scholarly journals DISKURSUS FEMINISME DALAM HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM PADA SITUSWEB ISLAM INDONESIA: RESPONS KELOMPOK ISLAM KONSERVATIF DAN ISLAM MODERAT

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Ihab Habudin

This article discusses intensively the discourse between those who support and against feminism within Indonesian Muslims. The two groups are represented by almanhaj.or.id and islami.co. The author compares three fundamental aspect of feminis legal theory: the position of men and women in Islamic family law; assumptions and relationship towards men and women; and accommodation of womaen’s experiences in law. From the three fundamental aspects, the author conclude that almanhaj.or.id is a Muslims’ website which understand women as object of law which are different with men and promote conservatism and anti-feminism, while islami.co represents Muslims’ website which understand women as subject of law which are equal with men and promote moderatism and feminism in understanding of Islamic Family Law. Artikel ini mendiskusikan secara intensif diskursus antara kelompok yang mendukung dan menetang feminisme di kalangan Muslim Indonesia. Dua kelompok tersebut direpresentasikan melalui situs almanhaj.or.id dan islami.co. Penulis membandingkan tiga aspek fundamental dalam Teori Hukum Feminis, yaitu: kedudukan laki-laki dan perempuan dalam hukum keluarga Islam; asumsi dan relasi antara laki-laki dan perempuan; dan akomodasi hukum terhadap pengalaman permpuan. Dari ketiga aspek itu, penulis menyimpulkan bahwa almanhaj.or.id merupakan sebuah website Muslim yang memahami perempuan sebagai objek hukum yang berbeda dengan laki-laki dan mempromosikan konservativisme dan anti-feminisme, sementara itu islami.co merepresentasikan website Muslim yang memahami perempuan sebagai subjek hukum yang setara dengan laki-laki dan mempromosikan moderatisme dan feminisme dalam memahami hukum keluarga Islam.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Faisal Aulia ◽  
Nur Afifah ◽  
Gilang Rizki Aji Putra

One of the crucial issues in family law in Indonesia that needs attention today is the issue of gender justice in family law, including post-divorce custody of children. This is due to the historical-empirical reality of family law that still places unequal status and roles between men and women. This article discusses how the provisions of child custody disputes in Islamic family law and how the legal provisions for post-divorce child custody have a gender perspective. Based on the above study it can be concluded; First, the legal provisions regarding child custody regulated in articles 105 and 156 are not gender responsive, this is because in determining that a person is given custody based on sex, not based on the aspects of morality, health, educating and caring for children, which in the end is for the realization of interests. the best boy. Second, aspects of morality, health, the ability to educate and care for children cannot be mastered and only owned by a certain gender, but all aspects can be owned by both men (fathers) and women (mothers).Kata Kunci: Hak Asuh Anak, Hukum Keluarga, Keadilan Gender


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zaenal Fanani

Abstract: The one of the crucial issues in the Islamic family law in Indonesia is the issue of gender equity including tug of love. It is caused by historical and empirical of Islamic family law which still put unequal status and unequal roles between men and women. That Islamic family law is law that has become the positive law or has become law and regulation in Indonesia. This article will discuss about the provision of tug of love dispute in Islamic family law in Indonesia, and the renewal of provision of tug of love dispute from a gender justice perspective. Based on the review and analysis can be concluded that the provision of tug of love dispute in Islamic family law in Indonesia (particularly Article 105 and 156 KHI) is not gender equitable and should be revised by adding the aspect of morality, aspect of health, the ability to educate and the ability to take care of children as the main parameter in determining the right parent who will possess the custody of the children.Abstrak: Salah satu persoalan krusial dalam hukum keluarga di Indonesia yang perlu mendapat pembaharuan dewasa ini adalah persoalan keadilan jender dalam hukum keluarga, termasuk hak asuh anak. Hal ini dikarenakan kenyataan historis-empiris hukum keluarga masih menempatkan status dan peran yang tidak setara antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Hukum keluarga yang dimaksud adalah hukum keluarga yang sudah menjadi hukum positif atau menjadi peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Artikel ini akan membahas tentang bagaimana ketentuan sengketa hak asuh anak dalam hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia, serta bagaimana pembaruan ketentuan sengketa hak asuh anak dalam perspektif keadilan jender. Berdasarkan kajian artikel ini, dapat disimpulkan; Pertama, ketentuan hukum tentang sengketa hak asuh anak yang diatur dalam pasal 105 dan 156 KHI tidak responsif jender. Kedua, aspek moralitas, kesehatan dan kemampuan mendidik dan memelihara anak tidak bisa dimonopoli oleh jenis kelamin tertentu akan tetapi semua aspek tersebut sama-sama bisa dimiliki baik oleh kaum perempuan (ibu) maupun oleh kaum laki-laki (bapak).


