scholarly journals Evaluating the effectiveness of using enoxaparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in hip replacement patients: A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 4228-4232
Author(s):  
Vo Thanh Toan ◽  
To Dong Kha ◽  
Bui Van Anh

Introduction: Our research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin in patients undergoing hip replacement. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on medical records of patients aged 40 years and older undergoing hip replacement. Exclusion criteria included patients who had used anticoagulants to prevent other diseases, patients with a history of chronic renal failure, liver failure, cancer or allergy to anticoagulants, and patients with indicated mechanical prophylaxis. In our study, 65 patients were randomized into 2 groups - the control group and the venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis group (receiving subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 - 14 days). Preventive effectiveness was evaluated based on the comparison of VTE incidence after surgery between the groups. Results: In our study, most of the patients were over 60 years old (79.2%). No case of pulmonary embolism was recorded. There were 11 patients in the control group (17.2%) who developed deep venous thrombosis (DVT) versus 2 patients in the prophylaxis group (3.1%). After adjusting for postoperative hospital stay, use of enoxaparin reduced the risk of DVT by 89.7% (OR 0.103, 95% confidence interval 0.019-0.569, p=0.009), especially in patients over 60 years old (OR 0.147, 95% confidence interval 0.026 - 0.822, p = 0.029). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that using enoxaparin significantly reduces the incidence of DVT in patients undergoing hip replacement, especially in patients over 60 years old.

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n693
Author(s):  
Daniel Ayoubkhani ◽  
Kamlesh Khunti ◽  
Vahé Nafilyan ◽  
Thomas Maddox ◽  
Ben Humberstone ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To quantify rates of organ specific dysfunction in individuals with covid-19 after discharge from hospital compared with a matched control group from the general population. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting NHS hospitals in England. Participants 47 780 individuals (mean age 65, 55% men) in hospital with covid-19 and discharged alive by 31 August 2020, exactly matched to controls from a pool of about 50 million people in England for personal and clinical characteristics from 10 years of electronic health records. Main outcome measures Rates of hospital readmission (or any admission for controls), all cause mortality, and diagnoses of respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, kidney, and liver diseases until 30 September 2020. Variations in rate ratios by age, sex, and ethnicity. Results Over a mean follow-up of 140 days, nearly a third of individuals who were discharged from hospital after acute covid-19 were readmitted (14 060 of 47 780) and more than 1 in 10 (5875) died after discharge, with these events occurring at rates four and eight times greater, respectively, than in the matched control group. Rates of respiratory disease (P<0.001), diabetes (P<0.001), and cardiovascular disease (P<0.001) were also significantly raised in patients with covid-19, with 770 (95% confidence interval 758 to 783), 127 (122 to 132), and 126 (121 to 131) diagnoses per 1000 person years, respectively. Rate ratios were greater for individuals aged less than 70 than for those aged 70 or older, and in ethnic minority groups compared with the white population, with the largest differences seen for respiratory disease (10.5 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 11.4) for age less than 70 years v 4.6 (4.3 to 4.8) for age ≥70, and 11.4 (9.8 to 13.3) for non-white v 5.2 (5.0 to 5.5) for white individuals). Conclusions Individuals discharged from hospital after covid-19 had increased rates of multiorgan dysfunction compared with the expected risk in the general population. The increase in risk was not confined to the elderly and was not uniform across ethnicities. The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of post-covid syndrome requires integrated rather than organ or disease specific approaches, and urgent research is needed to establish the risk factors.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1145-1145
Author(s):  
Stephanie W Young ◽  
Jason Kielly ◽  
Maria Mathews ◽  
Andrew Furey ◽  
Kuljit Grewal ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Rivaroxaban, an oral anti-Xa inhibitor, was approved in 2008 in Canada for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) post elective total hip replacement (THR). Studies completed in elective THR patients showed superiority or noninferiority of rivaroxaban over injectable low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for prevention of VTE, with no difference in trial defined major bleeding. Many centres use rivaroxaban for VTE prevention post THR as standard of care. Our centre introduced rivaroxaban for THR patients in May 2009. As there is limited data on real world experience with this agent, beyond bleeding and VTE events, we evaluated the change in VTE prophylaxis for this indication. Methods A retrospective cohort study was completed comparing the change in use of a LMWH, enoxaparin, to rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis for elective THR patients ≥ 19 years not requiring therapeutic anticoagulation. The setting was a regional health authority servicing a population of 290 000, and the timeframe was 18 months before and 18 months after the introduction of rivaroxaban, allowing a 3 month period in between for incorporation of rivaroxaban into routine care. Patients with THR completed pre introduction of rivaroxaban were in the enoxaparin (E) group and patients with THR completed post introduction were in either the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban (E+R, given sequentially) group, or the rivaroxaban (R) group. Data were abstracted from computerized and paper records using a standardized form. Data collected included demographics, medical and medication history, risk factors for bleeding and VTE, type of anesthesia, VTE prophylaxis details, post-discharge community health (CH) nursing visits and hospital visits (emergency room (ER) and inpatient admissions), and major bleeding or VTE events. Hospital visits and VTE were assessed up to 30 days, and major bleeding up to 2 days, after the last presumed dose of medication. Primary outcomes were differences between E, E+R, and R in hospital visits, as well as referrals to, and reasons for, post discharge CH nursing visits. Results There were 246 THR procedures in E, 43 in E+R, and 190 in R. Baseline characteristics were similar between the three groups. For E, E+R, R, 52%, 49% and 53% were female with a mean age of 64, 62, 64 years and a mean BMI of 31, 32, 31 kg/m2. There was no difference in surgery duration (mean 92, 97, 91 min for E, E+R, R), or number of patients transfused (19, 16, 14% for E, E+R, R). More patients (74%) in E+R received regional anesthesia exclusively, compared to E (57%) and R (52%), p=0.01. There was no difference in post-surgery time to VTE prophylaxis initiation (mean of 22, 22, 23 hours for E, E+R, R). There was a difference in the length of stay (mean 7.1, 8.4, 6.3 days for E, E+R, R, p=0.005), as well as total duration of prophylaxis (mean 10.4, 16.1, 14.5 days for E, E+R, R, p<0.0001). Patients in the E+R sequentially received a mean of 1.7 days of enoxaparin, then 14.2 days of rivaroxaban. Post discharge, there was no difference in the number of patients with at least one ER visit (7.3, 9.3, 6.3% for E, E+R, R, p=0.775) or hospital admission (3.3, 9.3, 2.6%, p=0.096). Most patients had a referral for CH nursing visits (94, 91, 95% for E, E+R, R, p=0.253). Most referrals requested dressing changes (81, 77, 82% for E, E+R, R, p=0.720) and removal of staples (91, 96, 91%, for E, E+R, R, p=0.671). The mean number of days post discharge for staple removal was 4.1, 4.3, 5.1 days for E, E+R, R, p<0.0001. The most common frequency of dressing changes requested was every 2 days (74, 63, 60% for E, E+R, R, p=0.009). Medication administration was requested for patients in E only (84, 0, 0% for E, E+R, R, p<0.0001), with a frequency of once daily (98%). Symptomatic VTE occurred in 1.6, 2.3, and 2.1% of patients for E, E+R, and R. There were 5 major bleeding events in E (2 extra-surgical site bleeds, 3 unexpected surgical site bleeds), and 0 events in both E+R and R. Conclusion This study provides useful data, beyond VTE and bleeding events, on the impact of a change in VTE prophylaxis post elective THR. No statistically significant difference was observed in post discharge hospital visits. Most patients had post discharge CH nursing visits requested; the overall requested visit frequency was reduced for all patients receiving rivaroxaban. Differences in type of anesthesia, length of stay, and duration of prophylaxis were noted for E+R. Differences between this group and R should be further explored. Disclosures: Grewal: Bayer: Honoraria.


