scholarly journals RNA Proximity Labeling: A New Detection Tool for RNA–Protein Interactions

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2270
Author(s):  
Ronja Weissinger ◽  
Lisa Heinold ◽  
Saira Akram ◽  
Ralf-Peter Jansen ◽  
Orit Hermesh
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Cellular Compartments ◽  
Rna Protein Complexes

Multiple cellular functions are controlled by the interaction of RNAs and proteins. Together with the RNAs they control, RNA interacting proteins form RNA protein complexes, which are considered to serve as the true regulatory units for post-transcriptional gene expression. To understand how RNAs are modified, transported, and regulated therefore requires specific knowledge of their interaction partners. To this end, multiple techniques have been developed to characterize the interaction between RNAs and proteins. In this review, we briefly summarize the common methods to study RNA–protein interaction including crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP), and aptamer- or antisense oligonucleotide-based RNA affinity purification. Following this, we focus on in vivo proximity labeling to study RNA–protein interactions. In proximity labeling, a labeling enzyme like ascorbate peroxidase or biotin ligase is targeted to specific RNAs, RNA-binding proteins, or even cellular compartments and uses biotin to label the proteins and RNAs in its vicinity. The tagged molecules are then enriched and analyzed by mass spectrometry or RNA-Seq. We highlight the latest studies that exemplify the strength of this approach for the characterization of RNA protein complexes and distribution of RNAs in vivo.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

scholarly journals Unbiased dynamic characterization of RNA-protein interactions by OOPS

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayner M. L. Queiroz ◽  
Tom Smith ◽  
Eneko Villanueva ◽  
Mie Monti ◽  
Mariavittoria Pizzinga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Bacterial Rna ◽  
Unbiased Manner ◽  
Cellular Compartments

AbstractCurrent methods for the identification of RNA–protein interactions require a quantity and quality of sample that hinders their application, especially for dynamic biological systems or when sample material is limiting. Here, we present a new approach to enrich RNA-Binding Proteins (RBPs): Orthogonal Organic Phase Separation (OOPS), which is compatible with downstream proteomics and RNA sequencing. OOPS enables recovery of RBPs and free protein, or protein-bound RNA and free RNA, from a single sample in an unbiased manner. By applying OOPS to human cell lines, we extract the majority of known RBPs, and importantly identify additional novel RBPs, including those from previously under-represented cellular compartments. The high yield and unbiased nature of OOPS facilitates its application in both dynamic and inaccessible systems. Thus, we have identified changes in RNA-protein interactions in mammalian cells following nocodazole cell-cycle arrest, and defined the first bacterial RNA-interactome. Overall, OOPS provides an easy-to-use and flexible technique that opens new opportunities to characterize RNA-protein interactions and explore their dynamic behaviour.

scholarly journals FLASH: ultra-fast protocol to identify RNA–protein interactions in cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. e15-e15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Avsar Ilik ◽  
Tugce Aktas ◽  
Daniel Maticzka ◽  
Rolf Backofen ◽  
Asifa Akhtar
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Sequencing Library

Abstract Determination of the in vivo binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is paramount to understanding their function and how they affect different aspects of gene regulation. With hundreds of RNA-binding proteins identified in human cells, a flexible, high-resolution, high-throughput, highly multiplexible and radioactivity-free method to determine their binding sites has not been described to date. Here we report FLASH (Fast Ligation of RNA after some sort of Affinity Purification for High-throughput Sequencing), which uses a special adapter design and an optimized protocol to determine protein–RNA interactions in living cells. The entire FLASH protocol, starting from cells on plates to a sequencing library, takes 1.5 days. We demonstrate the flexibility, speed and versatility of FLASH by using it to determine RNA targets of both tagged and endogenously expressed proteins under diverse conditions in vivo.

scholarly journals System-wide analyses of the fission yeast poly(A)+ RNA interactome reveal insights into organisation and function of RNA-protein complexes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Kilchert ◽  
Tea Kecman ◽  
Emily Priest ◽  
Svenja Hester ◽  
Krzysztof Kus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Rna Degradation ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Rna Exosome ◽  
And Function ◽  
Rna Protein Complexes

