scholarly journals The Quality of Life of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Brain Tumours and the Location of the Tumour

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Królikowska ◽  
◽  
Piotr Zieliński ◽  
Marek Harat ◽  
Renata Jabłońska ◽  
...  

Introduction. The location of intracranial neoplasms and the process of treating these lesions itself can significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Hence, the aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the location of the brain tumour on the quality of life of surgically treated patients. Aim. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of the location of the brain tumour on the quality of life of surgically treated patients. Material and Methods. The study included 236 patients with brain tumours operated at the Department of Neurosurgery of the 10th Military Clinical Hospital with the SP ZOZ Polyclinic in Bydgoszcz. Patients with different tumour locations were included: in the temporal lobe, in the frontal lobe, in the parietal lobe, in the ventricles of the brain and in the extra-cerebral locations. The following questionnaires were used to assess the quality of life: EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20, in which the patients were tested three times: on the day of admission to the Clinic, on the fifth day after brain tumour surgery and 30 days after the surgery. Results. Patients’ quality of life decreased in the early postoperative period in all groups in terms of tumour location, especially in patients with tumours of the frontal lobe (-0.104) and ventricular neoplasms (-0.109) (p > 0.05). On the 30th day, however, an improvement in the quality of life was achieved in all groups, the highest improvement was obtained in patients with tumours located extra-cerebrally (0.115) and tumours of the temporal lobe (0.097) (p > 0.05). Conclusions. There was no effect of the location of the brain tumour on the quality of life of the studied patients. In the early postoperative period, the quality of life decreased, while it improved 30 days after the surgery. (JNNN 2020;9(3):91–96) Key Words: brain tumour, quality of life, tumour location

Author(s):  
V. Yu. Cherebillo ◽  
M. Yu. Kurnukhina

The objective was to analyze and evaluate patients` quality of life before and after resection of brain meningioma.Methods and materials. We performed study of 31 patients with brain meningioma. The diagnosis of the studied patients was based on clinical and laboratory data, data of radiation and instrumental methods of research. The analysis of patients` quality of life was carried out in the preoperative, early and late postoperative periods. The patient` age ranged from 37 to 65 years; the median age was 57 years. We chose a special questionnaire-EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess quality of life of the studied pre- and postoperative periods. The questionnaire has been tested in many international clinical studies.Results. In the early postoperative period, the severity of pain increased in the patients under study, nausea and vomiting, constipation occurred more often. However, patients assessed their General health in both early and late postoperative periods better than before the operation. In the late postoperative period, there was a positive dynamics in all scales of the questionnaire.Conclusion. On examination of various parameters of quality of life before and after surgery in patients with brain meningioma, it was found that surgical intervention led to an improvement in the quality of life of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv3-iv4
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Vacher ◽  
Miguel Rodriguez Ruiz ◽  
Jeremy Rees

Abstract Aims Brain Tumour Related Epilepsy (BTRE) has a significant impact on Quality of Life with implications for driving, employment and social and domestic activities. Management of BTRE is complex due to the higher incidence of pharmacoresistance and the potential for interaction between anti-cancer therapy and anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Neurologists, oncologists, palliative care physicians and clinical nurse specialists treating these patients would benefit from up-to-date clinical guidelines. We aim to review the current evidence to adapt current NICE guidelines for Epilepsy and to outline specific recommendations for the optimal treatment of BTRE, encompassing both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Method A comprehensive search of the literature from the past 20 years on BTRE was carried out in three databases: Embase, Medline and EMCARE. A broad search strategy was used and the evidence was evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Results All patients with BTRE should be treated with AEDs. There is no proven benefit for the use of prophylactic AEDs, although there are no randomised trials testing newer agents. Seizure frequency varies between 10-40% (Class 2a evidence) in patients with Brain Metastases (BM) and from 30% (high-grade gliomas) to 90% (low-grade gliomas) (Class 2a evidence) in patients with Primary Brain Tumours (PBT). In patients with BM, risk factors include number of BM and melanoma histology (Class 2b evidence). In patients with PBT, risk factors include frontal and temporal location, oligodendroglial histology, IDH mutation and cortical infiltration (Class 2b evidence). There is a low incidence of seizures (13%) after stereotactic radiosurgery for BM (Class 2b evidence). Non-enzyme inducing AEDs are recommended as first line treatment for BTRE, but up to 50% of patients with BTRE due to PBT remain resistant (Class 2b evidence). Conclusion The review has highlighted the relative dearth of high quality evidence for the management of BTRE, and provides a framework for further studies aiming to improve seizure control, quality of life, and indications for AEDs.


