, the combination of a pyramid, ownership concentration and dual class shares is associated with higher Q. This finding suggests that the blockholder ownership outweighs the possible cost of excessive disproportionate ownership and that pyramids and dual class shares have different effects on company value.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surya Bahadur G.C.
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Board Committees ◽  
Governance Practices

The paper attempts to analyze inter-linkages between corporate governance, ownership structure, capital structure and firm performance in India. The study employs a panel data of all CNX Nifty companies from 2008 to 2012. Using LSDV panel data models and 2SLS model the study reveals that that good corporate governance practices adopted by companies is positively related with financial performance. Board independence, number of board committees, and director remuneration are found to have positive relationship while larger board size, ownership by promoters and financial leverage have negative relationship with performance. There is existence of bi-directional relationship between corporate governance and financial performance. Companies with sound financial performance are more likely to conform to corporate governance norms and standards and implement sound corporate governance system. In addition, the findings reveal that corporate governance practices adopted by the listed firms depend on their ownership structure. Ownership concentration is found to effect corporate governance negatively.Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol. 1 (2), 2016, pp. 48-65. 

scholarly journals Impact of the Corporate Governance and the Ownership Structure on the Firm’s Financial Performance and its Risk Taking Behavior

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Abid Ali Shah ◽  
Muhammad Aamir ◽  
Irum Saba ◽  
Zeeshan Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Adaptation Level ◽  
Stock Market Returns ◽  
Risk Taking Behavior

Purpose: In the developing country like Pakistan the agency problem may have different dimensions as it may not only be among the ownership and the management but also regarding the expropriation of the corporate profits by the largest shareholder at the cost of the many small shareholders. This paper examines the relationship between the Ownership Structure with its two dimensions i.e. Ownership Type and Concentration with the Corporate Governance adaptation level by the firms and its Financial Performance and Risk Taking Behavior judged by the Stock Market Returns. Methodology: The analysis was conducted in three sections using Panel Data Estimation using the data from 2006 to 2010 for 40 listed KSE firms. Findings: The results indicates that the improvement in the Corporate Practices increase the firm’s financial performance and reduction in the level of risk during undertaking of the riskier ventures. The Corporate Governance also has negative relationship with the Ownership Concentration proving the fact that the increase in the level of the ownership concentration results in the reduction of the level of good practices by the firms. Practical Implications: These results also provided a view of the Corporate Structure of the Pakistani firms and prove the fact that the Ownership Concentrated in single largest owner results in the reduction of Corporate Governance level and the Financial Performance of the firms and also results in the increase in the level of the risk undertaken by the firms.

scholarly journals The Effects Of Financial Performance Toward Firm Value With Ownership Structure As Moderating Variable (The Study On Manufacturing Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange In The Period Of 2012-2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-27
Author(s):  
Anida Amalia Luthfiah ◽  
Suherman Suherman
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Control Variable ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of Financial Performance toward Firm Value with Ownership Structure as Moderating Variable on Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in The Period of 2012-2016. Independent variable of this study is Financial Performance with Return on Assets as a proxy. Dependent variable of this study is Firm Value with Tobin's Q as a proxy. While moderating variable used in this study is a mechanism of Corporate Governance in the form of Ownership Structure with Managerial Ownership and Institutional Ownership as the proxy. Then control variable in this study are Firm Size and Leverage. The research model of this study employs panel data analysis with Fixed Effect Model approach. The empirical result shows that Financial Performance has positive significant effect on Firm Value. Managerial Ownership and Institutional Ownership can't moderate the relation between Financial Performance on Firm Value. Firm Size has negative significant effect on Firm Value. And Leverage has insignificant effect on Firm Value.

scholarly journals Relationship between ownership structure and financial performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Ahmad Abu Haija ◽  
Hussein Mohammed Alrabba
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
A Company

A firm’s ownership structure is important in gauging its market value, These structures have major impacts on the financial performance of firms in either positive or negative way as demonstrated in previous studies. This study aims to identify the relationship between ownership structure (i.e. family, foreign, managerial and institutional ownership) and Jordanian companies’ financial performance. In doing so, we used a sample consisted of 114 companies listed in ASE from 2009 to 2015 (seven years). Using multiple regression using to test whether there are relationships between ownership structure and firms’ financial performance. The results showed a positive relationship among managerial, institutional and family ownership and financial performance, while there is no significant relationship between foreign ownership and firm’s financial performance. Additionally, the result of the current study has documented that the firm size enhances its financial performance, while the leverage has negative relationship to the company’s financial performance. The implication of these findings is important in many ways, i.e. the existence of ownership forms is vital for a company performance, hence, the prospective investors should consider these forms when investing in companies the results show that R2 value is average which opens up possible research areas in the future to explore new explanatory variables to expand the literature on these issues especially in developing countries.

Price Effects of Dual-Class Shares

1986 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay M. Jog ◽  
Allan L. Riding
Keyword(s):  
Price Effects ◽  
Dual Class Shares ◽  
Dual Class
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document