AbstractProduction, function, and turnover of mRNA are orchestrated by multi-subunit machineries that play a central role in gene expression. Within these molecular machines, interactions with the target mRNA are mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and the accuracy and dynamics of these RNA-protein interactions are essential for their function. Here, we show that fission yeast whole cell poly(A)+ RNA-protein crosslinking data provides system-wide information on the organisation and function of the RNA-protein complexes. We evaluate relative enrichment of cellular RBPs on poly(A)+ RNA to identify interactors with high RNA-binding activity and provide key information about the RNA-binding properties of large multi-protein complexes, such as the mRNA 3’ end processing machinery (cleavage and polyadenylation factor, CPF) and the RNA exosome. We demonstrate that different functional modules within CPF differ in their ability to interact with RNA. Importantly, we reveal that CPF forms additional contacts with RNA via the Fip1 subunit of the polyadenylation module and two subunits of the nuclease module. In addition, our data highlights the central role of the RNA helicase Mtl1 in RNA degradation by the exosome as mutations in Mtl1 lead to disengagement of the exosome from RNA. We examine how routes of substrate access to the complex are affected upon mutation of exosome subunits. Our results provide important insights into how different components of the exosome contribute to engagement of the complex with substrate RNA. Overall, our data uncover how multi-subunit cellular machineries interact with RNA, on a proteome-wide scale.

scholarly journals Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale Network ◽  
Complementary Approach

Proximity-based labeling has emerged as a powerful complementary approach to classic affinity purification of multiprotein complexes in the mapping of protein–protein interactions. Ongoing optimization of enzyme tags and delivery methods has improved both temporal and spatial resolution, and the technique has been successfully employed in numerous small-scale (single complex mapping) and large-scale (network mapping) initiatives. When paired with quantitative proteomic approaches, the ability of these assays to provide snapshots of stable and transient interactions over time greatly facilitates the mapping of dynamic interactomes. Furthermore, recent innovations have extended biotin-based proximity labeling techniques such as BioID and APEX beyond classic protein-centric assays (tag a protein to label neighboring proteins) to include RNA-centric (tag an RNA species to label RNA-binding proteins) and DNA-centric (tag a gene locus to label associated protein complexes) assays.

scholarly journals uvCLAP: a fast, non-radioactive method to identify in vivo targets of RNA-binding proteins

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Maticzka ◽  
Ibrahim Avsar Ilik ◽  
Tugce Aktas ◽  
Rolf Backofen ◽  
Asifa Akhtar
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Rna Motif

AbstractRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play important and essential roles in eukaryotic gene expression regulating splicing, localization, translation and stability of mRNAs. Understanding the exact contribution of RBPs to gene regulation is crucial as many RBPs are frequently mis-regulated in several neurological diseases and certain cancers. While recently developed techniques provide binding sites of RBPs, they are labor-intensive and generally rely on radioactive labeling of RNA. With more than 1,000 RBPs in a human cell, it is imperative to develop easy, robust, reproducible and high-throughput methods to determine in vivo targets of RBPs. To address these issues we developed uvCLAP (UV crosslinking and affinity purification) as a robust, reproducible method to measure RNA-protein interactions in vivo. To test its performance and applicability we investigated binding of 15 RBPs from fly, mouse and human cells. We show that uvCLAP generates reliable and comparable data to other methods. Unexpectedly, our results show that despite their different subcellular localizations, STAR proteins (KHDRBS1-3, QKI) bind to a similar RNA motif in vivo. Consistently a point mutation (KHDRBS1Y440F) or a natural splice isoform (QKI-6) that changes the respective RBP subcellular localization, dramatically alters target selection without changing the targeted RNA motif. Combined with the knowledge that RBPs can compete and cooperate for binding sites, our data shows that compartmentalization of RBPs can be used as an elegant means to generate RNA target specificity.

scholarly journals Grad-seq identifies KhpB as a global RNA-binding protein in Clostridioides difficile that regulates toxin production

microLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Lamm-Schmidt ◽  
Manuela Fuchs ◽  
Johannes Sulzer ◽  
Milan Gerovac ◽  
Jens Hör ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Toxin Production ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Rna Protein Complexes

