scholarly journals Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale Network ◽  
Complementary Approach

Proximity-based labeling has emerged as a powerful complementary approach to classic affinity purification of multiprotein complexes in the mapping of protein–protein interactions. Ongoing optimization of enzyme tags and delivery methods has improved both temporal and spatial resolution, and the technique has been successfully employed in numerous small-scale (single complex mapping) and large-scale (network mapping) initiatives. When paired with quantitative proteomic approaches, the ability of these assays to provide snapshots of stable and transient interactions over time greatly facilitates the mapping of dynamic interactomes. Furthermore, recent innovations have extended biotin-based proximity labeling techniques such as BioID and APEX beyond classic protein-centric assays (tag a protein to label neighboring proteins) to include RNA-centric (tag an RNA species to label RNA-binding proteins) and DNA-centric (tag a gene locus to label associated protein complexes) assays.

scholarly journals iSUMO - integrative prediction of functionally relevant SUMOylation events

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Yao ◽  
Shuvadeep Maity ◽  
Shashank Gandhi ◽  
Marcin Imielenski ◽  
Christine Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid ◽  
Scale Experiment

AbstractPost-translational modifications by the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) are essential for diverse cellular functions. Large-scale experiment and sequence-based predictions have identified thousands of SUMOylated proteins. However, the overlap between the datasets is small, suggesting many false positives with low functional relevance. Therefore, we integrated ~800 sequence features and protein characteristics such as cellular function and protein-protein interactions in a machine learning approach to score likely functional SUMOylation events (iSUMO). iSUMO is trained on a total of 24 large-scale datasets, and it predicts 2,291 and 706 SUMO targets in human and yeast, respectively. These estimates are five times higher than what existing sequence-based tools predict at the same 5% false positive rate. Protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions are highly predictive of protein SUMOylation, supporting a role of the modification in protein complex formation. We note the marked prevalence of SUMOylation amongst RNA-binding proteins. We validate iSUMO predictions by experimental or other evidence. iSUMO therefore represents a comprehensive tool to identify high-confidence, functional SUMOylation events for human and yeast.

scholarly journals RNA Proximity Labeling: A New Detection Tool for RNA–Protein Interactions

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2270
Author(s):  
Ronja Weissinger ◽  
Lisa Heinold ◽  
Saira Akram ◽  
Ralf-Peter Jansen ◽  
Orit Hermesh
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Cellular Compartments ◽  
Rna Protein Complexes

Multiple cellular functions are controlled by the interaction of RNAs and proteins. Together with the RNAs they control, RNA interacting proteins form RNA protein complexes, which are considered to serve as the true regulatory units for post-transcriptional gene expression. To understand how RNAs are modified, transported, and regulated therefore requires specific knowledge of their interaction partners. To this end, multiple techniques have been developed to characterize the interaction between RNAs and proteins. In this review, we briefly summarize the common methods to study RNA–protein interaction including crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP), and aptamer- or antisense oligonucleotide-based RNA affinity purification. Following this, we focus on in vivo proximity labeling to study RNA–protein interactions. In proximity labeling, a labeling enzyme like ascorbate peroxidase or biotin ligase is targeted to specific RNAs, RNA-binding proteins, or even cellular compartments and uses biotin to label the proteins and RNAs in its vicinity. The tagged molecules are then enriched and analyzed by mass spectrometry or RNA-Seq. We highlight the latest studies that exemplify the strength of this approach for the characterization of RNA protein complexes and distribution of RNAs in vivo.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

scholarly journals Characterization of major chromatin assembly proteins in tetrahymena thermophile using proeomic and molecular evolutionary analyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed N Shah
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Chromatin Assembly ◽  
Histone Chaperones ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Selective Forces ◽  
Assembly Proteins

