Weiterbildung in der Klinischen Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin in Europa

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Parthaune ◽  
Doris Hendig ◽  
Christian Schaaf
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Medical Specialists

ZusammenfassungDie Weiterbildung in der Klinischen Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin ist in Europa heterogen. Mediziner, Naturwissenschaftler und Pharmazeuten können sich in Europa in der Klinischen Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin weiterbilden. Die Weiterbildungszeiten und -inhalte sowie Abschlussmodalitäten unterscheiden sich jedoch voneinander. Mit dem Ziel der Harmonisierung und Qualitätssicherung der Weiterbildung in Europa veröffentlichten sowohl die Sektion „Laboratory Medicine/Medical Biopathology“ der „European Union of Medical Specialists“ (UEMS) als auch die „European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine“ (EFLM) 2012 ein überarbeitetes Curriculum für die postgraduale Weiterbildung in der Klinischen Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin. Die EFLM führte die Berufsbezeichnung „Specialist in Laboratory Medicine“ (ehemals „European Specialist in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine“) ein. Die UEMS vergibt den polyvalenten Titel „Specialist in General Laboratory Medicine – Polyvalent Medical Biopathology“ sowie 4 monovalente Titel. Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt eine Übersicht zum aktuellen Stand der Weiterbildung in der Klinischen Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin in den EU-Staaten im Vergleich zu Deutschland. Die Ziele der UEMS und EFLM als Dachorganisationen der Klinischen Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin in der EU werden diskutiert.

Laboratory medicine in the European Union

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wytze P. Oosterhuis ◽  
Simone Zerah
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
European Federation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Important Challenge ◽  
The Eu

AbstractThe profession of laboratory medicine differs between countries within the European Union (EU) in many respects. The objective of professional organizations of the promotion of mutual recognition of specialists within the EU is closely related to the free movement of people. This policy translates to equivalence of standards and harmonization of the training curriculum. The aim of the present study is the description of the organization and practice of laboratory medicine within the countries that constitute the EU. A questionnaire covering many aspects of the profession was sent to delegates of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and Union Européenne de Médecins Spécialistes (UEMS) of the 28 EU countries. Results were sent to the delegates for confirmation. Many differences between countries were identified: predominantly medical or scientific professionals; a broad or limited professional field of interest; inclusion of patient treatment; formal or absent recognition; a regulated or absent formal training program; general or minor application of a quality system based on ISO Norms. The harmonization of the postgraduate training of both clinical chemists and of laboratory physicians has been a goal for many years. Differences in the organization of the laboratory professions still exist in the respective countries which all have a long historical development with their own rationality. It is an important challenge to harmonize our profession, and difficult choices will need to be made. Recent developments with respect to the directive on Recognition of Professional Qualifications call for new initiatives to harmonize laboratory medicine both across national borders, and across the borders of scientific and medical professions.

Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO)

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc H.M. Thelen ◽  
Florent J.L.A. Vanstapel ◽  
Christos Kroupis ◽  
Ines Vukasovic ◽  
Guilaime Boursier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Position Paper ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Medical Field ◽  
Iso 15189 ◽  
Medical Laboratories ◽  
Flexible Scope ◽  
Scientific Disciplines

AbstractThe recent revision of ISO15189 has further strengthened its position as the standard for accreditation for medical laboratories. Both for laboratories and their customers it is important that the scope of such accreditation is clear. Therefore the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) demands that the national bodies responsible for accreditation describe the scope of every laboratory accreditation in a way that leaves no room for doubt about the range of competence of the particular laboratories. According to EA recommendations scopes may be fixed, mentioning every single test that is part of the accreditation, or flexible, mentioning all combinations of medical field, examination type and materials for which the laboratory is competent. Up to now national accreditation bodies perpetuate use of fixed scopes, partly by inertia, partly out of fear that a too flexible scope may lead to over-valuation of the competence of laboratories, most countries only use fixed scopes. The EA however promotes use of flexible scopes, since this allows for more readily innovation, which contributes to quality in laboratory medicine. In this position paper, the Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN Standards belonging to the Quality and Regulation Committee of the EFLM recommends using an approach that has led to successful introduction of the flexible scope for ISO15189 accreditation as intended in EA-4/17 in The Netherlands. The approach is risk-based, discipline and competence-based, and focuses on defining a uniform terminology transferable across the borders of scientific disciplines, laboratories and countries.

