scholarly journals Analisis Daya Dukung Lahan Sebagai Pengembangan Fasilitas Perkotaan Kecamatan Mpunda Kota Bima Tahun 2015 – 2035

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Rasyid Ridha ◽  
Nyoman Utari Vipriyanti ◽  
IGN. Alit Wiswasta

<p><em>This study is based on the phenomenon of development in Bima City and affects the physical condition of the region and not evenly of facilities distribution. So that, it is necessary to</em><em> </em><em>analyze the carrying capacity of urban area facilities</em><em> development</em><em> in Mpunda District, Bima City</em><em> </em><em>2015-2035. The aim of this study is to determine the carrying capacity of Mpunda District to provide a suitable area for the development of urban facilities. The analysis uses both qualitative and quantitative description in the Mpunda Di</em><em>s</em><em>trict to describe the general overview </em><em>of </em><em>geographic distribution facilities. The analytical method used is based on Public Works Minister Regulation No.20/PRT/M/2007 about Technical Guidelines for Physical &amp; Environmental analysis</em><em>. </em><em>Analysis facility needs in planning is always based on the development trend of the population. The calculation for projecting the need facilities is based on SNI 03-1733-2004 </em><em>about</em><em> Procedures for Environmental Planning about Housing Design in City and Need of Environmental Facilities. The analysis results</em><em> of the carrying capacity of the urban area facilities development in Mpunda District is by establishing the protected areas based on the physical condition especially for class 4 of land capability which have the lowest ability with the land cover ratio in 2035 is 0%. Controlling as the </em><em>functions of the buffer zone </em><em>must be done for </em><em>class 3 </em><em>of land capability. The development land is directed for the class 1 and class 2 as the cultivation land. </em><em>There </em><em>is </em><em>land development, which is 20%. For the cultivation of land or land suitable for development land directed to land capability and land capability class 1 class 2. </em><em>The r</em><em>atio of </em><em>class 1 </em><em>land </em><em>coverage area</em><em> in 2035 has reached the maximum land cover ratio, </em><em>i.e.</em><em> 70%. While the ratio of </em><em>class 2 </em><em>land </em><em>coverage area in</em><em> 2035</em><em>, </em><em>i.e. 49% of </em><em>from </em><em>the </em><em>50% maximum of </em><em>land cover </em><em>ratio.</em></p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jossi Erwindy ◽  
Chay Asdak ◽  
Bombom Rachmat Suganda ◽  
Mohamad Sapari Dwi Hadian

Abstract The land is a natural resource that has limitations to accommodate human activities. Rapid urban population growth, continuous expansion of urban scale, rapid socioeconomic development, and increased pressure on land resources between residents and urban land are monumental contradictions when urban planning does not match land carrying capacity. Assessing urban land carrying capacity is very important to evaluate and obtain an overview of the land capability level by classifying its capacity to be designed according to the area function; to get an overview of the potential and constraints of each land capability class, and to serve as a basis for future regional development. This research was conducted in Palu City, a national urban area in Indonesia. It has limited regional development because it is an area prone to high earthquake disasters. Developing the area requires assessing the land's carrying capacity, especially to minimize the risk of earthquake hazards. The assessment involves three stages of analysis, namely Mapping Earthquake-Prone Areas with Mapping of Earthquake-Prone Areas with seismic micro-zonation; Land Capability Assessment; and Comparative Analysis of Land Capability and City Planning of Palu 2030. This study's results indicate that 74.56% of Palu City is an earthquake-prone area, dominated by land capability classes type A to B, namely low to very low land capability classes (55.42%). Thus, there are physical limitations in urban development. However, suppose it is integrated with the spatial plan of Palu City until 2030. In that case, most (56.07%) are already in accordance with the carrying capacity of their land, especially in protected areas. However, land development still does not comply with their carrying capacity (35%) in cultivation areas with earthquakes. High and covering an area of 24% of the total area of Palu City requires special attention in the development of its area going forward. The requirement that land use plans that do not comply with their carrying capacity must be strictly controlled, especially in high disaster-prone areas.


