scholarly journals Mahkota teleskopik sebagai retainer alternatif gigitiruan lepasan Telescopic crown as alternative retainer of removable denture

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Sri W. Rais ◽  
Setyawan Bonifacius

In making removable denture, some aspects must be considered: retention, stabilization, support, comfort, andaesthetic. Retention plays an important role in the success of a removable denture. Retention can be obtained from theundercut area, or friction of the denture’s components to the abutment or abutment. Clasp as a retainer, both of metalcasting and wire have been frequently used in the removable partial denture. The clasp has some shortcomings in itsusing, namely color of the metal can sometimes interfere with the aesthetic of the wearer and cannot be placed on teeththat have experienced extensive caries. Telescopic crown as retainer has several advantages, which can be used oncrown of abutment that has experienced extensive caries or tooth that will be an abutment but have endodontic-treated.On telescopic crowns, retention is obtained from the friction between the primary crowns against secondary crown thatserves as a retainer. This case report describes two cases of a removable denture with a metal framework using atelescopic crown on one tooth that serves as a retainer in the case of one-side free-end edentulous.

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
Okti Setyowati ◽  
Endang Kusdarjanti

The making of removable denture is performed by a dental laboratory. To facilitate the identification, according to Kennedy classification, classes are divided onto groups, the Kennedy class I, II, III and IV. To suit with the needs of the dental laboratory tasks commonly done, priority are necessary for common cases and should to be taught to students of Dental Health Technology Diploma. In Surabaya, research of various cases of removable partial denture with the various Kennedy classifications has never been done before. This study was to analyze the pattern of service for the removable partial denture manufacture in dental laboratory at Surabaya (2011 – 2013). The research is an observatory analytic. The population is all dental laboratories located around the campus of the Faculty of Dentistry Airlangga University Surabaya. The sample was the whole population is willing to become respondents. Sampling by total sampling. The method of collecting data using secondary data from a dental laboratory in Surabaya from 2011 until 2013. The note is cases removable denture according to the classification of Kennedy that Kennedy Class I, II, III and IV. Also of note kinds of materials used to make the denture base that is heat cured acrylic resins, thermoplastic resins and metals coherent. The data is a compilation table charting the frequency until needed, then analyzed using cross tabulation. Mostly denture type is flexible type and the least is metal framework. Most cases by classification Kennedy is followed by class II class III and class II and more recently is the fourth. In conclusion, in 2011 and 2013 the manufacture of removable partial dentures according to the classification of Kennedy Class III is the most common in both the upper arch and lower jaw, followed by Class II, Class I and Class IV. In 2012 which is the highest grade III followed by class II, class IV and class I. The denture type most used is a flexible denture, followed acrylic denture and the last is the metal framework.


Author(s):  
Tiago Rebelo Costa ◽  
Cláudio Akira Yamaguchi ◽  
Alessandra Pucci Mantelli Galhardo ◽  
Roberto Chaib Stegun ◽  
Bruno Costa ◽  
...  

Oral rehabilitation with free-end removable partial denture (RPD) is one of the major challenges in prosthodontic dentistry. The absence of a distal abutment produces undesirable RPD movement during masticatory function due to the high resilience of the residual ridge, which limits the denture efficiency and may damage the abutment teeth and bone over time. The advent of dental implants made possible to substitute the missing teeth with fixed implant-supported dentures as the first choice treatment to overcome such inconveniences. However, this indication may not be suitable for all patients due to financial, anatomical or systemic health conditions. Nevertheless it is possible to improve free extension RPD by using implants in the posterior edentulous ridge to achieve biological, biomechanical, physiological and social benefits. This article aims to present a case report on oral rehabilitation in which a RPD was made combined with an implant for posterior support in a sizeable edentulous ridge. The patient appreciated the retention improvement and the aesthetic result. The combination of a RPD with a posterior implant is an alternative treatment for cases in which implant-supported fixed prosthesis is not indicated, reducing the displacement and minimizing the limitations of the free-end devices.