Histones H3/H4 are deposited onto DNA in a replication-dependent or independent fashion by the CAF1 and HIRA protein complexes. Despite the identification of these protein complexes, mechanistic details remain unclear. Recently, we showed that in T. thermophila histone chaperones Nrp1, Asf1 and the Impβ6 importin function together to transport newly synthesized H3/H4 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. To characterize chromatin assembly proteins in T.thermophila, I used affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry to identify protein-protein interactions of Nrp1, Cac2 subunit of CAF1, HIRA and histone modifying Hat1-complex in T. thermophila. I found that the three-subunit T.thermophila CAF1 complex interacts with Casein Kinase 2 (CKII), possibly accounting for previously reported human CAF1phosphorylation. I also found that Hat2 subunit of HAT1 complex is also shared by CAF1 complex as its Cac3 subunit. This suggests that Hat2/Cac3 might exist in two separate pools of protein complexes. Remarkably, proteomic analysis of Hat2/Cac3 in turn revealed that it forms several complexes with other proteins including SIN3, RXT3, LIN9 and TESMIN, all of which have known roles in the regulation of gene expression. Finally, I asked how selective forces might have impacted on the function of proteins involved in H3/H4 transport. Focusing on NASP which possesses several TPR motifs, I showed that its protein-protein interactions are conserved in T. thermophila. Using molecular evolutionary methods I show that different TPRs in NASP evolve at different rates possibly accounting for the functional diversity observed among different family members.

scholarly journals RNA–protein interactions: disorder, moonlighting and junk contribute to eukaryotic complexity

Open Biology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 190096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Balcerak ◽  
Alicja Trebinska-Stryjewska ◽  
Ryszard Konopinski ◽  
Maciej Wakula ◽  
Ewa Anna Grzybowska
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Coding Regions ◽  
Regulatory Circuits ◽  
Proteins Interactions

RNA–protein interactions are crucial for most biological processes in all organisms. However, it appears that the complexity of RNA-based regulation increases with the complexity of the organism, creating additional regulatory circuits, the scope of which is only now being revealed. It is becoming apparent that previously unappreciated features, such as disordered structural regions in proteins or non-coding regions in DNA leading to higher plasticity and pliability in RNA–protein complexes, are in fact essential for complex, precise and fine-tuned regulation. This review addresses the issue of the role of RNA–protein interactions in generating eukaryotic complexity, focusing on the newly characterized disordered RNA-binding motifs, moonlighting of metabolic enzymes, RNA-binding proteins interactions with different RNA species and their participation in regulatory networks of higher order.

scholarly journals Targeting RNA Binding Proteins Involved in Neurodegeneration

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Romano ◽  
Emanuele Buratti
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Processing ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Aggregation Processes ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Screening Approaches

Dysfunctions at the level of RNA processing have recently been shown to play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases. Several proteins responsible for these dysfunctions (TDP-43, FUS/TLS, and hnRNP A/Bs) belong to the nuclear class of heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) that predominantly function as general regulators of both coding and noncoding RNA metabolism. The discovery of the importance of these factors in mediating neuronal death has represented a major paradigmatic shift in our understanding of neurodegenerative processes. As a result, these discoveries have also opened the way toward novel biomolecular screening approaches in our search for therapeutic options. One of the major hurdles in this search is represented by the correct identification of the most promising targets to be prioritized. These may include aberrant aggregation processes, protein-protein interactions, RNA-protein interactions, or specific cellular pathways altered by disease. In this review, we discuss these four major options together with their various advantages and drawbacks.

scholarly journals Recent advances in large-scale protein interactome mapping

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virja Mehta ◽  
Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Biological Studies ◽  
Protein Interactome ◽  
Literature Curation

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) underlie most, if not all, cellular functions. The comprehensive mapping of these complex networks of stable and transient associations thus remains a key goal, both for systems biology-based initiatives (where it can be combined with other ‘omics’ data to gain a better understanding of functional pathways and networks) and for focused biological studies. Despite the significant challenges of such an undertaking, major strides have been made over the past few years. They include improvements in the computation prediction of PPIs and the literature curation of low-throughput studies of specific protein complexes, but also an increase in the deposition of high-quality data from non-biased high-throughput experimental PPI mapping strategies into publicly available databases.