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-111
Author(s):  
Thiyas Tono Taufiq ◽  
Qotrunnada Zulfa Hafsari

This research focuses on discussing changes in the minimum age for marriage as stipulated in Law Number 16 of 2019 as an amendment to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage. The new Marriage Law changes the minimum marriage limit for men and women who will marry at least 19 years of age, previously the marriage limit for men is 19 years old and for women is 16 years old. This research seeks to find the pros and cons of legalizing the minimum age limit for marriage according to the views of the staff of the marriage register at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) in Yogyakarta who were non-randomly selected. The results of this research indicate that the process of changing the age limit of marriage does not see the pros and cons in society. Most importantly, the enactment of this law can hurt women, so that the purpose of reforming Islamic family law can realize legal unification by the times.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-87
Author(s):  
Arif Sugitanata ◽  
Suud Sarim Karimullah ◽  
Mohamad Sobrun Jamil

This article discusses the products of Islamic family law in Turkey with the main focus of this article review is how the history and development of family law in Turkey and what are the products of family law reform in Turkey using literature studies. This paper finds that the development of family law reform in Turkey starting from al-Majallâh (1876), The Ottoman Law of Family Right (1917), Turkish Civil Code (The Turkish Civil Code of 1926) is a response to the influence and changes in social conditions. , politics, and an unstable economy, especially at that time the Turkish people were still experiencing an identity crisis. Then the product of family law reform in Turkey is divided into two scopes, namely munakahat and Mawaris, where part of the munakahat itself includes, khitbah, minimum age limit for marriage, prohibitions in marriage, polygamy, walimah, marriage annulment, marriage that is not legalized, divorce. , compensation in divorce, while in Mawaris includes, wills and the amount of distribution between men and women are equal. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas tentang produk-produk hukum keluarga Islam di Turki dengan fokus utama kajian artikel ini adalah bagaimana sejarah dan perkembangan hukum keluarga di Turki dan apa saja produk dari pembaharuan hukum keluarga di Turki menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa perkembangan pembaharuan hukum keluarga di Turki yang dimulai dari al-Majallâh (1876), The Ottoman Law of Family Right (1917), Peraturan Sipil Turki (The Turkish Civil Code of 1926) merupakan sebuah respon atas pengaruh dan perubahan kondisi sosial, politik, dan ekonomi yang tidak stabil apalagi pada masa tersebut masyarakat Turki masih mengalami kondisi krisis identitas. Kemudian produk dari pembaharuan hukum keluarga di Turki dibagi kedalam dua cakupan yakni munakahat dan mawaris, di mana bagian dari munakahat itu sendiri meliputi, khitbah, batas usia minimal menikah, larangan dalam perkawinan, poligami, walimah, pembatalan perkawinan, perkawinan yang tidak disahkan, perceraian, kompensasi dalam perceraian, Sedangkan dalam mawaris meliputi, wasiat dan jumlah pembagian antara laki-laki dan perempuan yang setara.


