scholarly journals Factors of Specific Comorbidities Severity on the Risk of Mortality among Breast Cancer Survivors

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hwa Jeong Seo

Background: For cancer patients, comorbidities affect the risk, progression, and process of treatment. They negatively affect prognoses by increasing mortality. It is therefore necessary to predict prognoses accurately for cancer survivors by measuring comorbidities and their severity.Methods: In this study, the frequency of comorbidities was analyzed on the basis of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in breast cancer patients drawn from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort data. This study examined the relative effects of certain factors (age, diagnosis period, and CCI) between deaths and cancer survivors with logistic regression analysis. We applied Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis to predict the risk of mortality according to CCI as a survival predictor of breast cancer patients using three models with correction for age, including the body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol intake, and childbirth history.Results: The frequency analysis based on CCI found that the most frequent type of condition was pulmonary disease (2,262; 21.5%), followed by peptic ulcer (2,019; 19.2%), and metastatic cancer (1,821; 17.3%). The older one gets, the greater one’s risk of mortality with more severe comorbidities. Age and BMI led to greater risk of mortality, with correction for the variables (age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake and childbirth history) that could cause confounding.Conclusions: Severity of comorbidities significantly increased the risk of mortality for breast cancer patients. In particular, those cancer survivors who are aged ≥60 years, who have high BMI, and who once smoked need to get continuous care due to poor prognoses.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Sun ◽  
Dandan Ma ◽  
Pingping Gao ◽  
Yanling Li ◽  
Zexuan Yan ◽  
...  

