scholarly journals O "Sistema Acusatório" do Processo Penal Brasileiro: Apontamentos Acerca do Conteúdo da Acusatoriedade a partir de Decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal / The "Accusatorial System"of Brazilian Criminal Procedure: Notes on the Concept of Accusatorialism from the Federal Supreme Court's Decisions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Gomes De Vasconcellos
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Core Point ◽  
The Core ◽  
Federal Supreme

Resumo: Este artigo pretende desenvolver uma análise do posicionamento adotado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal brasileiro em relação ao conceito de “sistema acusatório” no processo penal. Para tanto, empreender-se-á estudo das decisões acerca da temática proferidas pelo referido órgão nos anos de 2010 a 2014. Em seguida, após breve excurso histórico, serão expostos os contornos principais da discussão doutrinária pátria sobre os sistemas processuais, ressaltando o ponto cerne das divergências: a possibilidade de produção de provas por iniciativa do julgador. Assim, a partir de tal arcabouço teórico, serão apontadas questões que carecem de aprofundamento e elucidação pela jurisprudência do tribunal máximo brasileiro.Palavras-chave: Processo Penal; sistema acusatório; Supremo Tribunal Federal.Abstract: This paper aims to develop an analysis of the Brazilian Supreme Court’s position related to the concept of “accusatorial system” in criminal law. In this sense, it will study the decisions of the court involving the topic in the years of 2010 to 2014. Then, after a brief historical excursion, the main lines of the Brazilian doctrinal discussion about procedural systems will be presented, highlighting the core point of disagreement: the possibility of producing evidence by the judge’s initiative. Thus, from such theoretical background, this paper will identify issues that claim a deep and clarified review from the Brazilian Supreme Court’s decisions.Keywords: Criminal Procedure; Accusatorial system; Brazilian Supreme Court.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian sebagai Tindak Pidana Ringan Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Gede Mahadi Waisnawa Hanata Putra ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
East Indies ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
A Minor

Indonesian Criminal Law is currently a legacy from the Dutch East Indies Government which has been adapted and passed by Law No. 16 of 1946 to be implemented nationally. The purpose of this research is to describe the regulation of theft of minor crimes in the Criminal Code before the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 and to describe the juridical consequences of Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2012 on theft as a minor criminal act in the Criminal Code. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results show that according to Article 206 of the Criminal Procedure Code, procedures for granting authority to investigate and review cases are carried out by the investigator himself and should not be disturbed by the prosecutor. This Perpres adjusts articles 364, 373, 379, 384, 407 and article 482 of the Criminal Code to Rp. 2,500,000.00. Therefore, fulfill this element of the requirement and enter a case where the value of the commodity does not exceed Rp. 2,500,000.00. Therefore, the case is examined by expedited procedure, which is tried by a judge, and the assignment and review of the case is carried out by the investigator himself without the interference of the prosecutor.

scholarly journals O Tribunal Superior do Trabalho e o trabalho escravo

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Sarah Gabay Pereira ◽  
José Claudio Monteiro de Brito Filho
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters ◽  
Federal Supreme

Estudo que pretende analisar, do ponto de vista qualitativo, três decisões do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST) no tocante ao trabalho em condições análogas à de escravo, verificando sua compatibilidade com a posição dominante do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) a respeito da temática, além de com decisões do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ). A pesquisa será feita pela análise, como dito, qualitativa de decisões do TST, sendo, por isso, fonte de pesquisa principal a jurisprudência desse tribunal a respeito. Secundariamente, até para o confronto que será realizado, serão utilizadas, ainda, como fontes de pesquisa, a legislação, a doutrina e, especialmente, decisões do STF e do STJ que tratam do trabalho escravo, e que, embora tomadas principalmente em matéria penal, podem ser relacionadas à matéria trabalhista, que é a que motiva as decisões do TST a respeito da temática. Em síntese, o presente texto possui como escopo identificar o entendimento do TST em relação ao trabalho escravo, fazendo, ao final, comparação com o que vem sendo decidido por STF e STJ.  PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Trabalho escravo. Tribunal Superior do Trabalho. Caracterização. “Lista suja”.  Abstract This study intends to analyze, from a qualitative point of view, three decisions of the Superior Labor Court (TST) regarding work in conditions analogous to slavery. The purpose is to verify the compatibility of these decisions with the understanding of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) and the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) on the subject. Secondarily, the law, doctrine and, especially, STF and STJ decisions on the subject will be used as research sources in criminal law, linking the understanding in criminal matters with the understanding of the subject at hand. In summary, the present study has as its scope to comparatively identify the understanding of the decisions of the Superiors Courts regarding issues involving work in conditions analogous to that of slave.  KEYWORDS: Slavery. Superior Labor Court. Description. Employers' Registry. Dirty list.

