scholarly journals Study of the efficacy and safety of proligestone administration for the control of the ovarian cycle in the bitch

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
K. TSELKAS (Κ. ΤΣΕΛΚΑΣ) ◽  
P. YPSILANTIS (Π. ΥΨΗΛΑΝΤΗΣ) ◽  
Ph. SARATSIS (Φ. ΣΑΡΑΤΣΗΣ)
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Injection Site ◽  
Ovarian Cycle ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

In this study the efficacy and safety of the administration of the progestagen proligestone for the control of the ovarian cycle of 66 female dogs were evaluated. Two to six injections of proligestone were made to those animals in anoestrus (group A, n=52) or 1 injection to those in the first 3 days of proestrus (group B, n = 14) in order to prevent or postpone oestrus, respectively. The efficacy of proligestone administration, based on the percentage of successful injections, was 98.07%, 98.03%, 98.00%, 97.67% and 88.00% after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th injection, respectively, and 96,83% in total, for group A, while 92.86% for group B. The observed side effects were: hair discoloration at the injection site, weight gain, pyometra and diabetes mellitus at α rate of 11.54%, 7.69%, 1.92% and 1.92%, respectively, for group A and 14.28%,14.28%, 7.14% and 0%, respectively, for group B.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2800-2803
Author(s):  
Shabir Hussain ◽  
Amjad Mustafa ◽  
Arif Mumtaz ◽  
Ghazala Shaheen ◽  
Fawad Qaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Drop ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glimepiride in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Design: It was an observational open comparative study. Study Settings: This study was conducted at Department of Pharmacology over 1 year from March 2017 to March 2018 at DHQ Teaching Hospital, Kohat. Material and Methods: Sixty (60) patients were enrolled in the study meeting the inclusion criteria. Tablet glimipiride 1 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg was used as the treatment option. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group Glimepiride (30 patients; administered glimepiride 2 mg daily) and group Sitagliptin (30 patients; administered sitagliptin 100 mg daily). If glycemic control was not reached then patient was excluded from the study and given further treatment for benefit of the patient. The samples of blood were taken at 12 weeks visit to test HbA1c level, fating blood sugar (FBG) and post prandial glucose (PPG) level. At the time of follow up patient were evaluated for efficacy, safety and tolerability. All collected data was entered then analysed in SPSS version 19.0. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled into the study, with 30 in each group. Mean age in sitagliptin group (A) was 45 years, while that of glimeperide group (B) was 47 years. There were 16 males and 14 females in group A, 18 males and 12 females in group B. We found a significant reduction of HbA1C and BMI in group S taking sitagliptin as compared to glimeperide group. (p<0.05) Reduction in FBS was comparable in both the groups. (p>0.05). Side effects in both the groups mostly included hypoglycemia, and vomiting, nausea and abdominal pain. These side effects were mild and did not need stoppage of medication or resulted in drop outs. Conclusion: Sitagliptin as an adjunct to present monotherapy with metformin showed significant drop out in HbA1c, PPG and FBG values after treatment of 12 weeks and was non inferior to glimepiride. However, no sitagliptin taking patients observed any episodes of hypoglycemia. Also weight loss was observed in sitagliptin group as compared to glimepiride group.. Keywords: Glimepiride, Sitagliptin, Efficacy, Safety, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Miami NICE trial: Nutritional support for patients incurring chemotherapy side effects.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6568-6568
Author(s):  
Damien Mikael Hansra ◽  
Catherine Diaz ◽  
Skip Camp ◽  
Caroline Randolph ◽  
Christine Norman-Tiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Dietary Counseling ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