The improvement in the quality of life is accompanied by an accelerated pace of living and increased work-related pressures. Recent decades has seen an increase in the proportion of obese patients, as well as an increase in the prevalence of breast cancer. More and more evidences prove that obesity may be one of a prognostic impact factor in patients with breast cancer. Obesity presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the population of breast cancer patients. Therefore, it is essential to have a better understanding of the relationship between obesity and breast cancer. This study aims to construct a prognostic risk prediction model combining obesity and breast cancer. In this study, we obtained a breast cancer sample dataset from the GEO database containing obesity data [determined by the body mass index (BMI)]. A total of 1174 genes that were differentially expressed between breast cancer samples of patients with and without obesity were screened by the rank-sum test. After weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), 791 related genes were further screened. Relying on single-factor COX regression analysis to screen the candidate genes to 30, these 30 genes and another set of TCGA data were intersected to obtain 24 common genes. Finally, lasso regression analysis was performed on 24 genes, and a breast cancer prognostic risk prediction model containing 6 related genes was obtained. The model was also found to be related to the infiltration of immune cells. This study provides a new and accurate prognostic model for predicting the survival of breast cancer patients with obesity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Lang ◽  
Badri Karthikeyan ◽  
Adolfo Quiñones-Lombraña ◽  
Rachael Hageman Blair ◽  
Amy P. Early ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The CBR3 V244M single nucleotide polymorphism has been linked to the risk of anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy in survivors of childhood cancer. There have been limited prospective studies examining the impact of CBR3 V244M on the risk for anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in adult cohorts. Objectives This study evaluated the presence of associations between CBR3 V244M genotype status and changes in echocardiographic parameters in breast cancer patients undergoing doxorubicin treatment. Methods We recruited 155 patients with breast cancer receiving treatment with doxorubicin (DOX) at Roswell Park Comprehensive Care Center (Buffalo, NY) to a prospective single arm observational pharmacogenetic study. Patients were genotyped for the CBR3 V244M variant. 92 patients received an echocardiogram at baseline (t0 month) and at 6 months (t6 months) of follow up after DOX treatment. Apical two-chamber and four-chamber echocardiographic images were used to calculate volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using Simpson’s biplane rule by investigators blinded to all patient data. Volumetric indices were evaluated by normalizing the cardiac volumes to the body surface area (BSA). Results Breast cancer patients with CBR3 GG and AG genotypes both experienced a statistically significant reduction in LVEF at 6 months following initiation of DOX treatment for breast cancer compared with their pre-DOX baseline study. Patients homozygous for the CBR3 V244M G allele (CBR3 V244) exhibited a further statistically significant decrease in LVEF at 6 months following DOX therapy in comparison with patients with heterozygous AG genotype. We found no differences in age, pre-existing cardiac diseases associated with myocardial injury, cumulative DOX dose, or concurrent use of cardioprotective medication between CBR3 genotype groups. Conclusions CBR3 V244M genotype status is associated with changes in echocardiographic parameters suggestive of early anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy in subjects undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Yu ◽  
Xianqi Meng ◽  
Huang Chen ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Wenwen Gao ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate whether radiomics classifiers from mammography can help predict tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels in breast cancer.MethodsData from 121 consecutive patients with pathologically-proven breast cancer who underwent preoperative mammography from February 2018 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training dataset (n = 85) and a validation dataset (n = 36). A total of 612 quantitative radiomics features were extracted from mammograms using the Pyradiomics software. Radiomics feature selection and radiomics classifier were generated through recursive feature elimination and logistic regression analysis model. The relationship between radiomics features and TIL levels in breast cancer patients was explored. The predictive capacity of the radiomics classifiers for the TIL levels was investigated through receiver operating characteristic curves in the training and validation groups. A radiomics score (Rad score) was generated using a logistic regression analysis method to compute the training and validation datasets, and combining the Mann–Whitney U test to evaluate the level of TILs in the low and high groups.ResultsAmong the 121 patients, 32 (26.44%) exhibited high TIL levels, and 89 (73.56%) showed low TIL levels. The ER negativity (p = 0.01) and the Ki-67 negative threshold level (p = 0.03) in the low TIL group was higher than that in the high TIL group. Through the radiomics feature selection, six top-class features [Wavelet GLDM low gray-level emphasis (mediolateral oblique, MLO), GLRLM short-run low gray-level emphasis (craniocaudal, CC), LBP2D GLRLM short-run high gray-level emphasis (CC), LBP2D GLDM dependence entropy (MLO), wavelet interquartile range (MLO), and LBP2D median (MLO)] were selected to constitute the radiomics classifiers. The radiomics classifier had an excellent predictive performance for TIL levels both in the training and validation sets [area under the curve (AUC): 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.738–0.917, with positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.913; AUC: 0.79, 95% CI, 0.615–0.964, with PPV of 0.889, respectively]. Moreover, the Rad score in the training dataset was higher than that in the validation dataset (p = 0.007 and p = 0.001, respectively).ConclusionRadiomics from digital mammograms not only predicts the TIL levels in breast cancer patients, but can also serve as non-invasive biomarkers in precision medicine, allowing for the development of treatment plans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongqing Su ◽  
Qianzi Lu ◽  
Yi Pan ◽  
Yao Yu ◽  
Shiyuan Wang ◽  
...  

Background: Breast cancer has plagued women for many years and caused many deaths around the world. Method: In this study, based on the weighted correlation network analysis, univariate Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, 12 immune-related genes were selected to construct the risk score for breast cancer patients. The multivariable Cox regression analysis, gene set enrichment analysis and nomogram were also conducted in this study. Results: Good results were obtained in the survival analysis, enrichment analysis, multivariable Cox regression analysis and immune-related feature analysis. When the risk score model was applied in 22 breast cancer cohorts, the univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the risk score model was significantly associated with overall survival in most of the breast cancer cohorts. Conclusion: Based on these results, we could conclude that the proposed risk score model may be a promising method, and may improve the treatment stratification of breast cancer patients in the future work.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22219-e22219
Author(s):  
B. S. Ajaikumar ◽  
R. Rao ◽  
J. Prabhu ◽  
J. D. Kulkarni ◽  
P. K ◽  
...  

