LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCING SCIENCE (RESEARCH), TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION IN CHINA

Author(s):  
N. A. Pozhilova

It seems possible to consider the features of the “eastern” approach to the procedure for fi nancing scientific and technical research using the example of the current regulation of state support for these areas in China. A set of measures to fi nance science, technology and innovation in China, among other things, has now led to what is commonly called the “Asian miracle”, including due to reasonable measures for balanced support of research teams, research institutes and the establishment of a clear administration system.

Author(s):  
Tatiana Giraldo Pardo

RESUMEN:Este trabajo pretende identificar a la luz de los indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, cuáles factores determinan la sustentabilidad de las políticas de inversión en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación dentro de los países iberoamericanos. Para ello se adoptan las cifras de los indicadores de la Ricyt (Red Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación), y con base en los resultados, se construyen dos modelos de sustentabilidad, fundamentados en dos ecuaciones paralelas. El primer modelo, está en función de la sostenibilidad y la pertinencia de las actividades de Ciencia y Tecnología. El segundo modelo, hace depender la sustentabilidad de la responsabilidad social y la iniciativa a la estructura. Se espera que los resultados arrojados por este doble modelo, sean más robustos que aquellos formulados a partir de los resultados de cada uno de los métodos por separado.ABSTRACTThis study aims at identifying the indicators in the fields of science and technology, which factors determine the sustainability of investment policies on science, research and innovation, among Iberoamerican countries. For this, Ricyt indicators have been adopted (Iberoamerican Network of Science, Technology and Innovation), and based on results, two sustainability models are designed focused on two parallel equations. The first model supports sustainability and appropriateness of scientific and technological activities. The second model, however, describes the dependence on sustainability based on social responsibility and structure initiative. It is really expected that the results shown by these two models be more robust than those resulting from each of these models in isolation.RESUMÉÉCe document vise à identifier, grâce à certains indicateurs scientifiques et technologiques, les facteurs déterminant la viabilité des politiques d’investissement en Science, Technologie et Innovation dans les pays d’Amérique latine. Pour ce faire, les chiffres et indicateurs de la Ricyt (Réseau ibéro-américain de la science, la technologie et l’innovation) sont pris en compte, et selon les résultats obtenus, deux modèles de développement durable sont construits, basés sur deux équations parallèles. Le premier modèle repose sur la viabilité et la pertinence des activités scientifiques et technologiques. Le second modèle fait dépendre la structure de la durabilité à la responsabilité sociale des entreprises et à l’initiative. Les résultats attendus de ce double modèle devraient être plus robustes que ceux réaliser séparément à partir des résultats de chacune des méthodes.RESUMOEste trabalho pretende identificar à luz dos indicadores de ciência e tecnologia, quais factores determinam a sustentabilidade das políticas de investimento em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação nos países iberoamericanos. Para isto adotaram-se os valores dos indicadores da Ricyt (Rede Iberoamericana de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação), e com base nos resultados, construem-se dois modelos de sustentabilidade, fundamentados em duas equaciones paralelas. O primeiro modelo está em função da sustentabilidade e a relevância das actividades de Ciência e Tecnologia. O segundo modelo, faz depender a sustentabilidade da responsabilidade social e a iniciativa da estrutura. Espera-se que os resultados obtidos por este duplo modelo sejam mais robustos do que aqueles formulados a partir dos resultados de cada um dos métodos de forma separada.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashik Paul

The Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh unveiled a new Science Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy on the occasion of the centenary year of Indian Science Congress on January 3, 2013 in Kolkata. One of the key goals of the STI policy is to develop science, technology and innovation with focus on faster, sustainable and inclusive development for the people. The policy speaks of promoting scientific temper amongst all sections of the society, making careers in science, research and innovation an attractive career option particularly for bright young minds, establishing world class infrastructure for R&D and increasing India’s contribution to global scientific publications from 3.5% to 7% creating an environment for enhanced private sector participation in R&D to mention a few. In principle, the policy promises significant boost to a largely demoralized science and technology community in the country. However, the methodology to achieve such goals and the possible outcome, if any, on a developing nation like India needs to be studied in greater details. Developing scientific temper among the vast majority of our population is a desirable but difficult target, keeping in view the impact of religion and caste-based policies of some state governments as well as national political forums. The STI-2013 objective of empowering women through appropriate STI inputs comes at a time when proper representations of women in different policy making positions are inadequate. National statistics of women in key government institutions of science and technology present glaring disparity in representation even after more than five decades of independence. This may be expected in a society caught between the idealisms of ‘equal entitlement’ and the glitz and glamour associated with the so-called ‘shining India’ concept. It should be kept in mind that there are not enough calories per head for a vast majority of Indians with 43% of Indian women being anaemic and 67% starved of calories.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pluvia Zuñiga ◽  
Luis Rubalcaba ◽  
Rafael Carvalho de Fassio