RSBO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Jeferson Luis de Oliveira Stroparo ◽  
Fabrício Guimarães Rodrigues ◽  
Moira Pedroso Leão ◽  
Dilcele Silva Moreira Dziedzic ◽  
João César Zielak

Introduction: Rehabilitation with the use of overlay-type removable prostheses is indicated in cases of more severe occlusal dysfunction. This type of treatment meets the need for more immediate results, providing aesthetic improvement while the rehabilitation work is being done, while promoting the gradual rehabilitation of occlusal function, re-adjusting the intermaxillary relationship. In addition, the patient can anticipate the final result of the treatment beforethe definitive prosthesis is made. Objective: To show a clinical case of planning and execution of removable overlays. Case report: JCF patient had occlusal dysfunction and presented as main complaint the aesthetic and functional deficiency. He used a removable partial denture (PPR) only on the upper arch. The existing prosthesis did not present stability due to the loss of some dental elements, pillars of the PPR. Two overlays (upper and lower) were indicated because the patient had good periodontal conditions in the remaining dentalelements that were in a favorable position. Necessary exodontia, adequacy of the buccal environment with sub and supragingival scaling and the fabrication of overlays were performed. Conclusion: The use of temporary overlays can provide the necessary time for the patient to adapt to the new occlusal conformation in the period in which the restorations and definitive prostheses are expected to be performed. The use of overlays presented a satisfactoryresult for the proposed treatment, since it promoted the functional rehabilitation, restored aesthetic, even temporarily, and motivated the patient to continue the treatment. According to the patient, there were significant improvements in chewing quality and self-esteem.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krisnadi Setiawan ◽  
Aprillia Adenan

Metal framework denture is needed in patient with tooth loss accompanied by the presence of periodontal disease inthe remaining tooth is needed. This denture primarily maintains the existing teeth post periodontal treatment. Theuse of metal framework in this case can help to prevent tooth movement and maintain tooth position afterperiodontal treatment. Therefore, the success of the treatment can be achieved because the metal characteristic ismore rigid when compared to other dental materials. This paper discusses the use of frame denture in patient afterperiodontal treatment on the remaining teeth in lower arch. It can be concluded that removable denture with metalframe combined with splint must be done on mobile teeth, to decrease mobile teeth and to preventincreasing of periodontal tissue damage after periodontal treatment.


Prosthesis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-436
Author(s):  
Anthony Pugliese ◽  
Enrico Cataneo ◽  
Leonzio Fortunato

A partial removable denture is a device that allows the patient to recover from a partial edentulism. This case report describes the realization of a chrome–cobalt partial removable denture by using two different realization methods: (1) analogic framework and (2) hybrid framework. This allowed us to compare the stability, retention as well as clasp quality of both the products and to highlight their respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 267-270
Author(s):  
Gitanjali Mago ◽  
Puneet Sharma

The various treatment options for the aesthetic and functional rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients are conventional fixed partial dentures, implant supported fixed partial dentures and removable partial dentures. In some cases, removable partial dentures may be the only choice which is available other than implants and fixed partial denture. Removable cast partial dentures are used as definitive removable prostheses when indicated, but location of clasps is not aesthetically pleasant. So, when patient is concerned about aesthetics, flexible partial dentures which is aesthetically superior may be considered. But for the success of flexible removable partial denture, proper diagnosis, treatment planning, insertion, wearing and maintenance of this prosthesis is very important.


2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Simone Guimarães Farias GOMES ◽  
Altair Antoninha Del Bel CURY

Flexible thermoplastic resins have been used as an alternative to partially edentulous patients for decades in the USA. However, they are neither popular nor widespread in Brazil. This material represents an excellent treatment option to solve clinical problems such as compromised esthetics caused by visible metal clasps, and fall fracture of dentures made of conventional resins. Additionally, there is little researching and no controlled clinical studies about the use of flexible resins in prosthodontics. For these reasons, this study presents a case report of a dissatisfied patient treated with a conventional removable partial denture, which was replaced by a modified metal framework without metal clasps in combination with flexible resin, and a literature review about this material focusing on the dental practitioner. The study also reports how these polymers can be used, their indications, and their clinical and laboratory considerations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Woon-Chul Shin ◽  
Mong-Sook Vang ◽  
Hong-So Yang ◽  
Sang-Won Park ◽  
Hyun-Pil Lim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthi Ambayiram ◽  
Ahila Singaravel Chidembaranathan ◽  
Muthukumar Balasubramanium

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document