scholarly journals Video Surveillance Captures Student Hand Hygiene Behavior, Reactivity to Observation, and Peer Influence in Kenyan Primary Schools

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e92571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Pickering ◽  
Annalise G. Blum ◽  
Robert F. Breiman ◽  
Pavani K. Ram ◽  
Jennifer Davis
2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Pickering ◽  
Jennifer Davis ◽  
Jenna Scalmanini ◽  
George Okoth ◽  
Pavani K. Ram ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Joo Kim ◽  
Andrew J. Pai ◽  
Nam-E Kang ◽  
Woo Kyoung Kim ◽  
Young Soon Kim ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A14.1-A14 ◽  
Author(s):  
AL Nicholson ◽  
RM Campbell ◽  
ST Brookes ◽  
CE Costelloe ◽  
CR Chittleborough ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Pittet

Hand hygiene prevents cross-infection in hospitals, but compliance with recommended instructions often is poor among healthcare workers. Although some previous interventions to improve compliance have been successful, none has achieved lasting improvement. This article reviews reported barriers to appropriate hand hygiene and factors associated with poor compliance.Easy access to hand hygiene in a timely fashion and the availability of skin-care lotion both appear to be necessary pre-requisites for appropriate hand-hygiene behavior. In particular, in high-demand situations, hand rub with an alcohol-based solution appears to be the only alternative that allows a decent compliance. The hand-hygiene compliance level does not rely on individual factors alone, and the same can be said for its promotion. Because of the complexity of the process of change, it is not surprising that solo interventions often fail, and multimodal, multidisciplinary strategies are necessary. A framework that includes parameters to be considered for hand-hygiene promotion is proposed, based on epidemiologically driven evidence and review of the current knowledge. Strategies for promotion in hospitals should include reasons for noncompliance with recommendations at individual, group, and institutional levels. Potential tools for change should address each of these elements and consider their interactivity.


2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constanze Wendt ◽  
Donald Knautz ◽  
Heike von Baum

AbstractBackground:The Fulkerson scale lists 15 typical clinical activities ranked according to their risk of hand contamination.Objective:To investigate how often healthcare workers (HCWs) apply antiseptic handrubs after each of the specified activities ranked in the Fulkerson scale.Design:Observational study.Setting:University Hospital of Heidelberg, a 1,600-bed teaching hospital.Methods:Using a structured protocol, 41 observers recorded whether HCWs rubbed their hands in 1 of 15 given situations.Results:Handrubs were used in 1,115 (52.2%) of 2,138 observations. Comparatively high rates of handrub use were observed after contact with sterile materials (39.6%) and after contact with excretions (90% to 97%). Nurses used handrubs significantly more frequently than did physicians after contact with the inanimate environment, but physicians applied handrubs significantly more frequently after contact with body secretions.Conclusions:This study showed better compliance with hand hygiene than that reported by many previous studies, but compliance was still inadequate and varied significantly by type of HCW, type of activity, and location in the hospital.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 860-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen ◽  
Esther van Buren-Jansen ◽  
Sabine van 't Schip ◽  
Johan J.M. Pel ◽  
Anna P. Nieboer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document