scholarly journals Manifestation of Furor as an Element of a Gross Violation of the Regime in Places of Deprivation of Liberty

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Andrey A. Pavlenko ◽  
◽  
Andrey N. Gordopolov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correctional Facility ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Physical Force ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of

Currently, when executing a sentence of imprisonment, officials of the penal system often encounter convicts who show gross disobedience, including via furor. The increase in the number of acts of violence against staff performing their official duties illustrates a situation that requires legal regulation. Penal legislation has no clear definition of the concept “furor”. It is only mentioned in Part 1 of Article 86 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The discrepancy between the norms of the law of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation and the law on institutions and bodies on the application of security measures to convicts in furor reduces the effectiveness of the response actions of the penal system employees. For the formation of the most complete understanding of the concept “convict’s furor”, scientific works are analyzed; A.V. Brilliantov presents the most complete concept. The etymological meaning of the term is established. The history of the formation of the term “furor” in medical encyclopedias and reference books, and in the norms of law in the period from the end of the 19th century to the present is considered. A hypothesis is made that repeated malicious disobedience may be in the form of manifesting furor. A connection between the concepts of malicious violation of the sentence serving regime and the manifestation of furor in the norms of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation is noted. Part 1 of Article 86 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation mentions malicious disobedience to legal requirements, which is similar in content to Part 1 of Article 116 of this code, in which one of the malicious violations of the sentence serving regime is “a threat, disobedience to representatives of the administration of a correctional facility and their insult in the absence of signs of a crime”. As a result, two ways of solving the problem of inconsistency of the grounds for the application of security measures in the RF Penal Code and in the law on institutions and bodies are proposed. The first way is to exclude the term “manifestation of furor” from the list of grounds for applying security measures in the RF Penal Code. The second is defining the term “manifestation of furor” in the norms of law and its consolidation as the basis for the use of physical force and special means in the law on institutions and bodies.

scholarly journals The right of Police officers and the Criminal-executive system to use firearms: some issues of theory and practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
A. А. Alimov ◽  
◽  
S. A. Yunusov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of the Federal Law «On the Police» and the law of the Russian Federation «On Institutions and Bodies Executing Criminal Sentences in the Form of Imprisonment», which empowers the police and the penal system with the right to use firearms. Possible problems of the implementation of the provisions of the legislation are identified, specific measures are proposed to improve the efficiency of legal regulation of the use of firearms by police officers and the penal system

scholarly journals Some Issues of the Legal Regulation of the Cossacks in Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
S. S. Zenin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Physical Force ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the current state of the legal regulation of social relations existing among the Russian Cossacks at the level of constitutent entities of the Russian Federation. The author examines the legal form of regulating social relations and the content of normative legal acts adopted in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation regarding the Russian Cossacks. The paper concludes that there is a need to develop a more effective mechanism of participation of constituent entities of the Federation in the legislative process on issues of joint jurisdiction at the federal level. The author highlights the need to apply a model legislation in order to unify the provisions of regional normative legal acts. The paper focuses on the importance of a clearer definition of the legal status of the Cossacks who have assumed obligations to carry out public service, including taking into account the possibility of using physical force, special means, and cold weapons that they have the right to wear as elements of national clothing.

scholarly journals Administrative Restraint Measures Applied by Employees of the Penal System of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Commission of an Administrative Offense

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-658
Author(s):  
Sergei A. Starostin ◽  
Nadezhda V. Aniskina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Physical Force ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: the article considers the theory and practice of applying administrative restraint measures implemented by employees of the penal system of the Russian Federation in case of the commission of an administrative offense. We substantiate an idea concerning the impact of the effectiveness of the use of administrative coercion measures by employees of the penal system not only on the overall level of penitentiary security, but also on state security in general. Aim: to reveal the specifics of application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system, taking into account the specifics of the law enforcement sphere. Methods: our research is based on the dialectical method of scientific cognition. The article uses general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, etc.), specific scientific and special methods of cognition (comparative legal, formal legal, statistical). Results: we reveal the essence of application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system; we study the practice of implementing the norms concerning the use of administrative restraint measures by employees of the penal system; we reveal the features of their application, taking into account the specifics of the sphere of law enforcement sphere, such as focusing on ensuring penitentiary security, preventing administrative offenses and crimes, application on the territory of penitentiary institutions in most cases, etc. We find out that the legal basis for the application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system of the Russian Federation needs to be improved. Conclusions: in order to increase the effectiveness of the practice of implementing administrative enforcement measures in the penal system, we formulate proposals to improve the norms of the current legislation: namely, Section V of the Law of the Russian Federation of July 21, 993 no. 5473-1 should contain definitions of the terms “use of physical force”, “use of special means”; the terms such as application and use of firearms should be distinguished; the wording “provision of medical first aid” should be replaced with “immediate provision of premedical aid to victims”. We also present arguments in favor of the expediency of supplementing Federal Law 197-FZ of July 19, 2018 “About the service in the Penal System of the Russian Federation...” with a provision that assigns to the employees of the penal system the duty to comply with the norms of criminal legislation (on necessary defense, extreme necessity and other circumstances excluding the criminality of the act) in cases of the implementation of administrative restraint measures.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation and Organization of the Work of Management Subjects Related to the Dismissal of Employees of the Penal System of the Russian Federation due to the Loss of Trust

