scholarly journals Adverse events with ayurvedic medicines- possible adulteration and some inherent toxicities

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Buddhi Paudyal ◽  
Astha Thapa ◽  
Keshav Raj Sigdel ◽  
Sudeep Adhikari ◽  
Buddha Basnyat

Ayurvedic medicine, a traditional system of medicine practiced in the Indian subcontinent is considered to be devoid of adverse effects. We report three cases which highlight the possibility of adverse events related with the use ofwith the use of ayurvedic products. A 35 years old woman with hepatitis took ayurvedic powder medicine and with swarnabhasma (gold salt)s and had her liver injury worsened, possibly due to alkaloids, and developed nephrotic syndrome, possibly due to and gold salt. A 57 years old hypertensive man was taking ayurvedic medicine containing reserpine which had long been withdrawn from the allopathic system of medicine due to wide range of side effects. A 47 years old woman with rheumatoid arthritis was taking an unknown tablet containing a steroid as an adulterant for 2 years and developed side effects typical of steroid excess. We like to highlight the fact that ayurvedic medicines do have propensity to may cause adverse effects due to adulterations or inherent constituents like alkaloids, and hence are may not always be completely safe.

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Buddhi Paudyal ◽  
Astha Thapa ◽  
Keshav Raj Sigdel ◽  
Sudeep Adhikari ◽  
Buddha Basnyat

Ayurvedic medicine, a traditional system of medicine practiced in the Indian subcontinent is considered to be devoid of adverse events. We report three cases which highlight the possibility of adverse events related with the use of ayurvedic products. A 35 year old woman with hepatitis took ayurvedic powder medicine and swarnabhasma (gold salt) and had her liver injury worsened, possibly due to alkaloids, and developed nephrotic syndrome, possibly due to gold salt. A 57 year old hypertensive man was taking ayurvedic medicine containing reserpine which had long been withdrawn from the allopathic system of medicine due to wide range of side effects. A 47 year old woman with rheumatoid arthritis was taking an unknown tablet containing steroid as an adulterant for 2 years and developed side effects typical of steroid excess. We would like to highlight the fact that ayurvedic medicines do have propensity to cause adverse events due to adulteration or inherent constituents like alkaloids, and hence may not always be completely safe.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Buddhi Paudyal ◽  
Astha Thapa ◽  
Keshav Raj Sigdel ◽  
Sudeep Adhikari ◽  
Buddha Basnyat

Ayurvedic medicine, a traditional system of medicine practiced in the Indian subcontinent is considered to be devoid of adverse effects. We report three cases which highlight the possibility of adverse events with the use of ayurvedic products. A 35 years old woman with hepatitis took ayurvedic powders and had her liver injury worsen, possibly due to alkaloids, and developed nephrotic syndrome, possibly due to gold salt. A 57 years old hypertensive man was taking ayurvedic medicine containing reserpine which had long been withdrawn from the allopathic system of medicine due to wide range of side effects. A 47 years old woman with rheumatoid arthritis was taking an unknown tablet containing a steroid as an adulterant for 2 years and developed side effects typical of steroid excess. We like to highlight the fact that ayurvedic medicines do have propensity to cause adverse effects due to adulterations or inherent constituents like alkaloids, and hence are not completely safe.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-365
Author(s):  
Shweta Nakarmi ◽  
Kalpana Pudasaini ◽  
Bhojraj Adhikari ◽  
Binit Vaidya