Germany (‘.de’)

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Bettinger
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Domain Names ◽  
The Core ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Federal Supreme

Disputes arising under trademark and competition law owing to the registration and use of domain names have become commonplace in German courts. Following a phase of widespread legal uncertainty, in the meantime the core problems of domain names under trademark and competition law have been resolved. There are more than 50 judgments from the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) and a multitude of decisions from the courts of the lower instances in disputes concerning domain names.

scholarly journals German Experience of Terminating Criminal Prosecution with the Imposition of Duties and Regulations on the Accused in the Context of the Russian Draft Law on Criminal Offence

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 775-785
Author(s):  
Aleksey Tarbagaev ◽  
Ludmila Maiorova ◽  
Yana Ploshkina
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Presumption Of Innocence ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
The Supreme Court

The second attempt of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to introduce the concept of a criminal offence into Russian criminal and criminal procedure legislation widens the non-rehabilitating grounds for the termination of a criminal case or prosecution with the imposition of other criminal law measures: it is suggested that, in addition to a court fine, community work and partially paid work should also be introduced. This leads to certain problems, including problems with the presumption of innocence and the observance of the principle of justice. The authors turn to the German experience for a better understanding of the situation. Germany faced similar problems much earlier, when § 153а was introduced in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany (CPC of the FRG); it provided for an opportunity to terminate criminal prosecution for criminal offences on the grounds of expediency with the imposition of duties and regulations on the accused, which are akin to criminal law measures under draft law № 1112019-7. Taking into consideration the theoretical approaches developed in Germany, the practice of the Constitutional Court of the FRG and the Supreme Court of the FRG, the authors examine the goals of introducing § 153а in the CPC of the FRG, the practice of its implementation, as well as the problem of terminating criminal prosecution on the grounds of expediency with the imposition of duties and regulations on the accused connected with the observance of the Constitution of the FRG, the presumption of innocence, the principles of justice, certainty, equality before law; they analyze the controversial legal nature of duties and regulations under § 153а in the CPC of the FRG. According to German criminal procedure law, the termination of criminal prosecution on the grounds of expediency with the imposition of duties and regulations on the accused is a right, and not a duty of the corresponding officers and agencies as it is, in fact, an alternative to criminal prosecution which makes it possible to terminate it at a certain stage when there are all the necessary legal grounds for criminal prosecution.

PERSINGGUNGAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI ANTARA PENGADILAN TUN DAN PENGADILAN TIPIKOR / INTERCEPTION OF JUSTICE AUTHORITY OF DISCRETION ABUSE BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION COURT AND CORRUPTION COURTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Budi Suhariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
State Finance ◽  
The Law ◽  
To Receive