6568 Background: Few studies have been performed addressing nutritional interventions & mitigation strategies to address side effects such as weight gain, anorexia, dysgeusia, in patients (pts) undergoing chemotherapy. We aim to study the effect of nutritional counseling on body mass index (BMI) and other side effects in pts undergoing systemic chemotherapy. Methods: Prospective randomized study of 50 pts into two groups (A & B). Group A was randomized to standard of care: oncologist visits once per month x 3 months, routine physician counseling & dietary recommendations. Group B: standard of care + nutritionist intervention which included 3 visits x 30 mins each. Nutritionists performed an initial assessment of pts at the first session (template provided in poster) then tailored dietary counseling monthly x3 months which includes dietary strategies to mitigate side effects, pt & caregiver education, recipes, & handouts (provided in poster). Inclusions: medically insured male & female adults with active malignancies (hematologic &boncologic) on chemotherapy (neoajuvant, adjuvant, palliative). Exclusions: pts with head & neck, stomach, esophagus, pancreatic tumors & pts with pre-existing cachexia. Data collected: pt gender, age, race, ethnicity, cancer subtype, TNM staging, chemotherapy regimen. Primary objective: compare change in BMI at visit 1, 2, &3. Secondary endpoints: anorexia, nausea, vomiting, depression, etc. reported in poster. Mean change in BMI, secondary endpoints compared using students T-test with ANOVA using SAS software version 8.0 & minitab version 17. Results: Group A initial BMI = 28.85 vs group B initial BMI = 27.34 (p = 0.05). Change in BMI group A vs B at visit 1 (0.4 vs 0.09, p = 0.002), visit 2 (4.6 vs -0.52, p = 0.001), visit 3 (6.5 vs 0.46, p = 0.003). Demographics & secondary endpoints reported in poster. Conclusions: We found dietary counseling in addition to standard of care was associated with significant mitigation of weight gain in patients on systemic chemotherapy. Dietary counseling is a relatively simple, inexpensive, individualized, & reproducible method to mitigate chemotherapy related weight gain.

Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin as Add-On Therapy in Patients of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Nauman Wazir ◽  
Shafqat Ur Rehman
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Mycotic Infections

OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy of two doses i.e., 10 mg and 25 mg in lowering the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) having suboptimal glycaemic control on maximal doses of Metformin and Sitagliptin, and to see the frequency of its side-effects. METHODOLOGY: The study design was a randomized control trial. Fifty nine adult patients of T2DM who were already on 2000 mg of Metformin and 100 mg of Sitagliptin and were having suboptimal glycaemic control (HBA1C >7% and <12%) were randomized to two groups, one group receiving 10 mg (Group A) and the other group receiving 25 mg of empagliflozin (Group B) as an additional treatment. HbA1C and FBG were taken before and 12 weeks after addition of empagliflozin in both the groups. Side effects of empagliflozin such as urinary tract infections (UTI) and genital mycotic infections were also recorded in both the groups. RESULTS: Total patients in-group A were 31 and their mean age was 51.48±4.29 years. In-group B there were 28 patients and their mean age was 52.39±5.20 years. There was a statistically significant reduction of both HbA1C and FBG in both the groups after empagliflozin treatment; (p=0.000) for both HbA1C and FBG in both the groups. Although numerically UTI and genital mycotic infections were more than pre-treatment numbers, they were not statistically significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Empagliflozin can be safely added to the oral anti-diabetic regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have suboptimal glycaemic control and results in significant improvement in HbA1C.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of short-term chemotherapy for patients with spinal tuberculosis undergoing surgery in Chinese population: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Lin ◽  
Zhenyong Ke ◽  
Si Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Chinese Population ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Short Course Chemotherapy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of short-course chemotherapy (≤ 6 months) compared with the standard therapy (9–18 months) for patients with spinal tuberculosis (TB) undergoing surgery in Chinese population. Methods In this meta-analysis, we searched electronic databases in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Wanfang data to determine the equivalence of short-course therapy (group A) and standard therapy (group B) for the drug therapy of TB in Chinese population up to December 24, 2019. Weighted mean difference (WMD), odds risk (OR), and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. All analyses of relevant outcome indicators were managed by using the Review Manager (RevMan) 5.2 software. Results This meta-analysis included six trials published involving 851 patients (group A, 397; group B, 454) with spinal TB. Results showed there were no significant differences between group A and group B in clinical cure rate (OR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.19–2.00, p > 0.05), change of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (WMD = − 0.75; 95% CI − 3.33 to 1.83; p > 0.05) and bone graft fusion rate (OR = 2.32; 95% CI 0.36–14.81, p > 0.05). Meanwhile, there were fewer side effects (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.24–0.58, p < 0.05) in group A compared with group B. Conclusions The results of this meta-analysis showed that for patients with spinal TB undergoing surgery in Chinese population, short-course chemotherapy could be equivalent to the standard chemotherapy in terms of efficacy and have less side effects than the latter.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Caudal Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine with Clonidine in Infra Umbilical Surgeries in Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Swetha J Gouda ◽  
P.V. Margi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Caudal Block ◽  
Hemodynamic Changes ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Caudal epidural analgesia is one of the most commonly performed regional blocks in paediatric anaesthesia for intra and post-operative analgesia. Addition of opioids like morphine, fentanyl is associated with side effects like respiratory depression, urinary retention, etc. Clonidine, an α2 agonist is known for its analgesic effects with lesser side effects. Hence, this study was conducted to know the efficacy and safety of addition of clonidine to bupivacaine in a single shot caudal block in children.Subjects and Methods:This study was conducted among 60 children in the age group of 5 – 10 years coming for various elective infraumbilical surgical procedures. They were divided into two groups of 30 each. Group A received caudal 0.25% bupivacaine (1ml/kg) and group B received caudal 0.25% bupivacaine (1ml/kg) with clonidine (1.5µg/kg). The various parameters studied were hemodynamic changes, duration of analgesia and incidence of side effects.Results:The groups were similar in age, sex and weight. The hemodynamic parameters like heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate were also similar between the two groups after administering caudal block. The mean duration of analgesia in group B (433.5 ± 60 min) was significantly longer (p< 0.05) than group A (250.33 ±41 min). Conclusion:This study showed that the addition of clonidine in the dose of 1.5µg/kg to 0.25% bupivacaine (1ml/kg) improved the analgesic duration and efficacy after a single shot caudal block with minimal side effects in children.

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ivermectin and Topical Permethrin in the Treatment of Scabies

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Mohsena Akhter ◽  
Ishrat Bhuiyan ◽  
Zulfiqer Hossain Khan ◽  
Mahfuza Akhter ◽  
Gulam Kazem Ali Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Sarcoptes Scabiei ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Common Skin ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Scabies is one of the most common skin diseases in our country. It is caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis, which is an ecto-parasite infesting the epidermis. Scabies is highly contagious. Prevalence is high in congested or densely populated areas. Individuals with close contact with an affected person should be treated with scabicidal which is available in both oral and topical formulations. The only oral but highly effective scabicidal known to date is Ivermectin. Amongst topical preparations, Permethrin 5 % cream is the treatment of choice. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy & safety of oral Ivermectin compared to topical Permethrin in the treatment of scabies. Methodology: This prospective, non-randomized study was conducted at the out-patient department of Dermatology and Venereology of Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College & Hospital over a period of 6 months, from August 2016 to January 2017. The study population consisted of one hundred patients having scabies, enrolled according to inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups. group A was subjected to oral Ivermectin and the group B to Permethrin 5% cream. Patients were followed up on day 7 and 14 for assessment of efficacy and safety. Result: The mean scoring with SD in group A (Ivermectin) and group B (Permethrin) were 8.26 ± 2.22 and 7.59 ± 2.01 respectively at the time of observation. The difference between the mean score of the two group is not significant (p=0.117) the mean scoring with SD in group A and group B were 4.54 ± 2.05 and 1.64 ± 1.84 respectively at 7thdays. The difference between the mean score of the two group is significant (p<0.001). The mean scoring with SD in group A and group B were 2.68± 2.35 and .36± 1.10 respectively at 14th day difference between the mean score of the group is significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Topical application of permethrin 5% cream is more effective and safer than oral Ivermectin in the treatment of scabies. TAJ 2020; 33(1): 41-47