Background: Methotrexate is considered as the anchor drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, various adverse effects limit its use leading to frequent discontinuation of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the common adverse effects of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at National Center for Rheumatic Diseases from June 2018 to May 2019 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using methotrexate monotherapy. Laboratory tests like liver function tests, renal function tests, complete blood count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate were done at baseline and every 3 months. Data on patients’ comorbidities, disease activity and side effects of drug were collected on every follow- up. Statistical analysis was carried out with the help of SPSS 23.0. Results: Out of 232 patients experiencing at least one adverse effect while on methotrexate monotherapy, 87.5% were female and mean age was 46.9±10.8 years. The mean dose of methotrexate was 16.6 ± 3.9 mg/week with the most frequently used dose of 20mg/week. Among the variety of adverse reaction observed, the most common was transaminitis (75.0%) with approximately 50.0% as isolated liver function abnormality, followed by nausea (19.4%), anorexia (12.9%), leukopenia (12.5%), oral ulcer (8.2%) and psychological intolerance (4.7%). Multiple regression analysis showed significant predictive value of body mass index for transaminitis (p-value 0.007). Conclusions: Asymptomatic liver function test derangement was the most frequent adverse-effect of methotrexate observed, whereas nausea and anorexia were the most common patient reported events. The frequent dose associated with side-effects in Nepalese patients was around 20mg/week. Keywords: Adverse events; methotrexate; Nepal; rheumatoid arthritis


1985 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Letendre ◽  
Douglas J. DeJong ◽  
Donald R. Miller

The use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis is reviewed. Methotrexate, a folic acid antagonist, is sometimes employed in an attempt to symptomatically control patients whose disease does not respond adequately to conventional therapies. Systemic administration of 7.5–15 mg/wk in a “pulse” fashion appears to be effective without precipitating severe adverse effects. However, concern over potentially serious side effects and a lack of well-controlled clinical trials have limited its use to severe, refractory disease. Further studies are needed before its role in rheumatoid arthritis can justifiably be expanded.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 559.2-560
Author(s):  
V. Rivera Teran ◽  
S. Sicsik ◽  
D. Vega-Morales ◽  
F. Irazoque-Palazuelos ◽  
D. Miranda ◽  
...  

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common autoimmune disease. Older patients treated with biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are at a significantly greater risk of adverse effects (AEs) [1]. However, the rate of drug discontinuation because of adverse effects caused by bDMARDs has not differed in elderly compared to younger patients in different registries.Objectives:Determine if drug discontinuation of bDMARDs differs by age in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Mexican Adverse Events Registry (BIOBADAMEX).Methods:BIOBADAMEX is a Mexican ongoing cohort of patients using bDMARDs since 2016. In this analysis we included all patients with diagnosis of RA with at least two assessments. Survival on bDMARDs was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictors of discontinuation, including age older than median age in the sample were investigated by Cox regression analyses.Results:Among 743 patients in the registry, 497 had RA diagnosis, from which, 214 had at least two assessments. At baseline, patients had a median (IQR) age of 53.4 (45-61) years old, median disease duration of 10.7 (6-17) months and median DAS28 of 4.7 (3-6). Conventional DMARDS were used by 185 (87%) patients and 94 (44%) patients used corticosteroids. Comorbidities were present in 194 (91%). The most common bDMARDs received at baseline were abatacept 59 (27%), tocilizumab 45(21%), adalimumab 31 (15%) and certolizumab 30 (14%). At the time of analysis, the median bDMARDs treatment duration was 21.0(13-34) months, 128 (59%) had discontinued treatment, 66 for inefficacy, 32 for adverse events and 30 for others. Fig 1 shows discontinuation rate curves in patients younger and older than median age. Cox proportional-hazards demonstrated no significant differences regarding age older than median age (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.4, p=0.7), female sex (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-1.9, p=0.44), use of corticosteroids (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.6, p=0.20), comorbidities (HR 0.9, 95% 0.6-1.5, p=0.78), DAS28 (HR 0.9, 95% 0.9-1.1, p=0.93) or other factors.Figure 1.Discontinuation rate curves in patients younger and older than median age (< 53.4 and >=53.4 years old)Conclusion:This analysis did not show a role of age on discontinuation of bDMARDs in Mexican RA patients. Further longitudinal analyses will be performed including more patients to assess retention rate of bDMARDs and identify predictive variables of discontinuation in Mexican population.References:[1]Akter R, et al. Can Geriatr J. 2020 May 1;23(2):184-189.[2]Ikari Y, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23861.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
pp. 65-66
Author(s):  
(Lt Col) Rajnish Kumar ◽  
(Lt Col) Vaka Raja Sekhar Reddy ◽  
(Lt Col) Sumit Kumar Singh ◽  
Debarshi jana

