Portfolio Assessment, Peer Assessment and Writing Skill Improvement

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 2504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yaghoubi ◽  
Majid Mobin
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Skill Improvement

scholarly journals DIFFERING EFFECTS OF CONFERENCE AND PEER ASSESSMENT ON WRITING SKILL OF EFL LEARNERS

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1108-1116
Author(s):  
Maryam Manafi Anvar ◽  
Azadeh Nemati
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Previous Method ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Peer Evaluation ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Teacher Guidance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Evaluation Group ◽  
Post Test

This study intended to demonstrate the significant differences between conference and peer evaluation on writing skill of EFL learners in Pooyesh Language House of Bandar Lengeh. To find out the differences, two types of tests (pre- test before treatment and receiving feedback, post- test after treatment and receiving feedback) were given to two groups of students (30 students for conference and 30 students for peer evaluation). The participants were all teen and adult students who were studying at the same level in this Language House. The writing tests were taken from their previous books which they had practiced before. The pre-test was given to students. In conference group, a mark was given to them by their teacher and during the term the students learned how to write through their teachers comments, but in peer evaluation group, through their classmates comments, so in the second group the classmates just checked each others papers and found errors without giving any mark, because they were not familiar with assessment system; it was the teacher task. In the first group, the teacher was familiar with assessment system, but in peer evaluation group the students found how to check other students' writing as treatment, according to IELTS writing assessment criteria, through their teacher guidance. The post- test was given at the end of the term and previous method was repeated. The results of the study indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between conference and peer evaluation, so the research questions were rejected. The results gained from the two variables were analyzed according to quasi experimental design.

Outcome Assessment of a Writing-Skill Improvement Initiative: Results and Methodological Implications

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hollis Ashbaugh ◽  
Karla M. Johnstone ◽  
Terry D. Warfield
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Outcome Assessment ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Writing Skills ◽  
Accounting Students ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Within Subjects ◽  
Skill Improvement ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Over Time

This paper reports the outcome assessment of our accounting department's writing-skill improvement initiative. We employ complementary experimental designs to examine the effects of professionally relevant writing experiences on accounting students' writing-skill development. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we compare the writing skills of accounting students who participated in our writing initiative with the writing skills of other business students who did not participate. Using a within-subjects experimental design, we track improvements of accounting students' writing skills over time. Results from both outcome assessment methodologies indicate that accounting students' writing skills improve as students participate in our writing initiative. This paper provides insight into the features of a successful writing initiative and offers methodological suggestions for conducting outcome assessments of writing initiatives.

The influence of peer assessment training on assessment knowledge and reflective writing skill

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-875
Author(s):  
Bobby Hoffman
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Writing Assignments ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Assessment Training

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of peer-assessment training as a catalyst to enhance student assessment knowledge and the ability to effectively evaluate reflective journal writing assignments when using the online peer assessment (PA) tool Expertiza. Design/methodology/approach Over a two-year period, end-of-unit assessment test scores and reflective writing samples from a peer-assessment participation group were compared to a no peer-assessment control group. Analysis of covariance was used to control for existing writing skill and ongoing feedback on writing samples. Findings No significant increases were observed in student assessment knowledge when participating in peer-assessment training. Comparison of matched participant samples revealed that after controlling for existing writing skill, students participating in PA graded reflective writing assignments significantly lower than instructor-graded assessments from students not afforded peer-assessment participation. Research limitations/implications No distinction was made on the relative influence of giving or receiving PA influenced performance on the outcome measures. Second, students making multiple revisions based on feedback were not analyzed. Third, the Expertiza system does not control for the number of reviews performed, thus differential weighting of assessment outcomes may be realized unless all students submit and perform the same number of assessments. Finally, in absence of any qualitative analysis as to what factors students consider when grading writing samples, it is unknown as to how individual difference factors or adherence to scoring rubrics may have influenced the obtained results. Practical implications Students may be reticent evaluating peers or utilize grading criteria beyond the mandatory evaluation rubrics. Clear distinctions should be provided to students indicating how instructional content aligns with skills needed to conduct assessment. Training that addresses the theoretical and transactional components of PA are important, but teachers should recognize that when developing assessment skills learners undergo a developmental catharsis related to building trust and establishing a secure and comfortable identity as an assessor. Peer review systems should quantify the relative contribution of each reviewer through the measurement of frequency, timeliness and accuracy of the feedback, compared with instructor standards/evaluations. Originality/value This paper reduces the gap in the literature concerning how PA evolves over time and identifies factors related to the etiology of the peer-review process. In addition, the paper reveals new information regarding the calibration between instructor and peer evaluations.

PORTFOLIO ASSESMENT AS A CATALYST OF PROCESS-ORIENTED SKILL TO PROMOTE STUDENTS IN WRITING BUSINESS LETTERS

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryani Yulian ◽  
Yuniarti Yuniarti
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Business English ◽  
Future Career ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Process Oriented ◽  
Management Students ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Oriented Approach ◽  
English Subject

The purpose of this study was to improve the writing skill of the Management students at Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak. A classroom action research was employed to conduct a portfolio assessment as a process-oriented skill. Students are expected to be able to write various kinds of business letters to fulfill the needs of their future career. The ability of how to write well cannot be obtained through a product-oriented approach particularly to students with low level English skill. Therefore, this study aimed at improving students’ writing skill in terms of writing business letters namely letter of offer. The samples consisted of 37 students of Business English subject in the academic year 2018/2019. The findings of the study proved significant improvement on students’ writing with portfolio assessment in terms of sub-skills in writing namely text harmony, vocabulary selection, grammar option, vocabulary writing, and writing tidiness from the first cycle to the second cycle. Subsequently, the students can orderly produce piece of writing since the underlying purpose of this study was to encourage writing as process-oriented skill.

scholarly journals The Impact of Portfolio Assessment on The Moroccan EFL Students’ Writing Engagement

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmostafa Omarakly ◽  
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Teacher Student ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Experimental Group

Although the pedagogical value of portfolio assessment is widely investigated, its impact on students’ engagement is still under-explored. Accordingly, this study intended to examine the impact of portfolio assessment on the Moroccan EFL students’ writing engagement. To this end, two groups of high school students were involved in the study. The two groups were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received the treatment; portfolio assessment accompanied with various reflection and assessment techniques (i.e. self-and peer-assessment and teacher-student conferences) whereas the control group followed the regular summative writing achievement tests. To enrich the data, the experimental group students’ views about portfolio assessment were elicited via students’ written reflections. The analysis of the quantitative data showed that the experimental group students achieved a higher and more significant level of writing engagement than the control group students. Furthermore, the analysis of the qualitative data revealed that the students positively perceived portfolio assessment to impact their writing engagement at various levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document