Social Support, Self-Regulation, and Resilience in Two Populations: General-Population Adolescents and Adult Cancer Survivors

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 568-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Wills ◽  
Erin O'Carroll Bantum
BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Jin Kim ◽  
Jin-young Min ◽  
Yong-Seok Seo ◽  
Kyoung-bok Min

Abstract Background Although a significant association between air pollution and mental health has been identified, few studies have addressed this relationship based on cancer diagnosis. This study investigated whether associations between long-term air pollution and mental health conditions differ based on whether the individual has been diagnosed with cancer. Methods Nationally representative data were used and a total of 38,101 adults were included in the analyses. We assessed mental health factors such as perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation, and analyzed the associations between these factors and individuals’ annual average exposure to air pollutants, including particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 μm (PM10), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Results Compared with the general population, PM10 exposure in cancer survivors predicted a higher risk of depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] =1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06–1.69) and suicidal ideation (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.01–1.64). Notably, the statistically significant relationship between PM10 exposure and suicidal ideation in cancer survivors disappeared after further adjustment for depressive symptoms (p = 0.3103). This pattern was also observed in the result of propensity score-matched analysis for comparison between cancer survivors and the general population. Conclusions This study provides the first evidence that cancer survivors with depressive symptoms may be more susceptible to suicidal ideation in the context of persistent PM10 exposure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19116-e19116
Author(s):  
Eric Adjei Boakye ◽  
Katherine M. Polednik ◽  
Arun Sharma ◽  
Yamile Molina ◽  
Vy Pham ◽  
...  

e19116 Background: Mental distress is associated with poor treatment adherence and adverse psychosocial outcomes, and cancer survivors, especially adolescent and young adults (AYA), may experience greater distress than older adults and the general population. We tested this hypothesis by examining the association between AYA vs. adult cancer survivors vs. the general population without a history of cancer, and mental distress. Methods: Using the 2014-2017 National Health Interview Surveys, 2,516 AYA cancer survivors (aged 15 – 39 years) were identified. We then used propensity score matching (matched on sociodemographics, comorbidities, smoking status and visit to mental health professional in past year) to create 2,516 older cancer survivors (aged ≥ 40 years); and 2,516 adults without cancer (general population) as the comparison groups. Mental distress (outcome of interest) was measured using the validated Kessler nonspecific mental/psychological distress (K6) scale. The 6-item K6 scale examines how frequently within the past 30 days an individual felt nervous, hopeless, restless or fidgety, worthless, sad, and that everything was an effort. Responses were summed to yield a score ranging between 0 and 24 and classified as none/low (0≤K6 < 5), moderate (5≤K6 < 13), and severe (K6≥13) mental distress. Two separate weighted multinomial logistic regression models estimated the odds of mental distress in study population (AYA vs. adult cancer survivors; and AYA vs. general population), adjusting for known covariates. Results: Mental distress was more prevalent among AYAs than adult cancer survivors (moderate: 24.0% vs 18.3%; and severe: 5.7% vs 4.2% [ P= .0002]); and the general population (moderate: 24.3% vs 16.7%; and severe: 6.1% vs 5.3% [ P< .0001]). Similarly, prevalence was higher among adult cancer survivors than the general population (moderate: 16.8% vs 13.6%; and severe: 3.2% vs 2.7% [ P= .0002]). In the multivariable multinomial analyses, AYAs had greater odds of mental distress (aORmoderate = 1.44; 95% CI 1.09, 1.89; and aORsevere = 1.77; 95% CI 1.21, 2.58) vs. adult cancer survivors. AYAs also had greater odds of mental distress vs. the general population (aORmoderate = 1.39; 95% CI 1.08, 1.79), but no significant difference in severe distress. Conclusions: About 1-in-4 AYA cancer survivors report some mental distress, and distress is more prevalent among this younger age group than older adults with cancer and the general population. Psychosocial care may be especially needed in this younger population to mitigate adverse psychosocial outcomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas T. Iannarino ◽  
Allison M. Scott ◽  
Sara L. Shaunfield

Following a cancer diagnosis, young adults (YAs; that is, 18-39) often experience altered social relationships with family, friends, romantic partners, and peers. In light of the social struggles YA patients and survivors report due to cancer’s biographical disruption, we elicited narratives from 30 YA cancer survivors to examine how their normative perceptions of social support functioned to hinder and assist them in coping with the cancer experience. Through thematic narrative analysis of their individual accounts, YA survivors explained why and how they perceived various support attempts from peers and loved ones to be effective (i.e., being treated “normally”), ineffective (i.e., receiving pity, negative stories, rudeness, excessive self-monitoring, and returns from estrangement), and both effective and ineffective (e.g., instrumental and relational support) in integrating cancer into their biographies. Implications for the advancement of interpersonal communication theory and for the development of age-appropriate communication interventions, educational programs, and informational resources are discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Krok-Schoen ◽  
Angela L. Palmer-Wackerly ◽  
Phokeng M. Dailey ◽  
Julianne C. Wojno ◽  
Janice L. Krieger

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the decision-making (DM) styles of younger (18-39 years), middle-aged (40-59 years), and older (≥60 years) cancer survivors, the type and role of social support, and patient satisfaction with cancer treatment DM. Method: Adult cancer survivors ( N = 604) were surveyed using Qualtrics online software. Results: Older adults reported significantly lower influence of support on DM than younger adults. The most common DM style for the age groups was collaborative DM with their doctors. Younger age was a significant predictor of independent ( p < .05), collaborative with family ( p < .001), delegated to doctor ( p < .01), delegated to family ( p < .001), and demanding ( p < .001) DM styles. Discussion: Despite having lower received social support in cancer treatment DM, older adults were more satisfied with their DM than younger and middle-aged adults. Health care workers should be aware of different DM styles and influence of social networks to help facilitate optimal patient DM and satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document