scholarly journals The Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew JS Coats ◽  
Louise G Shewan ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
Sharp Separation ◽  
Clinical Trial Evidence ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Heart failure is defined as a clinical syndrome and is known to present with a number of different pathophysiological patterns. There is a remarkable degree of variation in measures of left ventricular systolic emptying and this has been used to categorise heart failure into two separate types: low ejection fraction (EF) heart failure or HF-REF and high EF heart failure or HF-PEF. Here we review the pathophysiology, epidemiology and management of HF-PEF and argue that sharp separation of heart failure into two forms is misguided and illogical, and the present scarcity of clinical trial evidence for effective treatment for HF-PEF is a problem of our own making; we should never have excluded patients from major trials on the basis of EF in the first place. Whilst as many heart failure patients have preserved EFs as reduced we have dramatically under-represented HF-PEF patients in trials. Only four trials have been performed in HF-PEF specifically, and another two trials that recruited both HF-PEF and HF-REF can be considered. When we consider the similarity in outcomes and neurohormonal activation between HF-REF and HF-REF, the vast corpus of trial data that we have to attest to the efficacy of various treatment (angiotensinconverting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], beta-blockers and aldosterone antagonists) in HF-REF, and the much more limited number of trials of similar agents showing near statistically significant benefits in HF-PEF the time has come rethink our management of HF-PEF, and in particular our selection of patients for trials.

scholarly journals New trends in drug treatment of heart failure in old age

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klara Komici ◽  
Leonardo Bencivenga ◽  
Angela Spezzano ◽  
Pierangela Nocella ◽  
Graziamaria Corbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
High Prevalence

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome, with high prevalence in the elderly. The World Heath Organization (WHO) predicts that by 2050 the population aged over 80 years will account around 400 million, reflecting that HF will still represent a major public health concern. Improved management of cardiovascular diseases and HF, together with the increased life expectancy explains, at least in part, the high prevalence of HF especially in the elderly. Beside the canonical therapy for HF failure, including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers and aldosterone antagonists, new potential and promising therapies, such as sacubitril/valsartan, iron deficiency treatment and serelaxine, are emerging also in elderly HF patients. In this review we focus on the classical recommended HF therapy and the possible application of new trends in elderly.

Abstract 17051: Relationship Between Neurohormonal Blockade Dose and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure With Recovered Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Seok Kim ◽  
Hyo-In Choi ◽  
Jin-Oh Park ◽  
Ju Hyeon Kim ◽  
Yeong jin Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Target Dose ◽  
Receptor Blockers ◽  
Maintenance Group

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) patients who recover left ventricular function (HF-Recovered) have reported to have a different prognosis compared to HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF). However, no study has analyzed the dosage of neurohormonal blockade in these patients. Hypothesis: Higher dose of neurohormonal blockade might be important for better outcomes in HF-Recovered patients. Methods: HF-Recovered patients were defined with left ventricular EF ≥40% at time of study entry and retrospectively checked EF <40%. 256 patients were enrolled between Mars 2009 and September 2014. Results: Of the study population, 48.8% received <50% of the target dose of angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), whereas 51.2% received ≥50% of the target dose at time of EF ≥40%. 55.5% received <50% of the target dose of β-blockers (BBs), whereas 44.5% received ≥50% of the target dose. 31.3% increased the dose of ACEIs/ARBs or BBs at time of EF ≥40% (uptitration group), and 68.8% maintained the doses (maintenance group). During an average of 29.8 months of follow-up, 35 patients (13.7%) were died. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, ≥50% of the target dose of BBs was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR=0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.88, p=0.024). This dose-survival relationship was not the case for ACEIs/ARBs. Figure shows survival curves according to the uptitration or dose of BBs at time of EF ≥40%. Dose of BBs at time of EF ≥40% was lower among uptitration group than maintenance group. However, last follow-up doses of BBs between two groups were the same. Moreover, higher dose of BBs at time of EF recovery was associated with higher last follow-up dose. Conclusions: The dose of BBs was associated with mortality in HF-Recovered patients. High dose of neurohormonal blockade, especially BBs may prevent future adverse events, even if EF was recovered to ≥40% suggesting the importance of dose-uptitrating effort.

Abstract MP71: Socioeconomic Status, Guideline Directed Medical Therapy, and Prognosis in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Community (ARIC) Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Mathews ◽  
Ning Ding ◽  
Amira Collison ◽  
Yejin Mok ◽  
Jung-Im Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Area Deprivation ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Introduction: Current research suggests racial differences exist in the utilization of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) and prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Whether individual and community level socioeconomic status (SES) impacts prescription patterns of GDMT and prognosis in HFrEF has not been studied. Methods: We studied 669 ARIC participants with incident HFrEF (EF<50%) (mean age 77.6 (SD 6.5) years; 39% black; 46% women) during 2005-2017 (median 1.8 years of follow-up). We assessed the proportion of patients on optimal GDMT (defined as ß-blockers [BB] and ACE inhibitors [ACEI] or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARB]) or adequate GDMT (one of either BB, ACEI/ARB, aldosterone antagonists [AA], or hydralazine and nitrates [H-ISDN]) at hospital discharge by individual SES (education and income), neighborhood SES (area deprivation index: ADI) and their combination (Table). We also examined the contribution of GDMT prescription to prognosis overall, and by SES. Subsequently, we quantified the association of SES with mortality and re-hospitalization for HFrEF. Results: The proportion of patients prescribed optimal and adequate GDMT was 54% and 81%, respectively. BB were most frequently prescribed (83%), followed by ACEI/ARB (61%), AA (11%), and H-ISDN (9%). Overall, BB were associated with lower mortality, while H-ISDN were associated with higher mortality, compared to their non-use counterparts. ACEI/ARB were associated with lower re-hospitalization, compared to non-users of ACEI/ARB. The prescription of GDMT and the effect of GDMT on prognosis did not significantly differ by SES. Despite that, lower SES was independently associated with higher risk of mortality and re-hospitalization (Table). Conclusions: Overall, optimal GDMT was low at discharge, but did not differ by SES. Despite that, there were significant differences in death and re-hospitalization by SES, suggesting a potential need for tailored approaches to HFrEF management for low SES individuals.

