scholarly journals Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale among Brazilian adult patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 400-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Paulo Consentino Solano ◽  
Eduardo Sawaya Botelho Bracher ◽  
Alexandre Faisal-Cury ◽  
Hazem Adel Ashmawi ◽  
Maria José Carvalho Carmona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Brazilian Portuguese ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Self Report ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Portuguese Version ◽  
Resilience Scale

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Personal resilience is associated with several mental health outcomes. The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) is a widely used self-report measurement of resilience. This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the CD-RISC. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional validation study carried out in the outpatient clinics of a public university hospital. METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation followed established guidelines and involved interviews with 65 adults in psychiatric and non-psychiatric outpatient clinics at a teaching hospital. Validation was assessed through concurrent application of the Lipp Brazilian Stress Symptom Inventory (ISSL), Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ), Sheehan Disability Scales (SDS) and Chronic Pain Grade (CPG) to 575 patients at the same setting. Temporal stability was verified through a second application to 123 participants. RESULTS: Factor analysis identified four factors, named tenacity, adaptability-tolerance, reliance on support from outside and intuition. The alpha coefficient of 0.93 and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84 indicated good internal consistency and temporal stability. Significant correlations between this version of the CD-RISC and the ISSL, SRQ, SDS and CPG were noted. The patients at the outpatient clinic for borderline personality had resilience scores that were significantly lower than those of the patients at the general anxiety or post-traumatic stress outpatient clinics. CONCLUSION: This Brazilian Portuguese version of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale exhibited adequate reliability and validity among a sample of Brazilian adult patients.

scholarly journals Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Dispositional Resilience Scale among Brazilian adult patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 1014-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Paulo Consentino Solano ◽  
Eduardo Sawaya Botelho Bracher ◽  
Alexandre Faisal-Cury ◽  
Hazem Adel Ashmawi ◽  
Maria José Carvalho Carmona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Stress Disorders ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Brazilian Version ◽  
Borderline Patients

ABSTRACT Objective Verifying the psychometrics of a Brazilian version of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15). Methods Cross-cultural adaptation was done interviewing 65 adult patients. Validation was evaluated by application of the Lipp Brazilian Stress Symptoms Inventory (ISSL), Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ), and other measures to 575 participants from the psychiatric ambulatories (for borderline personality, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorders) and non-psychiatric ambulatories (chronic pain, pre-anesthetic consultation and companions for the latter). Temporal stability was verified with 123 participants. Results Exploratory factor analysis yielded a three-factor solution. Psychometrics were acceptable (alpha coefficient, 0.71; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.81). Correlations with the ISSL, SRQ and other measures were noted except for factor 3. In the psychiatric sample, hardiness scores of borderline patients were lower than those of patients with anxiety disorders. Conclusion This version of the DRS-15 exhibited good reliability in a sample of Brazilian patients; validity was confirmed in two of the scale factors.

scholarly journals The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI-GH) Questionnaire

2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 325-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli ◽  
Patrícia Coelho de Soárez ◽  
Clarissa Campos Guaragna Kowalski ◽  
Marcos Bosi Ferraz
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
General Health ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Work Productivity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Brazilian Portuguese ◽  
Activity Impairment ◽  
Portuguese Version ◽  
Sf 36

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: It is still difficult to measure work productivity losses caused by health problems. Despite the importance given to this issue over the last few years, most instruments for performing this task are available only in the English language. This study translated the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment _ General Health (WPAI-GH) Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, adapted it cross-culturally and evaluated its reliability and validity. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey to test scale reliability and validity, at São Paulo Hospital and the clinic of the Rheumatology division of Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM). METHODS: Data were obtained from a survey that incorporated the WPAI-GH, short form-36 (SF-36) and some demographic questions. The questionnaires were administered by interview to 100 subjects. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics was used to characterize the subjects. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha were used to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the instrument. Intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.79 to 0.90 indicated good reliability. Cronbach's alpha of 0.74 indicated good internal consistency. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess validity. There were significant positive relationships between the WPAI-GH and SF-36. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WPAI-GH is a reliable and valid measurement tool and may be useful for those who seek to measure the impact on productivity of health problems among populations of Brazilian employees.

scholarly journals Transcultural adaptation of the Thirst Distress Scale (TDS) into Brazilian Portuguese and an analysis of the psychometric properties of the scale for patients on hemodialysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-162
Author(s):  
Clara Sandra de Araujo Sugizaki ◽  
Clarice Carneiro Braga ◽  
Ana Tereza Vaz de Souza Freitas ◽  
Maria do Rosário Gondim Peixoto
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Brazilian Portuguese ◽  
Final Version ◽  
Portuguese Version ◽  
Transcultural Adaptation ◽  
Distress Scale