Diskresi sebagai wewenang bebas, keberadaannya rentan akan disalahgunakan. Penyalahgunaan diskresi yang berimplikasi merugikan keuangan negara dapat dituntutkan pertanggungjawabannya secara hukum administrasi maupun hukum pidana. Mengingat selama ini peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tidak merumuskan secara rinci yang dimaksudkan unsur menyalahgunakan kewenangan maka para hakim menggunakan konsep penyalahgunaan wewenang dari hukum administrasi. Problema muncul saat diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 dimana telah memicu persinggungan dalam hal kewenangan mengadili penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) antara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada perkembangannya, persinggungan kewenangan mengadili tersebut ditegaskan oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 bahwa PTUN berwenang menerima, memeriksa, dan memutus permohonan penilaian ada atau tidak ada penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) dalam Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan sebelum adanya proses pidana. Sehubungan tidak dijelaskan tentang definisi dan batasan proses pidana yang dimaksud, maka timbul penafsiran yang berbeda. Perlu diadakan kesepakatan bersama dan dituangkan dalam regulasi tentang tapal batas persinggungan yang jelas tanpa meniadakan kewenangan pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang diskresi pada Pengadilan TUN.Discretion as free authority is vulnerable to being misused. The abuse of discretion implicating the state finance may be prosecuted by both administrative and criminal law. In view of the fact that the law on corruption eradication does not formulate in detail the intended element of authority abuse, the judges use the concept of authority abuse from administrative law. Problems arise when the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 triggered an interception in terms of justice/ adjudicate authority on authority abuse (including discretion) between the Administrative Court and Corruption Court. In its development, the interception of justice authority is affirmed by Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2015 that the Administrative Court has the authority to receive, examine and decide upon the appeal there is or there is no misuse of authority in the Decision and / or Action of Government Officials prior to the criminal process. That is, shortly before the commencement of the criminal process then that's when the authority of PTUN decides to judge the misuse of authority over the case. In this context, Perma No. 4 of 2015 has imposed restrictions on the authority of the TUN Court in prosecuting the abuse of discretionary authority.

Der Wald im Lichte der neueren bundesgerichtlichen Rechtsprechung | Forest legislation in the recent jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court

2009 ◽  
Vol 160 (9) ◽  
pp. 263-274
Author(s):  
Alois Keel ◽  
Willi Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Large Scope ◽  
Forest Law ◽  
Federal Jurisdiction ◽  
Forest Legislation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Forest Status ◽  
Area Planning ◽  
Federal Supreme

With the entry into force of the new Swiss Federal Law on Forests on the 1st of January 1993, the basis of decision-making for the Federal Supreme Court concerning forestry issues has, at least formally, fundamentally changed. This article depicts the development of the Federal Supreme Court's jurisdiction during 2000–2008 concerning the legislation on forests. The analysis of about 100 decisions reveals that the federal jurisdiction has, with regard to contents, barely changed in comparison to that of the federal law on supervision of the forest police of 1902. The most frequent causes of dispute are assessments of forest status, authorizations for deforestation, and forest distance regulations. The Federal Supreme Court merely refined the jurisdiction; it did not, or did not need to disclose fundamentally new lines [benchmarks]. It rather adheres to the restrictive definition of forest and the strict conservation of forests, while the cantons do not dispose of a large scope for the deforestation jurisdiction or the definition of the term “forest”. The Federal Supreme Court grants the cantons more freedom to regulate and implement the forest distance. Obvious changes can be observed concerning the number of forest law cases that have been dealt with by the Federal Supreme Court. Compared to the 1980ies and early 1990ies, they have decreased by more than half. Among others, reasons for this decrease are the cantons' obligation to appoint courts only as last cantonal resort, the improvement of the formal and material coordination of the proceedings, and the introduction of the “static forest term” with respect to building zones in the sense of the federal law on area planning.

Features of the election of such preventive measure as house arrest in relation to minors

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Manohina
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
A Minor

In the article, the author turns to the study of the peculiarities of choosing such a preventive measure as house arrest for minors. Due to the fact that the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation does not precisely define cases when a court must elect a house arrest in relation to minors, in practice there are often difficulties in which cases to choose such a preventive measure as detention, and in which house arrest. In the work, the author attempts to determine the essence of such a preventive measure as house arrest and the peculiarities of his election in relation to minors, and also considers the prohibitions and (or) restrictions to which minors cannot be subjected. The positions contained in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court “On the practice of the application by the courts of legislation on preventive measures in the form of detention, house arrest and bail” are analyzed. The author expresses the opinion that it is inadvisable to choose such a preventive measure as house arrest for minors. Based on the study, the author makes recommendations on the possibility, at the discretion of the court, to make adjustments to the prohibitions and (or) restrictions to which a minor suspect or accused will be subjected to whom such a preventive measure as house arrest is chosen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document