scholarly journals Somatic mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 are prognostic and follow-up markers in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia with normal karyotype

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marijana Virijevic ◽  
Teodora Karan-Djurasevic ◽  
Irena Marjanovic ◽  
Natasa Tosic ◽  
Mirjana Mitrovic ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) genes are frequent molecular lesions in acute myeloid leukaemia with normal karyotype (AML-NK). The effects of IDH mutations on clinical features and treatment outcome in AML-NK have been widely investigated, but only a few studies monitored these mutations during follow-up. Patients and methods In our study samples from 110 adult de novo AML-NK were studied for the presence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, their associations with other prognostic markers and disease outcome. We also analyzed the stability of these mutations during the course of the disease in complete remission (CR) and relapse. Results IDH mutations were found in 25 (23%) patients. IDH+ patients tend to have lower CR rate compared to IDH-patients (44% vs 62.2%, p = 0.152), and had slightly lower disease free survival (12 months vs 17 months; p = 0.091). On the other hand, the presence of IDH mutations had significant impact on overall survival (2 vs 7 months; p = 0.039). The stability of IDH mutations were studied sequentially in 19 IDH+ patients. All of them lost the mutation in CR, and the same IDH mutations were detected in relapsed samples. Conclusions Our study shows that the presence of IDH mutations confer an adverse effect in AML-NK patients, which in combination with other molecular markers can lead to an improved risk stratification and better treatment. Also, IDH mutations are very stable during the course of the disease and can be potentially used as markers for minimal residual disease detection.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 657-657
Author(s):  
Alexander Kohlmann ◽  
Niroshan Nadarajah ◽  
Vera Grossmann ◽  
Tamara Alpermann ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 657 Introduction: RUNX1 mutations constitute disease-defining aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and were demonstrated to be particularly frequent in secondary and de novo AML with normal karyotype or non-complex alterations and to confer an unfavorable prognosis. Monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in AML has been shown to provide prognostic information and is increasingly used for treatment decisions. A variety of molecular markers has been identified suitable for MRD assessment, yet there still is a lack of such markers in a significant number of patients. The use of RUNX1 mutations may bridge a gap. Aims: Patients and Methods: RUNX1 mutation screening was prospectively performed in 814 patients with AML at diagnosis (645 de novo, 109 s-AML, and 60 t-AML). The median age of the patients was 69.6 years (range: 1 – 93 years), including 375 female and 439 male patients, respectively. 50.5% (411/814) of cases presented with a normal karyotype, 38.8% (316/814) with non-complex cytogenetic alterations, 9.6% (78/814) with a complex aberrant karyotype, and 1.1% (9/814) with prognostically favorable cytogenetics. Mutation analysis was performed using a sensitive next-generation amplicon deep-sequencing assay (454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT). Moreover, in a subset of 44 AML patients and additional 59 retrospectively analyzed cases the prognostic impact of MRD levels of RUNX1 mutations was studied at a second time point after completion of intensive induction therapy (median sampling interval: 128 days after diagnosis; range 60 – 180 days). In these follow-up samples the RUNX1 mutations already detected at diagnosis were investigated with a higher coverage (835-fold median coverage) as compared to the diagnostic assessment (759-fold median coverage) resulting in a sensitivity level of 1%. Furthermore, in 57 patients paired samples from diagnosis and relapse were analyzed to assess the stability of RUNX1 mutations. Results: 211/814 patients (25.9%) were detected to carry RUNX1 mutations. The median clone size was 39% and revealed a significant heterogeneity ranging from 2% to 96%. 73.9% (156/211) of mutated patients carried one mutation only, whereas 26.1% (55/211) harbored two (n=46) or more (n=9) mutations. In detail, the 211 patients harbored a total number of 275 alterations in RUNX1: 42.5% (117/275) frame-shift mutations, 34.9% (96/275) missense, 14.2% (39/275) nonsense, 4.4% (12/275) exon-skipping/splicing, and 4.0% (11/275) in-frame insertion/deletion alterations, respectively. Regarding MRD assessment, patients were separated according to the median MRD level (3.92%; range 0.03% - 48.00%) into “good responders” (n=78) with MRD levels below 3.92% and “poor responders” (n=25) with MRD levels above 3.92%. This resulted in significant differences in both event-free survival (median 21.4 vs 5.7 months, p<0.001) and overall survival (73.3% vs 66.1% at 2 years, p=0.016). Moreover, in 57 cases the stability of individual RUNX1 mutations was studied at the time of relapse. In 46/57 (80.7%) cases the same alterations detected at diagnosis were present at relapse, whilst in 2/57 (3.5%) cases the RUNX1 mutation from the diagnostic sample was no longer detectable at relapse. Importantly, in 7/57 (12.3%) patients novel RUNX1 mutations were detected in regions different from those affected at diagnosis. Conclusion: Next-generation deep-sequencing accurately detects and quantifies RUNX1 mutations in AML with high sensitivity. RUNX1 mutations qualify as patient-specific markers for individualized disease monitoring. Thus, the measurement of mutation load by next-generation sequencing may contribute to refine the assignment into distinct risk categories in AML. Analysis of RUNX1 mutations should be considered for the complete coding region at relapse to detect new RUNX1 mutations. Disclosures: Kohlmann: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria. Nadarajah:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Grossmann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Alpermann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership.


