Differences in Hand Hygiene Behavior Related to the Contamination Risk of Healthcare Activities in Different Groups of Healthcare Workers

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constanze Wendt ◽  
Donald Knautz ◽  
Heike von Baum

AbstractBackground:The Fulkerson scale lists 15 typical clinical activities ranked according to their risk of hand contamination.Objective:To investigate how often healthcare workers (HCWs) apply antiseptic handrubs after each of the specified activities ranked in the Fulkerson scale.Design:Observational study.Setting:University Hospital of Heidelberg, a 1,600-bed teaching hospital.Methods:Using a structured protocol, 41 observers recorded whether HCWs rubbed their hands in 1 of 15 given situations.Results:Handrubs were used in 1,115 (52.2%) of 2,138 observations. Comparatively high rates of handrub use were observed after contact with sterile materials (39.6%) and after contact with excretions (90% to 97%). Nurses used handrubs significantly more frequently than did physicians after contact with the inanimate environment, but physicians applied handrubs significantly more frequently after contact with body secretions.Conclusions:This study showed better compliance with hand hygiene than that reported by many previous studies, but compliance was still inadequate and varied significantly by type of HCW, type of activity, and location in the hospital.

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-186
Author(s):  
Aaron Asibi Abuosi ◽  
Samuel Kaba Akoriyea ◽  
Gloria Ntow-Kummi ◽  
Joseph Akanuwe ◽  
Patience Aseweh Abor ◽  
...  

Objective To assess hand hygiene compliance in selected primary hospitals in Ghana. Design A cross-sectional health facility-based observational study was conducted in primary health care facilities in five regions in Ghana. A total of 546 healthcare workers including doctors, nurses, midwives and laboratory personnel from 106 health facilities participated in the study. Main outcome measures The main outcome measures included availability of hand hygiene materials and alcohol job aids; compliance with moments of hand hygiene; and compliance with steps in hygienic hand washing. These were assessed using descriptive statistics. Results The mean availability of hand hygiene material and alcohol job aids was 75% and 71% respectively. This was described as moderately high, but less desirable. The mean hand hygiene compliance with moments of hand hygiene was 51%, which was also described asmoderately high, but less desirable. It was observed that, generally, hand hygiene was performed after procedures than before. However, the mean compliance with steps in hygienic hand washing was 86%, which was described as high and desirable. Conclusion Healthcare workers are generally competent in performance of hygienic hand washing. However, this does not seem to influence compliance with moments of hand hygiene. Efforts must therefore be made to translate the competence of healthcare workers in hygienic hand washing into willingness to comply with moments of hand hygiene, especially contact with patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Pittet

Hand hygiene prevents cross-infection in hospitals, but compliance with recommended instructions often is poor among healthcare workers. Although some previous interventions to improve compliance have been successful, none has achieved lasting improvement. This article reviews reported barriers to appropriate hand hygiene and factors associated with poor compliance.Easy access to hand hygiene in a timely fashion and the availability of skin-care lotion both appear to be necessary pre-requisites for appropriate hand-hygiene behavior. In particular, in high-demand situations, hand rub with an alcohol-based solution appears to be the only alternative that allows a decent compliance. The hand-hygiene compliance level does not rely on individual factors alone, and the same can be said for its promotion. Because of the complexity of the process of change, it is not surprising that solo interventions often fail, and multimodal, multidisciplinary strategies are necessary. A framework that includes parameters to be considered for hand-hygiene promotion is proposed, based on epidemiologically driven evidence and review of the current knowledge. Strategies for promotion in hospitals should include reasons for noncompliance with recommendations at individual, group, and institutional levels. Potential tools for change should address each of these elements and consider their interactivity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (08) ◽  
pp. 744-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uluhan Sili ◽  
Pinar Ay ◽  
Huseyin Bilgin ◽  
Seyhan Hidiroglu ◽  
Volkan Korten