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab and trabectedin in pretreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS): Preliminary results of a phase II trial of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG-15, NitraSarc) for the non-L sarcoma cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11545-11545
Author(s):  
Daniel Pink ◽  
Dimosthenis Andreou ◽  
Anne Flörcken ◽  
Alexander Golf ◽  
Stephan Richter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Primary Efficacy Endpoint ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Group A ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B

11545 Background: Single-agent PD-1 inhibitors have modest activity in the treatment of most STS. Potential strategies to increase efficacy include combination therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment. Considering that apart from direct growth inhibition and death of malignant cells, trabectedin (Tr) also induces macrophage depletion and/or different immunologic effects, suggesting a possible synergistic effect of combined Tr plus anti-PD-1 treatment. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined Tr and nivolumab (Ni) as a second-line treatment in STS. Methods: The prospective, explorative, two group, non-randomized phase II NiTraSarc trial enrolled pretreated patients (pt) with advanced STS (Group A: lipo- or leiomyosarcomas, Group B: non-L-sarcomas). Pt were initially treated with 3 cycles of Tr 1.5 mg/m2, followed by the combination of Tr 1.5 mg/m2 + Ni 240 mg (“late combination cohort” (LCC)) for up to 16 cycles. After positive results of a preplanned interim analysis, pt received the combination therapy starting with cycle 2 (“early combination cohort” (ECC)). 92 pt were recruited to the trial (55 in Group A, 37 in Group B). Primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival rate after 6 months (PFSR6) according to RECIST v.1.1. This is a first analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint in Group B based on a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population of evaluable 36 pt: 23 and 13 pt from the LCC and ECC, respectively. Results: The most common Group B subtypes comprised undifferentiated pleomorphic/not otherwise specified sarcoma (UPS/NOS, 13pt) and fibromyxoid sarcoma (FMS, 6pt). After a median follow-up of 5 months (m) PFSR6 was 13.9% for all pt, 8.7% in LCC and 23.1% in ECC. Median duration of disease stabilization (DoDS) was 4m in all pt, the LCC and the ECC. Two pt had a partial response (PR), 10 had disease stabilization (SD), while 13 pt progressed, and 11 had missing data. By subtype: PR- UPS/NOS=2 (DoDS 12.7m/12.5m). SD: UPS/NOS=3, epithelioid=2, synovial=2, FMS=1, fibrosarcoma=1, other=1. All 36 pt experienced at least one adverse event (AE) reaching a total of 579 AEs, 141 (24.4%) of which were considered to be grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. The main grade ≥3 AEs were: leukopenia (47.2% of pt), neutropenia (41.7% of pt), thrombocytopenia (33.3% of pt), increased ALT (30.6% of pt), and anemia (27.8% of pt). Conclusions: Tr+Ni was well tolerated and showed activity in at least some patients with non-L-sarcomas (mostly UPS/NOS) especially in the ECC. Analyses of the collected data, including PD-L1 expression profile, with the goal to establish whether Tr+Ni should be further pursued in these patients, are ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03590210; EudraCT: 2017-001083-38. Clinical trial information: NCT03590210.

