Erasmus Darwin, 18th-Century Polymath

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Kormondy

Erasmus Darwin was a founding member of the Lunar Society of Birmingham, the members of which were referred to as “Lunaticks.” He is here described as a polymath, an 18th-century “natural philosopher” who was a physician, scientist (with interests in botany, zoology, meteorology, chemistry, among others), inventor, and poet who also advanced quite profound evolutionary ideas two generations prior to those of his grandson, Charles Robert Darwin.

Author(s):  
M. McNEIL

Erasmus Darwin was the focus and embodiment of provincial England in his day. Renowned as a physician, he spent much of his life at Lichfield. He instigated the founding of the Lichfield Botanic Society, which provided the first English translation of the works of Linnaeus, and established a botanic garden; the Lunar Society of Birmingham; the Derby Philosophical Society; and two provincial libraries. A list of Darwin's correspondents and associates reads like a "who's who" of eighteenth century science, industry, medicine and philosophy. His poetry was also well received by his contemporaries and he expounded the evolutionary principles of life. Darwin can be seen as an English equivalent of Lamarck, being a philosopher of nature and human society. His ideas have been linked to a multitude of movements, including the nosological movement in Western medicine, nineteenth century utilitarianism, Romanticism in both Britain and Germany, and associationist psychology. The relationships between various aspects of Darwin's interests and the organizational principles of his writings were examined. His poetical form and medical theory were not peripheral to his study of nature but intrinsically linked in providing his contemporaries with a panorama of nature. A richer, more integrated comprehension of Erasmus Darwin as one of the most significant and representative personalities of his era was presented.


Classics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Ketterer ◽  
Jon Solomon

The more than four hundred years of the operatic genre have produced thousands of works involving Greco-Roman plots, characters, and themes. The musical drama labeled with the imprecise term “opera” maintained an intimate relationship with the classical tradition since its inception. Late Renaissance Italian scholars and artists who created the first operas (drammi per musica) studied and imitated ancient Greek music theory and practice, mistakenly thinking that ancient poetic drama had been sung in its entirety. The result was a wholly new dramatic form. The plots of these earliest productions for the courts of north Italy (Daphne, Euridice, Orpheus, Ariadne) derived from ancient mythological literature, as did most of the lavish French lyric “tragedy” at Versailles such as Phaeton, Perseus, or Theseus. As opera developed and spread throughout Europe, it also incorporated plots and characters from ancient Greek and Roman history and epic. The Habsburg court in Vienna produced titles like The Elements of Epicurus, and The Clemency of Titus, while the commercial productions in Venice for carnival premiered Jason and Agrippina. The tension between box-office appeal of musical spectacle and a desire for effective drama on the Greek model generated an Italian operatic reform around 1700 and the resulting librettos of Metastasio on subjects like Cato in Utica, Dido Abandoned or Artaxerxes defined serious opera for two generations. The second half of the 18th century saw another reform with Gluck’s settings of Euripidean tragedies (Alcestis, Iphigenia in Aulis, Iphigenia in Tauris), and with Cherubini’s Medea, all of which remain in the modern repertoire. In the 19th century, Hector Berlioz adapted Virgil’s epic Aeneid for his Les Troyens (The Trojans), Richard Wagner infused the tragic dramaturgy of Aeschylus in his Ring tetralogy, and the setting for Giuseppe Verdi’s Aida was derived from Greco-Egyptian literary, historical, and archaeological sources. The 20th century saw the von Hofmannsthal/Strauss Elektra, Stravinsky’s Oedipus Rex (in Latin), Carl Orff’s Prometheus (in ancient Greek), William Walton‘s Troilus and Cressida, and more than a half dozen operas based on the story of Medea. The new millennium has begun with ambitious stagings of Aeschylus’s Eumenides for the 2004 Athens Olympics and Europa Riconosciuta (Europa Identified) for the reopening of Teatro alla Scala.


A short account of Erasmus Darwin is hard to compass. This massive figure cannot be isolated, for however large he loomed in the last half of the 18th century, the greater figure of his grandson Charles has almost obscured this bulky giant. I am not attempting an assessment of his contribution to evolutionary thought, but hope to present aspects of his originality and humanity that entitle him to be remembered in his own right, besides illuminating some of the sources of his grandson’s genius, both cultural and inherited. Erasmus’s cast of mind appears to hold definite heritable qualities. Why a certain individual pursues a certain branch of knowledge remains hidden; the early chance influence, playing on the inherited capacity and developing in the culture of his time, produces a physician or a philologist, an entomologist or an etymologist. But though the chance influence that kindles the spark is seldom revealed, a substratum of family character through several generations suggests more than family traditions handed on. When we examine the achievements and characteristics of his forbears and descendants, the copious mind of Erasmus appears as a vast family aggregate.


