scholarly journals PERHITUNGAN BIAYA OPERASI DAN PERAWATAN PLTN SKALA BESAR DAN KECIL

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Mochamad Nasrullah ◽  
Wiku Lulus Widodo

ABSTRAK PERHITUNGAN BIAYA OPERASI DAN PERAWATAN PLTN SKALA BESAR DAN KECIL. Biaya pembangkit PLTN terdiri dari tiga komponen, yaitu biaya investasi, bahan bakar dan operasi perawatan (O & M). Besarnya biaya O&M pada PLTN besar dan kecil tidaklah sama. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menghitung biaya O&M PLTN skala besar dan kecil dengan mempertimbangkan parameter teknis dan ekonomis yang diambil dari berbagai data sekunder dan sumber lainnya. Studi dilakukan menggunakan data dari PLTN jenis PWR dengan daya 1343 MWe untuk PLTN ukuran besar dan daya 90 MWe untuk PLTN ukuran kecil. Asumsi digunakan tingkat eskalasi sebesar 5%, faktor kapasitas 90%. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah menghitung dengan spreadsheet yang meliputi skala masing-masing komponen O&M. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan biaya O & M jika dihitung dengan satuan juta US$/tahun, maka biaya O&M PLTN 1343 MWe sebesar 99,21 juta US$/tahun lebih mahal dari PLTN 90 MWe sebesar 45,13 juta US $/tahun. Namun jika biaya O & M PLTN 1343 MWe dihitung dengan satuan mills $/kWh, maka hasilnya  sebesar 9,37 lebih murah dibandingkan dengan PLTN 90 MWe yaitu sebesar 63,70 mills $/kWh. Hal ini berarti semakin kecil ukuran kapasitas dayanya maka biaya operasi dan perawatannya semakin mahal. Penyebab perbedaan biaya operasi dan perawatan antara PLTN skala besar dan kecil, adalah kapasitas daya, faktor kapasitas, jumlah personal yang bekerja pada biaya administrasi umum pegawai dan manajemen, operasi pembangkit tahunan, biaya tenaga kerja offsite. Kata kunci : Biaya operasi dan perawatan, PLTN, LEGECOST ABSTRACT CALCULATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST FOR LARGE AND SMALL SCALE NPP. The generation cost of nuclear power plant consists of three components:  investment costs, fuel cost operation and maintenance (O&M) cost. O&M costs in the large scale of NPP is different from small scale NPP. The objective of this study are to calculate the O&M cost of large NPP and small NPP by considering technical and economic parameters from secondary data and  other references. This study uses 1343 MWe PWR data for large NPP and 90 MWe PWR for small NPP. The assumptions are 5% escalation level and 90% capacity factor. The methodology for calculation using spreadsheet with scaling methods for each O&M components. The results shows that the O &M cost if calculated in units of million US$/year, the O&M cost of NPP 1343 MWe is US$million 99.21/ year which is more expensive than the O&M cost of NPP 90 Mwe which is only US$million 45.13/ year.  But if the cost of O&M 1343 MWe nuclear power plant unit is calculated in units of mills $/kWh, the result shows that the O&M cost is 9.37 mills $/kWh which is less than the 90 MWe NPP which reaches $ 63.70 mills/kWh. The conclusion is  lower NPP capacity  has higher O&M cost. Different O&M cost is caused by power capacity, capacity factor, the amount of worker on site staff, the annual net generation and the offsite technical support. Keywords: Operation and maintenance cost, NPP, LEGECOST 

Author(s):  
Taihei Yotsuya ◽  
Kouichi Murayama ◽  
Jun Miura ◽  
Akira Nakajima ◽  
Junichi Kawahata

A composite module construction method is to be examined reflecting one of the elements of construction rationalization of a future nuclear plant planned by Hitachi. This concept is based on accomplishments and many successes achieved by Hitachi through application of the modular construction method to nuclear power plant construction over 20 years. The feature of the composite module typically includes a planned civil structure, such as a wall, a floor, and a post, representing modular components. In this way, an increased level of rationalization is expected in the conventional large-scale nuclear plants. Furthermore, the concept aiming at the modularization of all the building parts comprising medium- or small-scale reactors is also to be examined. Additional aims include improved reductions in the construction duration and rationalization through use of the composite module. On the other hand, present circumstances in nuclear plant construction are very pressing because of economic pressures. With this in mind, Hitachi is pursuing additional research into the introduction of drastic construction rationalization, such as the composite module. This concept is one of the keys to successful future plant construction, faced with such a severe situation.