2016 ◽  
Vol 175 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Weber ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Tamara Alpermann ◽  
Karolína Perglerová ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adhra Al-Mawali ◽  
Avinash Daniel Pinto ◽  
Shoaib Al-Zadjali

Background/Aims: In CD34-positive acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), the leukaemia-initiating event likely takes place in the CD34+CD38- cell compartment. CD123 has been shown to be a unique marker of leukaemic stem cells within the CD34+CD38- compartment. The aim of this study was to identify the percentage of CD34+CD38-CD123+ cells in AML blasts, AML CD34+CD38- stem cells, and normal and regenerating bone marrow CD34+CD38- stem cells from non-myeloid malignancies. Methods: Thirty-eight adult de novo AML patients with intention to treat were enrolled after the application of inclusion criteria from February 2012 to February 2017. The percentage of the CD34+CD38-CD123+ phenotype in the blast population at diagnosis was determined using a CD45-gating strategy and CD34+ backgating by flow cytometry. We studied the CD34+CD38-CD123+ fraction in AML blasts at diagnosis, and its utility as a unique phenotype for minimal residual disease (MRD) of AML patients. Results: CD123+ cells were present in 97% of AML blasts in patients at diagnosis (median 90%; range 21-99%). CD123+ cells were also present in 97% of the CD34+CD38- compartment (median 0.8164%, range 0.0262-39.7%). Interestingly, CD123 was not present in normal and regenerating CD34+CD38- bone marrow stem cells (range 0.002- 0.067 and 0.004-0.086, respectively). Conclusion: The CD34+CD38-CD123+ phenotype is present in virtually all AML blasts and it may be used as a unique single phenotype for MRD detection in AML patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 1993-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Adel Abdelhalim ◽  
Basma M. Elgamal ◽  
Mona R. ElKafoury ◽  
Naglaa M. Hassan ◽  
Marwa M. Hussein ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs that are important for post-transcriptional gene regulation in both healthy and morbid conditions. Numerous miRNAs promote tumorigenesis, while others have a tumour suppressive effects. Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a heterogeneous group of genetically diverse hematopoietic malignancies with variable response to treatment. AIM: Our study aimed to investigate the possible role of miR-150 in de novo adult AML and the impact of its level on survival, and we used in the silicon analysis to predict the main target genes involved in miR-150 mediated cancer pathway. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated miR-150 expression profiling assay using TaqMan primer probes RT-PCR in the plasma of 50 adult AML patients, before the start of treatment and at day 28 of treatment, along with 20 normal adult control samples. miR-16 was used as an endogenous reference for standardisation. Follow-up of patients during treatment at day 28 of induction chemotherapy and after one year was done. RESULTS: In this study, we found a significantly lower level of miR-150 in AML patients when compared to controls (p = 0.005) with 0.62 fold change than in healthy controls. Patients were divided into two groups: the low miR-150 group (miR-150 < 1) and the high miR-150 group (miR-150 > 1). A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding initial total leukocytic count and initial PB blast count while for the TLC, HB and PLT count at follow up. No difference in the overall survival between the low and the high miR-150 groups could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that miR-150 functions as a tumour suppressor and gatekeeper in inhibiting cell transformation and that its downregulation is required for leukemogenesis.


Leukemia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1482-1490 ◽  
Author(s):  
C S Hourigan ◽  
R P Gale ◽  
N J Gormley ◽  
G J Ossenkoppele ◽  
R B Walter

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-208
Author(s):  
Kristian Løvvik Juul‐Dam ◽  
Hans B. Ommen ◽  
Charlotte G. Nyvold ◽  
Christiane Walter ◽  
Helen Vålerhaugen ◽  
...  

Leukemia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1266-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gauri Deb ◽  
Bettina Wingelhofer ◽  
Fabio M. R. Amaral ◽  
Alba Maiques-Diaz ◽  
John A. Chadwick ◽  
...  

AbstractThe histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1 or KDM1A) has emerged as a candidate therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML); tranylcypromine-derivative inhibitors induce loss of clonogenic activity and promote differentiation, in particular in the MLL-translocated molecular subtype of AML. In AML, the use of drugs in combination often delivers superior clinical activity. To identify genes and cellular pathways that collaborate with LSD1 to maintain the leukaemic phenotype, and which could be targeted by combination therapies, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 dropout screen. We identified multiple components of the amino acid sensing arm of mTORC1 signalling—RRAGA, MLST8, WDR24 and LAMTOR2—as cellular sensitizers to LSD1 inhibition. Knockdown of mTORC1 components, or mTORC1 pharmacologic inhibition, in combination with LSD1 inhibition enhanced differentiation in both cell line and primary cell settings, in vitro and in vivo, and substantially reduced the frequency of clonogenic primary human AML cells in a modelled minimal residual disease setting. Synergistic upregulation of a set of transcription factor genes associated with terminal monocytic lineage differentiation was observed. Thus, dual mTORC1 and LSD1 inhibition represents a candidate combination approach for enhanced differentiation in MLL-translocated AML which could be evaluated in early phase clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document