Introduction: While improvement of hand hygiene (HH) compliance is considered as the best approach to reduce healthcare-associated infections, the instructional interventions in HH among healthcare workers of intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital was not successful enough. The following study was conducted to evaluate HH knowledge, perception, practice and effectiveness of the trainings among healthcare workers of ICU in our hospital. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU containing 8 medical and 16 surgical beds with 284 filled questionnaires about HH knowledge and 1187 observed opportunities for HH compliance. Results: Overall observed HH compliance rate was 40.6%; lowest compliance was 21.7% for “before clean/aseptic procedure” indication and highest compliance was 68.6% for “after touching a patient” indication. Although > 90% healthcare workers correctly identified the World Health Organization’s five indications for HH, 82 – 85% failed to recognize non-indications, i.e. when it was not necessary to perform HH. Our study showed that 15.1% of healthcare workers neither received nor felt the need for HH training. Conclusions: Despite regular HH trainings, healthcare workers could not differentiate when HH was not required which suggested failure to understand HH rationale. This may explain poor HH compliance rates. A systematic study is needed in order to find out the reasons behind of this noncompliance and improve HH training methods for educating healthcare workers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M Nicholson ◽  
Ingrid A Tennant ◽  
Allie C Martin ◽  
Kelvin Ehikhametalor ◽  
Glendee Reynolds ◽  
...  

Introduction: Consistent practice of hand hygiene (HH) has been shown to reduce the incidence and spread of hospital acquired infections. The objectives of this study were to determine the level of compliance and possible factors affecting compliance with HH practices among HCWs at a teaching hospital in Kingston, Jamaica. Methodology: A prospective observational study was undertaken at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) over a two weeks period. Trained, validated observers identified opportunities for hand hygiene as defined by the WHO “Five Hand Hygiene Moments” and recorded whether appropriate hand hygiene actions were taken or missed. Observations were covert to prevent the observer’s presence influencing the behaviour of the healthcare workers (HCWs) and targeted areas included the intensive care units (ICUs), surgical wards and surgical outpatient departments. A ward infrastructure survey was also done. Data were entered and analysed using SPSS version 16 for Windows. Chi-square analysis using Pearson’s formula was used to test associations between ‘exposure’ factors and the outcome ‘compliance’. Results: A total of 270 hand hygiene opportunities were observed and the overall compliance rate was 38.9%. No differences were observed between the various types of HCWs or seniority. HCWs were more likely to perform hand hygiene if the indication was ‘after’ rather than ‘before’ patient contact (p = 0.001). Conclusion: This study underscores the need for improvement in HH practices among HCWs in a teaching hospital. Health education with particular attention to the need for HH prior to physical contact with patients is indicated.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Zhou ◽  
Xinping Zhang

Abstract BackgroundAppropriate hand hygiene behavior is much crucial during COVID-19 pandemic, which is influenced by workload, mental health and professional quality of life. The increasing workload, worse mental health and negative professional quality of life are severe challenges for healthcare workers, whereas the evidence of mechanism between them and hand hygiene behavior are limited. This study aimed to understand and model how HCWs’ hand hygiene behaviors were influenced by workload, mental health and professional quality of life.MethodsA total of 1,734 healthcare workers were investigated, covering self-reported hand hygiene behavior, mental health, workload, professional quality of life and socio-demographic characteristics. Structural equation modelling was conducted to confirm interrelationships and parameters among the variables.Findings The final model had a good fit (CFI=0.980; TLI=0.941; RMSEA=0.055). Higher workload was linked to worse mental health (β = 0.165, p < 0.001) and higher burnout (β = 0.183, p < 0.001). Worse mental health was linked to higher burnout (β = 0.339, p < 0.001). The higher burnout was associated with worse self-reported hand hygiene behavior (β = -0.302, p < 0.001).ConclusionWorkload is positively associated with mental health and burnout; mental health is positively related to burnout; burnout is negatively associated with hand hygiene behavior. Thus, hand hygiene behavior can be promoted by the strategy to decrease the workload, burnout and enhance mental health.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayşe Karaaslan ◽  
Eda Kepenekli Kadayifci ◽  
Serkan Atıcı ◽  
Uluhan Sili ◽  
Ahmet Soysal ◽  
...  