Author(s):  
María Llum Juan Liern

RESUMENEsta contribución pretende ser una reflexión crítica sobre esa coyuntura histórica del siglo XVIII, examinada a luz de la cultura y la religiosidad, para intentar esclarecer cómo el Setecientos español está enraizado en el movimiento de renovación espiritual que enlaza con el humanismo cristiano del siglo XVI y confirma un resurgimiento del influjo y magisterio de Erasmo. Esta corriente alimenta las inquietudes de dos valencianos que defendieron unas nuevas formas de religiosidad alejadas de la religiosidad barroca en la búsqueda de un equilibrio armonioso entre razón y Revelación: Gregorio Mayans y Síscar y, Vicente Blasco García y su estrecha colaboración para publicar la "Vida de Fr. Luis de León" y las "Obras propias y traducciones de Fr. Luis de León", que propició una interesante relación epistolar acerca del interés por los clásicos griegos y latinos así como los humanistas del siglo XVI.PALABRAS CLAVEHumanismo, Ilustración valenciana, fray Luis León, Gregorio Mayans, Vicente Blasco. TITLEGregorio Mayans and Vicente Blasco, two generations of valencian Enlightenment and the same cultural and religious concern: the poems of fray Luis de León (1761)ABSTRACTThis contribution aims to be a critical reflection on that historical conjuncture of the eighteenth century, examined in light of culture and religiosity, to try to clarify how the Spanish 18th century is rooted in the movement of spiritual renewal that links with the christian humanism of the sixteenth century and confirms a resurgence of the influence and teaching of Erasmus. This current feeds the concerns of two valencians who defended new forms of religiosity away from the Baroque religiosity, in the search for a harmonious balance between reason and Revelation: Gregorio Mayans Síscar and Vicente Blasco García and their close collaboration to publish the "Life of Luis de León" and theown works and translations of Fr. Luis de León, gave rise to a very interesting epistolary relationship about the interest in the greek and latin classics, and the humanists of the 16th century.KEY WORDSHumanism, Valencian Illustration, fray Luis de León, Gregorio Mayans, Vicente Blasco.


1996 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 455-479 ◽  

There is no doubt that Dick Synge was a very exceptional person. According to his family, this first showed itself in the memory of an event, which occurred when he was only fifteen months old, when he was allowed to play with the gravel outside the church during the christening of his sister. The Synge family consisted of two branches, one of which, the Irish Synges, contained the famous playwright, J.M. Synge. They trace their ancestry back to a Thomas Millington also called Singe of Bridgenorth (born ca . 1500). The English Synges were also certainly present in Bridgenorth in the early 16th century. The Irish and the English Synges are known to have been in touch with one another in the 18th century. The English Synges remained as fairly prominent citizens of Bridgenorth until the late 19th century. Both branches of the family used the name Millington as a Christian name. For unknown reasons the spelling of his surname, Sing or Synge, varied. Family legend has it that the origin of the name Millington, which was used by both branches of the family as a Christian name, was that they had lived at Millington Hall in the parish of Rostherne (Cheshire). Because a member of the family sang so beautifully before King Henry VIII he was told to take the name of Singe. One of Dick Synge’s great uncles, born in 1863 and always known as ‘Uncle Millington’, became Warden of St Edwards School, Oxford. Among Synge’s recent ancestors was his grandmother who was a Thornely. All the Thornelys were mildly academic and quietly eccentric or unconventional in one way or another, so that Synge is thought to have inherited much from them, even including his height. Two generations further back was William Roscoe, M.R, who helped to abolish slavery and whose art collection still forms the nucleus of the Walker Art Gallery; he also founded the Liverpool Botanic Gardens. Synge came from a distinguished family which included his grandfather, A.M. Sing, who was President of the Liverpool Athenaeum and a Governor of the Liverpool Collegiate School.