Abstract 13135: Starting Beta-blockers in Hypertension is Followed by Excess Loop Diuretic Use: Beta-blocker Induced Heart Failure?

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N Silverman ◽  
Jeanne d de Lavallaz ◽  
Timothy B Plante ◽  
Margaret M Infeld ◽  
Markus Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Temporal Relationship ◽  
Loop Diuretic ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Recent investigation has identified that discontinuation of beta-blockers in subjects with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) leads to a reduction in natriuretic peptide levels. We investigated whether a similar trend would be seen in a hypertension clinical trial cohort. Methods: In 9,012 subjects hypertensive subjects without a history of symptomatic heart failure, known LVEF <35% or recent heart failure hospitalization enrolled in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), we compared incidence of loop diuretic initiation and time to initiation following start of a new anti-hypertensive medication. The categorical relationship (new antihypertensive class followed by loop-diuretic use) and temporal relationship (time to loop diuretic initiation) were each analyzed. The categorical relationship was assessed using a Pearson’s chi-squared test and the temporal relationship using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Bonferroni-corrected p-values were utilized for all comparisons. Results: Among the 9,012 subjects analyzed, the incidence of anti-hypertensive initiation and loop diuretic initiation was greatest following start of a beta-blocker (16.6%) compared with other antihypertensive medication classes (calcium channel blocker 13.8%, angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker 12.9% and thiazide diuretic 10.2%; p<0.001). In addition, the median time between starting a new antihypertensive medication and loop diuretic was the shortest for beta-blockers and longest for thiazides (both p <0.01). No significant differences in renal function were identified between groups. Conclusion: Compared to other major classes of hypertensive agents, starting beta-blockers was associated with more common and earlier initiation of a loop diuretics in a population without heart failure at baseline. This finding may suggest beta-blocker induced heart failure in a population with a predominantly normal ejection fraction.

Abstract 17470: Racial Disparities in Goal Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure- A Single Center Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Azmeen ◽  
Naga Vaishnavi Gadela ◽  
Vergara Cunegundo
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Geographic Variations ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Heart failure(HF) is a clinical syndrome that is widely prevalent affecting approximately 6.5 million people in the United States. It accounts for the ever-rising health care costs in the US due to recurrent hospitalizations. Despite advancements in medical management, the mortality and the rate of hospitalizations continues to be high with geographic variations and racial disparities. Through this descriptive study, we sought to analyze the health disparities among Hispanic, African American (AA) and Caucasian population in a single-center. Methods: We identified a total of 178 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from our outpatient clinic by utilizing the ICD-10 codes. Patients with ejection fraction >50% have been excluded. A retrospective chart review of their ethnic background, medications, and number of heart failure exacerbations per year has been performed. Results: 178 patients (mean age 62 years, 35.56% of females) including Hispanics (n=102), AA(n=44), and Caucasians (n=32) were included in the study. Although all patients were started on Beta-blockers, only 76.4% and 37.2% of Hispanics were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. Similarly, 72.7% and 45.4% of AA were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. This is in contrast to Caucasians population, where a majority of patients were on started on GDMT; 90% and 75% were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. This was also reflected by the number of admissions due to HF exacerbations which ranged from 2-4/year for Hispanics and AA populations and 0-1/year for Caucasians. Conclusions: GDMT for HF is known to reduce heart failure exacerbations, mortality and the ever rising cost of the healthcare system. We have observed that despite recommendations to initiate GDMT in all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, racial disparities exist. Physicians should be mindful of initiating GDMT in all patients.

scholarly journals Drug-Induced Heart Failure (Part 2: Mechanisms of Development, Clinical Signs, Differential Diagnosis, Risk Factors, Treatment and Prevention)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
O. D. Ostroumova ◽  
I. V. Goloborodova
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Channel Blockers ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Treatment And Prevention ◽  
Developing Heart

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome caused by an impaired pumping function of the heart muscle, etiologically associated with cardiovascular disease and, in the vast majority of cases, requiring complex therapeutic regimens and simultaneous prescription of several drugs. To date, we know several classes of drugs (including those used for heart failure) which can induce development/progression of heart failure in both patients with left ventricular dysfunction, and in patients who do not have cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was to analyse and systematize data on development mechanisms, as well as methods of prevention and treatment of drug-induced heart failure when using diff erent groups of drugs. It has been established that drug-induced heart failure is most often associated with the use of calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine), beta-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs (disopyramide, fl ecainide, propafenone, amiodarone, ibutilide, dofetilide, dronedarone), anthracyclines (doxorubicin) and other antitumor drugs (trastuzumab, bevacizumab, infl iximab), hypoglycemic drugs (thiazolidinediones, saxagliptin, alogliptin), and nonsteroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs, including selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. The study revealed various mechanisms of heart failure development following drug treatment. In some patients, heart failure development is associated with the cardiotoxic eff ect of a particular drug, in others with adverse eff ects on hemodynamics. Much depends on risks of developing heart failure, including specifi c risks attributable to groups of drugs and individual drugs. The identifi cation of drugs that can contribute to the development/ progression of heart failure, and possible clinical manifestations of drug-induced heart failure, as well as provision of timely information to physicians, and engagement of clinical pharmacologists with the aim of optimizing treatment of patients can facilitate timely diagnosis, treatment and prevention of drug-induced heart failure. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document