scholarly journals Some Issues of the Legal Regulation of the Cossacks in Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
S. S. Zenin

The article analyzes the current state of the legal regulation of social relations existing among the Russian Cossacks at the level of constitutent entities of the Russian Federation. The author examines the legal form of regulating social relations and the content of normative legal acts adopted in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation regarding the Russian Cossacks. The paper concludes that there is a need to develop a more effective mechanism of participation of constituent entities of the Federation in the legislative process on issues of joint jurisdiction at the federal level. The author highlights the need to apply a model legislation in order to unify the provisions of regional normative legal acts. The paper focuses on the importance of a clearer definition of the legal status of the Cossacks who have assumed obligations to carry out public service, including taking into account the possibility of using physical force, special means, and cold weapons that they have the right to wear as elements of national clothing.

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
Anna Kanakova

The article discusses the constitutional category of «labour», the definition of which is not enshrined in legislative acts because it is considered to be a well-known category, which is not a special legal one and does not require any clarification. However, this approach creates difficulties for legal regulation, as it blurs the boundaries for the legislator and the executor. Lack of awareness of the concept of a regulated category can lead to a situation when the legislator, creating a new law or making amendments to an existing one, will subject to regulation the area that does not pertain to the relevant legal phenomenon, or vice versa - will ignore part of the content of the regulated category, which is certain to negatively affect the quality of legal regulation. Law enforcement practices similarly face difficulties in having only doctrinal understandings of statutory concepts, which creates inconsistency in decisions made by lawyers in course of their professional work. The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation enshrined the category of «labour» in a number of articles, but did not clarify the interpretation of its concept. The analysis of economic and legal views on labor allows us to conclude that, despite the status of a well-known category, which, it would seem, does not need an explanation, only the presence of clear criteria for recognizing an activity as labor, provides high-quality legal regulation, in particular, it allows not only to separate the types of activities that are not subject to legal regulation, but also to choose the right branch of law that regulates social relations in each particular case.


Author(s):  
Kseniya Igorevna Korobko

This article analyzes the legal regulation of social relations in the area of traditional medicine on the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation at the present stage. The author examines the normative legal acts with regards to traditional medicine on the federal and regional levels. A conclusion is made that federal legislation regulates a limited number of questions in the field of traditional medicine; thus legal regulation in this sphere is virtually delegated to the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. At the same time, legislation fundamentally differs from region to region, so is the legal status of the participants of legal relations. The scientific novelty consists in formulated conclusions on the need for amending the current legislation for the purpose of consolidation on the federal level of universal requirements to exercising activity by all subjects of traditional medicine. Such recommendations would allow ensuring unity of legal status of the subjects of legal relations in the area of traditional medicine throughout the Russian Federation.


Taxes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Maryana B. Napso ◽  

Throughout studying of a problematics of conscientiousness in article the question of legislative fastening of a category of conscientiousness from the point of view of various approaches is considered. Considering the complex approach necessary in questions of legal definition of the maintenance of this or that category, the author insists on introduction of concepts of conscientiousness, the diligent tax bearer, a presumption of conscientiousness not only and it is not so much within the limits of separate norms and articles, how many on necessity of reduction of maintenance НК the Russian Federation according to them. The legal regulation in such context when conscientiousness is a letter and spirit of the law, demands revision of set of its positions, concerning legal status of tax bearers, tax departments, tax agents, banks, a legal regulation of actions of tax control and consideration of their results, the tax information etc. Hence, for the author it is a question of giving to legal regulation of a certain orientation, a formulation new концепта, according to which: 1) the diligent person always has advantage before unfair, and the more so before the defaulter; 2) the diligent person cannot be put in the worst position, than unfair; 3) granting of tax privileges demands a recognition of the person the diligent; 4) application of special tax modes is put in direct dependence on a recognition of the person by the diligent. Thus, in a basis of legal regulation of a principle of conscientiousness the author puts the approach based on a recognition of a difference of legal status of persons depending on execution by them of a duty on payment of taxes that, in its opinion, to the greatest degree corresponds to taxation major principles — compulsions, generality, equality and justice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Alsu Machmutovna Khurmatullina ◽  
Evgeniy Batyrovich Sultanov ◽  
Rimma Rashitovna Amirova ◽  
Olga Mikhailovna Smirnova

The significance of regulating people's personal data in the context of implementing each person's right to privacy of personal life and family life becomes especially crucial for the purposes of ensuring biogenetical safety of people in Russia. This requires raising the issue of implementing the right to privacy in the context of the biotechnological revolution. The special legal significance of this issue in the Russian Federation is connected with the passing of such laws as the Law "On personal data" and the Law "On state genome registration in the Russian Federation". This article analyzes the legal status of biometric personal data. We note the need for legal regulation of the protection of biometric information as confidential data. The results of this research are based on using the following methods: universal dialectical method of scientific cognition, as well as general scientific methods based on it (description, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, analogy, generalization) and specific scientific methods (comparative law method, systematic structural method and formal law method).


2021 ◽  
pp. 166-175
Author(s):  
Ivan Vladimirovich Grigorev

The subject of this research is the normative sources that establish the rights, responsibilities and prohibitions in civil service, as well as the mechanisms for their implementation. The author dwells on the practical issues arising in the context of implementation of anti-corruption legislation associated with the right of the officers to exercise other paid activity, acquire and own securities, responsibility to notify about the possible colliding interests, limitation on the deed of gift due to their professional activities, providing data on income, expenses, property, and real obligations. Special attention is given to certain legal provisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of general jurisdiction related to the peculiarities of the legal status of civil officers. The scientific novelty consists in comprehensive examination of the legal issues in regulation of anti-corruption elements of the legal status of civil officers. The main conclusions lies in determination of the gaps and conflicts of legal regulation of such relations. Critical assessment is given to the case law on the appeal of the prosecutors to transfer the property with no evidence that it has been acquired with legitimate income to the income of the Russian Federation. The author formulates recommendations for the improvement of the existing federal legislation on countering corruption in civil service.