scholarly journals A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO ANALYSE THE SIDE EFFECTS OF OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL AND ENALAPRIL IN HYPERTENSIVE SUBJECTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Parminderpal Singh ◽  
Kiranjit Kiranjit
Keyword(s):  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postural Hypotension ◽  
Olmesartan Medoxomil ◽  
National Commission ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Taste Alteration ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: The present study was aimed to analyze the side effects of olmesartan medoxomil and enalapril in hypertensive subjects.Methods: The study consisted of newly diagnosed hypertension categorized according to 7th report of Joint National Commission on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. The subjects were divided into two groups. The Group A subjects received olmesartan, and Group B subjects received enalapril. Pressure was recorded both in supine and sitting positions. The appearance of side effects was observed in the follow-up, i.e., dry cough, headache, postural hypotension, angioedema, dizziness, skin rashes, taste alterations, and urticaria. A statistical data were prepared on the basis of information obtained and analyzed thoroughly for antihypertensive effects and side effects of olmesartan and enalapril. SPSS software was used for analysis.Results: There was observed an increase in the incidence of taste alteration with drug therapy in Group B (Enalapril). There was observed an increase in the incidence of postural hypotension with drug therapy in both groups. In Group A (Olmesartan), the incidence of postural hypotension at the beginning of trial, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks was 0%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. In Group A (Olmesartan), there was no incidence of a headache at the beginning of trial, at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.Conclusion: From the study, it can be concluded that both olmesartan and enalapril are effective in Stage I and Stage II hypertension, but olmesartan is tolerated well with lesser side effects.

scholarly journals Prophylactic corneal cross-linking in LASIK surgery: effects on visual outcome and recovery time

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Dominique Clare Oh ◽  
Yiong Huak Chan ◽  
Sao Bing Lee ◽  
Jovina Li Shuen See
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Collagen cross-linking is a useful adjunct in preventing corneal ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic cross-linking in IntraLase LASIK affects optimum visual outcome and recovery time in the immediate post-surgery period and is associated with any side effects. Methods: This was a retrospective case study on the right eyes of 100 Chinese subjects aged 18 to 40 years who underwent IntraLase LASIK. Fifty subjects who underwentcross-linking after completing LASIK (Group A) were compared with 50 subjects who did not undergo LASIK (Group B). Cases were evaluated for pre- and post-operative spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), recovery time and presence of side effects. Results: At 1 week post-LASIK, mean (SD) UDVA of Group A subjects was poorer than Group B, at 1.05 (0.19) vs 1.17 (0.19) (p = 0.036); however, there was no significant difference in CDVA (p = 0.095). By 1 month post-LASIK, differences in both UDVA and CDVA were insignificant (p = 0.055, 0.106, respectively). Mean recovery time was 2.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-4.7) days longer in Group A (p = 0.010), although by 1 month post-LASIK, both groups were able to achieve CDVA equal to or better than that achieved pre-LASIK. Incidence of mild inflammation and dry eyes post-LASIK was similar in both groups (p = 1.00, 0.749, respectively); no other complications were observed. Conclusion: No differences in visual outcomes at and occurrence of side effects at 1 month post-LASIK were observed between subjects who underwent cross-linking prior to refractive surgery and those who did not. However, the group that underwent cross-linking had a slightly longer mean recovery time. Our study supports prophylactic cross-linking as a safe procedure that does not affect immediate visual outcomes among the Chinese population when used in adjunct with LASIK surgery.

scholarly journals Comparison of marsupialization under nasal endoscopy versus Lacrimal probing for treatment of congenital dacryocystoceles: a report of 40 cases

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhui Cui ◽  
Peng Sun ◽  
Lixing Tang ◽  
Chengyue Zhang ◽  
Qian Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Nasal Endoscopy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction This study was performed to compare the efficacy of marsupialization under nasal endoscopy versus Lacrimal probing in the treatment of congenital dacryocystocele. Methods Forty neonates (43 eyes) diagnosed with congenital dacryocystoceles were divided into Group A (nasal endoscopic marsupialization) and Group B (Lacrimal probing). The patients were followed up for 1 year after surgery. The efficacy, incidence of complications, and reoperation rate were compared between the two groups. Results The male:female ratio was 25:15 patients (27:16 eyes). In Group A, the success rate was 100%, the incidence of complications was 5%, and the reoperation rate was 0%. In Group B, the success rate was 90%, the incidence of complications was 20%, and the reoperation rate was 30%. Conclusion Compared with Lacrimal probing, marsupialization under nasal endoscopy provides greater efficacy and safety for congenital dacryocystoceles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document