Abstract Objective: To produce a transcultural adaptation of the Thirst Distress Scale (TDS) into Brazilian Portuguese and analyze the scale’s psychometric properties for patients on hemodialysis (HD). Methods: The original scale was translated, back translated, and discussed with psychometric assessment experts. The final version was tested with 126 patients on HD and retested with 70 individuals from the original patient population. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the scale’s internal consistency. Reliability of thirst intensity evaluated via the visual analogue scale (VAS) was tested with Kappa statistic and the Bland-Altman plot. Reproducibility was assessed based on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The wording of three items and the verb tenses of six had to be adjusted in the final version of the Brazilian Portuguese TDS. Comprehension of the scale by patients on HD was good, the scale’s internal consistency was satisfactory (0.84; p<0.001), agreement with a visual analogue scale (VAS) was moderate (kappa=0.44; p<0.001), and reproducibility neared perfection (ICC=0.87; p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results showed that the Brazilian Portuguese version of the scale might be used reliably. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the TDS is a practical, affordable, accessible and well-accepted tool that has a lot to offer for the management of patients with HD.

Reliability and validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Burns Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS)

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Echevarria-Guanilo ◽  
Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas ◽  
Jayme Adriano Farina ◽  
A. Wertus Faber ◽  
Jordi Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Brazilian Portuguese ◽  
Anxiety Scale ◽  
Pain Anxiety ◽  
Portuguese Version

scholarly journals Development and validation of continuity measures for inpatients receiving rehabilitation care

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Silvana L. Oliveira Sousa ◽  
Francesc Medina-Mirapeix ◽  
Pilar Escolar-Reina ◽  
Sean M. Collins ◽  
M. Carmen Lillo-Navarro
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Satisfaction Scale ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Individual Measure ◽  
Relational Management ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Development And Validation

Objective: The main goal of this study was to exemplify the development of a measure of continuity of care (COC) from inpatients’ perspective. This measure is focused on several aspects related to physiotherapy.Methods: A cross-sectional self-report based psychometric study was carried out in a public hospital in southeast Spain. One hundred and fifty two patients with neurological and orthopaedic disorders who received rehabilitation care during stay at hospital were included in the study. A self-report questionnaire was used to examine experiences of patients related to the three types of COC, relational, management and informational continuity. The questionnaire also includes questions about sociodemographic characteristics, patient/therapist affiliation and trust with therapist. To examine reliability were used test-retest and internal consistency. For validation analysis, there were used convergent and known group strategies.Results: Of the 19 indicators included, 13 were selected to demonstrate adequate reliability and validity. From these indicators were generated three composite measures (Relational, management and COC index) and one individual measure (Informational continuity). Test-retest reliability indicated excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.75) for the three indexes. The range of Cronbach’s value was from 0.60 to 0.73. Total scores of all the indexes were moderately correlated with the satisfaction scale (r > 0.30). Regarding the known groups, all indexes scores were similar for men and woman. However, significant differences were found for management index and for relational index, based on trust with therapist and patient/therapist affiliation, respectively.Conclusions: The continuity self-reported measures is a valid and reliable method to assessing the COC in hospitalized patients receiving physiotherapy.

scholarly journals Youth Leisure-Time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ): Reliability and Validity in Colombian University Students

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 7895
Author(s):  
Miguel Alejandro Atencio-Osorio ◽  
Hugo Alejandro Carrillo-Arango ◽  
María Correa-Rodríguez ◽  
Diego Rivera ◽  
José Castro-Piñero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Sedentary Behavior ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Leisure Time ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Kappa Statistics

Sedentary behavior (SB) is influenced by variations in social, cultural and economic contexts. This study assesses the test–retest reliability and validity of the Youth Leisure-time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ), a self-report tool that examines total and domain-specific SB in a cohort of young adults from Colombia. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 447 Colombian college students (52.8% men; mean (± standard deviation) age of 19.55 ± 2.54 years). To assess the reliability of the YLSBQ, Kappa statistics (k) were used. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to determine validity. The Cronbach alpha for the 12 behaviors of the YLSBQ showed a good-to-excellent internal consistency (0.867, ranging from 0.715–0.935). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated that 10 items (83.0%) and two items (17.0%) showed excellent and good reliability, respectively. Furthermore, ICC between the total sedentary time was 0.926 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.912 − 0.939), which was interpreted as excellent. The goodness-of-fit tests provided evidence that overall, a four-factor solution was an adequate fit with the time scores. In conclusion, the YLSBQ could be considered a reliable, valid and usable tool for the assessment of SB in young adults in a Latin American country. We found that the psychometric properties of the questionnaire were similar to those of the original Spanish validation study.