Background.The objective of this study was to assess the compliance of hand hygiene (HH) of healthcare workers (HCWs) in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary university hospital in Istanbul.Methods.An observational study was conducted on the compliance of HH for the five World Health Organization (WHO) indications. HCWs were observed during routine patient care in day shift. The authors also measured the technique of HH through hand washing or hand hygiene with alcohol-based disinfectant.Results.A total of 704 HH opportunities were identified during the observation period. Overall compliance was 37.0% (261/704). Compliance differed by role: nurses (41.4%) and doctors (31.9%) [P=0.02, OR: 1.504, CI 95%: 1.058–2.137]. HCWs were more likely to use soap and water (63.6%) compared to waterless-alcohol-based hand hygiene (36.3%) [P<0.05].Conclusion.Adherence to hand hygiene practice and use of alcohol-based disinfectant was found to be very low. Effective education programs that improve adherence to hand hygiene and use of disinfectants may be helpful to increase compliance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108
Author(s):  
O.T. Ige ◽  
O. Jimoh ◽  
S.O. Ige ◽  
I.P. Ijei ◽  
H. Zubairu ◽  
...  

Background: Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) have been recognized as a critical challenge affecting the quality of healthcare services provided. A significant proportion of these infections result from cross-contamination of microorganisms which are often acquired and spread by direct contact with patients or contaminated adjacent environmental surfaces through the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs). The objectives of this study are to profile bacterial pathogens commonly found on the hands of health care workers while routinely attending to patients in thehealthcare facility and to determine their antibiotic susceptibility pattern.Methodology: The fingers of the dominant hand of 300 HCWs at the Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital (BDTH), Kaduna, Nigeria, were imprinted on 5% Sheep blood, MacConkey, and Mannitol salt agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Bacteria isolates were identified by Gram staining and conventional biochemical tests. The susceptibility of isolated bacteria to selected antibiotics was determined by the modified Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method and interpreted using the 2012 guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Results: Bacteria were isolated from the hands of all 300 HCWs, with coagulase negative staphylococci (CONS) being the most frequent (67.0%, 201/300). Other bacteria identified were Staphylococcus aureus (23.7%, MRSA of 3%), Streptococcus pyogenes (2.7%), and Enterobacteriaceae (6%). The isolates were highly sensitive to ofloxacin 96.7% (290/300), augmentin 87.7% (263/300) and ceftriaxone 87.3% (262/300).Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high rate of contamination of hands of HCWs with potentially pathogenic bacteria, some of which were multidrug resistant. Concerted efforts should be made to implement programs dedicated to improve hand hygiene practices in the tertiary health care facility. Keywords: Hand hygiene, bacterial, pathogen, healthcare workers, healthcare associated infection   French title: Profil d'agents pathogènes bactériens contaminant les mains des travailleurs de la santé lors des soins quotidiens de routine auxpatients d'un hôpital tertiaire dans le nord du Nigéria   Contexte: Les infections associées aux soins de santé (IHA) ont été reconnues comme un défi critique affectant la qualité des services de santé fournis. Une proportion importante de ces infections résulte de la contamination croisée de micro-organismes qui sont souvent acquis et propagés par contact direct avec des patients ou des surfaces environnementales adjacentes contaminées par les mains des travailleurs de la santé (TS). Les objectifs de cette étude sont de dresser le profil des agents pathogènes bactériens que l'on trouve couramment dans les mains des travailleurs de la santé tout en s'occupant régulièrement des patients dans l'établissement de santé et de déterminer leur profil de sensibilité aux antibiotiques.Méthodologie: Les doigts de la main dominante de 300 travailleurs de la santé au Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital (BDTH), Kaduna, Nigéria, ont été imprimés sur des plaques de gélose au sang de mouton à 5%, MacConkey et Mannitol et incubés à 37°C pendant 24 heures. Les isolats de bactéries ont été identifiés par coloration de Gram et tests biochimiques conventionnels. La sensibilité des bactéries isolées aux antibiotiques sélectionnés a  été déterminée par la méthode de diffusion sur disque modifiée de Kirby-Bauer et interprétée en utilisant les lignes directrices de 2012 du Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Résultats: les bactéries ont été isolées des mains des 300 TS, les staphylocoques à coagulase négative (CONS) étant les plus fréquents (67,0%, 201/300). Les autres bactéries identifiées étaient Staphylococcus aureus (23,7%, SARM de 3%), Streptococcus pyogenes (2,7%) et Enterobacteriaceae (6%). Les isolats étaient très sensibles à l'ofloxacine 96,7% (290/300), à l'augmentationin 87,7% (263/300) et à la ceftriaxone 87,3% (262/300).Conclusion: Cette étude démontre un taux élevé de contamination des mains des travailleurs de la santé par des bactéries potentiellement pathogènes, dont certaines étaient multirésistantes. Des efforts concertés devraient être faits pour mettre en œuvre des programmes visant à améliorer les pratiques d'hygiène des mains dans les établissements de soins de santé tertiaires. Mots-clés: hygiène des mains, bactérienne, pathogène, personnel de santé, infection associée aux soins de santé        