scholarly journals Human mitochondrial protein complexes revealed by large-scale coevolution analysis and deep learning-based structure modeling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimin Pei ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Qian Cong
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Mitochondrial Protein ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
Complex Structures ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Contact Probability

AbstractRecent development of deep-learning methods has led to a breakthrough in the prediction accuracy of 3-dimensional protein structures. Extending these methods to protein pairs is expected to allow large-scale detection of protein-protein interactions and modeling protein complexes at the proteome level. We applied RoseTTAFold and AlphaFold2, two of the latest deep-learning methods for structure predictions, to analyze coevolution of human proteins residing in mitochondria, an organelle of vital importance in many cellular processes including energy production, metabolism, cell death, and antiviral response. Variations in mitochondrial proteins have been linked to a plethora of human diseases and genetic conditions. RoseTTAFold, with high computational speed, was used to predict the coevolution of about 95% of mitochondrial protein pairs. Top-ranked pairs were further subject to the modeling of the complex structures by AlphaFold2, which also produced contact probability with high precision and in many cases consistent with RoseTTAFold. Most of the top ranked pairs with high contact probability were supported by known protein-protein interactions and/or similarities to experimental structural complexes. For high-scoring pairs without experimental complex structures, our coevolution analyses and structural models shed light on the details of their interfaces, including CHCHD4-AIFM1, MTERF3-TRUB2, FMC1-ATPAF2, ECSIT-NDUFAF1 and COQ7-COQ9, among others. We also identified novel PPIs (PYURF-NDUFAF5, LYRM1-MTRF1L and COA8-COX10) for several proteins without experimentally characterized interaction partners, leading to predictions of their molecular functions and the biological processes they are involved in.

scholarly journals Reliable identification of protein-protein interactions by crosslinking mass spectrometry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swantje Lenz ◽  
Ludwig R. Sinn ◽  
Francis J. O’Reilly ◽  
Lutz Fischer ◽  
Fritz Wegner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Estimation Procedure ◽  
Scale Analysis ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
False Discovery ◽  
Large Scale Analysis ◽  
False Discovery Rate Estimation

Crosslinking mass spectrometry is widening its scope from structural analyzes of purified multi-protein complexes towards systems-wide analyzes of protein-protein interactions. Assessing the error in these large datasets is currently a challenge. Using a controlled large-scale analysis of Escherichia coli cell lysate, we demonstrate a reliable false-discovery rate estimation procedure for protein-protein interactions identified by crosslinking mass spectrometry.

scholarly journals Large-scale identification of RBP-RNA interactions by RAPseq refines essentials of post-transcriptional gene regulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ionut Atanasoai ◽  
Sofia Papavasileiou ◽  
Natalie Preiss ◽  
Claudia Kutter
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
The Past ◽  
Optimal Distance ◽  
Transcriptional Gene Regulation

Over the past decade, thousands of putative human RNA binding proteins (RBPs) have been identified and increased the demand for specifying RNA binding capacities. Here, we developed RNA affinity purification followed by sequencing (RAPseq) that enables in vitro large-scale profiling of RBP binding to native RNAs. First, by employing RAPseq, we found that vertebrate HURs recognize a conserved RNA binding motif and bind predominantly to introns in zebrafish compared to 3'UTRs in human RNAs. Second, our dual RBP assays (co-RAPseq) uncovered cooperative RNA binding of HUR and PTBP1 within an optimal distance of 27 nucleotides. Third, we developed T7-RAPseq to discern m6A-dependent and -independent RNA binding sites of YTHDF1. Fourth, RAPseq of 26 novel non-canonical RBPs revealed specialized moonlighting interactions. Last, five pathological IGF2BP family variants exhibited different RNA binding patterns. Overall, our simple, scalable and versatile method enables to fast-forward RBP-related questions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document