Abstract Much of our current knowledge about cellular RNA-protein complexes in bacteria is derived from analyses in gram-negative model organisms, with the discovery of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) generally lagging behind in gram-positive species. Here, we have applied Grad-seq analysis of native RNA-protein complexes to a major gram-positive human pathogen, Clostridioides difficile, whose RNA biology remains largely unexplored. Our analysis resolves in-gradient distributions for ∼88% of all annotated transcripts and ∼50% of all proteins, thereby providing a comprehensive resource for the discovery of RNA-protein and protein-protein complexes in C. difficile and related microbes. The sedimentation profiles together with pulldown approaches identify KhpB, previously identified in Streptococcus pneumoniae, as an uncharacterized, pervasive RBP in C. difficile. Global RIP-seq analysis establishes a large suite of mRNA and small RNA targets of KhpB, similar to the scope of the Hfq targetome in C. difficile. The KhpB-bound transcripts include several functionally related mRNAs encoding virulence-associated metabolic pathways and toxin A whose transcript levels are observed to be increased in a khpB deletion strain. Moreover, the production of toxin protein is also increased upon khpB deletion. In summary, this study expands our knowledge of cellular RNA protein interactions in C. difficile and supports the emerging view that KhpB homologues constitute a new class of globally acting RBPs in gram-positive bacteria.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals Characterization of major chromatin assembly proteins in tetrahymena thermophile using proeomic and molecular evolutionary analyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed N Shah
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Chromatin Assembly ◽  
Histone Chaperones ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Selective Forces ◽  
Assembly Proteins

Histones H3/H4 are deposited onto DNA in a replication-dependent or independent fashion by the CAF1 and HIRA protein complexes. Despite the identification of these protein complexes, mechanistic details remain unclear. Recently, we showed that in T. thermophila histone chaperones Nrp1, Asf1 and the Impβ6 importin function together to transport newly synthesized H3/H4 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. To characterize chromatin assembly proteins in T.thermophila, I used affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry to identify protein-protein interactions of Nrp1, Cac2 subunit of CAF1, HIRA and histone modifying Hat1-complex in T. thermophila. I found that the three-subunit T.thermophila CAF1 complex interacts with Casein Kinase 2 (CKII), possibly accounting for previously reported human CAF1phosphorylation. I also found that Hat2 subunit of HAT1 complex is also shared by CAF1 complex as its Cac3 subunit. This suggests that Hat2/Cac3 might exist in two separate pools of protein complexes. Remarkably, proteomic analysis of Hat2/Cac3 in turn revealed that it forms several complexes with other proteins including SIN3, RXT3, LIN9 and TESMIN, all of which have known roles in the regulation of gene expression. Finally, I asked how selective forces might have impacted on the function of proteins involved in H3/H4 transport. Focusing on NASP which possesses several TPR motifs, I showed that its protein-protein interactions are conserved in T. thermophila. Using molecular evolutionary methods I show that different TPRs in NASP evolve at different rates possibly accounting for the functional diversity observed among different family members.

scholarly journals RNA–protein interactions: disorder, moonlighting and junk contribute to eukaryotic complexity

Open Biology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 190096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Balcerak ◽  
Alicja Trebinska-Stryjewska ◽  
Ryszard Konopinski ◽  
Maciej Wakula ◽  
Ewa Anna Grzybowska
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Coding Regions ◽  
Regulatory Circuits ◽  
Proteins Interactions

RNA–protein interactions are crucial for most biological processes in all organisms. However, it appears that the complexity of RNA-based regulation increases with the complexity of the organism, creating additional regulatory circuits, the scope of which is only now being revealed. It is becoming apparent that previously unappreciated features, such as disordered structural regions in proteins or non-coding regions in DNA leading to higher plasticity and pliability in RNA–protein complexes, are in fact essential for complex, precise and fine-tuned regulation. This review addresses the issue of the role of RNA–protein interactions in generating eukaryotic complexity, focusing on the newly characterized disordered RNA-binding motifs, moonlighting of metabolic enzymes, RNA-binding proteins interactions with different RNA species and their participation in regulatory networks of higher order.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document