scholarly journals COMPARISON OF LOW-LOAD BENCH PRESS AND PUSH-UP EXERCISES ON MUSCULAR PERFORMANCE AMONG FEMALE YOUTH

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Khairunisa Abu Talip ◽  
Edmund Bonnie ◽  
Zulkifli Ismail ◽  
Mohd Rizal Md Razali
Keyword(s):  
Muscular Strength ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Muscular Endurance ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Female Youth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Low Load ◽  
Push Up

Introduction: Various fitness challenges had been invented and innovated in order to integrate exercise in life, especially during the new norm of Covid-19 pandemic. There is a lack of study on the effect of push-up exercise on sedentary women. The study aimed to compare the effects of six-week push-up (PU) and low-load bench press (BP) exercise interventions towards muscular strength (MS) and muscular endurance (ME) among healthy sedentary female youth. Methodology: Forty (n= 40) healthy sedentary female youth (aged 18.93 ±.97 years; body mass index 23.44 ±4.5 kg/m2) were recruited in the study. Participants were divided into two groups of training interventions (push-up and bench press group). Resistance exercise intervention involving four sessions per week for six consecutive weeks. Each session comprised of 3 sets of 12 repetitions with one minute of rest between each set. Bench press exercise was performed at 40% 1RM for bench press group. One-repetition maximum bench press (1RM BP) test and one-minute push-up (1Min PU) test were performed at pre and post-intervention to measure muscular strength and muscular endurance. A 2 x 2 mixed model ANOVA was employed to compare the effects of the two interventions following six-weeks of training. Result: Muscular strength and muscular endurance for the push-up group have significantly improved (p < .05), with at the end of the intervention were 59.75 ±13.91 and 45.05 ±6.59 as compared to during the pre-intervention of 42.0± 11.40 and 28.95 ±5.93, respectively. A similar result also found for bench press group. Muscular strength and muscular endurance for bench press group had significantly increased (p < .05), from the pre-test of 44.50 ±9.58 and 29.95 ±6.28 to the post-test of 60.25 ±10.45 and 41.45 ±6.20, respectively. However, there is no significant difference observed between groups (bench press and push-up protocols) on muscular strength (p= .661) and muscular endurance (p= .472). Conclusions: The present study concludes that push-up and low-load bench press exercise interventions do significantly improve muscular strength and muscular endurance of sedentary female youth, with push-up as an alternative for bench press for sedentary female youth.

Comparison of CrossFit Barbara and classic resistance trainings for the protection of strength performance during off-season in kickboxers

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Cebrail Gençoğlu ◽  
İlhan Şen
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
Strength Performance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Push Up

BACKGROUND: The inability of athletes to train or the decrease in the intensity and frequency of training may cause athletes to lose performance. Particularly in view of the current COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining strength outside the normal framework provides an advantage to athletes for the next competitions. OBJECTIVE: To compare the CrossFit Barbara which can be applied easily at home during the off-season or some situations such as the epidemic limitation to classic resistance training methods used to maintain the strength performance of national kickboxers. METHODS: Forty-three national kickboxers, CrossFit (CF, n= 22), and resistance training (RT, n= 21), participated in this study. While CF performed 20 pull-ups, 30 push-ups, 40 sit-ups, and 50 squat exercises, RT performed bench press, lat pull down, leg press, biceps curl, and triceps extension exercises twice per week for six weeks. Before and after the six weeks, the following variables were measured; body mass (BM) and body fat percentage (FP), VO2max, bench press (BP), squat (SQ), leg strength (LS), hand grip strength (HGS), pull-up, push-up and counter movement jump (CMJ). RESULTS: BP (p< 0.001, F= 41.125, ηp2= 0.501), SQ (p< 0.001, F= 26.604, ηp2= 0.394), LS (p< 0.001, F= 15.234, ηp2= 0.271), push-up (p< 0.001, F= 31.978, ηp2= 0.438) and pull-up (p< 0.001, F= 24.410, ηp2= 0.373) values changed significantly in group-time interaction between CF and RT groups, while there was no significant difference for the BM (p= 0.198, F= 1.715, ηp2= 0.040), Fat (p= 0.265, F= 1.279, ηp2= 0.030), HGS (p= 0.665, F= 0.190, ηp2= 0.005, CMJ (p= 0.054, F= 3.946, ηp2= 0.088) and VO2max (p=0.747, F= 0.106, ηp2= 0.003). Furthermore, according to the before and after study values, BP, SQ, LS, and CMJ decreased significantly (p< 0.05) while BM, FP, HGS, VO2max, pull-up and push-up variables did not in the CF (p> 0.05). In the RT, the pull-up and push-up variables decreased significantly (p< 0.05) while there was no significant difference for BP, SQ, LS, HGS, VO2max, body mass, body fat percentage and CMJ (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: CF Barbara workout was more effective in maintaining strength endurance performances, and RT in maintaining maximum strength performances. According to the individual performance needs of athletes, reasonable training method can be used to prevent performance decrement in the strength domain.

Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular endurance responses immediately and 2 months after a whole-body Tabata or vigorous-intensity continuous training intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 650-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hashim Islam ◽  
Tina L. Siemens ◽  
Jennifer B.L. Matusiak ◽  
Laura Sawula ◽  
Jacob T. Bonafiglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Individual Response ◽  
Muscular Endurance ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Training Post ◽  
Vigorous Intensity ◽  
Push Up

Young adults (52 females, 16 males; age = 21 ± 3 years; V̇O2peak: 41 ± 6 mL/(kg·min)) were randomized into 3 groups: (i) no-exercise control (CTL; n = 15), (ii) Tabata (n = 27), or (iii) vigorous-intensity continuous training (VICT; n = 26) groups for a 4-week supervised training period (4 sessions/week). V̇O2peak, time-to-fatigue (TTF), 5 km time-trial performance (TT), and muscular endurance were assessed at baseline, post-training (POST), and 2-month follow-up (FU). Response confidence intervals (CI) were used to classify individuals as likely responders (R; CI > 0). Both exercise interventions increased TTF and TT at POST (both p < 0.01), but these benefits were maintained at FU after VICT only (p < 0.01). Push-up performance was increased at POST and FU (both p < 0.01) after Tabata. VICT resulted in a greater proportion of TTF R versus both groups at POST (CTL: 1/15; VICT: 19/26; Tabata: 9/27) and versus Tabata at FU (3/15; 13/26; 4/27). VICT also had a greater proportion of TT R versus CTL at POST (2/15; 17/26; 10/27). Tabata had a greater proportion of R for maximum push-up repetitions versus both groups at POST (3/15; 6/26; 18/27) and versus CTL at FU (2/15; 10/26; 18/27). Collectively, VICT appears to be more effective for improving cardiorespiratory fitness, whereas whole-body Tabata confers larger improvements in push-up performance following short-term training. Novelty: Vigorous-intensity continuous training elicits larger improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness versus whole-body Tabata. Individual response profiles parallel group-level changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular endurance.

scholarly journals Effect of exercise on shoulder function and morbidity following mastectomy with axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer: a prospective randomized clinical study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3217
Author(s):  
Sri Aurobindo Prasad Das ◽  
Sathasivam Sureshkumar ◽  
Vijayakumar C. ◽  
Vikram Kate ◽  
Srinivasan K.
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion ◽  
Drain Removal ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: There are no guidelines for the exercises performed in physical rehabilitation after breast cancer surgery and, specifically, for how to minimize these postoperative complications. Hence this study was conducted to study the effect of exercise intervention on upper extremity range of motion, strength, lymphedema, pain and activities of daily living (ADL).Methods: A total of 75 patients were included in the study in accordance to inclusion criteria. They were randomized into exercise group (n=38) and no exercise group (n=37). Patients in the exercise group were given a set of 19 active or active assisted range of motion exercises and strengthening exercises with frequent follow up. The other group were did not receive any strict exercise, they were given a few free hand exercise when they had some shoulder complaints based on treating physician discretion. Apart from demographic data other parameters studied were pain, numbness, active shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, lymphedema and ADL. These were evaluated before surgery, 24 hours after drain removal and 3 weeks /6 weeks/ 3 months of post-surgery.Results: Demographic parameters were comparable between the groups. Pain score, shoulder ROM were better in the exercise group compared to no exercise group and this difference was found to be significant (p <0.001). More patients in no exercise group experienced numbness. There was no statistically significant difference in the grip strength between the two groups. The incidence of lymphedema was higher in no exercise group compared to exercise group and this was extremely significant. (p < 0.001). Patients in no exercise group had higher disability scores for ADL which was significant compared to exercise group.Conclusions: Exercise interventions resulted in significantly reduced pain, improved shoulder ROM and lowered ADL impairment. Exercise intervention significantly reduced the incidence of lymphedema, but there was no effect on strength.

scholarly journals Different Doses of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Have No Effect on Exercise Performance in Resistance Trained Women

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3463
Author(s):  
Raci Karayigit ◽  
Scott C. Forbes ◽  
Alireza Naderi ◽  
Darren G. Candow ◽  
Ulas C. Yildirim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscular Strength ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Female Athletes ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Mouth Rinse ◽  
Muscular Endurance ◽  
Training Experience

Carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse has been shown to enhance aerobic endurance performance. However, the effects of CHO mouth rinse on muscular strength and endurance are mixed and may be dependent on dosage of CHO. The primary purpose was to examine the effects of different dosages of CHO rinse on strength (bench press 1 repetition maximum [1-RM]) and muscular endurance (40% of 1-RM repetitions to failure) in female athletes. Sixteen resistance-trained females (age: 20 ± 1 years; height: 167 ± 3 cm; body mass: 67 ± 4 kg; BMI: 17 ± 2 kg/m2; resistance training experience: 2 ± 1 years) completed four conditions in random order. The four conditions consisted of a mouth rinse with 25 mL solutions containing either 6% of CHO (Low dose of CHO: LCHO), 12% CHO (Moderate dose of CHO: MCHO), 18% CHO (High dose of CHO: HCHO) or water (Placebo: PLA) for 10 s prior to a bench press strength and muscular endurance test. Maximal strength (1-RM), muscular endurance (reps and total volume), heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and glucose (GLU) were recorded each condition. There were no significant differences in strength (p = 0.95) or muscular endurance (total repetitions: p = 0.06; total volume: p = 0.20) between conditions. Similarly, HR (p = 0.69), RPE (p = 0.09) and GLU (p = 0.92) did not differ between conditions. In conclusion, various doses of CHO mouth rinse (6%, 12% and 18%) have no effect on upper body muscular strength or muscular endurance in female athletes.

scholarly journals The role of volume-load in strength and absolute endurance adaptations in adolescent’s performing high- or low-load resistance training

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Steele ◽  
James P. Fisher ◽  
Ari R. Assunção ◽  
Martim Bottaro ◽  
Paulo Gentil
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Load Resistance ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Muscular Endurance ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Volume Load ◽  
Low Load

This study compared high- (HL) and low-load (LL) resistance training (RT) on strength, absolute endurance, volume-load, and their relationships in untrained adolescents. Thirty-three untrained adolescents of both sexes (males, n = 17; females, n = 16; 14 ± 1 years) were randomly assigned into either (i) HL (n = 17): performing 3 sets of 4–6 repetitions to momentary concentric failure; or (ii) LL (n = 16): performing 2 sets of 12–15 repetitions to momentary concentric failure. RT was performed for 2×/week for 9 weeks. Change in maximum strength (1 repetition maximum) and absolute muscular endurance for barbell bench press was assessed. Weekly volume-load was calculated as sets (n) × repetitions (n) × load (kg). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) revealed that both groups significantly increased in strength and absolute endurance with large effect sizes (d = 1.51–1.66). There were no between-group differences for change in strength or absolute endurance. Ninety-five percent CIs revealed that both groups significantly increased in weekly volume-load with large effect sizes (HL = 1.66, LL = 1.02). There were no between-group differences for change in volume-load though average weekly volume-load was significantly greater for LL (p < 0.001). Significant Pearson’s correlations were found for the HL group between average weekly volume-load and both strength (r = 0.650, p = 0.005) and absolute endurance (r = 0.552, p = 0.022) increases. Strength and absolute endurance increases do not differ between HL and LL conditions in adolescents when performed to momentary concentric failure. Under HL conditions greater weekly volume-load is associated with greater strength and absolute endurance increases.

P2528Responsiveness to nutritional intervention would impact on future cardiovascular prognosis in poor fitness patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ehara ◽  
K Shibata ◽  
M Kameshima ◽  
H Fujiyama ◽  
M Terai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Peak Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Fitness Level ◽  
Cardiovascular Prognosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index

Abstract Purpose Nutritional improvement has been proposed for long-term cardiovascular prognosis as well as fitness recovery. We aimed to examine whether “responsiveness” to nutritional and exercise interventions would impact patients' cardiovascular prognosis even patients in low baseline fitness level. Methods We included 254 consecutive patients who participated in the phase II comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation (CCR) for at least three months. All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) at the initial and completion phases of CCR. Nutritional guidance was periodically performed individually during CCR. Peak oxygen uptake (PVO2) was measured through CPX to evaluate the fitness level, whereas nutritional status was evaluated using the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI). Patients were divided into “low fitness” and “normal fitness” groups based on the median of baseline PVO2. Each group was further classified into four categories according to the changes in VO2 and GNRI during CCR: “Both NOT improved”, “Only GNRI improved”, “Only PVO2 improved”, and “Both improved”. Results Cox proportional regression analysis showed that the category of “both NOT improved” was an independent predictor for cardiovascular risk among the baseline low fitness group (Hazard ratio: 4.5, p=0.007); whereas no significant difference among the normal fitness group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the event-free survival rate was significantly lower in the “both NOT improved” category (log rank p=0.002) among the baseline low fitness group (figure); whereas no significant difference among the normal fitness group. GNRI/PVO2 improvement vs. prognosis Conclusion Responsiveness to nutritional and exercise intervention could be a predictive factor of cardiovascular prognosis even in low fitness patients.

