scholarly journals On the N-spectrum of oriented graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 486-495
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abudayah ◽  
Omar Alomari ◽  
Torsten Sander
Keyword(s):  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Undirected Graphs ◽  
Negative Spectrum ◽  
Oriented Graphs ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Spectral Bounds

Abstract Given any digraph D, its non-negative spectrum (or N-spectrum, shortly) consists of the eigenvalues of the matrix AA T , where A is the adjacency matrix of D. In this study, we relate the classical spectrum of undirected graphs to the N-spectrum of their oriented counterparts, permitting us to derive spectral bounds. Moreover, we study the spectral effects caused by certain modifications of a given digraph.

scholarly journals The non-negative spectrum of a digraph

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Alomari ◽  
Mohammad Abudayah ◽  
Torsten Sander
Keyword(s):  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Negative Spectrum ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Adjacency Spectrum

Abstract Given the adjacency matrix A of a digraph, the eigenvalues of the matrix AAT constitute the so-called non-negative spectrum of this digraph. We investigate the relation between the structure of digraphs and their non-negative spectra and associated eigenvectors. In particular, it turns out that the non-negative spectrum of a digraph can be derived from the traditional (adjacency) spectrum of certain undirected bipartite graphs.

scholarly journals The normalized distance Laplacian

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Carolyn Reinhart
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Radius ◽  
Characteristic Polynomial ◽  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Distance Matrix ◽  
Laplacian Matrix ◽  
Diagonal Matrix ◽  
The Matrix

Abstract The distance matrix 𝒟(G) of a connected graph G is the matrix containing the pairwise distances between vertices. The transmission of a vertex vi in G is the sum of the distances from vi to all other vertices and T(G) is the diagonal matrix of transmissions of the vertices of the graph. The normalized distance Laplacian, 𝒟𝒧(G) = I−T(G)−1/2 𝒟(G)T(G)−1/2, is introduced. This is analogous to the normalized Laplacian matrix, 𝒧(G) = I − D(G)−1/2 A(G)D(G)−1/2, where D(G) is the diagonal matrix of degrees of the vertices of the graph and A(G) is the adjacency matrix. Bounds on the spectral radius of 𝒟 𝒧 and connections with the normalized Laplacian matrix are presented. Twin vertices are used to determine eigenvalues of the normalized distance Laplacian. The distance generalized characteristic polynomial is defined and its properties established. Finally, 𝒟𝒧-cospectrality and lack thereof are determined for all graphs on 10 and fewer vertices, providing evidence that the normalized distance Laplacian has fewer cospectral pairs than other matrices.

scholarly journals New Bounds for the α-Indices of Graphs

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1668
Author(s):  
Eber Lenes ◽  
Exequiel Mallea-Zepeda ◽  
Jonnathan Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Spectral Radius ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Minimal Degree ◽  
Diagonal Matrix ◽  
The Matrix

Let G be a graph, for any real 0≤α≤1, Nikiforov defines the matrix Aα(G) as Aα(G)=αD(G)+(1−α)A(G), where A(G) and D(G) are the adjacency matrix and diagonal matrix of degrees of the vertices of G. This paper presents some extremal results about the spectral radius ρα(G) of the matrix Aα(G). In particular, we give a lower bound on the spectral radius ρα(G) in terms of order and independence number. In addition, we obtain an upper bound for the spectral radius ρα(G) in terms of order and minimal degree. Furthermore, for n>l>0 and 1≤p≤⌊n−l2⌋, let Gp≅Kl∨(Kp∪Kn−p−l) be the graph obtained from the graphs Kl and Kp∪Kn−p−l and edges connecting each vertex of Kl with every vertex of Kp∪Kn−p−l. We prove that ρα(Gp+1)<ρα(Gp) for 1≤p≤⌊n−l2⌋−1.