scholarly journals An overview of EFLM harmonization activities in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1591-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Kilpatrick ◽  
Sverre Sandberg
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Biological Variation ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Eu Countries ◽  
European Guidelines ◽  
Common Basis ◽  
Evaluation Procedures ◽  
E Learning

Abstract The European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) has initiated many harmonization activities in all phases of the examination process. The EFLM is dealing with both the scientific and the educational aspects of harmonization, with the intention of disseminating best practice in laboratory medicine throughout Europe. Priorities have been given (1) to establish a standard for conducting and assessing biological variation studies and to construct an evidence based EFLM webpage on biological variation data, (2) to harmonize preanalytical procedures by producing European guidelines, (3) to improve test ordering and interpretation, (4) to produce other common European guidelines for laboratory medicine and play an active part in development of clinical guidelines, (5) to establish a common basis for communicating laboratory results to patients, (6) to harmonize units of measurement throughout Europe, (7) to harmonize preanalytical procedures in molecular diagnostics and (8) to harmonize and optimize test evaluation procedures. The EFLM is also now launching the 5th version of the European Syllabus to help the education of European Specialists in Laboratory Medicine (EuSpLM), which is being supported by the development of e-learning courses. A register of EuSpLM is already established for members of National Societies in EU countries, and a similar register will be established for specialists in non-EU countries.

scholarly journals European views on patients directly obtaining their laboratory test results

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian D. Watson ◽  
Joanna Siodmiak ◽  
Wytze P. Oosterhuis ◽  
Joel Corberand ◽  
Per E. Jorgensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Technologies ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Information Age ◽  
Negative Attitude ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
Laboratory Results ◽  
Changing Practices

AbstractMedicine is a highly professionalized endeavour, by tradition centred on the authority of physicians. Better education and the advent of the information age cater for increased demands on society in general and on health care in particular to enable people to make informed decisions regarding themselves. Participation in medical decisions requires informed knowledge which is hard to obtain without substantial and time consuming professional help.We performed a survey amongst the member organizations of European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) in order to investigate the recognition and preparedness of providing help to patients in interpreting their laboratory results.Out of 40 EFLM Member Societies, 27 sent their responses to the survey. In most cases the first line delivery of laboratory results to physicians is by computer link (63%). Patients receive their laboratory results on demand from their physician in 60% of cases. However, 34% of laboratory specialists showed a negative attitude for delivering laboratory results to patients. Yet, in 48% of countries 1–5 patients per day ask a laboratory specialist about the significance of laboratory results outside the reference range. When patients are informed about the purpose of laboratory testing, they seek information primarily from their physician, followed by the internet and the Specialist in Laboratory Medicine.Changing practices increasingly enabling patient access to their records are on the increase facilitated by recent innovations in information technologies. Successful transfer of some of the responsibilities of physicians, demands a mutual triangular dialogue between the patient, their physician and laboratory medicine.

Sample collections from healthy volunteers for biological variation estimates’ update: a new project undertaken by the Working Group on Biological Variation established by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Carobene ◽  
Marta Strollo ◽  
Niels Jonker ◽  
Gerhard Barla ◽  
William A. Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Biological Variation ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Laboratory Measurements ◽  
Controlled Conditions ◽  
Edta Plasma ◽  
Blood Specimens

AbstractBackground:Biological variation (BV) data have many fundamental applications in laboratory medicine. At the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) the reliability and limitations of current BV data were discussed. The EFLM Working Group on Biological Variation is working to increase the quality of BV data by developing a European project to establish a biobank of samples from healthy subjects to be used to produce high quality BV data.Methods:The project involved six European laboratories (Milan, Italy; Bergen, Norway; Madrid, Spain; Padua, Italy; Istanbul, Turkey; Assen, The Netherlands). Blood samples were collected from 97 volunteers (44 men, aged 20–60 years; 43 women, aged 20–50 years; 10 women, aged 55–69 years). Initial subject inclusion required that participants completed an enrolment questionnaire to verify their health status. The volunteers provided blood specimens once per week for 10 weeks. A short questionnaire was completed and some laboratory tests were performed at each sampling consisting of blood collected under controlled conditions to provide serum, KResults:Samples from six out of the 97 enroled subjects were discarded as a consequence of abnormal laboratory measurements. A biobank of 18,000 aliquots was established consisting of 120 aliquots of serum, 40 of EDTA-plasma, and 40 of citrated-plasma from each subject. The samples were stored at –80 °C.Conclusions:A biobank of well-characterised samples collected under controlled conditions has been established delivering a European resource to enable production of contemporary BV data.