Author(s):  
Petr Evgenievich Mazepov

The subject of this research is the legal regulation of franchising at the current stage of economic development. The object of this research is social relations emerging as a result of conducting business activity in the form of franchising. The present state of legal regulation of franchising in the Russian Federation is being analyzed. Special attention is paid to the aspects of regulation of this institution in the conditions of digitalization. The author examines the prospects of using smart contracts in the sphere of franchising, peculiarities of digital elements within a franchise, concept of digital franchising, and prospects of its regulation. The scientific novelty consists in examination of franchising in the conditions of digital economy from the perspective of analysis and determination of the prospect of legal regulation of this institutions. It is concluded that the improvement of regulation of franchising in the context of digital economy in the Russian Federation is possible through the following avenues: 1) simplified procedure of state registration for granting exclusive rights based on the agreement of commercial concession; establishment of alternative methods of identification of the entity who expresses statement of intention; 2) introduction of amendments to the Part 3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation for assigning legal status to such objects as cloud technologies and big data; 3) improvement of norms of the Article 1033 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to specify the admissibility of restrictive terms with regards to user activity in the Internet; 4) formulation of regulatory norms for rendering digital services,.


10.12737/5499 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
Алексей Титов ◽  
Aleksey Titov

In article the analysis loose is provided in the legislation of the Russian Federation of criteria which taxing and judicial authorities use when carrying out an assessment of validity of application by the taxpayer of tax benefit in cases of «dishonesty» of the contractor of the taxpayer. Approach of the legislator to definition of the concept «integrity» of the taxpayer is investigated. The position of the author on the practical problems arising in the course of use by the taxpayer of the right to use tax benefit is stated. The author of the real work comes to a conclusion that lack of due legal regulation of process of use by the taxpayer of the right for use of tax benefit often allows taxing authorities to resolve an issue of validity of tax benefit at discretion.


2020 ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Andrey A. Pavlenko ◽  
◽  
Andrey N. Gordopolov ◽  

Currently, when executing a sentence of imprisonment, officials of the penal system often encounter convicts who show gross disobedience, including via furor. The increase in the number of acts of violence against staff performing their official duties illustrates a situation that requires legal regulation. Penal legislation has no clear definition of the concept “furor”. It is only mentioned in Part 1 of Article 86 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The discrepancy between the norms of the law of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation and the law on institutions and bodies on the application of security measures to convicts in furor reduces the effectiveness of the response actions of the penal system employees. For the formation of the most complete understanding of the concept “convict’s furor”, scientific works are analyzed; A.V. Brilliantov presents the most complete concept. The etymological meaning of the term is established. The history of the formation of the term “furor” in medical encyclopedias and reference books, and in the norms of law in the period from the end of the 19th century to the present is considered. A hypothesis is made that repeated malicious disobedience may be in the form of manifesting furor. A connection between the concepts of malicious violation of the sentence serving regime and the manifestation of furor in the norms of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation is noted. Part 1 of Article 86 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation mentions malicious disobedience to legal requirements, which is similar in content to Part 1 of Article 116 of this code, in which one of the malicious violations of the sentence serving regime is “a threat, disobedience to representatives of the administration of a correctional facility and their insult in the absence of signs of a crime”. As a result, two ways of solving the problem of inconsistency of the grounds for the application of security measures in the RF Penal Code and in the law on institutions and bodies are proposed. The first way is to exclude the term “manifestation of furor” from the list of grounds for applying security measures in the RF Penal Code. The second is defining the term “manifestation of furor” in the norms of law and its consolidation as the basis for the use of physical force and special means in the law on institutions and bodies.


Author(s):  
Bakhodurdzhon Ismatulloevich Ismatulloev

This article explores the peculiarities of constitutional-legal regulation of the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence, which is the foundation of migration relations in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan. Special attention is given to examination of the provisions of constitutional legislation of Russia and Tajikistan regarding regulation of migration, and modern scientific approaches towards understating the possibilities of exercising the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence reflected in the constitutional law of both countries. The main conclusion of the conducted research consists in the statement that the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence is the basic right in the constitutional legal status of modern migrants, which is specified in constitutional legislation of Russia and Tajikistan. Analysis of the legislation of these countries underlines that a common trend became an amendment to the freedom of movement with responsibility of immigrants to migration registration. This requirement of the legislator is aimed at prevention of illegal migration, which is a negative consequence of exercising the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence.


Author(s):  
Vladimir Viktorovich Bulgakov

The relevance of the topic is due to the importance of such an element of the constitutional and legal status of man and citizen as the right to housing. According to para. 1, Art. 40 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation everyone has the right to housing. At the present stage of social relations development the problem of proper maintenance of right to ownership on residential premises remains acute. The realization of the right to ownership of housing is the foundation for the functioning of the economic and social policy of the state. The purpose of the study is to consider the specifics and content of legal relations related to the ownership, use and disposal of residential premises. We identify the concept of “residential premise”, we also include the scholars position regarding this issue. We consider the proprietary rights for the use, ownership and disposal of property, which in their unity constitute the content of the property right of residential premises. In addition, we analyze the basic provisions of the regulations governing the implementation of the right of ownership of residential premises. We designate the grounds for the emergence of residential premises ownership, as well as the rights and obligations of the owner of the premises. We concluded that the property right is inalienable and serves as a guarantee of the constitutional right to housing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document