Binomial incidence matrix of a semigraph

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150017
Author(s):  
Jyoti Shetty ◽  
G. Sudhakara
Keyword(s):  
Graph Theory ◽  
Complete Graph ◽  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Incidence Matrix ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Line Graph ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Theory Of Graphs

A semigraph, defined as a generalization of graph by  Sampathkumar, allows an edge to have more than two vertices. The idea of multiple vertices on edges gives rise to multiplicity in every concept in the theory of graphs when generalized to semigraphs. In this paper, we define a representing matrix of a semigraph [Formula: see text] and call it binomial incidence matrix of the semigraph [Formula: see text]. This matrix, which becomes the well-known incidence matrix when the semigraph is a graph, represents the semigraph uniquely, up to isomorphism. We characterize this matrix and derive some results on the rank of the matrix. We also show that a matrix derived from the binomial incidence matrix satisfies a result in graph theory which relates incidence matrix of a graph and adjacency matrix of its line graph. We extend the concept of “twin vertices” in the theory of graphs to semigraph theory, and characterize them. Finally, we derive a systematic approach to show that the binomial incidence matrix of any semigraph on [Formula: see text] vertices can be obtained from the incidence matrix of the complete graph [Formula: see text].

scholarly journals Compressing Optimal Paths with Run Length Encoding

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 593-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Strasser ◽  
Adi Botea ◽  
Daniel Harabor
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
Minimum Size ◽  
Undirected Graphs ◽  
Compression Scheme ◽  
Run Length ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Np Complete ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Grid Based

We introduce a novel approach to Compressed Path Databases, space efficient oracles used to very quickly identify the first edge on a shortest path. Our algorithm achieves query running times on the 100 nanosecond scale, being significantly faster than state-of-the-art first-move oracles from the literature. Space consumption is competitive, due to a compression approach that rearranges rows and columns in a first-move matrix and then performs run length encoding (RLE) on the contents of the matrix. One variant of our implemented system was, by a convincing margin, the fastest entry in the 2014 Grid-Based Path Planning Competition. We give a first tractability analysis for the compression scheme used by our algorithm. We study the complexity of computing a database of minimum size for general directed and undirected graphs. We find that in both cases the problem is NP-complete. We also show that, for graphs which can be decomposed along articulation points, the problem can be decomposed into independent parts, with a corresponding reduction in its level of difficulty. In particular, this leads to simple and tractable algorithms with linear running time which yield optimal compression results for trees.

scholarly journals On Graphs with Cyclic Defect or Excess

10.37236/415 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Delorme ◽  
Guillermo Pineda-Villavicencio
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Integer Coefficients ◽  
Disjoint Cycles ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Odd Degree ◽  
Unexplored Area ◽  
Trivial Graph ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

The Moore bound constitutes both an upper bound on the order of a graph of maximum degree $d$ and diameter $D=k$ and a lower bound on the order of a graph of minimum degree $d$ and odd girth $g=2k+1$. Graphs missing or exceeding the Moore bound by $\epsilon$ are called graphs with defect or excess $\epsilon$, respectively. While Moore graphs (graphs with $\epsilon=0$) and graphs with defect or excess 1 have been characterized almost completely, graphs with defect or excess 2 represent a wide unexplored area. Graphs with defect (excess) 2 satisfy the equation $G_{d,k}(A) = J_n + B$ ($G_{d,k}(A) = J_n - B$), where $A$ denotes the adjacency matrix of the graph in question, $n$ its order, $J_n$ the $n\times n$ matrix whose entries are all 1's, $B$ the adjacency matrix of a union of vertex-disjoint cycles, and $G_{d,k}(x)$ a polynomial with integer coefficients such that the matrix $G_{d,k}(A)$ gives the number of paths of length at most $k$ joining each pair of vertices in the graph. In particular, if $B$ is the adjacency matrix of a cycle of order $n$ we call the corresponding graphs graphs with cyclic defect or excess; these graphs are the subject of our attention in this paper. We prove the non-existence of infinitely many such graphs. As the highlight of the paper we provide the asymptotic upper bound of $O(\frac{64}3d^{3/2})$ for the number of graphs of odd degree $d\ge3$ and cyclic defect or excess. This bound is in fact quite generous, and as a way of illustration, we show the non-existence of some families of graphs of odd degree $d\ge3$ and cyclic defect or excess. Actually, we conjecture that, apart from the Möbius ladder on 8 vertices, no non-trivial graph of any degree $\ge 3$ and cyclic defect or excess exists.

scholarly journals On the Main Eigenvalues of Universal Adjacency Matrices and U-Controllable Graphs

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 812-826
Author(s):  
Alexander Farrugia ◽  
Irene Sciriha
Keyword(s):  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Laplacian Matrix ◽  
Simple Graph ◽  
Identity Matrix ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Vertex Degrees ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Main Eigenvalues ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

