scholarly journals Analysis of systemic immunity and inflammation in the prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
G. G. Khakimova ◽  
T. N. Zabotina ◽  
A. A. Tryakin ◽  
A. A. Borunova ◽  
T. V. Davidova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cellular Composition ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Immunity

Objective: to study the state of cellular immunity in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.Materials and methods. From 2017 to 2018, 45 previously untreated patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (25 with stage I–III, 20 with stage IV) received surgical / combined treatment or independent chemotherapy, respectively, at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical ResearchCenter of Oncology. Peripheral blood sampling was carried out before starting treatment. We studied the cellular composition of peripheral blood, as well as systemic immunity parameters determined by flow cytometry (CD3+CD4+; CD3+CD8+; CD4+CD8+; CD4+/CD8+; CD3–CD16+CD56+; CD3–CD19+), and their prognostic significance in relation to overall survival and progression-free survival.Results. The prognostic value of the relative indicator of platelet lymphocytic index was determined: progression-free survival in patients with a high level of platelet-lymphocytic index (>208.7) was higher: 8.1 months versus 4.5 months (p = 0.0027). A favorable prognosis for overall survival was an increase in the number of CD3–CD19+ lymphocytes (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.85–0.97; p = 0.007), and an unfavorable prognosis was an increase in the number of neutrophils (HR 1.26; 95 % CI 1.05–1.50; p = 0.012), platelet count (HR 1.01; 95 % CI 1.0–1.01; p = 0.043), as well as an increase in the number of NK cells (HR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.0–1.09; p = 0.029).Conclusion. Indicators of the cellular composition of peripheral blood, characterizing a systemic inflammatory reaction, as well as indicators of systemic immunity, can serve as additional prognostic factors for gastric cancer.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

scholarly journals Is there an oligometastatic state in pancreatic cancer? Practical clinical considerations raise the question

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1106) ◽  
pp. 20190627
Author(s):  
Marta Scorsetti ◽  
Tiziana Comito ◽  
Davide Franceschini ◽  
Ciro Franzese ◽  
Maria Giuseppina Prete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clinical Considerations

Objectives: To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a local ablative treatment (LAT) in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients affected by histologically confirmed stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis. Endpoints are local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 41 patients were treated with SBRT on 64 metastases. Most common sites of disease were lung (29.3%) and liver (56.1%). LC at 1 and 2 years were 88.9% (95% CI 73.2–98.6) and 73.9% (95% CI 50–87.5), respectively. Median LC was 39.9 months (95% CI 23.3—not reached). PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 21.9% (95% CI 10.8–35.4) and 10.9% (95% CI 3.4–23.4), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.1–11.3). OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 79.9% (95% CI 63.7–89.4) and 46.7% (95% CI 29.6–62.2). Median OS was 23 months (95%CI 14.1–31.8). Conclusions: Our results, although based on a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients, show that patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer may benefit from local treatment with SBRT. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results. Advances in knowledge: Selected patients affected by oligometastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can benefit from local ablative approaches, like SBRT

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n = 66; SCRT group: n = 18). Results The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups. Conclusions This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

Clinical Experience with Azacitidine In Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) in Spain

