scholarly journals EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMBINED TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER, BREAST CANCERAND CANCER OF THE FLOOR OF THE MOUTH USING A STERILE HYDROGEL MATERIAL "KOLEGEL 5-FTUR"

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
L. I. Korytova ◽  
V. P. Sokurenko ◽  
E. A. Maslyukova ◽  
A. V. Meshechkin ◽  
N. D. Oltarzhevskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Malignant Tumor ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Effectiveness Evaluation ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Tumor Localization ◽  
Floor Of The Mouth ◽  
Cancer Breast

The article is devoted to the effectiveness evaluation of the use of sterile material «Kolegel 5-ftur» on the basis of sodium alginate with 5-fluorouracil, as of shape of disk, in the course of chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer, breast cancer and cancer of the floor of the mouth. The study group included 38 patients: 19 patients diagnosed with CRR, 10 patients -BC, 9 patients - a cancer of the mouth floor. The study used a hydrogel material «Kolegel 5-ftur» during chemoradia- tion therapy for histologically confirmed diagnosis of a malignant tumor. The effectiveness of the combined treatment is proved by the following criteria: local control of the tumor, the analysis of toxicity and immediate effect. Thus, the use of hydrogel materials «Kolegel-5-ftur» in group of patients with primary malignant tumor localization in the floor of the mouth, with the aggressive chemotherapy provided enhancing the effectiveness of therapy.

EXPERIENCE OF THE APPLICATION OF THERMOCHEMIORRADIOTHERAPY IN COMBINED TREATMENT OF DYSTAL CANCER OF DIRECT INTESTINE

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Zhanna Startseva ◽  
Sergey Afanasev ◽  
Dina Plaskeeva
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chemoradiation Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer

The article describes the experience of using ther-mochioradiotherapy in the combined treatment of distal locally advanced colorectal cancer, as well as comparing the effectiveness of treatment with chemoradiation therapy. The use of the proposed method as a component of the combined treatment of patients with rectal cancer allowed to increase the percentage of organ-preserving operations. As a result of thermochemotherapy, the prevalence of the primary tumor was significantly reduced, as a result of which the number of sphincter-bearing operations was reduced by almost 2 times (p

scholarly journals Function of N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Yuxin Zuo ◽  
Yu Peng ◽  
Lielian Zuo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Tumor Proliferation ◽  
Cancer Breast

N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) modification is a dynamic and reversible methylation modification at the N6-position of adenosine. As one of the most prevalent posttranscriptional methylation modifications of RNA, m6A modification participates in several mRNA processes, including nuclear export, splicing, translation, and degradation. Some proteins, such as METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, ALKBH5, FTO, and YTHDF1/2/3, are involved in methylation. These proteins are subdivided into writers (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP), erasers (ALKBH5, FTO), and readers (YTHDF1/2/3) according to their functions in m6A modification. Several studies have shown that abnormal m6A modification occurs in tumors, including colorectal cancer, liver cancer, breast cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and gastric cancer. The proteins for m6A modification are involved in tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, immunity, and other processes. Herein, the roles of m6A modification in cancer are discussed, which will improve the understanding of tumorigenesis, as well as the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of tumors.

scholarly journals Lack of Association between Common Polymorphisms in Selenoprotein P Gene and Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer, and Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hanjiang Xu ◽  
Fan Mo ◽  
Jun Zhou ◽  
Zongyao Hao ◽  
Xianguo Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Selenoprotein P ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Cancer Breast ◽  
P Gene ◽  
Breast And Prostate Cancer

Background and Objective. Selenoprotein P (SEPP1) is the major selenoprotein in plasma. Previous studies have demonstrated that SEPP1 expression was reduced in human prostate and colon tumors. Nowadays, studies concerning SEPP1 gene polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility have been extensively investigated, whereas results from these studies remain debatable rather than conclusive. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the association between two common polymorphisms (rs3877899 and rs7579) in SEPP1 and cancer susceptibility. Method. We search the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Wanfang (China) databases (up to December 1, 2020) to identify all eligible publications. The pooled odds ratio (OR) correspondence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to evaluate the associations. Results. Finally, nine eligible studies with 7,157 cases and 6,440 controls and five studies with 2,278 cases and 2,821 controls were enrolled in rs3877899 and rs7579 polymorphisms, individually. However, a null significant association was detected between the two polymorphisms in SEPP1 and susceptibility to colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer in all comparison models. Subsequently, subgroup analysis based on tumor type, no significant association was identified for prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer. In addition, when the stratification analyses were conducted by the source of control, HWE status, and ethnicity, yet no significant association was found. Conclusions. The current meta-analysis shows that SEPP1 rs3877899 and rs7579 polymorphisms may not be associated with susceptibility to colon cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, and further well-designed studies with a larger sample size are warranted to validate our findings.

Risk-adjustment models for breast, lung, and colorectal cancer cost, utilization, and outcomes in a commercially insured population.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18340-e18340
Author(s):  
Bhuvana Sagar ◽  
Yu Shen Lin ◽  
Liana Desharnais Castel
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Cost Drivers ◽  
Cancer Breast ◽  
Clinical Biomarkers ◽  
Cost Utilization

e18340 Background: Advances in oncology have led to rising costs which are unsustainable, necessitating value-based arrangements that maximize quality and overall outcomes. Our objective was to identify clinical and patient factors that predict higher costs and utilization among breast, lung, and colorectal cancer in a commercial population. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of claims in a sample of 9,748 commercially insured patients with breast, lung, and colorectal cancer, to measure costs and utilization based on presence of metastases, proxies for clinical biomarkers, patient demographics, and treatments. Results: Episode Risk Group (ERG) risk score, metastasis, and facility provider affiliation were cost drivers for all three types of cancer (breast, lung, and colorectal). Hypertension and younger age were cost drivers for breast cancer. In addition, HER2 positive status (β = 68,946, SE = 2,104, p < .0001) was significant in breast cancer, and VEGF in both lung (β = 56,975, SE = 10,138, p < .0001) and colorectal (β = 24,400, SE = 5,671, p < .0001) cancers. Metastasis also was associated with greater hospital admissions and hospital length of stay in all three cancers. Chemotherapy and supportive drug therapies accounted for the highest proportions of total medical costs among beneficiaries observed. Conclusions: Value-based reimbursement models in oncology should appropriately risk adjust by accounting for key cost drivers. Although claims-based methodologies may be further augmented with clinical data, we recommend adjusting for the factors we identified in models to predict costs and outcomes in breast, lung, and colorectal cancers.

scholarly journals Personalized Medicine in Screening for Malignant Disease: A Review of Methods and Applications

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. BMI.S11153 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schmalfuss ◽  
P.L. Kolominsky-Rabas
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Personalized Medicine ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Malignant Disease ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Breast ◽  
Potential Applications

Personalized medicine (PM) is currently a hot topic in the professional world. It is often called the medicine of the future and has already achieved resounding success in the area of targeted therapy. Nevertheless, integration of the concepts of PM into routine clinical practice is slow. This review is intended to give an overview of current and potential applications of PM in oncology. PM could soon play a decisive role, especially in screening. The relevance of PM in screening was examined in the case of four common cancers (colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer). A literature search was performed. This showed that biomarkers in particular play a crucial role in screening. In summary, it can be emphasized that there are already numerous known promising biomarkers in malignant disease. This results in several possibilities for individualizing and revolutionizing screening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document