Oral Aloe Vera-Induced Hepatitis

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1740-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M Bottenberg ◽  
Geoffrey C Wall ◽  
Roger L Harvey ◽  
Shahid Habib

Objective: To report a case of possible oral aloe vera-induced hepatitis. Case Summary: A 73-year-old female was admitted to the hospital for acute hepatitis. Extensive laboratory testing did not reveal the cause of the patient's disease. She was asked multiple times whether she was taking any home medications, which she initially denied. It was only after an extensive medication history done by a clinical pharmacist that the patient admitted to using oral aloe vera capsules for constipation. Upon discontinuation of the oral aloe vera, liver markers of hepatotoxicity returned to normal levels. Discussion: Herbal medications pose an increasing problem in patient safety, as the different types of these products and the number of patients who use them continue to grow. In the US, these products are not subject to the same regulatory scrutiny as prescription medications; thus, safety information can be difficult to obtain. In particular, hepatic toxicity due to herbal agents is poorly described in the medical literature. Aloe vera, often used topically for minor burns, can also be used orally as a laxative or an “anti-aging” agent. According to the Naranjo probability scale, the hepatotoxicity in this case was possibly related to ingestion of oral aloe vera. Additionally, using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for determining drug hepatotoxicity, the patient's symptoms were scored as probably caused by oral aloe vera. The more conservative designation was used in our report. Conclusions: With the widespread use of oral aloe vera and other herbal products, clinicians faced with a case of acute hepatitis that is not readily diagnosed should question patients about herbal use.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Andrzej Sieśkiewicz ◽  
Tomasz Łysoń ◽  
Marek Rogowski ◽  
Marek Bielecki ◽  
Ewa Gindzienska-Sieskiewicz ◽  
...  

Purpose: The risk of epiphora after medial maxillectomy with lacrimal duct transection is difficult to assess. The data available in the literature are inconclusive due to various operating techniques used by the authors of medical publications, different additional procedures aimed at improving tear drainage after maxillectomy, and a variety of lacrimal duct patency assessment techniques. The aim of our work was to assess the anatomical and functional patency of lacrimal ducts after medial maxillectomy without performing additional procedures to improve tear drainage as well as comparison of the results obtained with different assessment tests. Materials and methods: 21 patients who underwent medial maxillectomy in the years 2016–2019 were assessed for discomfort and epiphora based on patients’ own reports and basic clinical examination, lacrimal duct rinse test, the Munk score, and a modified endoscopic Jones I test. Results: Gradually increasing the sensitivity of the assessment method resulted in an increase in the number of patients with potential tear drainage disorders, starting from 0% in the rinsing test, 4.8% self-reported tearing complaints, 14.3% Munk score, and 19% modified endoscopic Jones I test. Conclusions: The study results revealed that a small fraction of patients tend to report epiphora as a consequence of medial maxillectomy themselves. Subtle functional disorders, which are not particularly bothersome to patients, are more common. More sensitive lacrimal duct patency tests reveal more cases of tear drainage disorders. The results of studies assessing the incidence of epiphora after medial maxillectomy appear to depend on the type of test used.


Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Jagat Chauhan ◽  
Mohan Kumar ◽  
Chetan Kumar Joshi ◽  
Sandeep Sharma ◽  
...  

Diabetes is a significant public health issue. The global diabetes epidemic has had a tremendous impact on India, and the disease burden has increased dramatically. Diabetes is quickly increasing in prevalence, especially in Indian cities, according to data. Therefore, an ideal drug is sought that has better safety and tolerability and the most effective control of diabetes. Many effective medications come from plant sources. Natural products like onion and garlic can effectively control diabetes. In this review, we should pay attention to Aloe vera and its bioactive compounds, that with the development of traditional medicine, Aloe vera can be used to treat various diseases. Some reports have questioned the safety and efficacy of Aloe vera or its compounds, especially at different doses, and some studies have shown no side effects. In this review we also focus on benefits on human health so that Aloe vera is part of the daily diet in many countries and appears to be non-toxic, it is necessary to investigate whether aloe vera dietary supplement can be a beneficial preventive or nutritional mitigation strategy to reduce the effects of diabetes. This review focuses on Aloe vera and its biologically active compounds that play a role in the treatment or prevention of this morbid disease: diabetes, including its underlying mechanism of blood sugar lowering properties, and herbal products that have been marketed for the treatment of diabetes or the therapeutic effect of diabetes.


