scholarly journals As Formas da Simpatia e o seu Papel na Compreensão das Vivências Alheias em Scheler

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-68
Author(s):  
Daniel Rodrigues RAMOS
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Intentional Structure ◽  
Intentional Acts

The objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler's phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged "place" for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective unification with whom one sympathizes or welcomes. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated to the reproduction of the feelings of the other, mistakenly equating sympathizing with affective contagion. Thus, first, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, it is discussed in what sense sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love. Palavras-chave : Feelings; sympathy; love; knowledge of each other.

scholarly journals Hate: toward a Four-Types Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Íngrid Vendrell Ferran
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Affective States ◽  
Developmental History ◽  
Intentional Structure

AbstractDrawing on insights found in both philosophy and psychology, this paper offers an analysis of hate and distinguishes between its main types. I argue that hate is a sentiment, i.e., a form to regard the other as evil which on certain occasions can be acutely felt. On the basis of this definition, I develop a typology which, unlike the main typologies in philosophy and psychology, does not explain hate in terms of patterns of other affective states. By examining the developmental history and intentional structure of hate, I obtain two variables: the replaceability/irreplaceability of the target and the determinacy/indeterminacy of the focus of concern. The combination of these variables generates the four-types model of hate, according to which hate comes in the following kinds: normative, ideological, retributive, and malicious.

Rebirth and Redeath

2020 ◽  
pp. 73-81
Author(s):  
Nicolas Bommarito
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Traditional Understanding

This chapter discusses the cycle of birth and death in Buddhism. It is important to distinguish rebirth from reincarnation. Reincarnation is the transfer of a soul from body to body. Rebirth, on the other hand, is a cycle of many births and deaths, without any soul linking them. It is commonly called rebirth but it could equally well be redeath since each lifetime involves both a birth and a death. In many traditional forms of Buddhism, this cycle of rebirth and redeath includes supernatural being and places. Many traditional Buddhists think of these places and beings as real. In fact, this is central to many traditional statements of the central problem Buddhism aims to solve; these different kinds of lives all make up what is called samsara. Beings are constantly being born and dying in these different realms, over and over and over. On this traditional understanding, Buddhism solves the problem by ending this cycle of birth and death. The solution, sometimes called nirvana, is about getting out of the cycle.

Selfdetermination in philosophy and factical life. Some considerations about an early Heidegger lecture

Methodus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-43
Author(s):  
Francisco Abalo
Keyword(s):  
Basic Problem ◽  
Methodological Problem ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Phenomenological Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Current Paper ◽  
Relevant Issue ◽  
The One ◽  
Intentional Structure ◽  
Intuitive Model

The main focus of this article is the methodological problem of the selfdetermination of the philosophy according to the phenomenological analysis carried out by Heidegger in one of the lectures of his early period (the so called Früh Freiburger Vorlesungen). The general frame of the current paper implies a hermeneutical thesis according to which the relevance of the well-known “factical life” is not solely thematic but mainly methodological. This function explains why these “phenomenological exercises” are some sort of genetical enquiries. In consequence, the specific aim of this article is, on the one hand, to show that the problem of the selfdetermination of the philosophy is the document of the more basic problem of the possibility of access to the intentional structures as such. On the other hand, this implies that the facticity as the primary horizon of comprehension constitutes in deed a redrawing of the intentional structure, in such a way that it is avoided the paradoxical consequences of the reflexive-intuitive model of access to one self and makes a relevant issue to the philosophy the problematic character of the intentionality itself.

Keats's Conscious and Unconscious Reactions to Criticism of Endymion

PMLA ◽  
1945 ◽  
Vol 60 (4-Part1) ◽  
pp. 1106-1129
Author(s):  
H. E. Briggs
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Real Power ◽  
Current Opinion ◽  
Other Hand

Writers on Keats, when discussing the central problem of the effects upon the poet of the contemptuous criticism directed against Endymion and against Keats personally, have presented various and often contradictory opinions. The two extreme views, namely, that Keats was killed by this criticism, or, on the other hand, that he was scarcely touched by it, are no longer regarded as tenable. The current opinion was first stated, I believe, by Sir Sidney Colvin when he wrote:the reviews of those days, especially the Edinburgh and Quarterly, had a real power of barring the acceptance and checking the sale of an author's work. What actually happened was that when a year or so later [after Endymion was condemned] Keats began to realise the harm which the reviews had done and were doing to his material prospects, these consequences in his darker hours preyed on him severely and conspired with the forces of disease and passion to his undoing.