scholarly journals Multicomponent Physical Exercise in Older Adults after Hospitalization: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Short- vs. Long-Term Group-Based Interventions

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iñaki Echeverria ◽  
Maria Amasene ◽  
Miriam Urquiza ◽  
Idoia Labayen ◽  
Pilar Anaut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Positive Effects

Multicomponent physical exercise is effective in curbing the effect of hospitalization in older adults. However, it is not well established which characteristics of the exercise interventions would optimize intervention sustainability and efficacy. This study compared the effects of two group-based multicomponent exercise interventions of different lengths in older adults after hospitalization. Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned to a short-term group-based branch (SGB, n = 27) or to a long-term group-based branch (LGB, n = 28). The SGB participated in a six-week multicomponent group-based exercise-training program followed by 18 weeks of home-based exercise. The LGB completed 12 weeks of each phase. Physical function, physical activity, quality of life, anthropometrics, and nutritional status were assessed at baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 weeks of intervention. Both groups improved physical function and nutritional status and increased physical activity after 12 weeks of intervention (paired student’s t-test, p < 0.01), and maintained the positive effects during the following 12 weeks. No group-by-time interaction was observed in any of the studied variables using mixed-model ANOVA. Based on these findings, we determined that 6 weeks of a group-based exercise intervention caused similar functional and nutritional benefits to a longer group-based intervention of 12 weeks when both are continued at home until 24 weeks.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Body Composition and Physical Fitness and the Effect of Exercise According to the Level of Childhood Obesity Using the MGPA Model

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 487
Author(s):  
Chae Kwan Lee ◽  
Young Kyun Sim ◽  
Jae-Hoon Lee ◽  
Jang Soo Yook ◽  
Soo-Min Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Childhood Obesity ◽  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Muscular Strength ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
The Body ◽  
Muscular Endurance ◽  
The Relationship

Childhood obesity can lead to adulthood obesity with adverse effects. Since body composition and physical fitness differ depending on the obesity degree, a systemic analysis could help classify that degree. We used three study designs based on the obesity degree (body mass index [BMI] as a reference) for our objectives. First, we identified the relationship between body composition and physical fitness. Second, we determined the effects of exercise on body composition and physical fitness. Third, we performed a path analysis of the impact of exercise on body composition and physical fitness, and verified those effects among the groups. In study 1, 164 10-year-old subjects were divided into four groups: 33 in the normal weight (NO), 34 in overweight (OV), 54 in obesity (OB), and 43 in the severe obesity (SOB) group. In study 2, 101 participants from study 1 who wished to participate in the exercise program were divided into four groups (same criteria). The exercise program (three times a week for 60 min, for 16 weeks) consisted of sports and reinforcement exercises of increasing intensity. Body composition was measured by body weight, percentage of body fat (%BF), muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and body mass index (BMI). In contrast, physical fitness was measured by muscular strength, flexibility, muscular endurance, agility, and balance. As a result, all body composition variables were higher in the SOB group than in the other groups. Physical fitness, muscular strength and balance, and agility were highest in the SOB, NO, and OV groups, respectively. Pearson’s correlation revealed that muscular strength was associated with height and body weight across all groups. Agility showed a negative correlation with %BF in the NO, OB, and SOB groups. SMM was positively correlated in the OB and SOB groups. After the exercise intervention, BMI and the %BF of the SOB group were significantly reduced (p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively), while SMM presented a significant increase (p < 0.001). Height also showed a significant increase in all groups (p < 0.001). Among physical fitness variables, muscular strength, flexibility, muscular endurance, and balance showed a significant increase in all groups, while a significant increase in power was observed in only the OB and SOB groups. As for the effects of the body composition on physical fitness after exercise intervention, the greatest impact was observed for balance, muscular strength and agility, and muscular endurance in NO, OV, and OB groups, respectively. In conclusion, the body composition, physical fitness relationship, and the effects of exercise intervention on them differed depending on the obesity degree. Furthermore, the results varied according to the obesity degree. Thus, our study highlights the importance of creating particular exercise programs for the effective prevention and treatment of childhood obesity considering the obesity degree.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document