Petroleum Source Rocks of the Junggar, Tarim, and Turpan Basins, Northwest China: ABSTRACT

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Graham, S. Brassell, A. R. Ca
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 257-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Cheng ◽  
Huang Guanghui ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Zhang Wenjun ◽  
Liu Xi

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangfeng Zhao ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Zhenhong Wang ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Hongxing Wei ◽  
...  

The condensate gas reservoirs of the Jurassic Ahe Formation in the Dibei area of the Tarim Basin, northwest China are typical tight sandstone gas reservoirs and contain abundant resources. However, the hydrocarbon sources and reservoir accumulation mechanism remain debated. Here the distribution and geochemistry of fluids in the Ahe gas reservoirs are used to investigate the formation of the hydrocarbon reservoirs, including the history of hydrocarbon generation, trap development, and reservoir evolution. Carbon isotopic analyses show that the oil and natural gas of the Ahe Formation originated from different sources. The natural gas was derived from Jurassic coal measure source rocks, whereas the oil has mixed sources of Lower Triassic lacustrine source rocks and minor amounts of coal-derived oil from Jurassic coal measure source rocks. The geochemistry of light hydrocarbon components and n-alkanes shows that the early accumulated oil was later altered by infilling gas due to gas washing. Consequently, n-alkanes in the oil are scarce, whereas naphthenic and aromatic hydrocarbons with the same carbon numbers are relatively abundant. The fluids in the Ahe Formation gas reservoirs have an unusual distribution, where oil is distributed above gas and water is locally produced from the middle of some gas reservoirs. The geochemical characteristics of the fluids show that this anomalous distribution was closely related to the dynamic accumulation of oil and gas. The period of reservoir densification occurred between the two stages of oil and gas accumulation, which led to the early accumulated oil and part of the residual formation water being trapped in the tight reservoir. After later gas filling into the reservoir, the fluids could not undergo gravity differentiation, which accounts for the anomalous distribution of fluids in the Ahe Formation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 1556-1571
Author(s):  
Long Zhang ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Guo Wang ◽  
Mou Wang

Abstract Circumstantial evidence for the sources of uranium in ore deposits may be drawn from the study of deposit geochemistry and mineralogy. However, direct evidence supporting uranium leaching from source rocks has rarely been found. This study investigates the source of uranium in the Baiyanghe deposit in the Xiemisitai Mountains, northwest China. The main uranium ore bodies occur as fracture-fillings along contact zones between the Yangzhuang granite porphyry and the Devonian volcanic rocks. Zircon, thorite, columbite-(Mn), and bastnäsite are the dominant accessory minerals that host uranium in the granite porphyry. In situ columbite-(Mn) LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating yields a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 310 ± 4 Ma, suggesting that the Yangzhuang granite porphyry was emplaced during the Late Carboniferous. Backscattered electron (BSE) images reveal that various degrees of alteration of these same accessory minerals may be observed in the granite porphyry, and the altered domains of these minerals have lower BSE intensities compared to the unaltered domains. Results indicate that the altered domains of zircon grains have lower concentrations of Zr, Si, and U, and higher concentrations of Y, Fe, Ca, and P relative to the unaltered domains, and the altered domains of columbite-(Mn) grains are enriched in Ti and Fe and are depleted in Nb, Ta, Mn, U, and Zr. The altered domains of thorite grains have higher concentrations of Zr, Fe, Ca, Nb, and P, and lower Th and U compared to those of the relict domains. The petrochemical data indicate that the granite porphyry experienced losses in U, Be, F, Ba, Sr, Pb, Zr, Mo, Nb, Ta, and Hf during alteration. These results suggest that the past-magmatic hydrothermal fluids might be responsible for the mobilization of uranium form minerals in the granite porphyry. It is concluded that U-bearing accessory minerals in the granite porphyry were the primary source of uranium, and that post-magmatic hydrothermal processes caused remobilization and significant localized enrichment of the uranium to form high-grade ores as fracture-fillings along its contacts.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 537-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jigang Guo ◽  
Xiongqi Pang ◽  
Fengtao Guo ◽  
Xulong Wang ◽  
Caifu Xiang ◽  
...  

Jurassic strata along the southern margin of Junggar Basin are important petroleum system elements for exploration in northwest China. The Lower and Middle Jurassic source rock effectiveness has been questioned as exploration progresses deeper into the basin. These source rocks are very thick and are distributed widely. They contain a high total organic carbon composed predominantly of Type III kerogen, with some Type II kerogen. Our evaluation of source rock petroleum generation characteristics and expulsion history, including one-dimensional basin modeling, indicates that Jurassic source rocks are gas prone at deeper depths. They reached peak oil generation during the Early Cretaceous and began to generate gas in the Late Cretaceous. Gas generation peaked in the Paleogene–Neogene. Source rock shales and coals reached petroleum expulsion thresholds at thermal maturities of 0.8% and 0.75% vitrinite reflectance, respectively, when the petroleum expulsion efficiency was ∼40%. The petroleum generated and expelled from these source rocks are 3788.75 × 108 and 1507.55 × 108 t, respectively, with a residual 2281.20 × 108 t retained in the source rocks. In these tight reservoirs, a favorable stratigraphic relationship (where tight sandstone reservoirs directly overlie the source rocks) indicates short vertical and horizontal migration distances. This indicates the potential for a large, continuous, tight-sand gas resource in the Lower and Middle Jurassic strata. The in-place natural gas resources in the Jurassic reservoirs are up to 5.68 × 1012 − 15.14 × 1012 m3. Jurassic Badaowan and Xishanyao coals have geological characteristics that are favorable for coal-bed methane resources, which have an in-place resource potential between 3.60 × 1012 and 11.67 × 1012 m3. These Lower and Middle Jurassic strata have good shale gas potential compared with active US shale gas, and the inferred in-place shale gas resources in Junggar Basin are between 20.73 × 1012 and 113.89 × 1012 m3. This rich inferred conventional and unconventional petroleum resource in tight-sand, coal-bed, and shale gas reservoirs makes the deeper Jurassic strata along the southern margin of Junggar Basin a prospective target for future exploration.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Xu ◽  
Xianghua Ding ◽  
Zhengjiang Luo ◽  
Cuimin Liu ◽  
Erting Li ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Parnell ◽  
Geng Ansong ◽  
Fu Jiamo ◽  
Sheng Guoying

AbstractVeins of solid bitumen occur in Cretaceous sandstones at the northwest margin of the Junggar Basin, China. The bitumen has a low aromaticity and a composition comparable to gilsonite. The bitumen contains abundant steranes and terpanes, and β-carotane, although most n- and i- alkanes have been removed, which is characteristic of the local crude oil. The sterane and triterpane maturity parameters show that the bitumen, local crude oil, and source rocks are all mature. Bitumen–wallrock relationships suggest that the host sandstone was not completely consolidated at the time of emplacement of the bitumen veins, although bitumen emplacement was a relatively late diagenetic event. The burial history for the northwest Junggar Basin shows that hydrocarbon generation from the assumed upper Permian source rocks commenced in late Triassic/early Jurassic times and suggests that rapid hydrocarbon generation may have resulted in overpressure contributing to the bitumen emplacement.


AAPG Bulletin ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 789-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nansheng Qiu ◽  
Jian Chang ◽  
Yinhui Zuo ◽  
Jiyang Wang ◽  
Huili Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document