II. The Philaids and the Chersonese

1956 ◽  
Vol 6 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 113-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. L. Hammond
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Autumn And Winter

The discovery of the inscription with the name of [M]iltiades, which confirmed the statement in Dionysius Halicarnassensis 7. 3. 1 that a Miltiades was archon at Athens in 524/3, prompts a reconsideration of the problems presented by the accounts in Herodotus and in Marcellinus Life of Thucydides concerning the Philaid family. To the question, who is this Miltiades, the following answers have been given. ‘He is not a Philaid.’ The objection to this answer is that the Peisistratids either occupied the archonship themselves or gave it to members of leading families, such as Cleisthenes the Alcmeonid in 525/4; if then this Miltiades was a member of a leading family, he is almost certainly a member of the Philaid family. ‘He is the elder Miltiades who founded the settlement in the Chersonese.’ In Herodotus' account (6. 34–37) Miltiades left Athens, where he was already powerful, at the beginning of a tyranny by Peisistratus; then after several operations in the Chersonese Miltiades was rescued by Croesus. The year in which Miltiades left Athens was either 561/0 or 556/5 and almost certainly the latter; for in 561/0 Croesus was not on the throne. The year 546 may be excluded; for in 546 autumn and winter Croesus had neither the time nor the opportunity to concern himself with Miltiades, since Cyrus was then at war with Lydia and seized Sardis.2 If Miltiades was powerful in 556/5, he was at that date no youngster but at least in his thirties—a man born say c. 590. In 524/3, being well on in his sixties and having spent thirty years and more in the Chersonese (for Herodotus does not suggest that he ever came back to Athens), this Miltiades is unlikely to have been the eponymous archon. We conclude, then, that the archon Miltiades in 524/3 was a different and younger Miltiades. Having cleared the ground on these two points, I turn to the central problem, whether there were two men called Miltiades, one born c. 590 and the other the general who died of a wound soon after 489, or whether there were three men called Miltiades, one of whom was in a generation intermediate between Miltiades born c. 590 and Miltiades dead c. 489. Either solution is chronologically possible.

scholarly journals Lines and Semi-Countably Differentiable Primes

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Abigaël Alkema
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
The Other ◽  
Real Case ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Linear Graph ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Axiomatic Set Theory

Let l(u)⊃ |G|. A central problem in higher non-linear graph theoryis the construction of projective numbers. We show that Recent developments in axiomatic set theory [6] have raised the questionof whetherEis not dominated byl. On the other hand, the work in [6, 24] did not consider the hyper-real case.

The Soul of Historiography

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-280
Author(s):  
Daniel Fairbrother
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Historical Representation ◽  
Real Importance ◽  
Explicit Content ◽  
Historical Representations

Abstract This paper argues for a new version of holism about historiography. The argument starts with an analogy with Aristotle’s conceptions of soul and character. The aim is to overcome the central problem critics have identified in Ankersmit’s holism about historical representations: it is not clear how a posited holistic entity can make a difference to a work of history. The solution offered in this paper is that there are two – modally distinct – dimensions of content in works of history. One comprises its explicit content as given in its statements. This corresponds to actuality, action, and narrative in Aristotle. The other is where we find a holistic entity: a work of history’s representation of a historical situation. This is analysed here as a unified range of possibilities for action generated by the interrelated complex of factors introduced by the work’s explicit contents. This corresponds to potentiality, soul, and character in Aristotle. The theory is further developed in relation to two examples, one idealized, the other an example of real historiography. By distinguishing between actuality and possibility as dimensions of a historical representation, the holistic entity is enabled to be implicit while having real importance in relation to the content of historiography.

