The Key Directions of the Legal Development of the National Priorities of International Strategic Partnership

Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
Agnessa Inshakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Cooperation ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
National Development ◽  
Strategic Partnership ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Interstate Cooperation ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Legal Infrastructure

The main topic of the current issue of the journal “Legal Concept = Pravovaya Paradigma” – “The global transformations of the legal infrastructure of the modern state: trends in the inter-country interaction and the national development” was declared by the editorial board to conduct a comprehensive intersectoral collective mini-study on the issues of the legal support for the development of strategic partnership and traditional interstate cooperation. A comprehensive analysis of the potential areas of international cooperation in need of a developed technological legal infrastructure is presented in the prepared draft in an expanded format. These are the traditional areas of the activity of international organizations in the context of scientific, technological, and industrial integration, and interstate cooperation in the field of economic activity on foreign trade, public procurement, fiscal policy, as well as new areas in criminal and civil proceedings, arbitration, electoral justice, involving the study of foreign experience to plan strategic partnership and full-fledged mutually beneficial international technological cooperation. It is proved that different strategies of inter-country cooperation and strategic partnership within countries will lead to the creation of different legal systems. A new form of partnership is being investigated - strategic partnership arising as a result of integration processes in the world and the changes in the goals, objectives, and principles of interrelationships of subjects of international law, which is characterized by long-term, mutually beneficial relations of equal status with an emphasis on the economic component. It is argued that the growing economic intra-national inequality is a problem of systemic importance for jurisprudence. It should be studied and taken into account when developing the strategic partnership policy documents and the acts of international cooperation, which will contribute to the creation of more peaceful and prosperous coexistence, backed by an effective law of nations, which meets all types of major challenges to which it is impossible to offer competent adaptive legal responses outside of close inter-country interaction.

THE CHANCELLERY OF CONTRACT AFFAIRS (TO THE HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN RUSSIA IN PETER THE GREAT’S TIME)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-144
Author(s):  
D.A. REDIN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Procurement ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Early History ◽  
Regulatory Body ◽  
Peter The Great ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Administrative Regulation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Distinct Features

The purpose of the article is to research the history of creation and formation of the Chancellery of Contract Affairs – the first supervisory and regulatory body in the field of public procurement in Russia. The early history of the Contracting Chancellery (1715–1717) can be traced in the context of the development of legislative and administrative regulation of public procurement during the reign of Peter the Great. The institution of public procurement itself, according to the author, is associated with the acquisition of distinct features of the modern state by Russia, which was manifested in the previous time. The immediate impetus for the development of the institution was the reform of the armed forces and the resulting mobilization efforts of the supreme power. The very content of the research predetermined the use of source-based and historical-legal methods. As a result of the study, the author states that the creation of a special body – the Chancellery of Contract Affairs, designed to take control of the situation under state contracts, turned out to be the right decision. The well-coordinated work of the Contracting Chancellery with the Senate, fiscal authorities and investigative bodies led to the creation of a number of important regulatory legal acts, almost ‘from scratch’ forming the legislative basis for the institution of public procurement functioning. The need for further work on the designated topic is noted.

The 2000s and Beyond

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayati Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Structural Change ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
National Development ◽  
Development Strategies ◽  
Financial Instability ◽  
Economic Insecurity ◽  
Ecological Damage ◽  
The World ◽  
Social Tensions ◽  
Boom And Bust

The decade of the 2000s was a period of boom and bust when, despite rising prosperity in general, there was increased inequality and heightened economic insecurity for most people in the world. The Survey reports tracked both causes and outcomes, taking a broader view of development that emphasized the importance of economic processes and structural change and recognized the effects of macro imbalances and financial instability, as well as the limits posed by ecological damage and social tensions. Several concerns—and possible solutions—outlined in the Survey reports still have major contemporary relevance, including the importance of countries adopting their own national development strategies and the need for international cooperation.

EDITORIAL

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1951 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Keyword(s):  
New Haven ◽  
Executive Board ◽  
The Creation

THE Editorial Board of Pediatrics announces two changes of personnel with the New Year of 1951. These changes have been approved by the Executive Board of the Academy at its meeting at Chicago, October 16-19, 1950. Dr. Grover F. Powers, New Haven, and Dr. Irvine McQuarrie, Minneapolis, have been retired from the Board and Dr. Milton J. E. Senn, New Haven, and Dr. Mitchell I. Rubin, Buffalo, have been appointed to the Board effective January 1, 1951. Dr. Powers and Dr. McQuarrie have been on the Editorial Board since the creation of the Board for Pediatrics and both served on the Board of the Journal of Pediatrics almost from the beginning of that publication.

scholarly journals Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-7 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Community ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Editorial Office ◽  
New Combinations ◽  
Original Publication ◽  
The Public ◽  
Taxonomic Changes ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Evolutionary Microbiology

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

scholarly journals PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF CREATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTS IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS

10.23856/2807 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeriia Loiko ◽  
Andrii Ramskyi
Keyword(s):  
International Cooperation ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Higher Educational

The article is devoted to the analysis of problems and prospects for the creation and commercialization of intellectual products in higher educational establishments and the development of international cooperation in this field.

How Does Literary Theory Cross Boundaries (or Not)?

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Analía Gerbaudo
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Literary Theory ◽  
Literary Studies ◽  
Social Sciences And Humanities ◽  
Historical Perspectives ◽  
International Circulation ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Creation

This article analyzes the obstacles that hinder the reconstruction of the processes of institutionalization and internationalization of literary studies in Argentina within the framework of the project International Cooperation in the Social-Sciences and Humanities: Comparative Socio-Historical Perspectives and Future Possibilities, directed by Gisèle Sapiro. These obstacles were negotiated partly through the creation of two categories: “stories” and “fantasies of nano-intervention.” The article introduces these categories, along with some examples that enable reflection on the factors that impede or condition the international circulation of literary theory.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_1) ◽  
pp. 8-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon Oren ◽  
George M. Garrity
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
Editorial Office ◽  
New Combinations ◽  
Original Publication ◽  
The Public ◽  
Taxonomic Changes ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Evolutionary Microbiology

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank do not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific communit y.

Nature and prospects of the EURATOM fusion programme

1987 ◽  
Vol 322 (1563) ◽  
pp. 199-211 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Cooperation ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Nuclear Fusion ◽  
Environmentally Friendly ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Energy Problem ◽  
Full Size ◽  
Joint Construction ◽  
The Creation

The seriousness of the energy problem and the attractiveness of providing mankind, through the use of nuclear fusion, with a potentially inexhaustible and environmentally friendly new fuel, was already obvious in the 1950s. We were aware of the formidable scientific and technological difficulties that lay ahead and that a long-term effort would have to be sustained through all possible fluctuations of an economic and political nature; this is what motivated us to establish a common European Fusion Programme more than 25 years ago. This programme designed, in conformity with reiterated Council decisions, to lead to the joint construction of prototype reactors (provided that they appeared feasible) has absorbed the fusion activities of the member countries and has even attracted two non-member countries to join. The main results obtained in the associated European Laboratories will be briefly reviewed. A full-size test of the efficiency of the programme is the creation of JET. In fulfilment of our task we are now operating JET and preparing the Next Step, NET, two strictly linked activities, with support to both from a number of associated laboratories. For the reasons listed above there is hardly another research area that is more suited than fusion for world-wide international cooperation, and in this respect the EURATOM programme is particularly attractive mainly because of JET. The suitability of such a cooperation could become even more manifest for the Next Step, which is a much more sophisticated and expensive device than JET.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document