scholarly journals Tel1 Activation by the MRX Complex Is Sufficient for Telomere Length Regulation but Not for the DNA Damage Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 213 (4) ◽  
pp. 1271-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Keener ◽  
Carla J. Connelly ◽  
Carol W. Greider
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Telomere Elongation ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Epistasis Analysis ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation

Previous models suggested that regulation of telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Tel1(ATM) and Mec1(ATR) would parallel the established pathways regulating the DNA damage response. Here, we provide evidence that telomere length regulation differs from the DNA damage response in both the Tel1 and Mec1 pathways. We found that Rad53 mediates a Mec1 telomere length regulation pathway but is dispensable for Tel1 telomere length regulation, whereas in the DNA damage response, Rad53 is regulated by both Mec1 and Tel1. Using epistasis analysis with a Tel1 hypermorphic allele, Tel1-hy909, we found that the MRX complex is not required downstream of Tel1 for telomere elongation but is required downstream of Tel1 for the DNA damage response. Our data suggest that nucleolytic telomere end processing is not a required step for telomerase to elongate telomeres.

scholarly journals Tel1 activation by the MRX complex is sufficient for telomere length regulation but not for the DNA damage response in S. cerevisiae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Keener ◽  
Carla J. Connelly ◽  
Carol W. Greider
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Telomere Elongation ◽  
Epistasis Analysis ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Processing Event ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation

AbstractPrevious models suggested that regulation of telomere length in S. cerevisiae by Tel1(ATM) and Mec1(ATR) parallel the established pathways regulating the DNA damage response. Here we provide evidence that telomere length regulation differs from the DNA damage response in both the Tel1 and Mec1 pathways. We found that Rad53 mediates a Mec1 telomere length regulation pathway but is dispensable for Tel1 telomere length regulation, whereas in the DNA damage response Rad53 is regulated by both Mec1 and Tel1. Using epistasis analysis with a Tel1 hypermorphic allele, Tel1-hy909, we found that the MRX complex is not required downstream of Tel1 for telomere elongation but is required downstream of Tel1 for the DNA damage response. Since models that invoke a required end processing event for telomerase elongation are primarily based on the yeast pathways, our data call for a re-examination of the requirement for telomere end processing in both yeast and mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Distinct Functions in Regulation of Meiotic Crossovers for DNA Damage Response Clamp Loader Rad24(Rad17) and Mec1(ATR) Kinase

Genetics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 213 (4) ◽  
pp. 1255-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miki Shinohara ◽  
Douglas K. Bishop ◽  
Akira Shinohara
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Clamp Loader ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Distinct Mechanism ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Specific Manner ◽  
Atr Kinase

The number and distribution of meiotic crossovers (COs) are highly regulated, reflecting the requirement for COs during the first round of meiotic chromosome segregation. CO control includes CO assurance and CO interference, which promote at least one CO per chromosome bivalent and evenly-spaced COs, respectively. Previous studies revealed a role for the DNA damage response (DDR) clamp and the clamp loader in CO formation by promoting interfering COs and interhomolog recombination, and also by suppressing ectopic recombination. In this study, we use classical tetrad analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to show that a mutant defective in RAD24, which encodes the DDR clamp loader (RAD17 in other organisms), displayed reduced CO frequencies on two shorter chromosomes (III and V), but not on a long chromosome (chromosome VII). The residual COs in the rad24 mutant do not show interference. In contrast to rad24, mutants defective in the ATR kinase homolog Mec1, including a mec1 null and a mec1 kinase-dead mutant, show slight or few defects in CO frequency. On the other hand, mec1 COs show defects in interference, similar to the rad24 mutant. Our results support a model in which the DDR clamp and clamp-loader proteins promote interfering COs by recruiting pro-CO Zip, Mer, and Msh proteins to recombination sites, while the Mec1 kinase regulates CO distribution by a distinct mechanism. Moreover, CO formation and its control are implemented in a chromosome-specific manner, which may reflect a role for chromosome size in regulation.

scholarly journals The Role of Rif1 in telomere length regulation is separable from its role in origin firing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calla B. Shubin ◽  
Carol W. Greider
Keyword(s):  
Telomere Length ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Complex ◽  
Telomere Elongation ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Lengthening

AbstractTo examine the established link between DNA replication and telomere length, we tested whether firing of telomeric origins would cause telomere lengthening. We found that RIF1 mutants that block Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding activated telomeric origins but did not elongate telomeres. In a second approach, we found overexpression of ΔN-Dbf4 and Cdc7 increased DDK activity and activated telomeric origins, yet telomere length was unchanged. We tested a third mechanism to activate origins using the sld3-A mcm5-bob1 mutant that deregulates the pre-replication complex, and again saw no change in telomere length. Finally, we tested whether mutations in RIF1 that cause telomere elongation would affect origin firing. We found that neither rif1-Δ1322 nor rif1HOOK affected firing of telomeric origins. We conclude that telomeric origin firing does not cause telomere elongation, and the role of Rif1 in regulating origin firing is separable from its role in regulating telomere length.

