scholarly journals Head Injury as a Risk Factor for Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 32 Observational Studies

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0169650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjun Li ◽  
Yongming Li ◽  
Xiaotao Li ◽  
Shuang Zhang ◽  
Jincheng Zhao ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yago Leira ◽  
Clara Domínguez ◽  
Juan Seoane ◽  
Juan Seoane-Romero ◽  
Juan Manuel Pías-Peleteiro ◽  
...  

Background: In the last decade, several observational studies have suggested that there exists an association between periodontal disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether or not this link exists. Summary: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline for systematic review was used and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016035377). The search strategy included using electronic databases and by hand searching articles published up to January 2016. MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Observational studies including patients meeting criteria for both AD and PD were eligible to be included in the analysis. Quality assessment of selected studies was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. From a total of 550 titles and abstracts, 5 studies were included (2 cross-sectional, 2 case-control and one cohort study) in the review. A fixed effects meta-analysis showed that the presence of PD is associated with the presence of AD (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.21-2.35). When only severe forms of PD were evaluated, a significant association was also observed (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.58-5.62). Key Messages: In the present review, a significant association was observed between PD and AD. Further studies should be carried out in order to investigate the direction of the association and factors that may confound it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 103751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tooran Nayeri Chegeni ◽  
Shahabeddin Sarvi ◽  
Mahmood Moosazadeh ◽  
Mehdi Sharif ◽  
Sargis A. Aghayan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A Underwood ◽  
Heather P Davidson ◽  
Amber B Azam ◽  
Mary C Tierney

Abstract Background and Objectives Depression is an important risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but little is known about the mechanisms of this association. Given sex differences in both AD and depression, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there are sex differences in their association, as this may improve understanding of underlying mechanisms. Research Design and Methods MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for observational studies including both sexes and examining the association between history of depression and AD. Results Forty studies, including 62,729 women and 47,342 men, were identified. Meta-analysis was not possible because only 3 studies provided sufficient data. Seven studies provided information about the influence of sex for a qualitative synthesis. Two found an association in men only, 2 in women only, and 3 reported no sex differences. The 2 studies finding an association in women only were unique in that they had the shortest follow-up periods, and were the only clinic-based studies. Discussion and Implications The findings of our systematic review show that there are important methodological differences among the few studies providing data on the influence of sex on depression as a risk factor for AD. Had all 40 studies provided sex-segregated data, these methodological differences and their impact on sex effects could have been examined quantitatively. We encourage researchers to report these data, as well as potential moderating factors, so that the role of sex differences can be better understood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document