EGALITA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moh. Ulumuddin

<p>A discussion of the relationship betwen men and women which is not only discuss biological differences, but also their social role differences. So, in the Islamic Law about the value of women testimony than men is the main differences in muamalah case and islamic family law case.<em></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><em>Suatu diskusi hubungan antara para laki-laki dan perempuan yangtidak hanya mendiskusikan perbedaan segi biologi, tetapi juga melibatkan perbedaan peranan sosial mereka. Maka</em><em>,</em><em> di dalam Hukum Islam tentang nilai kesaksian wanita-wanita dibanding orang</em><em> laki-laki merupakan </em><em>pokok-pokok penting perbedaan di dalam kasus muamalah hukum dan </em><em>hukum perkawinan Islam</em></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-65
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Nössing

AbstractThis article discusses the new divorce on grounds of discord procedure (taṭlīq li-š-šiqāq) within the context of the Moroccan family law reform of 2004. Literature available in English and French has, so far, focused primarily on the improvements the Moroccan family law reform has brought in regard to women’s rights. The reform is considered one of the most progressive legislative projects in the MENA region and a milestone for gender equality, notably the reform of divorce law. Divorce on grounds of discord was seen as the long-awaited divorce guarantee for women. However, legal scholars maintained that case law jeopardised the divorce guarantee. This legal-anthropological study is informed by fieldwork at the family court in Rabat, as well as official statistics, case law and the standard legal commentary. It aims to scrutinise how divorce on grounds of divorce is put into practice by the judiciary, how Moroccan men and women make use of it and how changes on a procedural and institutional level affect the implementation of the new divorce procedure. My empirical findings show that divorce on grounds of discord effectively guarantees Moroccan women’s right to divorce. Well beyond the discussion on women’s rights in divorce, I will demonstrate that, within a decade, divorce on grounds of discord developed into a standard divorce procedure for both men and women across socio-economical milieus and age groups.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 64-75
Author(s):  
Md. Zawawi Abu Bakar ◽  
Rajwani Md. Zain ◽  
Wan Ab Rahman Khudzri Wan Abdullah

This paper aims to explain the dilemma that occurs in marital relationships. The issue of performing the external or internal maintenance obligation on the husband who has HIV / AIDS causes the wife to suffer. Thus, a qualitative study has been done to identify the dilemma that occurs in the relationship between husband and wife. Archival research methods such as the provisions of Islamic Family Law (UUKI), fiqh munakahat and case studies have been used. Interview methods were also performed to answer the objectives of the study. A total of 8 respondents, namely the wives of AIDS sufferers, were interviewed to obtain study data and the data was finally analyzed manually (QDA). The results show that there is discrimination against people living with HIV / AIDS (OHDHA) (wife) in the form of external and internal maintenance (husband and wife relationship). Even sadder, all respondents have been infected with HIV / AIDS as a result of intimate relationships with their husbands. The study finally concludes that OHDHA (wife) needs guidance and understanding of how to deal with the dilemma of performing duties as a wife and avoiding darar treatment from her partner (husband). Keywords: UUKI, Obligation, Wife, nafkah, HIV/AIDS. Makalah ini bertujuan menjelaskan dilema yang berlaku dalam hubungan suami isteri. Isu berkenaan melaksanakan kewajipan nafkah zahir atau batin terhadap suami yang menghidap HIV/AIDS menyebabkan isteri menderita. Justeru, satu kajian kualitatif telah dilakukan untuk mengenal pasti dilemma tersebut yang berlaku dalam hubungan suami isteri. Kaedah kajian arkib seperti peruntukan Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (UUKI), fiqh munakahat dan kajian kes telah digunakan. Kaedah temubual juga telah dilakukan untuk menjawab objektif kajian. Responden seramai 8 orang iaitu isteri kepada penghidap AIDS telah ditemubual bagi mendapat data kajian dan data akhirnya dianalisis secara manual (QDA). Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa berlaku diskriminasi terhadap Orang Hidup Dengan HIV/AIDS (OHDHA) (isteri) iaitu dalam bentuk nafkah zahir dan batin (hubungan suami isteri). Lebih menyedihkan lagi semua responden telah dijangkiti HIV/AIDS hasil hubungan intim bersama suami. Kajian akhirnya menyimpulkan bahawa OHDHA (isteri) perlu kepada bimbingan dan pemahaman bagaimana menangani dilemma melaksanakan kewajipan sebagai isteri dan mengelakkan daripada perlakuan darar daripada pasangannya (suami).   Kata kunci: UUKI, kewajipan, isteri, nafkah, HIV/AIDS


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document