Economy and society: from Parsons through Habermas to semiotic institutionalism

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Risto Heiskala
Keyword(s):  
Social Theory ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Théorie Sociale ◽  
The Social ◽  
Great Transformation ◽  
The One ◽  
Cette Question

English The great transformation to modernity made the economy the major organizing factor of the social synthesis, thus bringing forth the issue of the economy/society relationship as the central problem of modern social theory. This article deals with two broad approaches to this problem: Parsons's and Habermas's variants of structural-functionalism, on the one hand, and various currents of (neo)institutionalism, on the other. An attempt to synthesize the benefits of these conflicting approaches is made from the point of view of semiotic institutionalism. What emerges is a general theoretical framework, which is better equipped than the original structural-functionalist and institutionalist conceptions for the analysis of the economy/society relationship. French Les grandes transformations vers la modernité ont fait de l'économie le principal facteur organisateur de la synthèse sociale, portant sur le devant de la scène la question de la relation économie/société en tant que question centrale de la théorie sociale moderne. L'article s'intéresse à deux grandes approches de cette question: les variantes structuro-fonctionnalistes de Parsons et Habermas d'une part, et divers courants du (néo)institutionnalisme de l'autre. L'auteur s'efforce de faire la synthèse des points forts de ces deux approches conflictuelles du point de vue de l'institutionnalisme sémiotique. Il en émerge un cadre théorique général plus adapté que les conceptions structurofonctionnalistes et institutionnalistes à l'analyse de la relation économie/société.

Freedom of Movement in an ERA of Shared Parenting: The Differences in Judicial Approaches to Relocation

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Parkinson
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Primary Caregiver ◽  
The Other ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Freedom Of Movement ◽  
Trial Judges ◽  
The Family ◽  
Shared Parenting

In 2006, Parliament made major amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (‘Family Law Act’) to encourage a greater level of shared parenting, and to give greater emphasis to the importance of children maintaining a relationship with both parents in the absence of violence or abuse. There are major differences between trial judges in how to apply the new laws to the problem of parental relocation — where the primary caregiver wants to move a long way from the other. The central problem is determining how much importance should be given to a parent's freedom of movement given this greater emphasis on the involvement of both parents. There are stark differences in the policy and approach of different trial judges, which have yet to be resolved by an authoritative and carefully reasoned decision of an appellate court. This article examines these substantial differences in view between judges on this issue since the 2006 amendments, and proposes a way forward based upon revisiting the leading judgment of Kirby J in the High Court in AMS v AIF.1

scholarly journals KARAKTER DAN PERILAKU MILINEAL: PELUANG ATAU ANCAMAN BONUS DEMOGRAFI

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-22
Author(s):  
Suci Prasarti ◽  
Erik Teguh Prakoso
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Millennial Generation ◽  
National Development ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
The Other ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Unique Character ◽  
Other Hand

ABSTRACT The central problem of this research is the issue of demographic bonus and millineal generation whose impact can be an opportunity or threat to the sustainability and progress of the development of the Indonesian nation. The purpose of this research is to find indicators of character and milineal behavior and analyze the potential opportunities and threats. This study uses a qualitative approach using observation, interview, and documentation data collection techniques. The results of the study concluded that millennial generation has a unique character based on region and socio-economic conditions. One of the main characteristics of millennial generation is that it is characterized by a very literate digital, communicative, and multitasking technology. Being raised by technological advancements, this generation has creative, informative, passionate and productive characteristics. If the unique characteristics of this milineal are understood and facilitated optimally, it will be an opportunity for the development of productive human resources that will become the nation's development capital. On the other hand, the characteristics of this generation will be a threat to national development if not understood and facilitated according to their potential and passion. ABSTRAKProblematika sentral riset ini adalah isu bonus demografi dan generasi milineal yang dampaknya dapat menjadi peluang atau ancaman terhadap keberlangsungan dan kemajuan pembangunan bangsa Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian adalah menemukan indikator karakter dan perilkau milineal serta menganalisis potensi peluang dan ancamannya. Penelitian ini memnggunakan hampiran kualitatif dengan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan  data observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa generasi milenial memiliki karakter unik berdasarkan wilayah dan kondisi sosial-ekonomi. Salah satu ciri utama generasi milenial adalah ditandai oleh  sangat melek teknologi digital, komunikatif, dan multitasking. Karena dibesarkan oleh kemajuan teknologi, generasi ini memiliki ciri-ciri kreatif, informatif, mempunyai passion dan produktif. Bila karakteristik khas dari milineal ini  dipahami dan difasilitasi secara optimal akan menjadi peluang terbangunnya sumber daya manusia yang produktif sehingga akan menjadi modal pembangunan bangsa. Sebaliknya karakteristk generasi milineal ini akan menjadi ancaman pembangunan bangsa apabila tidak dipamahami dan difasilitasi sesuai dengan potensi dan passionnya.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document