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Ardhy Firdian ◽  
Baba Barus ◽  
Didit Okta Pribadi

<p>Enviromental carrying capacity was measured in three methods,i.e land capability, land carrying capacity and water carrying capacity. Garut Regency which is located at the upstream Cimanuk Watershed has an important role in the sustainability of capacity for downstream area. The aims of this study are: (1) to identify land use in Garut Regency in 2009, (2) to identify land capability in Garut Regency, (3) to assess the suitability of land use with land capability and space pattern in Garut Regency, (4) to identify the status of environmental carrying capacity in Garut Regency, and (5) to set a space pattern based on environmental carrying capacity. Based on the interpretation of Landsat Satellite Imagery in 2009, dryland agriculture has dominated the coverage about 45.4% and forest cover about 23.8%. This study also shows that most area in Garut Regency is belong to Class IV land capability (36.4% of the regency area) without Class I of land capability. Suitabilty evaluation between land cover and land capabilty describe that 48,45% area is suitable, 50.4% area is not suitable and 1.18% area is conditionally suitable depending on limitation factors that affect land capability. Another evaluation between space patern and land capability shown that 59.0% area is suitable, 32.1% area is not suitable, and 8.84% area is conditionally suitable. Both status of land carrying capacity and water carrying capacity are deficit. According to spatial pattern based on land capability and existing forest, space that can be use as the preservation area is about 58.5% of the area, and space that can be use as the cultivation area is about 41.5% of the area of Garut Regency.<br />Keywords : Land capability, land cover/use, spatial pattern, water carrying capacity</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-93
Author(s):  
Arfiani Syariah

Indonesia with the very broad span its land, posses a large number of locations that feasible to be develop as a tourism area for supporting the economy of its cities. One of them that potentially to be developed was Bukit Surowiti in Gresik, East Java. Until recently Bukit Surowity only be used as pilgrimage tourism area, with high frequent visitors only happened at certains times of occasion. With the hilly topography condition, the area could offer an alternative type of tourism to be develop. An area itself can be said sustainable if it is supported by the ability to maintain and improve the environmental sustainability as of community economic through direct involvement for tourism development. This study aimed to analyzed the Bukit Surowity physical condition and identified areas that have the most appropriate land-carrying capacity for tourism facilities and supporting infrastructure for its development. The identification was conducted through a field surveys and land characteristics zoning based on the potential of topography, viewing zones and existing vegetation for the need of further analysis and mapping through Visual Absorption Capability method. The result generated a spatial map on the most feasible location for the land development that can become reference for the local government in determine the direction of Bukit Surowiti tourism area development


2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 02017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatuwat Wattanasetpong ◽  
Uma Seeboonruang ◽  
Uba Sirikaew ◽  
Walter Chen

Soil loss due to surface erosion has been a global problem not just for developing countries but also for developed countries. One of the factors that have greatest impact on soil erosion is land cover. The purpose of this study is to estimate the long-term average annual soil erosion in the Lam Phra Phloeng watershed, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand with different source of land cover by using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and GIS (30 m grid cells) to calculate the six erosion factors (R, K, L, S, C, and P) of USLE. Land use data are from Land Development Department (LDD) and ESA Climate Change Initiative (ESA/CCI) in 2015. The result of this study show that mean soil erosion by using land cover from ESA/CCI is less than LDD (29.16 and 64.29 ton/ha/year respectively) because soil erosion mostly occurred in the agricultural field and LDD is a local department that survey land use in Thailand thus land cover data from this department have more details than ESA/CCI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominika Karpińska ◽  
Mieczysław Kunz

Abstract The paper presents results of research on light pollution in the night sky of Toruń. A permanent network of measuring stations has been established in the city, consisting of 24 sites representing various types of land development and land cover: single-family housing, city centre, multi-family housing, areas overgrown with vegetation and open areas. Within this network, a repeatable direct measurement of the sky brightness using an SQM photometer was carried out over a period of three consecutive months in the summer season, i.e. from June to September 2017. The measurement sessions were conducted in similar weather and astronomical conditions. Based on the obtained data, a spatial distribution of light pollution was determined, ranges of values obtained during the measurements were provided, and the results were additionally referred to the distinguished land cover categories and land development types.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Widiatmaka Widiatmaka ◽  
Wiwin Ambarwulan ◽  
Muhamad Yanuar Jarwadi Purwanto ◽  
Yudi Setiawan4 ◽  
Hefni Effendi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document