Background/ Context: Corticosteroids, despite being a very effective line of treatment for various disorders is known to have a wide range of adverse effects. The use of systemic and topical steroids has been associated with cataract formation, however the ophthalmic side effects of application of steroid on skin away from the face has not been studied in depth. With increasing use of corticosteroids as rst line of therapy in treatment of various dermatological conditions, the ocular side effects, if any, of these preparations, cannot be overlooked. Aim: To study the incidence of cataract in patients using skin preparations of corticosteroids away from the face and also to correlate the dose and duration of steroid therapy to incidence of cataract. Materials & Methods: 50 patients with dermatological disorders who were being treated with dermatological steroids, on sites other than the face and periorbital region, for a period of more than six months consisted of the study group. The study group consisted of patients in the age group of 20 – 60 years. The study was conducted over a period of two years at a tertiary care hospital. Visual acuity, Slit lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometryand detailed fundus examination using 90D lens were carried out. Results: The incidence of cataract was signicantly higher in patients using dermatological steroids away from the face. Prolonged duration of use of these steroids also indicated a signicantly higher incidence of cataract. However, a larger population based study needs to be carried out to study the relationship between potency of steroid and incidence of cataract, although preliminary studies indicate a denite correlation between the two. Conclusions: Despite, steroids being used away from the face, there was a denite increase in the incidence of cataract. Before coming to any rm conclusions it would be advisable to reproduce the study in a larger population. However from the present pilot study it is prudent to advocate judicious use of innocuous looking steroid creams as they can cause signicant adverse effects


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Atef Nassar

Abamectin and indoxacarb are relatively new insecticides with different mode of action and are applied to control a wide range of plant pests. However, their side effects to mammals are not fully studied. Accordingly, current study aimed to compare the adverse effects of both insecticides against the endocrine biomarkers: triiodothyronine (T3), tetraiodothyronine (T4), follicular-stimulating hormone (FSH), progesterone, and testosterone. These parameters were measured after orally-injecting rats with 1/20 LD50 doses of each of abamectin and indoxacarb for 60 days. Results showed that indoxacarb had pronounced reduction in the contents of T3 and FSH hormones compared to control and abamectin. Also, indoxacarb increased testosterone level compared to abamectin. T4 level was reduced by abamectin treatment compared to indoxacarb. Progesterone content was significantly increased after the abamectin treatment, while it was decreased after the indoxacarb treatment. However, the tested insecticides belong to avermectins and oxadiazine chemical groups that have different mode of action. They showed some similarity in their effect on T3, T4, and FSH, except for the progesterone hormone that showed a contradicting response. These two insecticides were marked as safe but current study highlight the need for caution during their application in the integrated pest management program.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Kirby ◽  
Victoria Shepherd ◽  
Jeremy Howick ◽  
Sophie Betteridge ◽  
Kerenza Hood

Abstract Background Nocebo effects (‘negative placebo’ effects) experienced by clinical trial participants can arise from an underlying condition or through communication about side effects in the participant information leaflets (or elsewhere). However, little is known about how information on potential side effects is provided to trial participants. In this study we aimed to increase the evidence-base in this area by identifying the way in which potential side effects from investigational medicinal products used in trials are presented in written information to potential participants. Methods Trials were identified from the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) clinical trial registry. Eligible studies were placebo controlled clinical trials of investigational medicinal products (IMP) in adults conducted in the UK in three targeted clinical areas (cancer, musculoskeletal conditions and mental and behavioural disorders). Ongoing and recently completed (within three years) trials were included. We assessed readability using the Flesch Reading Ease scale, Gunning-Fog Index and Flesch-Kincaid Grade. Data extracted from the PILs were divided into 8 predefined qualitative themes for analysis in NVivo11. Results PILs from 33 studies were included. Most of the patient information leaflets were ranked as ‘fairly easy to read’ or ‘difficult to read’ according to the Flesch Reading Ease scale. All studies presented information about adverse events, whereas only a third presented information about intervention benefits. Where intervention or study benefits were presented, they were usually after adverse events (21/33 64%). Discussion Participant information leaflets scored poorly on ease of readability and had more content relating to adverse effects than any potential beneficial effects. The way in which adverse events were presented was heterogeneous in terms of their likelihood and severity and the amount and level of detail provided. In comparison to the adverse effects, potential benefits from the intervention and/or study were described less often and by shorter text. Participants were commonly presented with adverse effects ahead of any potential benefits.