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie Kit Ling Au ◽  
Lorna Kwai Ping Suen ◽  
Simon Ching Lam

Abstract Background: The elderly population in Hong Kong is rapidly growing, and the need for residential care homes (RCHs) is increasing. The risk of being infected with micro-organisms increases among the frail and the vulnerable elderly population as their immunity system begins to deteriorate. Furthermore, the residents in RCHs are at high risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) due to the confined living environments and individual co-morbidities. In relation to this, infection control practice (ICP) is considered a crucial and effective approach in preventing HAIs. This study aimed to observe the daily ICP of healthcare workers in RCH settings.Methods: An observational study was conducted to observe daily ICP among healthcare workers in private and subsidized RCHs. Each RCH was separated into different units based on the location (common area and bedroom area) and nature of residents for successive days. The ICP episodes were observed until 200 opportunities in each unit. The ICP episodes were recorded by an electronic tool called “eRub,” which is an ICP checklist based on international guidelines.Results: The most frequent observed ICP episodes were hand hygiene (n=1053), the use of gloves (n=1053) and respiratory protection (n=1053). The overall compliance of hand hygiene was poor, with only 15% of participants performing this during the “five moments for hand hygiene.” Furthermore, the observations showed that 77.9% improperly performed the use of gloves, and 31.8% failed to wear a mask during the care provision for the elderly. However, the results showed that most healthcare workers can wear the mask in a proper way when they should. Generally, the personal care workers were the worst in terms of hand hygiene and use of gloves compared with the other types of healthcare workers. Conclusions: Despite the fact that the practice of hand hygiene, the use of gloves, and respiratory protection were the important elements of ICP, overall compliance to these elements was still poor. Personal care workers had the most frequent contact with the residents, but they had the worst compliance rate. Hence, continued monitoring and training among healthcare workers is needed, particularly personal care workers, in this healthcare service setting.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 957-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Hagel ◽  
Jana Reischke ◽  
Miriam Kesselmeier ◽  
Johannes Winning ◽  
Petra Gastmeier ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETo quantify the Hawthorne effect of hand hygiene performance among healthcare workers using direct observation.DESIGNProspective observational study.SETTINGIntensive care unit, university hospital.METHODSDirect observation of hand hygiene compliance over 48 audits of 2 hours each. Simultaneously, hand hygiene events (HHEs) were recorded using electronic alcohol-based handrub dispensers. Directly observed and electronically recorded HHEs during the 2 hours of direct observation were compared using Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman plots. To quantify the Hawthorne effect, we compared the number of electronically recorded HHEs during the direct observation periods with the re-scaled electronically recorded HHEs in the 6 remaining hours of the 8-hour working shift.RESULTSA total of 3,978 opportunities for hand hygiene were observed during the 96 hours of direct observation. Hand hygiene compliance was 51% (95% CI, 49%–53%). There was a strong positive correlation between directly observed compliance and electronically recorded HHEs (ρ=0.68 [95% CI, 0.49–0.81], P<.0001). In the 384 hours under surveillance, 4,180 HHEs were recorded by the electronic dispensers. Of those, 2,029 HHEs were recorded during the 96 hours in which direct observation was also performed, and 2,151 HHEs were performed in the remaining 288 hours of the same working shift that were not under direct observation. Healthcare workers performed 8 HHEs per hour when not under observation compared with 21 HHEs per hour during observation.CONCLUSIONSDirectly and electronically observed HHEs were in agreement. We observed a marked influence of the Hawthorne effect on hand hygiene performance.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(8):957–962


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document