e22219 Background: Triple-negative (ER-negative, PR-negative, HER2/neu negative) breast cancer has distinct clinical and pathologic features, and is a clinical problem because of its typically high grade, relatively poor prognosis, aggressive behavior and lack of targeted therapies leaving chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment. This study envisaged to analyse the influence of triple negativity status on survival and disease free survival in prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Methods: Breast tumors of 215 women aged 30–75, diagnosed from 2004 were tested for ER, PR and HER2 positivity by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinical outcomes such as recurrence, disease free survival and overall survival using Kaplan Meiers Survival analysis and Coxs regression analysis. The study cohort was followed up for 60 months or until death whichever was earlier. Results: Triple negativity significantly influenced disease free survival (46 ± 3, 41, 52) vs. non triple negative cohort (mean ± SE; 95%CI, 37 ± 2; 32, 40) and log rank = 2.1, p = 0.04. However triple negativity did not influence overall survival in months (56 ± 0; 55, 56) vs. non triple negative cohort (43 ± 1; 42, 45), (log rank = 1.78, p = 0.16). However, the mean disease free survival was (45 ± 7; 32, 58) months for patients >40 years age vs (37 ± 4; 33, 39) for patients < 40 years of age (log rank = 2.87, p =0.02). Stage of disease, node status, grade and menopausal status did not influence disease free survival significantly. However, Cox regression analysis did not predict significant effects of triple negativity on overall survival or disease free survival when controlled for confounding factors such as age, node status, stage etc Conclusions: Our observations suggest that triple negativity can significantly affect progression of breast cancer in Indian breast cancer patients and longer follow up is necessary (10 years) to determine its effects on survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1078-1078
Author(s):  
Christof Vulsteke ◽  
Alena Pfeil ◽  
Barbara Brouwers ◽  
Matthias Schwenkglenks ◽  
Robert Paridaens ◽  
...  

1078 Background: Recently we described the impact of genetic variability on severe toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving (neo-) adjuvant FEC chemotherapy (Annals of Oncology 2013, In Press). We now further assessed the impact of a wide range of patient-related factors on FEC toxicity in routine clinical setting. Methods: Patients with early breast cancer receiving (neo-)adjuvant 6 cycles FEC or sequential 3 cycles of FEC and 3 cycles D were retrospectively evaluated through electronic chart review for febrile neutropenia (primary endpoint; CTC 3.0). Age at diagnosis, body mass index, body surface area, number of cycles received, germline genetic polymorphisms, and baseline biochemical variables (white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin and creatinine) were available for most patients (missing data <10%). All patients had follow up for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed including univariate associates of outcome with a p-value <0.25. Results: We identified 1,031 patients treated between 2000-2010 with 6x FEC (n=488) or 3x FEC followed by 3x D (n=543). 174 (16.9%) patients developed febrile neutropenia during FEC. After logistic regression analysis febrile neutropenia was found to be significantly associated with carriers of the rs45511401 variant T-allele in the MRP1 gene found in 12% of patients (p= 0.03, OR1.99, CI 1.07-3.71) and with increasing serum creatinine values (p=0.05 OR 4.58/CI 0.99-20.98); all other investigated patient-related parameters were not retained by the model. At a mean follow up of 5.2 years, the occurrence of febrile neutropenia was not correlated with PFS and OS. Conclusions: In this study, only the baseline level of serum creatinine and germline genetic polymorphisms in the MRP-1 gene were predictive for the occurrence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving FEC chemotherapy. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia did not seem to impact on outcome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Marcy Winget ◽  
Siqi WU ◽  
Jennifer Kim ◽  
Cati Brown-Johnson

180 Background: Prior research has identified barriers to provision of quality survivorship care in primary care settings such as lack of expert knowledge and training, primary care burden and insufficient communication with oncologists. We implemented a survivorship clinic at an academic medical center in the primary care division with the goal of defining the elements required for a seamless transition and co-management. Methods: The primary care physician received training in cancer survivorship based on the ASCO Curriculum, shadowing of 3 breast medical oncologists and 1 gynecologic oncologist, attendance at the 2018 Cancer Survivorship Symposium and NCCN’s Cancer Survivorship Advocacy Meeting. Patients with breast and gynecologic cancers were referred by their oncologists or APP (PA or NP) at various points in their cancer trajectory. Clinical characteristics of patients were abstracted from the electronic medical record and in-depth interviews were conducted with 2 patients. Results: 41 patients attended the survivorship clinic. The majority (88%) were breast (63%) or gynecologic (24%) cancer survivors. Patient age was evenly distributed with 8 age < 46, 11 age 46-59, and 7 age > = 60. 23 (56%) patients had stage < 3 at diagnosis. 21 (51%) had been cancer-free for five years + and 4 were referred by their oncologist to help with patient co-management during cancer treatment. Of the 8 breast cancer patients < 46 years old, 6 had a genetic mutation and 7 were interested in fertility. 15/26 breast cancer patients are currently on endocrine therapy. Interviewed patients expressed appreciation for receiving whole-person care and knowing there is bidirectional communication between clinicians. Conclusions: Cancer survivors are open to and interested in a survivorship visit based in a primary care clinic; this includes both patients who have been cancer-free > 5 years as well as those recently treated with curative intent. Greater efforts are needed to train primary care physicians to deliver survivorship visits that are customized to meet the needs of cancer survivors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18354-e18354
Author(s):  
Liang Yu ◽  
Xin Lei ◽  
Ying Lin