Author(s):  
N S Nikolaev ◽  
A V Efimov ◽  
R V Petrova ◽  
D V Kovalev ◽  
M I Ivanov

Up to 1.5 million total hip arthroplasty is performed annually in the world. In Russia, at least 300 thousand patients a year need hip replacement surgery. High tissue invasiveness during surgical approaches presents special requirements for the rehabilitation process in the early postoperative period. Accelerating and making it more efficient is possible with the use of the least traumatic operating access. The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of two models of the organization of rehabilitation in the postoperative period after hip arthroplasty: using standard Harding surgical access and the minimally invasive Rottinger access. Material of the study - patients operated on with standard Harding access (group I, n = 227) and front-external Rottinger access (group II, n = 266). Criteria for inclusion of patients in both groups are primary coxarthrosis without previous surgical interventions, exclusion criteria are connective tissue diseases, severe comorbidity. Group I patients underwent postoperative rehabilitation according to the standard protocol, group II - according to the rehabilitation concept "ERAS, fast-track". To assess the effectiveness of the rehabilitation at all stages in both groups, the rehabilitation potential was assessed on the rehabilitation routing scale (SRM), the dynamics of the pain syndrome on the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the verticalization period was taken into account, the main assessment scales of the patient's motor functions and psychological status were used in hip arthroplasty: Harris scale, quality of life questionnaire (EQ - 5D), modified Rankin scale. Results and discussion. The proportion of hip arthroplasty using MIS access in the total number of operations increased from 0.7% in 2015 to 10.1% in 2018. The studied groups are comparable in terms of the ratio of men and women, average age, number of observations, BMI and the volume of blood loss. The surgeon duration and the duration of the stationary phase in group I exceeded the similar parameters of the II group. The modified Rankin scale at admission and discharge in all patients showed moderate disability, starting indicators and results after 3 months were more prosperous in group II. Both groups had an equivalent score on the Harris scale before surgery and after 3 months after it, more pronounced positive dynamics of the quality of life on the EQ-5D scale ("thermometer") was noted in group II. A decrease in pain after surgery compared with baseline, with regression to 0.8-1.0 points by 3 months after surgery, was noted in all patients. The assessment on the rehabilitation routing scale did not differ in both groups. At the stationary stage, group I patients walked with additional support on crutches (100%), group II - on a cane (92.5%). On long days 4-6, 82.8% of patients of group I and 91.7% of patients of group II passed long distances. At the end of stage I rehabilitation, 83.7% of group I patients and 92.5% of group II were sent to the outpatient rehabilitation stage, the rest were transferred to stage II of rehabilitation in a 24 - hour hospital. The third stage of rehabilitation, all patients went on an outpatient basis at the place of residence. At the follow-up stage, the data of a telephone survey of group II were analyzed (n = 68, 25.6% of the respondents). By 3 months, the Harris score exceeds 90 points, satisfaction with the operation is 97%. As a result of the use of surgical MIS access for hip arthroplasty, all patients had good rehabilitation indicators. Conclusions. The general approach to managing patients after hip arthroplasty is similar for all types of surgical access, however, MIS-access creates the most favorable conditions for the rehabilitation of patients in the early postoperative period: a positive attitude of the patient, reduced blood loss, reduced surgical incision, the possibility of early activation and transition to the general regime for 6-7 days. The results of the study showed the advantages of a model for the organization of rehabilitation in the postoperative period after hip arthroplasty using mini-invasive access over standard surgical access. Group II patients (MIS access) had a higher level of physical activity and a low level of pain in the early postoperative period.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-165
Author(s):  
V. Yu. Murylev ◽  
N. E. Erokhin ◽  
P. M. Elizarov ◽  
G. A. Kukovenko ◽  
A. V. Muzychenkov ◽  
...  

Background. Among the methods of surgical treatment of early stages medial knee osteoarthritis in the partial knee replacement (PKR) becomes more and more relevant. The relevance and increasing number of PKR are confirmed by data from various national registers.The aim of the study was to research the early functional results of PKR and to analyze the complications at various stages of the postoperative period.Material and Methods. Study design: a single-center prospective study. The results of 90 operations of PKR in the period from March 2018 to April 2020 are presented. Assessment of knee function and quality of life of patients was performed according to three scalesquestionnaires: KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36, which were filled in preoperatively and then at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 months. after surgery. Patients within the reporting period provided X-rays and filled in the scales at the face-to-face examination and at remote contact.Results. The most significant improvement of quality of life and median values of the functional results observed after 3 months, and after 18 months. After replacement the best median functional outcome scales KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36 — 79,4 (73,6–84,3); 27,1 (24,8–30,6); 89,1 (85,3–92,6) compared with the functional results obtained before surgery 32,3 (22,8–38,4); 73,6 (63,6–78,8); 35,2 (31,3–42,1); p = 0,027; p = 0.023; p = 0,028, respectively. A negative correlation was obtained between BMI and functional outcome (p = 0.027, R = -0.7).Conclusion. PKR allowed us to achieve an improvement in the quality of life and functional results already in the early postoperative period (from 3 to 18 months after the operation). The improvement of the operating technique, the analysis of errors and the regularity of the performed PKR will improve the results of PKR and minimize the number of complications.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e029084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Zahid ◽  
Wardah Khalid ◽  
Khabir Ahmad ◽  
Shireen Shehzad Bhamani ◽  
Iqbal Azam ◽  
...  