Author(s):  
Takashi Kamei

Even after the huge impact of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, Japan has to establish its energy supply system satisfying requirements of both global warming and resistibility of natural disaster. Nuclear power has a potential to reduce carbon emission but large-scale and centralized nuclear power plant may lose large volume of electricity supply at once. Small-scale nuclear power plants will bring solution in Japan. Thorium molten-salt reactor (MSR) is selected to simulate implementation capacity of small reactors in Japan. In order to use thorium as nuclear fuel, fissionable isotope is indispensable since natural thorium does not include fissile material. Japan owns plutonium in spent nuclear fuel of uranium usage. Quantitative evaluation of implementing capacity of thorium MSR in Japan by using plutonium accumulated in Japan. Implementation capacity of thorium MSR will be about 38 GWe and 11.2 GWe in the maximum and minimum cases at 2050, respectively.


Author(s):  
Xiaomeng Dong ◽  
Zhijian Zhang ◽  
Zhaofei Tian ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Guangliang Chen

Multi-physics coupling analysis is one of the most important fields among the analysis of nuclear power plant. The basis of multi-physics coupling is the coupling between neutronics and thermal-hydraulic because it plays a decisive role in the computation of reactor power, outlet temperature of the reactor core and pressure of vessel, which determines the economy and security of the nuclear power plant. This paper develops a coupling method which uses OPENFOAM and the REMARK code. OPENFOAM is a 3-dimension CFD open-source code for thermal-hydraulic, and the REMARK code (produced by GSE Systems) is a real-time simulation multi-group core model for neutronics while it solves diffusion equations. Additionally, a coupled computation using these two codes is new and has not been done. The method is tested and verified using data of the QINSHAN Phase II typical nuclear reactor which will have 16 × 121 elements. The coupled code has been modified to adapt unlimited CPUs after parallelization. With the further development and additional testing, this coupling method has the potential to extend to a more large-scale and accurate computation.


Author(s):  
Richard A. Hill

After several years of intense labor by many industry people, ASME is about to issue its newly approved PRA standard. This standard is for probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for nuclear power plant applications. It is not a standard on how to build a PRA model; although, that could be inferred from the standard’s technical requirements. This Standard sets forth requirements for PRAs used to support risk-informed decisions related to design, licensing, procurement, construction, operation, and maintenance. It also prescribes a method for applying these requirements depending the degree to which risk information is needed and credited.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Martinez-Quiroga ◽  
F. Reventos

System codes along with necessary nodalizations are valuable tools for thermal hydraulic safety analysis. Qualifying both codes and nodalizations is an essential step prior to their use in any significant study involving code calculations. Since most existing experimental data come from tests performed on the small scale, any qualification process must therefore address scale considerations. This paper describes the methodology developed at the Technical University of Catalonia in order to contribute to the qualification of Nuclear Power Plant nodalizations by means of scale disquisitions. The techniques that are presented include the so-calledKv-scaled calculation approach as well as the use of “hybrid nodalizations” and “scaled-up nodalizations.” These methods have revealed themselves to be very helpful in producing the required qualification and in promoting further improvements in nodalization. The paper explains both the concepts and the general guidelines of the method, while an accompanying paper will complete the presentation of the methodology as well as showing the results of the analysis of scaling discrepancies that appeared during the posttest simulations of PKL-LSTF counterpart tests performed on the PKL-III and ROSA-2 OECD/NEA Projects. Both articles together produce the complete description of the methodology that has been developed in the framework of the use of NPP nodalizations in the support to plant operation and control.


2014 ◽  
Vol 521 ◽  
pp. 530-535
Author(s):  
Meng Wang ◽  
Jian Ding ◽  
Tian Tang ◽  
Zhang Sui Lin ◽  
Zhen Da Hu ◽  
...  

The current situation of nuclear power plants at home and abroad is described, and the impact of large-scale nuclear power accessing to the grid is analyzed, specifically in the aspects of nuclear power modeling, simulation, load following, reliability, fault diagnosis, etc. Nuclear power accessing to the grid will bring a series of problems, the causes of each problem, the main solutions and future development directions are summarized.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Norman Coleman ◽  
Daniel J. Blumenthal ◽  
Charles A. Casto ◽  
Michael Alfant ◽  
Steven L. Simon ◽  
...  

AbstractResilience after a nuclear power plant or other radiation emergency requires response and recovery activities that are appropriately safe, timely, effective, and well organized. Timely informed decisions must be made, and the logic behind them communicated during the evolution of the incident before the final outcome is known. Based on our experiences in Tokyo responding to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant crisis, we propose a real-time, medical decision model by which to make key health-related decisions that are central drivers to the overall incident management. Using this approach, on-site decision makers empowered to make interim decisions can act without undue delay using readily available and high-level scientific, medical, communication, and policy expertise. Ongoing assessment, consultation, and adaption to the changing conditions and additional information are additional key features. Given the central role of health and medical issues in all disasters, we propose that this medical decision model, which is compatible with the existing US National Response Framework structure, be considered for effective management of complex, large-scale, and large-consequence incidents. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2012;0:1-10)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document