e18354 Background: Myelosuppression during chemotherapy can lead to life-threatening infections, dose reductions, treatment delays, as well as prolonged hospitalizations, early morbidity, and early mortality. According to NCCN guideline, Pegfilgrastim 6mg per cycle is recommended for breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and dosage modification based on body weight is not required. However, primary PEGylated G-CSF prophylaxis comes with significant extra cost, which has a great impact on health care resources, especially for patients without insurance coverage. Methods: We analyzed clinical data of patients, weighing between 45 and 65 kilogram, received a single subcutaneous PEGylated recombinant human G-CSF injection at fixed doses of either 3 mg or 6 mg per chemotherapy cycle approximately 24 hours after completion of each cycle of chemotherapy. Data for this retrospective study were obtained from Thyroid and Breast Surgical Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between July 1, 2017, and October 31, 2017. Results: 41 cycles in 33 patients were included in 3mg PEGylated G-CSF group, and 46 cycles in 39 patients were included in 6mg PEGylated G-CSF group. Among chemotherapy cycles, the incidence of neutropenic event was19.5%and 2.2% in 3mg PEGylated G-CSF group and 6mg PEGylated G-CSF group, respectively. No patients experienced dose reductions or treatment delays in both groups. Using single-factor Logistic Regression Analysis, we found that dose of PEGylated G-CSF(3mg vs 6mg) was significantly associated with occurrence of neutropenic event(p = 0.028). Multi-factor Logistic Regression Analysis also showed that dose of PEGylated G-CSFwas significantly associated with occurrence of neutropenic event (p = 0.031). Conclusions: Our study showed that dose of prophylactic PEGylated G-CSF was significantly associated with occurrence of neutropenic events. So adequate dose of PEGylated G-CSF is important to reduce chemotherapy induced neutropenic events and to guarantee the quality of chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.


Breast Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Aloisio da Costa Vieira ◽  
Allini Mafra da Costa ◽  
Josue Lopes de Souza ◽  
Rafael Richieri Coelho ◽  
Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira ◽  
...  

Background: The etiology of lymphedema is multifactorial, and definition criteria of lymphedema, its limitation, and follow-up must be considered in studies related to risk factors. The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors related to arm lymphedema in a cohort study with a long follow-up. Patients and Methods: The study was performed in 622 breast cancer patients. The main endpoint reported was the presence of clinical lymphedema reported in medical records. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors related to lymphedema. Results: 66.4% of the patients were submitted to mastectomy, 88.4% to level III axillary lymphadenectomy, 34.9% to radiotherapy in the supraclavicular fossa, and 4.3% to axillary radiotherapy. The mean follow-up was 96.7 months. 45 patients (7.2%) developed lymphedema, of which 82.2% had developed lymphedema at 60 months. Univariate regression analysis showed that supraclavicular radiotherapy, adjuvant/palliative chemotherapy, ≥ 15 lymph nodes dissected, and axillary surgery increase the lymphedema rate by 1.87, 2.28, 2.03, and 6.17, respectively. Adjusted multivariate regression analysis showed that the combination of axillary dissection and number of lymph nodes dissected was the main factor related to lymphedema (p = 0.017). Conclusion: In the pre-sentinel era, axillary dissection and the number of lymph nodes resected are related to 10-year lymphedema.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document