A universal adjacency matrix U of a graph G is a linear combination of the 0–1 adjacency matrix A, the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees D, the identity matrix I and the matrix J each of whose entries is 1. A main eigenvalue of U is an eigenvalue having an eigenvector that is not orthogonal to the all–ones vector. It is shown that the number of distinct main eigenvalues of U associated with a simple graph G is at most the number of orbits of any automorphism of G. The definition of a U–controllable graph is given using control–theoretic techniques and several necessary and sufficient conditions for a graph to be U–controllable are determined. It is then demonstrated that U–controllable graphs are asymmetric and that the converse is false, showing that there exist both regular and non–regular asymmetric graphs that are not U–controllable for any universal adjacency matrix U. To aid in the discovery of these counterexamples, a gamma–Laplacian matrix L(gamma) is used, which is a simplified form of U. It is proved that any U-controllable graph is a L(gamma)–controllable graph for some parameter gamma.

scholarly journals Laplacian integral graphs with a given degree sequence constraint

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1431-1448
Author(s):  
Ansderson Fernandes Novanta ◽  
Carla Silva Oliveira ◽  
Leonardo de Lima
Keyword(s):  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Degree Sequence ◽  
Laplacian Matrix ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Diagonal Matrix ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Sequence Constraint ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Vertex Degrees ◽  
Integral Graphs

Let G be a graph on n vertices. The Laplacian matrix of G, denoted by L(G), is defined as L(G) = D(G) −A(G), where A(G) is the adjacency matrix of G and D(G) is the diagonal matrix of the vertex degrees of G. A graph G is said to be L-integral if all eigenvalues of the matrix L(G) are integers. In this paper, we characterize all Lintegral non-bipartite graphs among all connected graphs with at most two vertices of degree larger than or equal to three.

scholarly journals Skew Spectra of Oriented Graphs

10.37236/270 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Shader ◽  
Wasin So
Keyword(s):  
Directed Graph ◽  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Undirected Graph ◽  
Oriented Graph ◽  
Oriented Graphs ◽  
Underlying Graph ◽  
Adjacency Spectrum ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Skew Adjacency Matrix

An oriented graph $G^{\sigma}$ is a simple undirected graph $G$ with an orientation $\sigma$, which assigns to each edge a direction so that $G^{\sigma}$ becomes a directed graph. $G$ is called the underlying graph of $G^{\sigma}$, and we denote by $Sp(G)$ the adjacency spectrum of $G$. Skew-adjacency matrix $S( G^{\sigma} )$ of $G^{\sigma}$ is introduced, and its spectrum $Sp_S( G^{\sigma} )$ is called the skew-spectrum of $G^{\sigma}$. The relationship between $Sp_S( G^{\sigma} )$ and $Sp(G)$ is studied. In particular, we prove that (i) $Sp_S( G^{\sigma} ) = {\bf i} Sp(G)$ for some orientation $\sigma$ if and only if $G$ is bipartite, (ii) $Sp_S(G^{\sigma}) = {\bf i} Sp(G)$ for any orientation $\sigma$ if and only if $G$ is a forest, where ${\bf i}=\sqrt{-1}$.

Queryable Compression on Time-evolving Web and Social Networks with Streaming

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Michael Nelson ◽  
Sridhar Radhakrishnan ◽  
Chandra Sekharan ◽  
Amlan Chatterjee ◽  
Sudhindra Gopal Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Data Structure ◽  
Adjacency Matrix ◽  
Binary Tree ◽  
Network Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Undirected Graphs ◽  
Sparse Graphs ◽  
Compressed Data ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Better Than

Time-evolving web and social network graphs are modeled as a set of pages/individuals (nodes) and their arcs (links/relationships) that change over time. Due to their popularity, they have become increasingly massive in terms of their number of nodes, arcs, and lifetimes. However, these graphs are extremely sparse throughout their lifetimes. For example, it is estimated that Facebook has over a billion vertices, yet at any point in time, it has far less than 0.001% of all possible relationships. The space required to store these large sparse graphs may not fit in most main memories using underlying representations such as a series of adjacency matrices or adjacency lists. We propose building a compressed data structure that has a compressed binary tree corresponding to each row of each adjacency matrix of the time-evolving graph. We do not explicitly construct the adjacency matrix, and our algorithms take the time-evolving arc list representation as input for its construction. Our compressed structure allows for directed and undirected graphs, faster arc and neighborhood queries, as well as the ability for arcs and frames to be added and removed directly from the compressed structure (streaming operations). We use publicly available network data sets such as Flickr, Yahoo!, and Wikipedia in our experiments and show that our new technique performs as well or better than our benchmarks on all datasets in terms of compression size and other vital metrics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document