scholarly journals The expression of telomere-related proteins and DNA damage response and their association with telomere length in colorectal cancer in Saudi patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0197154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ftoon Aljarbou ◽  
Nourah Almousa ◽  
Mohammad Bazzi ◽  
Sooad Aldaihan ◽  
Mohammed Alanazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Saudi Patients

scholarly journals Telomeres and Cancer

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Hueng-Chuen Fan ◽  
Fung-Wei Chang ◽  
Jeng-Dau Tsai ◽  
Kao-Min Lin ◽  
Chuan-Mu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Telomere Length ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Telomere Maintenance ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Telomere Elongation ◽  
Metabolism Pathway ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation ◽  
Genome Protection

Telomeres cap the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and are indispensable chromatin structures for genome protection and replication. Telomere length maintenance has been attributed to several functional modulators, including telomerase, the shelterin complex, and the CST complex, synergizing with DNA replication, repair, and the RNA metabolism pathway components. As dysfunctional telomere maintenance and telomerase activation are associated with several human diseases, including cancer, the molecular mechanisms behind telomere length regulation and protection need particular emphasis. Cancer cells exhibit telomerase activation, enabling replicative immortality. Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activation is involved in cancer development through diverse activities other than mediating telomere elongation. This review describes the telomere functions, the role of functional modulators, the implications in cancer development, and the future therapeutic opportunities.

scholarly journals The role of Rif1 in telomere length regulation is separable from its role in origin firing

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calla B Shubin ◽  
Carol W Greider
Keyword(s):  
Telomere Length ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Complex ◽  
Telomere Elongation ◽  
Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Length Regulation ◽  
Telomere Lengthening

To examine the established link between DNA replication and telomere length, we tested whether firing of telomeric origins would cause telomere lengthening. We found that RIF1 mutants that block Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding activated telomeric origins but did not elongate telomeres. In a second approach, we found overexpression of ∆N-Dbf4 and Cdc7 increased DDK activity and activated telomeric origins, yet telomere length was unchanged. We tested a third mechanism to activate origins using the sld3-A mcm5-bob1 mutant that de-regulates the pre-replication complex, and again saw no change in telomere length. Finally, we tested whether mutations in RIF1 that cause telomere elongation would affect origin firing. We found that neither rif1-∆1322 nor rif1HOOK affected firing of telomeric origins. We conclude that telomeric origin firing does not cause telomere elongation, and the role of Rif1 in regulating origin firing is separable from its role in regulating telomere length.

The Telomerase Inhibitor RHPS4 Induces Telomere Shortening, DNA-Damage and Cell Death in AML Cells and Chemosensitises Cells to Daunorubicin.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2760-2760
Author(s):  
Monica Pallis ◽  
Dotun Ojo ◽  
Jaineeta Richardson ◽  
John Ronan ◽  
Malcolm Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Telomere Shortening ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract Abstract 2760 Poster Board II-736 The quadruplex ligand RHPS4 is the lead compound in a drug discovery program at the University of Nottingham. It has been shown to bind to telomeres and inhibit telomerase, and subsequently induces growth arrest in progenitor cells from cancer cell lines whilst sparing normal haematopoietic progenitor cells. We explored its in vitro effects in AML cells, which are reported generally to have considerably shorter telomeres than normal CD34+ cells. AML cell lines were grown for 21 days in suspension culture. Primary samples were cultured for 14 days in semi-solid medium. Telomere length was measured by Southern blotting. γH2A.X was used to identify a DNA damage response, and cell viability was measured flow cytometrically with 7-amino actinomycin D. As reported in other tumour cell types, sensitivity to RHPS4 was found to be greatest in those AML cells with the shortest telomeres. In the OCI-AML3 cell line 0.3 μM RHPS4 inhibited cell growth by 50% in a 21 day clonogenic assay, accompanied by shortening of telomeres from 2.6 Kb to <1 Kb. Molm 13 cells (initial telomere length 3.2kB) also underwent telomere shortening in the presence of 0.3 μM RHPS4 (2.8Kb), whereas TF1a and U937 (both with initial telomere lengths approximately 6.5 kB) were insensitive at that concentration. After 6 days at 0.3 μM, RHPS4 was cytostatic, but at higher concentrations (1 μM) the drug was found to induce a substantial DNA damage response and loss of viability to OCI-AML3 cells. Moreover 0.3 μM RHPS4 enhanced the γH2A.X expression and cell death induced by the chemotherapy drug daunorubicin in these cells. Using 14 day clonogenic assays in primary AML samples (n=6), we found that the IC50 for RHPS4 alone was 0.7 μM. However, in the presence of 0.3 μM RHPS4, the median IC50 to daunorubicin was reduced from 19 nM to 5.5 nM. In conclusion we have determined that RHPS4 has telomere-shortening, cytostatic, cytotoxic and chemosensitising properties in AML cells. Disclosures: Stevens: Pharminox Ltd: director and shareholder of Pharminox Ltd which has a financial interest in RHPS4.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document