BackgroundCancer is a devastating disease and has detrimental effects on the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors and interferes with their treatment compliance. The aim of the study is to assess resilience and QoL among cancer survivors and to evaluate the important factors affecting their resilience and QoL, with respect to the Pakistani cultural context.Method and analysisA cross-sectional study will be conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. A minimum sample size of 250 head and neck cancers and 250 brain tumour survivors with 10% inflation for non-response rate will be required. The SD of QoL and resilience will range from 16.5 to 40.8 for head and neck cancer, and 12.7 to 34.1 for brain tumour, at 5% level of significance, with 2.5 precision. QoL will be assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 and resilience will be evaluated by Wagnild and Young’s 14-item scale. Mean±SD will be reported for resilience and QoL scores. Unadjusted and adjusted β-coefficients, with 95% CI, will be reported by using multiple linear regression analysis. Correlation analysis will also be performed using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation coefficients. A p value of <0.05 will be considered significant.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the Aga Khan University Pakistan’s Ethical Review Committee. Written informed consent will be taken from the participants by trained research assistants. A trained psychologist will provide on-spot counselling to the participants and those identified with severe depression will be referred to a psychiatrist. The study materials will be kept under lock and key and the electronic data base will be password protected and will only be accessed by the research team. The study findings will be disseminated through publications conferences and workshops and research briefs.Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03466762).


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii437-iii437
Author(s):  
Shelly Stubley ◽  
Anita Freeman ◽  
Christina Liossi ◽  
Anne-Sophie Darlington ◽  
Martha Grootenhuis ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Childhood brain tumours and their treatment can reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cause anxiety and depression, withdrawal, and social isolation. Improved communication within outpatient consultations may allow early identification and treatment of these issues. We explored family communication needs in survivors of childhood brain tumours receiving six-monthly follow-up outpatient review within the English NHS. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 families whose child aged 8–17 years had finished treatment for a brain tumour within the preceding five years. Thematic analysis used the Framework Method. RESULTS Adjusting to change and finding a “new normal” was the overarching theme to emerge. HRQoL issues included fatigue, coping with physical changes, challenges at school, isolation, and adjusting to changes in abilities. Survivors described a need for greater knowledge about and more support with changes in cognitive functioning. Parents spoke about the impact on the wider family and their changed role in supporting the child’s HRQoL. Communication barriers included short-term memory loss, shyness, and the need to suppress or regulate emotions evoked by these issues. Communication needs included more information regarding recovery and rehabilitation and/or help managing anxiety or emotional health. CONCLUSION The above communication needs and barriers should be addressed. Having a digital record to document and monitor this information systematically could improve service planning and provide patients and their families with the resources to reach their full potential and experience a better HRQoL.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Stołtny ◽  
Bogdan Dugiełło ◽  
Jarosław Pasek ◽  
Karol Szyluk ◽  
Michał Pyda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is an increasingly used method of stiffening the ankle and subtalar joints in advanced degenerative deformities. Material and methods The study group consisted of 19 men who were subjected to intramedullary and intra-osseous arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail. The average age of patients was 46 years (19–68). The main indication for surgical treatment was post-traumatic arthrosis 11 (58%). In the studied group of patients, clinical condition was assessed using the AOFAS classification, quality of life using the SF-12 scale, and assessment of pain intensity using the VAS scale. The above parameters were evaluated before surgery in the early (under 2 years), intermediate (from 2–5 years) and late (over 5 years) postoperative period. Results Analysis of the results showed that the assessed clinical condition on the AOFAS scale improved from an average of 20.6 points before TTCA to 63.5 points after the procedure. The result was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Analyzing the results obtained using the SF-12 quality of life scale, a statistically significant increase was found. In the physical sphere of quality of life PCS-12 increased from 26.5 points to 44.2 points (p = 0.0004) and in the mental sphere of quality of life MCS-12 from 46.1 points to 52.6 points (p = 0.030). The intensity of pain ailments, assessed in the VAS scale, decreased in all three periods of postoperative observation (in the early period p < 0.05, in the intermediate period p = 0.23, and in the late period p < 0.05), with the strongest analgesic effect (reduction of pain intensity by 4.3 points on the VAS scale) was observed in the early post-operative follow-up period. Conclusions Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail causes a significant improvement in the clinical condition according to the AOFAS classification, enabling most patients to move independently, a significant improvement in the physical and mental quality of life assessed in the SF-12 scale and a significant reduction in the intensity of pain ailments assessed in the VAS scale, especially in the early postoperative period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document