The unprecedented speed of technological change--impacting all sectors of the economy--is changing how research is done, how companies work and do business, and how governments operate and relate to citizens. Innovation may be open, but it is not free. Innovation procurement does not end with the establishment of a supportive legal framework. To cope with the speed of these changes, systematic and mission-driven investments in science and technology capabilities are critical. At the same time, investments must enhance the capabilities of the public and private sectors to work collaboratively, with a supply and demand focus and a shared vision of the risks and returns on investments. This publication emphasizes the increasingly multidimensional and interconnected knowledge flows to accelerate innovation and endogenous capacities between institutions. It is the second in a series of three IDB documents on innovation procurement and open innovation in Brazil. Through this series, the Bank shows its commitment to investing in science, technology, and innovation and strengthening digital transformation.


10.12737/432 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Кальянов ◽  
Aleksandr Kalyanov

It is shown that an increase in the competitiveness of Russia is impossible without an increase in the prestigious science and technology and innovation, and its inclusion among the top priorities. An important form of support from the public authorities should be to develop the legal framework of innovation and adoption of legal acts aimed at creating an enabling environment for innovative economic development. This should include the evelopment and improvement of the legislation in order to create a unified state policy innovation and creating favorable conditions for the development of science, technology and innovation, including its stimulation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Vásquez ◽  
Martha Lenis Castro ◽  
Youseline Garavito ◽  
Juan Camilo Gutierrez ◽  
Sandra Rodriguez Melendez

<div>More than fifty years of conflict in Colombia has left a country with many needs. This article analyzes how Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) can contribute to improving communities affected by violence in a post-conflict stage. This paper begins with an introduction focused on the processes of the generation of violence and the peace agreement, following the role of the UN in the post-conflict stage. A conceptual analysis of the actors involved in Science, Technology, and Innovation activities is also presented</div><div>with one analysis of the activities of STI that can contribute to the post-conflict, continuing with some financing strategies for the activities of STI and a brief description of the legal framework STI against the post-conflict. The paper concludes with some recommendations and opportunities in this new era for the country.</div>


Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Mark Shugurov

Introduction: in the context of the implementation of the declared technological modernization of the EAEU economy, the issue of developing the legal framework for the integration in the field of science, technology and innovation, and especially the issue of developing a system of its legal principles, is being updated. The purpose of the study is to develop a comprehensive conceptual understanding of the nature, system and functions of the legal principles that are the core of the legal regulation of the integration cooperation of the EAEU member states in the field of science, technology and innovation. The objectives of the study are the following: 1) to relate the legal principles of the regulation of scientific and technological integration with the principles of the Eurasian integration in general; 2) to carry out a consistent analysis of the degree of consolidation of the principles of scientific and technological integration in Union law; 3) to carry out the doctrinal classification of the principles. Methods: general scientific methods (system, structural and functional), specific scientific methods (comparative legal, dogmatic legal). Results: a classification of the legal principles of scientific and technological integration is proposed, the system of which includes a subgroup of general principles, as well as a subgroup of industry (structural-institutional, integration-legal and organizational) principles. Conclusions: the systematized legal principles are conceptualized as the key legal tools for managing integration processes in the field of science, technology and innovation, the formal consolidation of which will serve as a factor for expanding and deepening the regional scientific and technological integration of the member states.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Vásquez ◽  
Martha Lenis Castro ◽  
Youseline Garavito ◽  
Juan Camilo Gutierrez ◽  
Sandra Rodriguez Melendez

<div>More than fifty years of conflict in Colombia has left a country with many needs. This article analyzes how Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) can contribute to improving communities affected by violence in a post-conflict stage. This paper begins with an introduction focused on the processes of the generation of violence and the peace agreement, following the role of the UN in the post-conflict stage. A conceptual analysis of the actors involved in Science, Technology, and Innovation activities is also presented</div><div>with one analysis of the activities of STI that can contribute to the post-conflict, continuing with some financing strategies for the activities of STI and a brief description of the legal framework STI against the post-conflict. The paper concludes with some recommendations and opportunities in this new era for the country.</div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document