scholarly journals Controversies around the social model of disability

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Twardowski

Twardowski Andrzej, Controversies around the social model of disability. Culture – Society – Education no 2(16) 2019, Poznań 2019, pp. 7–21, Adam Mickiewicz University Press. ISSN 2300-0422. DOI: 10.14746/kse.2019.16.1 The aim of the article is to present a critical analysis of the social model of disability.In the first part, the author discusses the genesis, essence and basic advantages of the social model of disability. Next, five major disadvantages of this model are analysed:/1/ avoiding dealing with impairment as an important aspect of the lives of people with disabilities, /2/ separating impairment from disability, /3/ assuming that all people with disabilities are exposed to social oppression, /4/ postulating the creation of an environment without barriers and /5/ assuming that disability is the basis of the identity of people affected by it. In the final part of the article, the author presents reflections on the possibility of creating a new, more holistic model of disability.

Author(s):  
Richard Scotch ◽  
Kara Sutton

This chapter provides an overview of the social movement advocating for disability rights, including its origins, goals, strategies, structure, and impact. The chapter’s primary focus is on the movement in the United States, although developments in other nations are also discussed. The chapter reviews the origins of the disability rights movement in the 20th century in response to stigma and discrimination associated with disabilities and the medical model of disability; addresses the movement’s advocacy strategies, as well as the social model of disability that provided the conceptual underpinning for its goals and activities; and describes how the major components of the movement, including cross-disability organization, were brought together through collaboration and the common experiences of disability culture.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marivete Gesser ◽  
Reginaldo Medeiros Martins

Abstract This study aimed to identify the contributions of the discipline of “Disabilities and Inclusion” offered by the Specialization Course on Gender and Diversity at School (GDS) to promote inclusive educational processes for people with disabilities in basic education. Nine GDS students who were professionals from educational area participated in the research. The information was obtained through a focus group, recorded with the participants’ consent and analyzed based on the thematic content analysis method. The results indicated that there was a change in conception of disability, previously based in charitable and/or in biomedical conceptions, now more in line with the Social Model of Disability and with the precepts of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In addition, the knowledge obtained by the participants contributed to the construction of pedagogical strategies more focused on the inclusion of people with disabilities considering their specificities.


2018 ◽  
pp. 97-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Twardowski

The aim of this article is to provide a description and analysis of the social model of disability, and how it has developed during the past 40 years. In the first part of article the author presents the origins and basic tenets of the social model of disability emphasizing its key elements: the distinction between impairment and disability and the phenomenon of social oppression. Next, he describe the benefits of the social model. In the remainder of this article, the author analyze the main weaknesses of the social model of disability. The paper concludes with some reflections on the need to change in understanding of disability.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Silva Tavares ◽  
Elysângela Dittz Duarte ◽  
Roseni Rosângela de Sena

Abstract Objective: To analyze the current Brazilian public policies that guarantees the social rights of children with chronic conditions, in the areas of health, social assistance and education. Method: Documentary research of laws that shape policies related to the attention to children with chronic illness and people with disabilities in the areas of human rights, health, social assistance and education. A critical analysis of the discourse of three selected legislations was carried out. Results: Children with chronic conditions are covered by legislation for the representation of children with chronic diseases or disabilities. There are discourses of the social model of disability, of children and people with disabilities as subjects of rights, of the state's responsibility in relation to the guarantee of social rights and the co-responsibility of the family. Discourses associated with the ideology of human rights in conflict with the ideology of normalization were evidenced. Conclusion: The actions defined for this group are incipient and with signs of restricting financing, revealing ideological struggles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 452-462
Author(s):  
Syeda Sultana Parveen

This study employs a small-scale survey to investigate the lives of Bangladeshi disabled residents in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Survey instruments include individual interviews and focus group discussions with people with disabilities in the Bangladeshi community. The paper also investigates the health and social care activities of Tower Hamlets Council through the lens of the social model of disability. The findings show that there are numerous facilities available for people with disabilities, but there is still a lack of satisfaction with the services provided to the community.


Author(s):  
Eduardo Avalos

En el presente artículo se realiza un análisis sobre la evolución en los diversos contextos históricos y/o sociales de las personas con discapacidad. Para luego adentrarse en la normativa que tiene jerarquía constitucional en Argentina como la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad,  igualmente se analizan casos jurisprudenciales de Comisión Interamericana como la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos han intervenido en casos originados por la violación de derechos de las personas con discapacidad, y la justicia federal. Finalmente, se concluye con una relexión personal sobre la discapacidad como cuestión social, diferenciando el rol normativo, y judicial en Argentina. Abstract In this article an analysis is made of the evolution in the various historical and / or social contexts of people with disabilities. To later delve into the regulations that have constitutional hierarchy in Argentina such as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, jurisprudential cases of the Inter-American Commission are also analyzed, such as the Inter American Court of Human Rights that have intervened in cases originating from the violation of rights people with disabilities, and federal justice. Finally, it concludes with a personal relection on disability as a social issue, diferentiating the normative and judicial role in Argentina.


2015 ◽  
pp. 619-628
Author(s):  
Marija Cvijetic

This paper deals with the participation of people with disabilities in the society. Participation is one of the central concepts in international documents that were created under the influence of the social model of disability, which has shifted the focus of responsibility from one?s impairment to his/her environment. Review of experiences of adults with disabilities regarding the obstacles they face in relation to employment, intimate relationships, marriage and parenthood shows that the intensity and quality of participation of people with disabilities depend on a complex interaction between a person?s characteristics and specificities and his/her immediate and wider environment.


Author(s):  
O. Polumysna

Polumysna O. Defining the status “person with a disability” in UkraineThe article finds that the term “person with a disability” has constantly evolved, the attitude of society towards a person with a disability has been constantly changing. The nicknames that society assigned to this category of people, calling them lame, idiots, beggars, lunatics, social outsiders, the mentally retarded, the retarded, scarecrows for the healthy, samovars, etc. are considered. It was found that these names indicated only a person's disability or position in society and did not identify him as an ordinary person with his own needs and problems to be solved. In the twentieth century, only how able / incapable a person is came to the fore. At the end of the XX – beginning of the XXI century in many countries society began to pay attention not only to the medical indications of people with disabilities, but began to talk about the equality of these people in society, i.e. the implementation of the social model of disability. It is noted that the use of the words in-valid, dis-ability, mal-formation already fosters in society a negative attitude towards people with disabilities. It has been studied that the vast majority of researchers called people with disabilities “people with disabilities”, “people with special needs”, “people with disabilities”. In addition, there are sharper statements such as “abnormal student with disabilities”, “child with defects”, “special child”. After the law was passed in 2017, most scholars began using the term “person with a disability”. It was found that people with disabilities living in Ukraine ask not to be called autistic, cerebral palsy, downs, people with special needs, disabilities, and put a person first, and then his disability. There has been and in fact there is no consensus between society, scientists and people with disabilities themselves, as they are called, which indicates a certain imbalance and lack or one-sided communication in society.


Author(s):  
Marcin Wlazło

With the development of disability studies the awareness of “false universalization of disability” increased. It was realized that both theoretical and practical abuse is to treat disability as the main and even the only factor that binds the environment of people with disabilities. The configurations of the aspects of oppression and discriminatory attitudes have been in fact much more complex and elaborate than it was originally thought according to the promotion of the social model of disability. The article addresses the problem of multiplicity and simultaneous oppression, in which disability co-exists among other factors, considering gender, race or age of human as no less important factors of marginalization, violation of law and social exclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document