1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 214-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varro E Tyler

Objective: To provide an overview of basic information required by pharmacists to advise patients on the proper use of selected herbs and phytomedicines (“dietary supplements”) as therapeutic agents. Data Sources: The vast literature on this topic in the English, German, and French languages has been researched by the author over a period of many years. Databases that were used include NAPRALERT and MEDLINE. Study Selection: Articles and books dealing with the current popularity of botanical medicine and with laws and regulations covering so-called dietary supplements, as well as information on selected toxic herbs and a few of the most popular beneficial herbs used for treating common ailments and syndromes. Data Synthesis: Studies suggest that many herbal products currently available are both safe and effective drugs. A few products on the US market are definitely unsafe for human consumption and use. Conclusions: The increasing popularity of botanicals, coupled with regulations that prohibit definitive labeling, requires pharmacists to acquire accurate information based on scientifically and clinically acceptable data to advise patients on their use. Useful remedies for several common ailments and information concerning their safety and usefulness provide a starting point for an understanding of this complex field.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D Zuckerman ◽  
Kavita Babu

The term “drugs of abuse” lacks a formal medical definition. Historically, discussions of drugs of abuse focused on “street drugs”; however, the adverse effects of the nonmedical use of prescription medications, such as opiates, benzodiazepines, and therapeutic amphetamines, are increasingly seen. The purpose of this review is to aid the clinician in identifying and treating a broad representation of drugs of abuse, which may include those illicitly produced in laboratories (e.g., methamphetamine), diverted pharmaceuticals (oxycodone), and herbal products (marijuana). This review covers stimulants, hallucinogens, cannabinoids, and sedative-hypnotics. Figures show substances ranked according to weighted harm score on a normalized scale from 0 being no harm to 100 being extreme harm to self and others, a treatment algorithm for sympathomimetic toxicity, a treatment algorithm for sedative-hypnotic overdose, and a treatment algorithm for opioid overdose. Tables list commonly abused sympathomimetic agents, modern novel drugs of abuse, commonly abused sedative-hypnotic agents, commonly abused opiates, and pitfalls of the drug screen.   This review contains 4 highly rendered figures, 5 tables, and 89 references


2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 279-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan A. Liang

Americans rely extensively upon prescription medications to maintain health and quality of life. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, in 2002, at least 1.5 billion drugs were prescribed to patients in physician offices, 196 million in US emergency departments, and 140 million in outpatient settings. Almost two-thirds of visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient departments had at least one drug associated with the visit, and 7% of visits had five or more drugs. In 2004, US pharmacies dispensed over 3.5 billion prescriptions to patients. Estimates indicate that annual expenditures for prescription drugs in the US top $230 billion dollars each year—and there is every indication that these numbers will only increase.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 914-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Colleti Junior ◽  
Felipe Rezende Caino ◽  
Rafael Teixeira ◽  
Werther Brunow de Carvalho

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to investigate the epidemiology of Fulminant Acute Hepatitis in Latin America and the Caribbean and identify possible measures aimed at a better understanding and improvement of patient support. METHODS: We used 3 different researchers to investigate the topic of Fulminant Acute Hepatitis in pediatrics in papers published by Latin American and Caribbean authors in the PubMed and SciELO databases from 2000 to 2016. RESULTS: We found 2,879 articles in the databases searched. After selecting and excluding articles according to the study protocol, 68 remaining studies were obtained for analysis. A total of 1,265 cases of acute fulminant hepatitis were detected, with a predominance of females (42.9%), followed by males (39.4%), with no description of sex in 17.7% of the cases. The main cause was viral hepatitis, representing 45.1% of the cases. The hepatitis A virus was responsible for 34.7% of the total cases and 76.9% of the infectious causes. Of the total number of patients, 26.9% were described as idiopathic, and 11.5% had no cause. CONCLUSION: The preventable causes of Fulminant Acute Hepatitis include hepatitis viruses - primarily the hepatitis A virus - and poisoning. Active vaccination, basic sanitation, and public awareness can reduce the number of patients and, consequently, the costs of liver transplantation due to these causes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1215-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela B. Mariotto ◽  
K. Robin Yabroff ◽  
Eric J. Feuer ◽  
Roberta De Angelis ◽  
Martin Brown