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-641
Author(s):  
Svetlana V. Zavitova ◽  
Nataliya A. Mel’nikova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Logical System ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Selection Of

Introduction: the article considers problematic issues related to the work of management subjects (managers) and attestation commissions in situations when an employee of the penal system of the Russian Federation is dismissed due to the loss of trust. The aim of this study is to identify gaps in the current legislation on the service that arise when a measure of responsibility such as dismissal due to the loss of trust is applied; another aim consists in formulating proposals for improving legislation in this area. Methods: methodological basis of our study is represented by a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main place belongs to formal-logical, system-structural, and comparative-legal methods. Results: the study has shown that there are many problematic issues in the law enforcement practice regarding the dismissal of employees due to the loss of trust. The norms of the law do not clearly distinguish the components of corruption offenses for which an employee is subject to dismissal due to the loss of trust or may be brought to another type of liability. The issue regarding the status of the decision of the attestation commission remains unresolved; its decision is of an advisory nature, but at the same time, it is fundamental for making a decision by the employee’s superior. There is an ongoing discussion on the composition of the attestation commission; and options for the selection of independent experts are proposed. Discussion: dismissal due to the loss of trust is a specific type of disciplinary penalty, and its implementation is carried out by authorized management entities within the framework of disciplinary proceedings. The procedure for making a decision on the dismissal of employees of the penal system due to the loss of trust needs further improvement in its legal and organizational aspects, taking into account modern law enforcement and judicial practice.

PUBLIC CONTROL OVER THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PENAL SYSTEM: SUBJECT AND TYPES OF SUBJECTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Наталья Сергеевна Малолеткина ◽  
Андрей Петрович Скиба
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Public Monitoring

В статье анализируются вопросы деятельности членов общественных наблюдательных комиссий, контролирующих соблюдение прав лиц, содержащихся в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации. Теоретически реализация института общественного контроля необходима для соблюдения законности и повышения эффективности деятельности сотрудников мест принудительного содержания, выполнения ими возложенных на них обязанностей, предупреждения и выявления нарушений законности в их деятельности, а также соблюдения прав содержащихся лиц. В работе определяется перечень субъектов общественного контроля, дается их классификация и приводится предмет общественного контроля, реализуемого общественными наблюдательными комиссиями. С точки зрения правового регулирования деятельности членов общественных наблюдательных комиссий рассматриваются такие нормативные правовые акты, как Уголовно-исполнительный кодекс Российской Федерации и Федеральный закон «Об общественном контроле за обеспечением прав человека в местах принудительного содержания и о содействии лицам, находящимся в местах принудительного содержания». Исследуются положения Уголовно-исполнительного кодекса Республики Казахстан, регулирующие задачи общественного контроля, порядок создания и некоторые аспекты функционирования общественных наблюдательных комиссий в Республике Казахстан. The article analyzes the activities of members of public monitoring commissions that monitor compliance with the rights of persons held in institutions of the Penal system of the Russian Federation. Theoretically, the implementation of the Institute of public control is necessary to comply with the law and improve the efficiency of the employees of places of forced detention, perform their assigned duties, prevent and detect violations of the law in their activities, as well as respect the rights of detainees. The article defines the list of subjects of public control, gives their classification and provides the subject of public control implemented by public monitoring commissions. From the point of view of legal regulation of the activities of members of public monitoring commissions, such normative legal acts as the PenalCode of the Russian Federation and the Federal law «On public control over enforcement of human rights in places of custody and assistance to persons in places of forced detention» are considered. The article examines the provisions of the Penal code of the Republic of Kazakhstan that regulates the tasks of public control, the procedure for creating and some aspects of the functioning of public monitoring commissions in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Some questions connected with order of leaving of convicts to imprisonment in the penal system pre-trial detention center

2019 ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Ольга Александровна Алфимова
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correctional Facility ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Detention Center ◽  
Detention Centers ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Correction System