Author(s):  
Megan M Sheehan ◽  
Anita J Reddy ◽  
Michael B Rothberg

Abstract Background Protection afforded from prior disease among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is unknown. If infection provides substantial long-lasting immunity, it may be appropriate to reconsider vaccination distribution. Methods This retrospective cohort study of 1 health system included 150 325 patients tested for COVID-19 infection via polymerase chain reaction from 12 March 2020 to 30 August 2020. Testing performed up to 24 February 2021 in these patients was included. The main outcome was reinfection, defined as infection ≥90 days after initial testing. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic infection and protection of prior infection against reinfection. Results Of 150 325 patients, 8845 (5.9%) tested positive and 141 480 (94.1%) tested negative before 30 August. A total of 1278 (14.4%) positive patients were retested after 90 days, and 62 had possible reinfection. Of those, 31 (50%) were symptomatic. Of those with initial negative testing, 5449 (3.9%) were subsequently positive and 3191 of those (58.5%) were symptomatic. Protection offered from prior infection was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.6–85.8) and against symptomatic infection was 84.5% (95% CI, 77.9–89.1). This protection increased over time. Conclusions Prior infection in patients with COVID-19 was highly protective against reinfection and symptomatic disease. This protection increased over time, suggesting that viral shedding or ongoing immune response may persist beyond 90 days and may not represent true reinfection. As vaccine supply is limited, patients with known history of COVID-19 could delay early vaccination to allow for the most vulnerable to access the vaccine and slow transmission.


2014 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. PARK ◽  
H. S. JEONG ◽  
J. S. LEE ◽  
S. W. LEE ◽  
Y. H. CHOI ◽  
...  

SUMMARYIn February 2012, an outbreak of gastroenteritis was reported in school A; a successive outbreak was reported at school B. A retrospective cohort study conducted in school A showed that seasoned green seaweed with radishes (relative risk 7·9, 95% confidence interval 1·1–56·2) was significantly associated with illness. Similarly, a case-control study of students at school B showed that cases were 5·1 (95% confidence interval 1·1–24·8) times more likely to have eaten seasoned green seaweed with pears. Multiple norovirus genotypes were detected in samples from students in schools A and B. Norovirus GII.6 isolated from schools A and B were phylogenetically indistinguishable. Green seaweed was supplied by company X, and norovirus GII.4 was isolated from samples of green seaweed. Green seaweed was assumed to be linked to these outbreaks. To our knowledge, this is the first reported norovirus outbreak associated with green seaweed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document