scholarly journals Differences in walking attainment ages between low-risk preterm and healthy full-term infants

2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 593-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana P. Restiffe ◽  
José Luiz D. Gherpelli
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Predictive Variables

OBJECTIVE: To compare gross motor development of preterm infants (PT) without cerebral palsy with healthy full-term (FT) infants, according to Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS); to compare the age of walking between PT and FT; and whether the age of walking in PT is affected by neonatal variables. METHODS: Prospective study compared monthly 101 PT and 52 FT, from the first visit, until all AIMS items had been observed. Results: Mean scores were similarity in their progression, except from the eighth to tenth months. FT infants were faster in walking attainment than PT. Birth weight and length and duration of neonatal nursery stay were related to walking delay. CONCLUSION: Gross motor development between PT and FT were similar, except from the eighth to tenth months of age. PT walked later than FT infants and predictive variables were birth weight and length, and duration of neonatal intensive unit stay.

Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants

1998 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Darrah ◽  
Lynn Redfern ◽  
Thomas O Maguire ◽  
A.Paul Beaulne ◽  
Joe Watt
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development

scholarly journals Relationship between segmental trunk control and gross motor development in typically developing infants aged from 4 to 12 months: a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamis W. Pin ◽  
Penelope B. Butler ◽  
Hon-Ming Cheung ◽  
Sandra Lai-Fong Shum
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Developmental Trend ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Trunk Control ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Young Infants

Abstract Background Trunk control is generally considered to be related to gross motor development. However, this assumption has not been validated with clinical data. This pilot study was the first of its kind to examine the longitudinal development of segmental trunk control and gross motor development from 4 to 12 months of age in typically developing full-term infants. Methods A convenience cohort of 20 healthy full-term infants (mean gestation = 39.0 weeks, SD 1.2; mean birthweight = 2975.0 g, SD 297.0; males = 10) was recruited. All study infants were tested and scored monthly by independent assessors using the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale from 4 to 12 months of age. Results A developmental trend of segmental trunk control was found in the infants. Static vertical upright trunk control developed prior to active and reactive control. Statistically significant correlations were found between trunk control status and gross motor development mainly in prone and sitting positions from 8 months of age onwards (all p < 0.004, Spearman’s r ranged from 0.644 to 0.798). Conclusions This pilot study provides preliminary clinical evidence to support the inter-dependency between vertical upright trunk control and gross motor development in young infants, particularly as upright functional skills are gained. This suggests that a dual focus on training upright trunk control alongside gross motor skills could be of benefit in the treatment of infants with movement disorders.

scholarly journals Psychomotor development of preterm infants aged 6 to 12 months

2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Helena Eickmann ◽  
Natália Ferraz de Araújo Malkes ◽  
Marília de Carvalho Lima
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Psychomotor Development ◽  
Biological Factors ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Significant Difference

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The immaturity of preterm infants' organ systems may lead to difficulties in adapting to different environmental stimuli. The aim was to compare the psychomotor development of preterm infants (with corrected age) and term infants aged 6 to 12 months and to investigate associated factors.DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analytical study conducted at Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.METHODS: The sample consisted of 135 infants (45 preterm and 90 full-term) aged 6 to 12 months. Neuropsychomotor development was assessed using the Bayley III cognitive, language and motor subscales. Biological, socioeconomic and demographic data were gathered from medical records and through interviews with mothers.RESULTS: The mean cognitive, language and motor indices were within the range of normality for the sample as a whole. No significant difference in the development of infants born preterm and full-term was observed, except for expressive communication, in which preterm infants presented a lower index. Motor development was influenced by biological factors, and the poorest performances were observed in male infants; birth weight birth weight < 1500 g; Apgar score at five minutes < 7; weight-, length- and head circumference-for-age < -1 Z-score; and exclusively breastfeeding for < two months.CONCLUSIONS: Prematurity did not influence the psychomotor development of infants in this study population. Motor development was the most affected domain in the sample as a whole, especially due to biological factors. Investigations on child neuropsychomotor development should try to identify many determinant factors because of its multifactorial nature.

Gross motor development of Thai healthy full-term infants aged from birth to 14 months using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Inter individual variability

2020 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 105169
Author(s):  
Rungreudee Tupsila ◽  
Surussawadi Bennett ◽  
Lugkana Mato ◽  
Orawan Keeratisiroj ◽  
Wantana Siritaratiwat
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development

Prospective study of gross motor development in children with SMA Type II

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bono ◽  
M. Inverno ◽  
G. Botteon ◽  
E. Iotti ◽  
M. Estienne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development

Gross motor development in youth with cerebral palsy; associations with musculoskeletal function

Physiotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. e287-e288
Author(s):  
R.C. Vos ◽  
J.G. Becher ◽  
J.M. Voorman ◽  
J.W. Gorter ◽  
M. van Eck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Musculoskeletal Function

scholarly journals Impact of physiotherapy on neuromotor development of premature newborns

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giselle Athayde Xavier Coutinho ◽  
Daniela de Mattos Lemos ◽  
Antônio Prates Caldeira
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Perinatal Care ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Neuromotor Development

Introduction The population of children born prematurely has increased in line with improving the quality of perinatal care. It is essential to ensure to these children a healthy development. Objective We evaluate the neuromotor development of a group of preterm infants regularly assisted by a physiotherapy service in comparison to full-term newborns, checking, so the impact of the service. Materials and methods We randomly assigned preterm and full-term infants that formed two distinct groups. The group of preterm infants was inserted into a monitoring program of physiotherapy while the other infants were taken as a control group not receiving any assistance in physiotherapy. The groups were compared using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at forty-week, four and six months of corrected gestational age and the scores were compared using Student's t-test, assuming a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). Results The preterm group had significantly lower scores at 40th week compared to the control group, but subsequent scores showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion The timely and adequate stimulation was efficient to promote the motor development of premature infants included in a follow up clinic.

scholarly journals Growth, lung function, and physical activity in schoolchildren who were very-low-birth-weight preterm infants

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Dill Winck ◽  
João Paulo Heinzmann-Filho ◽  
Deise Schumann ◽  
Helen Zatti ◽  
Rita Mattiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Normal Birth Weight ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Normal Birth

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare somatic growth, lung function, and level of physical activity in schoolchildren who had been very-low-birth-weight preterm infants (VLBWPIs) or normal-birth-weight full-term infants. Methods: We recruited two groups of schoolchildren between 8 and 11 years of age residing in the study catchment area: those who had been VLBWPIs (birth weight < 1,500 g); and those who had been normal-birth-weight full-term infants (controls, birth weight ≥ 2,500 g). Anthropometric and spirometric data were collected from the schoolchildren, who also completed a questionnaire regarding their physical activity. In addition, data regarding the perinatal and neonatal period were collected from the medical records of the VLBWPIs. Results: Of the 93 schoolchildren screened, 48 and 45 were in the VLBWPI and control groups, respectively. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding anthropometric characteristics, nutritional status, or pulmonary function. No associations were found between perinatal/neonatal variables and lung function parameters in the VLBWPI group. Although the difference was not significant, the level of physical activity was slightly higher in the VLBWPI group than in the control group. Conclusions: Among the schoolchildren evaluated here, neither growth nor lung function appear to have been affected by prematurity birth weight, or level of physical activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document