scholarly journals Escitalopram and Neuroendocrine Response in Healthy First-Degree Relatives to Depressed Patients – A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e21224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulla Knorr ◽  
Maj Vinberg ◽  
Allan Hansen ◽  
Marianne Klose ◽  
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0128095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Hartmann ◽  
Marieke Wichers ◽  
Claudia Menne-Lothmann ◽  
Ingrid Kramer ◽  
Wolfgang Viechtbauer ◽  
...  

10.19082/2849 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 2849-2854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Mohammadi ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Eghbali ◽  
Sedighah Soheilikhah ◽  
Saeedeh Jam Ashkezari ◽  
Maryam Salami ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
R V Magnus

Two double-blind four-way crossover studies are reported, comparing the antidepressant effect of 14-day courses of: viloxazine, viloxazine with a tranquillizer either perphenazine or diazepam or tranquillizer alone, against a placebo. In one study the antidepressant effect of viloxazine at a dose of 150 mg daily was statistically greater than that of placebo, whilst in the second study viloxazine was statistically superior to diazepam (15 mg daily). In depressed patients with a clear anxiety component, viloxazine alone seemed preferable to a combination with a tranquillizer as such a combination did not produce an enhanced clinical effect and the incidence of side-effects was possibly increased. Viloxazine was generally well tolerated and side-effects, when they occurred, were generally a mild upper gastro-intestinal disturbance.


2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002118
Author(s):  
Roni Nitecki ◽  
Haley A Moss ◽  
Catherine H Watson ◽  
Diana L Urbauer ◽  
Alexander Melamed ◽  
...  

BackgroundIdentifying mutation-carrying relatives of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes via cascade testing is an underused first step in primary cancer prevention. A feasibility study of facilitated genetic testing of at-risk relatives of patients with a known pathogenic mutation demonstrated encouraging uptake of cascade testing.Primary objectiveOur primary objective is to compare the proportion of genetic testing of identified first-degree relatives of probands with a confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation randomized to a facilitated cascade testing strategy versus standard of care, proband-mediated, information sharing.Study hypothesisWe hypothesize that facilitated cascade testing will drive significantly higher uptake of genetic testing than the standard of care.Trial designThe FaCT (Facilitated Cascade Testing) trial is a prospective multi-institutional randomized study comparing the efficacy of a multicomponent facilitated cascade testing intervention with the standard of care. Patients with a known BRCA1/2 mutation (probands) cared for at participating sites will be randomized. Probands randomized to the standard of care group will be instructed to share a family letter with their first-degree relatives and encourage them to complete genetic testing. First-degree relatives of probands randomized to the intervention arm will receive engagement strategies with a patient navigator, an educational video, and accessible genetic testing services.Major inclusion/exclusion criteriaAdult participants who are first-degree relatives of a patient with a BRCA1/2 mutation and have not had prior genetic testing will be included.Primary endpointAnalyses will assess the proportion of first-degree relatives identified by the proband who complete genetic testing by 6 months in the intervention arm versus the control arm.Sample sizeOne hundred and fifty probands with a BRCA1/2 mutation will be randomized. Each proband is expected to provide an average of 3 relatives, for an expected 450 participants.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsJanuary 2024.Trial registrationNCT04613440


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber ◽  
Martin Hautzinger ◽  
Georg Fiedler ◽  
Wolfram Keller ◽  
Ulrich Bahrke ◽  
...  

Objective: For chronic depression, the effectiveness of brief psychotherapy has been limited. This study is the first comparing the effectiveness of long-term cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and long-term psychoanalytic therapy (PAT) of chronically depressed patients and the effects of preferential or randomized allocation. Methods: A total of 252 adults met the inclusion criteria (aged 21-60 years, major depression, dysthymia, double depression for at least 24 months, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms [QIDS] >9, Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI] >17, informed consent, not meeting exclusion criteria). Main outcome measures were depression self-rating (BDI) and rating (clinician-rated QIDS [QIDS-C]) by independent, treatment-blinded clinicians. Full remission rates (BDI ≤12, QIDS-C ≤5) were calculated. An independent center for data management and biostatistics analyzed the treatment effects and differences using linear mixed models (multilevel models and hierarchical models). Results: The average BDI declined from 32.1 points by 12.1 points over the first year and 17.2 points over 3 years. BDI overall mean effect sizes increased from d = 1.17 after 1 year to d = 1.83 after 3 years. BDI remission rates increased from 34% after 1 year to 45% after 3 years. QIDS-C overall effect sizes increased from d = 1.56 to d = 2.08, and remission rates rose from 39% after 1 year to 61% after 3 years. We found no significant differences between PAT and CBT or between preferential and randomized allocation. Conclusions: Psychoanalytic as well as cognitive-behavioural long-term treatments lead to significant and sustained improvements of depressive symptoms of chronically depressed patients exceeding effect sizes of other international outcome studies.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Ullah Syed ◽  
Mohammad Wasay ◽  
Safia Awan

Background/Objective: Recent literature has identified links between vitamin B12 deficiency and depression.We compared the clinical response of SSRI-monotherapy with that of B12-augmentation in a sample of depressed patients with low normal B12 levels who responded inadequately to the first trial with the SSRIs. Methods: Patients with depression and low normal B12 levels were randomized to a control arm (antidepressant only) or treatment arm (antidepressants and injectable vitamin B12 supplementation). Results: A total of 199 depressed patients were screened. Out of 73 patients with low normal B12 levels 34 (47%) were randomized to the treatment group while 39 (53%) were randomized to the control arm. At three months follow up 100% of the treatment group showed at least a 20% reduction in HAM-D score, while only 69% in the control arm showed at least a 20% reduction in HAM-D score (p<0.001). The findings remained significant after adjusting for baseline HAM-D score (p=0.001). Conclusion: Vitamin B12 supplementation with antidepressants significantly improved depressive symptoms in our cohort.


Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (13) ◽  
pp. 2272-2282
Author(s):  
Mary Jane Esplen ◽  
Sarah Harrington ◽  
Yvonne W. Leung ◽  
Melyssa Aronson ◽  
Heidi Rothenmund ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document