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4253-4253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maneesha Mehra ◽  
Nicole Cossrow ◽  
Robert A Stellhorn ◽  
Jessica Vermeulen ◽  
Avinash Desai ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4253 Background: Castleman's Disease (CD), first described in 1956 by Benjamin Castleman and also known as angiofollicular or giant lymph node hyperplasia, is characterized by lymphadenopathy resulting from abnormal proliferation of B lymphocytes and plasma cells. The clinical manifestations of the disease range from asymptomatic discrete lymphadenopathy, Unicentric Castleman's Disease (UCD), to a more severe form with recurrent episodes of diffuse lymphadenopathy and multi-organ involvement, Multicentric Castleman's Disease (MCD). In a discrete subpopulation, MCD is associated with HIV and Human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) infection. Incidence and prevalence of this rare disease is generally unknown but the hypothesized prevalence of CD ranges between 30,000 and 100,000 in the US. There are no codes to accurately identify CD, UCD or MCD in national databases. Objective: The objective of this effort is to propose an algorithm identifying and characterizing potential CD patients to estimate related incidences based on available information and patient characteristics from a national claims database. Methods: The diagnostic and procedure codes that are used in diagnosing lymphadenopathy patients in a longitudinal commercial claims database were used to define and characterize a cohort of likely CD patients. Included patients were required to be continuously enrolled in the database for at least three years. Patients with a history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Lupus, Hodgkin's disease (HD), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or other malignancies were excluded. Patients must have a diagnosis code of ICD-9 = 785.6 indicating lymphadenopathy followed by a lymph node biopsy (procedure code = 38505) on or within two years after the initial ICD-9 diagnosis date. Patients who had a diagnosis, within 1 year after the initial ICD-9 diagnosis date, of RA, Lupus, HD, NHL or other malignancies were excluded. Once the pool of potential CD patients was identified, it was further characterized according to age, gender, prescription medication use and comorbidities, particularly the development of NHL. To estimate incidence of the disease in the US, the number of patients identified in the pool adjusted for the total patient-time in the database was applied to US census population. Results: In a claims database of nearly 27 million patients (N=26,982,399), 16,967 patients were identified with an ICD-9 diagnosis of 785.6 and a biopsy code of 38505. After the additional exclusion criteria based on a three year continuous enrollment and a biopsy code on of within two years after the index diagnosis date and excluding patients with prior RA, Lupus, HD, NHL or other malignancies, there were 2,094 patients. After further excluding patients who developed RA, Lupus, HD, NHL other malignancies or HIV within one year after the diagnosis date, 1,153 patients remained with potential diagnosis of CD. These patients were mostly female (64.4%, N=742) and the mean and median age of this cohort were 43 and 45 years, respectively. The most common comorbid conditions were swelling in head/neck, followed by malaise and fatigue and pain in limb. Among these patients, only a quarter were taking a steroid or chemotherapy. Steroid use (dexamethasone and prednisone) was the more common treatment; rituxan usage was documented for less than 1% of the cohort. Based on this sample the incidence rate of CD is 21 cases per million person-years. Applying this rate to the 25 years and older US population, assumed to be 207,301,600 in 2011, the incidence of CD in the US is 4,353 patients. Discussion: To date, a thorough investigation of the incidence of CD in the US has not been done. Within the limitations of this effort, a plausible strategy using a US claims database to identify and characterize patients with CD was developed and confirms the very low incidence of CD. Furthermore this effort characterizes potential CD patients as young adults, and only very few of them receive treatment with steroids or chemotherapy. The low chemotherapy usage may suggest that there are very few MCD patients in this cohort. The value of this effort is to demonstrate a relatively quick and cost-effective strategy to characterize the epidemiology and medical need for a rare disorder. Disclosures: Mehra: Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employment. Cossrow:Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employment. Stellhorn:Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employment. Vermeulen:Janssen Biologics Europe: Employment. Desai:Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employment. Munshi:Janssen Global Services, LLC: Consultancy.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13000-13000 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Ervin-Haynes ◽  
R. M. Schinagl ◽  
M. R. Dalesandro ◽  
J. Roecker ◽  
H. Youssoufian ◽  
...  

13000 Background: EGFR expression, as determined by IHC, is currently used to select patients for cetuximab therapy. Based on prior studies in colorectal cancer patients, approximately 60 to 75% of patients express EGFR. There is increasing evidence that EGFR expression is not predictive of response to cetuximab therapy, and does not properly select patients who might benefit from such therapy (Chung et al 2005, Saltz et al 2005, Scartozi et al 2004, NCCN 2005). Such selection limits access to a considerable number of patients who might otherwise benefit. Methods: A clinical trial of cetuximab (Erbitux®) monotherapy is being conducted in 60 EGFR-undetectable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at 14 sites in the US and Canada to explore the relationship between EGFR expression and cetuximab activity. Results: As of January 5, 2006, 112 patients have been screened. Of these patients, 33 (29%) were EGFR-undetectable and continued screening for study enrollment; 52 (46%) tested positive for EGFR expression; and 2 (2%) did not have enough tissue to evaluate EGFR status and were not enrolled onto the trial. The remaining 25 pts (22%), were initially found to be EGFR-undetectable by IHC testing at local labs, but were subsequently identified as EGFR-positive after reevaluation at a highly experienced, centralized laboratory. Conclusion: The majority of patients tested for EGFR expression are tested using the EGFR pharmDx™ IHC assay. Results of the IHC-based assay for EGFR expression are highly dependent upon sample preparation and the methods used in conducting the assay. Variability in methods among labs may result in poor identification of pts expressing EGFR. This finding, together with the growing evidence that EGFR expression is not predictive of response to cetuximab therapy, indicate that the current routine practice of tumor IHC EGFR testing for the purpose of selecting cetuximab therapy may be inappropriate and pts who could potentially benefit from cetuximab therapy are being excluded from a treatment option. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document