Is laboratory medicine ready for the era of personalized medicine? A survey addressed to laboratory directors of hospitals/academic schools of medicine in Europe

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Malentacchi ◽  
Irene Mancini ◽  
Ivan Brandslund ◽  
Pieter Vermeersch ◽  
Matthias Schwab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personalized Medicine ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Data Interpretation ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
European Federation ◽  
New Methodologies ◽  
Health Model ◽  
Personalised Therapy

AbstractDevelopments in “-omics” are creating a paradigm shift in laboratory medicine leading to personalized medicine. This allows the increase in diagnostics and therapeutics focused on individuals rather than populations. In order to investigate whether laboratory medicine is ready to play a key role in the integration of personalized medicine in routine health care and set the state-of-the-art knowledge about personalized medicine and laboratory medicine in Europe, a questionnaire was constructed under the auspices of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and the European Society of Pharmacogenomics and Personalised Therapy (ESPT). The answers of the participating laboratory medicine professionals indicate that they are aware that personalized medicine can represent a new and promising health model, and that laboratory medicine should play a key role in supporting the implementation of personalized medicine in the clinical setting. Participants think that the current organization of laboratory medicine needs additional/relevant implementations such as (i) new technological facilities in -omics; (ii) additional training for the current personnel focused on the new methodologies; (iii) incorporation in the laboratory of new competencies in data interpretation and counseling; and (iv) cooperation and collaboration among professionals of different disciplines to integrate information according to a personalized medicine approach.

scholarly journals Adding clinical utility to the laboratory reports: automation of interpretative comments

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wytze Oosterhuis
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Diagnostic Efficiency ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
Interpretative Comments

Abstract In laboratory medicine, consultation by adding interpretative comments to reports has long been recognized as one of the activities that help to improve patient treatment outcomes and strengthen the position of our profession. Interpretation and understanding of laboratory test results might in some cases considerably be enhanced by adding test when considered appropriate by the laboratory specialist – an activity that was named reflective testing. With patient material available at this stage, this might considerably improve the diagnostic efficiency. The need and value of these forms of consultation have been proven by a diversity of studies. Both general practitioners and medical specialists have been shown to value interpretative comments. Other forms of consultation are emerging: in this time of patient empowerment and shared decision making, reporting of laboratory results to patients will be common. Patients have in general little understanding of these results, and consultation of patients could add a new dimension to the service of the laboratory. These developments have been recognized by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, which has established the working group on Patient Focused Laboratory Medicine for work on the matter. Providing proper interpretative comments is, however, labor intensive because harmonization is necessary to maintain quality between individual specialists. In present-day high-volume laboratories, there are few options on how to generate high-quality, patient-specific comments for all the relevant results without overwhelming the laboratory specialists. Automation and application of expert systems could be a solution, and systems have been developed that could ease this task.

scholarly journals Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Panteghini ◽  
Ferruccio Ceriotti ◽  
Graham Jones ◽  
Wytze Oosterhuis ◽  
Mario Plebani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Total Error ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Performance Specifications ◽  
Fit For Purpose ◽  
Set Up

AbstractMeasurements in clinical laboratories produce results needed in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients. These results are always characterized by some uncertainty. What quality is needed and what measurement errors can be tolerated without jeopardizing patient safety should therefore be defined and specified for each analyte having clinical use. When these specifications are defined, the total examination process will be “fit for purpose” and the laboratory professionals should then set up rules to control the measuring systems to ensure they perform within specifications. The laboratory community has used different models to set performance specifications (PS). Recently, it was felt that there was a need to revisit different models and, at the same time, to emphasize the presuppositions for using the different models. Therefore, in 2014 the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) organized a Strategic Conference in Milan. It was felt that there was a need for more detailed discussions on, for instance, PS for EQAS, which measurands should use which models to set PS and how to set PS for the extra-analytical phases. There was also a need to critically evaluate the quality of data on biological variation studies and further discussing the use of the total error (TE) concept. Consequently, EFLM established five Task Finish Groups (TFGs) to address each of these topics. The TFGs are finishing their activity on 2017 and the content of this paper includes deliverables from these groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document