Author(s):  
D. King-Hele

Long ago, I suggested that Erasmus Darwin ‘achieved more in a wider range of intellectual disciplines than anyone since’. This remark has not yet been contradicted; and that is perhaps enough to justify the choice of Erasmus Darwin as the subject of the Wilkins Lecture for 1997. I shall run quickly through his varied talents, comment on his personality and then outline his life and achievements. As an addition to the life story, I shall include glances at those of his many friends who together formed the Lunar Society of Birmingham, so called because it met at the time of the full moon; they are of course the ‘Lunaticks’ of my title. To conclude, I shall look more closely at one of his many interests, explaining how he came to believe in biological evolution (as we now call it) and then had to keep quiet about it for 20 years before eventually championing it in public.


2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
Igor N. Yurkin ◽  

On the example of representatives of the first two generations of the Demidov family, the paper shows how one of the most successful entrepreneurial dynasties of the first half of the 18th century ensured the succession of development of the family business. The strategies of its transmission by inheritance are traced in detail. The legacy of Nikita Demidov, the dynasty’s founder, was divided according to the “Law on single inheritance” (1714): the transfer of property was conflict free, but gave rise to hidden grievances that influenced the further relations of the heirs. The division of the inheritance of the middle son, Grigory Demidov, who was murdered in 1728 and did not determine his heir, also gave rise to a long-term enmity among family members. Akinfiy Demidov’s choice of a successor with careful preparation for the transfer of the undivided industrial economy to him also turned out to be unsuccessful, since most of the heirs were not satisfied. It was only the youngest son, Nikita Nikitich, who managed to carry out the operation of transferring property rights in such a way that this transfer could be considered “equalizing”, “amicable” and therefore “sinless”. The author claims that the circumstances and forms of ownership transfer by each member of the clan influenced the strategies chosen by the other members. With this in mind, the implementation by N. N. Demidov of the option, which ensured the conflict-free transfer of the family business, is regarded as a result of taking into account the mistakes and failures of his predecessors. The influence of external factors on these processes, in particular, changes in legislation regulating the field of family law, and transformations associated with a change in the estate status of actors, is also noted.


Author(s):  
V.E. Smirnov

Аннотация Статья посвящена теме взлёта и падения семейства Балфийа, на примере которого прослеживаются изменения, затронувшие военно-бюрократические институты османского Египта в конце XVII первой половине XVIII в., и определившие их дальнейшую функциональную эволюцию во второй половине XVIII столетия. Основанный одним из высших османских офицерских чинов Хасаном-агой главой (агой) корпуса гёнюллиян дом Балфийа фактически за два поколения эволюционировал в весьма влиятельный мамлюкский бейт со всеми свойственными ему атрибутами и практически ничем не отличался от более старых домов неомамлюкского типа, для которых был характерен отход от традиционного порядка передачи прав, привилегий и наследств мамлюкской знати. Анализ особенностей становления и развития дома Балфийа позволил выявить определённые закономерности формирования властных структур египетской провинции в рассматриваемый период, а также сделать ряд выводов относительно характера их функционирования и взаимодействия. В результате ассимиляции военно-политической элиты оджаков мамлюкской системой организации и патронажа в египетском эялете сложилась высшая военно-политическая группировка в лице мамлюков, которые в конце XVIII в. завладели политической инициативой и начали оспаривать власть у Порты.Abstract The article is dedicated to the rise and fall of the Balfyia family, whose story allows us to see the changes in the military and beaurocratic institutions of Ottoman Egypt in the late 17th first half of the 18th centuries, which in the end determined their functional evolution in the second half of the 18th century. Established by one of the senior Ottoman officers Hasan-aga, the head (aga) or the Gunullian corps the house of Balfyia, within two generations, evolved into a highly influential Mamluk beit, with all of the typical attributes. It was practically indistinguishable from the older houses of the neo-Mamluk type, characterized by their departure from the traditional order of the transfer of rights, privileges and inheritance of Mamluk nobility. The analysis of the peculiar characteristics and evolution of the house of Balfyia allowed us to establish the patterns of the formation of the governing structures of the Egyptian province in the examined period, as well as to make several conclusions on the character of their function and interaction. As a result of the assimilation of the military and political odzhak elites by the Mamluk organizational system and patronage in the Egyptian eyalet, a military-political Mamluk group was shaped that by the late 17th century succeeded in securing the political initiative and even challenged the Porta.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document