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5040-5040
Author(s):  
Pablo Gonzalez Navarro ◽  
Regina García Delgado ◽  
Alicia Bailén Garcia ◽  
Juan Antonio Múñoz Múñoz
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 5040 Clinical Experience with Azacitidine In Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) in Spain Pablo González Navarro 1*, Regina García Delgado 2*, Alicia Bailén Garcia 3*, Juan Antonio Muñoz Muñoz 4* 1MD, PhD. Hospital San Cecilio, 18014 Granada, Spain, Teléfono: 958023600 [email protected]; 2Hospital Virgen De La Victoria, Málaga, Spain; 3Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain; 4MD, PhD. Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain Introduction: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic stem cells often occurring in elderly patients. In the new WHO classification, CMML has been reclassified as a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disease. CMML has been subdivided in two subclasses: CMML-1:<5% blasts in peripheral blood and 5–9% blasts in bone marrow, and CMML-2: <10% blasts in peripheral blood and 10–19% blasts in bone marrow (Greco et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis.2011). Azacitidine (AZA) is an hypomethylating agent approved in Europe for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes, with an intermediate to high risk of progressing to AML or death; chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and AML that has developed from a myelodysplastic syndrome (prescribing information EMEA 2011). Until its approval in May 2009, AZA was used in Spain under compassionate use in clinical trials. AZA produce a direct decrease of DNA methyltransferase activity, reverting aberrant DNA methylation and increasing the expression of silenced genes, leading to celular differentiation and/or apoptosis (Greco et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2011). Materials and Methods: We report the results of a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter Spanish study of 27 patients to assess the effectiveness of AZA to treat CMML. We present results of: Response, Overall Response, Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival. Results: Eighteen of the patients (69.23%) had Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) type 1 and nine (30.77%) CMML type 2. Median age at diagnosis was 69 years. Male/female ratio: 19/8. ECOG performance status score 1–2 was 78%, twenty patients (74%) received an initial dose of 75 mg/m2 of AZA, whereas three patients (11%) received 50mg/ m2. The mean number of cycles received was 8.32, 95%IC (5.91; 10.73). Overall response to treatment was 53% (CR+PR+HI+mCR): 14.81% complete response, 7.4% partial response, 3,7% Medular complete response and 29,62% Hematological Improvement. In addition, 18,51% had stable disease. Thirty-six percent of patients were alive at the end of treatment with AZA. Median Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival were 17.47 months (95%CI 9.33, upper limit not reached) and 10.97 (95%IC 3.97, 17.47) respectively (Figure 1, 2). Conclusion: Our results show that AZA is an active drug in the treatment of patients with CMML, with similar response rates in the published literature. More data from this study and further investigation with different clinical trials are needed to confirm these outcomes as well as safety and effectiveness of this treatment. Disclosures: García Delgado: Celgene and Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4411-4411
Author(s):  
Sarita Rani Jaiswal ◽  
Sumita Chatterjee ◽  
Aditi Chakrabarti ◽  
Sneh Bhargava ◽  
Ray Kunal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract In a pilot study, 75 patients with Primary Refractory (PRef) AML without matched family donors were offered post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) based haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Twenty-seven patients (36%) opted for haploidentical transplantation with or without further chemotherapy. There was no difference in the patient or disease characteristics amongst patients undergoing transplantation or not. The conditioning regimen comprised of FluCyMel (n=5), FluBuMel (n=17) and FluTreoTBI (n=5). MMF was tapered between days 14 and 21 posttransplant in the absence of GVHD and cyclosporine A was tapered between days 60 and 90. The progression free survival at a median follow-up of 25 months was 36.6% and 0% in the transplant and the non-transplant group (p=0.0001). Prompt engraftment was noted at a median of 14 days irrespective of disease status or conditioning regimens. Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD were 26.6% and 8% respectively. The overall incidence of infections remained low, with CMV reactivation and invasive aspergillosis occurring in 9 and 2 patients respectively. CMV disease was diagnosed in 2 patients. Non-relapse mortality at 1 year was 16.7%. The incidence of disease progression was 54%. Factors positively impacting progression free survival were < 15% marrow blasts at transplant and a Natural Killer Cell Ligand Mismatch (NKLMM) donor. NKLMM, Haplotype or B scores had no impact on CMV infection or GVHD. However, Bx Haplotype was associated with lower NRM (5%, 95%CI-1-9) compared to 48.6% (95%CI 28.2-69.0) in AA Haplotype (p=0.01). Disease status did not impact the overall survival (p=0.11) in the HSCT cohort. In fact, NKLMM donors with B haplotype had the greatest impact on overall survival in both the HSCT cohort (71.4%, 95%CI 54.3-88.5%) compared to 20% (95%CI 8.8-31.2, p=0.01) in those without the same. Our data suggests PTCY based Haploidentical PBSC transplantation is feasible in patients with PRef AML and donor NKLMM might improve progression free survival, provided the conditioning protocol and the post-grafting therapy offer the optimum platform for alloreactivity of NK cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Impact of Superselective Intra-Arterial and Systemic Chemoradiotherapy for Gingival Carcinoma; Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicity between radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACRT) and RT with concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: Median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT group: 60 Gy; SCRT group:69 Gy). At 3 years, the two groups significantly differed in overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.00–87.62; SCRT: 50.37%, 95% CI: 27.58–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.64%, 95% CI: 62.69–85.17; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.028) and local control (LC; IACRT: 77.17%, 95% CI: 64.23–86.41; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with poor OS (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had significantly worse PFS.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. IACRT is an effective and organ-preserving treatment for GC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Polysomy is associated with poor outcome in 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglial tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1164-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Chen ◽  
Cheddhi Thomas ◽  
Felipe Andres Munoz ◽  
Sanda Alexandrescu ◽  
Craig M Horbinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Short Survival ◽  
Oligodendroglial Tumors

AbstractBackgroundChromosomal instability is associated with earlier progression in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutated astrocytomas. Here we evaluated the prognostic significance of polysomy in gliomas tested for 1p/19q status.MethodsWe analyzed 412 histologic oligodendroglial tumors with use of 1p/19q testing at 8 institutions from 1996 to 2013; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for 1p/19q was performed. Polysomy was defined as more than two 1q and 19p signals in cells. Tumors were divided into groups on the basis of their 1p/19q status and polysomy and were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsIn our cohort, 333 tumors (81%) had 1p/19q loss; of these, 195 (59%) had concurrent polysomy and 138 (41%) lacked polysomy, 79 (19%) had 1p/19q maintenance; of these, 30 (38%) had concurrent polysomy and 49 (62%) lacked polysomy. In agreement with prior studies, the group with 1p/19q loss had significantly better PFS and OS than did the group with 1p/19q maintenance (P &lt; 0.0001 each). Patients with 1p/19q loss and polysomy showed significantly shorter PFS survival than patients with 1p/19q codeletion only (P &lt; 0.0001), but longer PFS and OS than patients with 1p/19q maintenance (P &lt; 0.01 and P &lt; 0.0001). There was no difference in survival between tumors with &gt;30% polysomic cells and those with &lt;30% polysomic cells. Polysomy had no prognostic significance on PFS or OS in patients with 1p/19q maintenance.ConclusionsThe presence of polysomy in oligodendroglial tumors with codeletion of 1p/19q predicts early recurrence and short survival in patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document