В статье освещается правовая регламентация вопросов, связанных с условиями и порядком оставления осужденных к лишению свободы в следственных изоляторах уголовно-исполнительной системы. Решение об оставлении осужденного в СИЗО принимается администрацией СИЗО и оформляется приказом начальника. Приказ начальника СИЗО является, по сути, юридическим основанием для оставления осужденного для выполнения работ по хозяйственному обслуживанию и отбывания наказания в виде лишения свободы именно в данном учреждении, а не в том, которое назначил ему суд в обвинительном приговоре. Иными словами, можно сказать, что на сегодняшний день законом предусмотрен внесудебный порядок оставления осужденных в СИЗО для выполнения работ по хозяйственному обслуживанию. В связи с этим нельзя не согласиться с мнением некоторых специалистов, считающих, что такой порядок ставит в некую зависимость возможность отбывания наказания осужденными в СИЗО от воли администрации этого учреждения, а также предоставляет довольно широкий простор административному усмотрению. Вместе с тем, только суд наделен правом определять степень изоляции осужденных и режим отбывания наказания. Эти требования отражены в ст. 58 УК РФ. Это требование закона содержится и в п. 5 ст. 78 УИК РФ, однако в ситуации с оставлением в СИЗО складывается положение, когда решением его начальника, по сути, изменяется вступивший в силу приговор суда в части назначенного осужденному ранее вида ИУ. The legal regulation of the questions connected with conditions and order of leaving of convicts to imprisonment in pre-trial detention centers of penal correction system is covered in the present article. The decision on leaving of the convict in the pre-trial detention center is made by administration of the pre-trial detention center and made out by the order of the chief. The order of the chief of the pre-trial detention center is in fact a legislative basis for leaving of the convict for performance of work on economic service and serving sentence in the form of imprisonment in this establishment, but not in that which was appointed to it by court in a conviction. In other words it is possible to tell that today the law provided an extrajudicial order of leaving of convicts in the pre-trial detention center for performance of work on economic service. In this regard, it is necessary to agree with opinion of some authors considering that such order puts into certain dependence a possibility of serving sentence condemned in the pre-trial detention center from will of administration of this establishment and also provides enough “broad lands to an administrative discretion”. At the same time, only the court is given the right to define extent of isolation of convicts and the mode of serving sentence. These requirements are reflected in Art. 58 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. This requirement of the law contains also in Paragraph 5 of Art. 78 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation, however in a situation with leaving in the pre-trial detention center there is situation when the decision of his chief, in fact, the court verdict which came into force regarding the appointed correctional facility condemned before a look changes.

POTENTIAL OF BANK CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS WITH CRYPTOCURRENCY IN RUSSIA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Юлия Борисовна Арон ◽  
Елена Валерьевна Жегалова
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Actual Problem ◽  
Digital Currency ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

В статье рассматривается актуальная проблема интеграции крипто-валюты в банковскую систему РФ. Авторами предлагается определение криптовалюты, обосновывается востребованность использования цифровой валюты в экономике. Рассматривается специфика современного правового регулирования операций с криптовалютой и перспективы его развития в российской экономике. The article deals with the actual problem of integrating cryptocurrency into the banking system of the Russian Federation. The authors propose a definition of cryptocurrency, substantiate the demand for the use of digital currency in the economy. The article considers the specifics of modern legal regulation of cryptocurrency transactions and the prospects for its development in the Russian economy.

scholarly journals Regulation and organization of convicts’ work in places of deprivation of liberty: some challenges

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-116
Author(s):  
Elena Shamshilova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Compliance With The Law ◽  
High Level

The article is devoted to the process of convicts attracting to work as a means of their correction. The main goals of convicts’ employment are outlined, as well as the problems of regulatory control of this process. The data of the Prosecutor’s office on compliance with the law in correctional institutions in the sphere of attracting convicts to work are analyzed. The study of legislation in the field of convicts’ employment revealed fragmentary regulation of this process, which is explained by the consolidation of norms on attracting this category of persons to work in both the Penal and Labor Codes of the Russian Federation. Taking into account the fact that the basis for regulating issues in the sphere of execution of punishments is the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The author concludes that it is necessary to make changes to the Penal legislation of Russia in the part concerning the organization of convicts attracting to work, as well as by adding rules on their dismissal. In addition, such problems in the sphere of employment of convicts as the lack of jobs, which entails a high level of non-working convicts, and the organization of remuneration that does not correspond to the stated in the labor legislation, were considered. Possible ways to solve these problems are suggested.

scholarly journals Theoretical analysis of legislative definition of the regime in correctional institutions: problems and ways to solve them

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-75
Author(s):  
V. E. Juzhanin ◽  
D. V. Gorban'
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Theoretical Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Scientific Thought ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The article provides a theoretical analysis of Part 1 of Article 82 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which defines the regime in correctional institutions of the Russian penal system. It is noted that this definition does not correspond to the achievements of modern penitentiary scientific thought about the regime. In particular, it is emphasized that the regime cannot provide conditions for serving a sentence, since it includes these conditions. Also, the regime cannot ensure the protection of convicts, supervision over them and separate maintenance of different categories of convicts, since, on the contrary, the latter are the means of ensuring the regime. According to the authors of the article, the legislator incorrectly uses the phrase regime of detention of convicts, meaning regime of serving a sentence, since they are different legal phenomena. It is noted that the most optimal definition of the regime is presented in the theoretical model of the general part of the new Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, prepared by a group of authors, but the authors also subjected this definition to some adjustments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document