scholarly journals Comparison of commercial DNA kits and traditional DNA extraction procedure in PCR detection of pork in dry/fermented sausages

Poljoprivreda ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1 Supplement) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivona Djurkin Kusec ◽  
◽  
Zarko Radisic ◽  
Miodrag Komlenic ◽  
Goran Kusec
2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 1505-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Isabel ◽  
Maurice Boissinot ◽  
Isabelle Charlebois ◽  
Chantal M. Fauvel ◽  
Lu-E Shi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAuthorities frequently need to analyze suspicious powders and other samples for biothreat agents in order to assess environmental safety. Numerous nucleic acid detection technologies have been developed to detect and identify biowarfare agents in a timely fashion. The extraction of microbial nucleic acids from a wide variety of powdery and environmental samples to obtain a quality level adequate for these technologies still remains a technical challenge. We aimed to develop a rapid and versatile method of separating bacteria from these samples and then extracting their microbial DNA.Bacillus atrophaeussubsp.globigiiwas used as a simulant ofBacillus anthracis. We studied the effects of a broad variety of powdery and environmental samples on PCR detection and the steps required to alleviate their interference. With a benchmark DNA extraction procedure, 17 of the 23 samples investigated interfered with bacterial lysis and/or PCR-based detection. Therefore, we developed thedual-filter method forappliedrecovery of microbial particles fromenvironmental and powdery samples (DARE). The DARE procedure allows the separation of bacteria from contaminating matrices that interfere with PCR detection. This procedure required only 2 min, while the DNA extraction process lasted 7 min, for a total of <10 min. This sample preparation procedure allowed the recovery of cleaned bacterial spores and relieved detection interference caused by a wide variety of samples. Our procedure was easily completed in a laboratory facility and is amenable to field application and automation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brankica Lakicevic ◽  
Branko Velebit ◽  
Vesna Jankovic ◽  
Danka Spiric ◽  
Tatjana Baltic ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (04) ◽  
pp. 5347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar B. Ahmed* ◽  
Anas S. Dablool

Several methods of Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction have been applied to extract bacterial DNA. The amount and the quality of the DNA obtained for each one of those methods are variable. The study aimed to evaluate bacterial DNA extraction using conventional boiling method followed by alcohol precipitation. DNA extraction from Gram negative bacilli was extracted and precipitated using boiling method with further precipitation by ethanol. The extraction procedure performed using the boiling method resulted in high DNA yields for both E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteria in (199.7 and 285.7μg/ml, respectively) which was close to control method (229.3 and 440.3μg/ml). It was concluded that after alcohol precipitation boiling procedure was easy, cost-effective, and applicable for high-yield quality of DNA in Gram-negative bacteria.


Author(s):  
Cristina Serra-Castelló ◽  
Sara Bover-Cid ◽  
Margarita Garriga ◽  
Tina Beck Hansen ◽  
Annemarie Gunvig ◽  
...  

Meat Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Ruiz-Moyano ◽  
Alberto Martín ◽  
María José Benito ◽  
Rocío Casquete ◽  
Manuel Joaquín Serradilla ◽  
...  

Meat Science ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Díaz ◽  
Manuela Fernandez ◽  
Gonzalo D.Garcia De Fernando ◽  
Lorenzo de la Hoz ◽  
Juan A. Ordoñez

Meat Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ruiz-Capillas ◽  
M. Triki ◽  
A.M. Herrero ◽  
L. Rodriguez-Salas ◽  
F. Jiménez-Colmenero

2015 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibiana A. dos Santos ◽  
Paulo C.B. Campagnol ◽  
Rodrigo N. Cavalcanti ◽  
Maria T.B. Pacheco ◽  
Flávia M. Netto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document