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of 2 Self-Report Measures to Assess Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith P. Gennuso ◽  
Charles E. Matthews ◽  
Lisa H. Colbert
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Sedentary Behavior ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background:The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of 2 currently available physical activity surveys for assessing time spent in sedentary behavior (SB) in older adults.Methods:Fifty-eight adults (≥65 years) completed the Yale Physical Activity Survey for Older Adults (YPAS) and Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) before and after a 10-day period during which they wore an ActiGraph accelerometer (ACC). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) examined test-retest reliability. Overall percent agreement and a kappa statistic examined YPAS validity. Lin’s concordance correlation, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis examined CHAMPS validity.Results:Both surveys had moderate test-retest reliability (ICC: YPAS = 0.59 (P < .001), CHAMPS = 0.64 (P < .001)) and significantly underestimated SB time. Agreement between YPAS and ACC was low (κ = −0.0003); however, there was a linear increase (P < .01) in ACC-derived SB time across YPAS response categories. There was poor agreement between ACC-derived SB and CHAMPS (Lin’s r = .005; 95% CI, −0.010 to 0.020), and no linear trend across CHAMPS quartiles (P = .53).Conclusions:Neither of the surveys should be used as the sole measure of SB in a study; though the YPAS has the ability to rank individuals, providing it with some merit for use in correlational SB research.

Test–Retest Reliability and Temporal Agreement of Direct and Indirect Sexual Interest Measures

Sexual Abuse ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107906322090435
Author(s):  
Robin Welsch ◽  
Alexander F. Schmidt ◽  
Daniel Turner ◽  
Martin Rettenberger
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Interest ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Viewing Time ◽  
Individual Change ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Relative Reliability ◽  
Standardized Effect Sizes ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The Explicit and Implicit Sexual Interest Profile (EISIP) is a multimethod measure of sexual interest in children and adults. It combines indirect latency-based measures such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT), Viewing Time (VT), and explicit self-report measures. This study examined test–retest reliability and absolute temporal agreement of the EISIP over a 2-week interval in persons who were convicted of sexual offenses against children ( n = 33) and nonoffending controls ( n = 48). Test–retest reliability of the aggregated EISIP measures was high across the whole sample ( rtt = .90, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .90) with the IAT yielding the lowest retest correlations ( rtt = .66, ICC = .66). However, these indicators of relative reliability only quantify the temporal stability of individual differences within the group, not the detectability of individual change. Absolute temporal agreement as assessed via Bland–Altman plots ranged from one fourth to three thirds of a standardized unit in the sexual preference scores. This implies that individual change has to exceed medium to large standardized effect sizes to be distinguishable from spontaneous temporal variation in the EISIP measures. Overall, scores of combined measures were largely superior to single measures in terms of both absolute and relative reliability.

scholarly journals Validation of the Apperception Test God Representations: An implicit measure to assess attachment to God representations. Associations with explicit attachment to God measures and with implicit and explicit measures of distress

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-291
Author(s):  
Henk P Stulp ◽  
Jurrijn Koelen ◽  
Gerrit G Glas ◽  
Liesbeth Eurelings-Bontekoe
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Attachment To God ◽  
Implicit Measure ◽  
Secure Base ◽  
Safe Haven ◽  
Avoidant Attachment ◽  
God Representations

In the context of theistic religions, God representations are an important factor in explaining associations between religion/spirituality and well-being/mental health. Although the limitations of self-report measures of God representations are widely acknowledged, well-validated implicit measures are still unavailable. Therefore, we developed an implicit Attachment to God measure, the Apperception Test God Representations (ATGR). In this study, we examined reliability and validity of an experimental scale based on attachment theory. Seventy-one nonclinical and 74 clinical respondents told stories about 15 cards with images of people. The composite Attachment to God scale is based on scores on two scales that measure dimensions of Attachment to God: God as Safe Haven and God as Secure Base. God as Safe Haven scores are based on two subscales: Asking Support and Receiving Support from God. Several combinations of scores on these latter subscales are used to assess Anxious and Avoidant attachment to God. A final scale, Percentage Secure Base, measures primary appraisal of situations as nonthreatening. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed that the composite Attachment to God scale could be scored reliably. Associations of scores on the ATGR scales and on the explicit Attachment to God Inventory with scores on implicitly and explicitly measured distress partly confirmed the validity of the ATGR scales by demonstrating expected patterns of associations. Avoidant attachment to God seemed to be assessed more validly with the implicit than with the explicit scale. Patients scored more insecure on the composite Attachment to God scale and three subscales than nonpatients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document