2018 ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
E. I. Kovalenko ◽  
I. B. Kononenko ◽  
A. V. Snegovoi ◽  
O. P. Grebennikova ◽  
L. V. Manzyuk

Hormonal therapy is a highly effective and well tolerable treatment of hormone-responsive breast cancer. However, it has some side effects that can affect quality of life and lead to treatment discontinuation. Common side effects of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are discussed in this article: menopausal, gynecological symptoms, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal adverse events. Some of them are preventable and manageable. In order to maintain good quality of life during treatment the oncologists should pay more attention to the side effects that lead to it’s deterioration and not be too anxious about insignificant ones.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246441
Author(s):  
Christopher Jackson ◽  
Alexandra L. J. Freeman ◽  
Zśofia Szlamka ◽  
David J. Spiegelhalter

Background Bisphosphonate drugs can be used to improve the outcomes of women with breast cancer. Whilst many meta-analyses have quantified their potential benefits for patients, attempts at comprehensive quantification of potential adverse effects have been limited. We undertook a meta-analysis with novel methodology to identify and quantify these adverse effects. Methods We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials in breast cancer where at least one of the treatments was a bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid, ibandronate, pamidronate, alendronate or clodronate). Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings were examined. Primary outcomes were adverse events of any type or severity (excluding death). We carried out pairwise and network meta-analyses to estimate the size of any adverse effects potentially related to bisphosphonates. In order to ascertain whether adverse effects differed by individual factors such as age, or interacted with other common adjuvant breast cancer treatments, we examined individual-level patient data for one large trial, AZURE. Findings We identified 56 trials that reported adverse data, which included a total of 29,248 patients (18,301 receiving bisphosphonate drugs versus 10,947 not). 24 out of the 103 different adverse outcomes analysed showed a statistically and practically significant increase in patients receiving a bisphosphonate drug compared with those not (2 additional outcomes that appeared statistically significant came only from small studies with low event counts and no clinical suspicion so are likely artifacts). Most of these 24 are already clinically recognised: ‘flu-like symptoms, fever, headache and chills; increased bone pain, arthralgia, myalgia, back pain; cardiac events, thromboembolic events; hypocalcaemia and osteonecrosis of the jaw; as well as possibly stiffness and nausea. Oral clodronate appeared to increase the risk of vomiting and diarrhoea (which may also be increased by other bisphosphonates), and there may be some hepatotoxicity. Four additional potential adverse effects emerged for bisphosphonate drugs in this analysis which have not classically be recognised: fatigue, neurosensory problems, hypertonia/muscle spasms and possibly dysgeusia. Several symptoms previously reported as potential side effects in the literature were not significantly increased in this analysis: constipation, insomnia, respiratory problems, oedema or thirst/dry mouth. Individual patient-level data and subgroup analysis revealed little variation in side effects between women of different ages or menopausal status, those with metastatic versus non-metastatic cancer, or between women receiving different concurrent breast cancer therapies. Conclusions This meta-analysis has produced estimates for the absolute frequencies of a range of side effects significantly associated with bisphosphonate drugs when used by breast cancer patients. These results show good agreement with previous literature on the subject but are the first systematic quantification of side effects and their severities. However, the analysis is limited by the availability and quality of data on adverse events, and the potential for bias introduced by a lack of standards for reporting of such events. We therefore present a table of adverse effects for bisphosphonates, identified and quantified to the best of our ability from a large number of trials, which we hope can be used to improve the communication of the potential harms of these drugs to patients and their healthcare providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document