Terápiás megközelítés és új evidenciák a neuromyelitis optica spektrum kezelésében

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 309-321
Author(s):  
Zsolt Illés

A neuromyelitis optica spektrum betegség (NMOSD) az esetek körülbelül 80%-ában AQP4-ellenanyaggal társul. A szeronegatív betegek körülbelül negyedében a központi idegrendszeri myelin oligodendrocyta glikoprotein (MOG) ellen mutatható ki ellenanyag, és ez a kórkép a MOG-ellen­anyag-asszociált betegség (MOGAD) elnevezést kapta. Jelen közlemény áttekinti az off-label azathioprin és myco­phenolat mofetil, valamint az evidenciákon alapuló B- és plazmasejt-depletio, az IL-6-jelátvitel és a komplement útvonal antagonizálás klinikai aspektusait NMOSD-ben. Az összefoglaló tárgyalja az NMOSD-terápia terhességi vonatkozásait, és a MOGAD – NMOSD-től eltérő – kezelési megközelítését. Az NMOSD kezelése kapcsán az utóbbi két évben több, III. fázisú klinikai tanulmányon alapuló I. osztályú evidencia jelent meg. A monoklonális ellenanyagokkal végzett vizsgálatok a rituximab (anti-CD20), az inebilizumab (anti-CD19), a tocilizumab (anti-IL6R), a satralizumab (anti-IL6R) és az eculizumab (anti-C5) hatékonyságát és biztonságosságát jelzik egyéb immunterápiákkal kombinálva vagy monoterápiában. A MOGAD kezelését bonyolítja, hogy az esetek körülbelül fele monofázisos, és a MOG ellenanyag a betegség lefolyása során spontán vagy kezelés hatására eltűnhet. A tartós immunszuppresszió igényét MOGAD-ban a relapsusterápiát követő, leépített orális szteroidkezelés után célszerű eldönteni. NMOSD-ben a fenntartó terápia folytatása javasolt terhesség és szoptatás alatt is, és ezt az optimális kezelés kiválasztásánál fertilis nőbetegeknél figyelembe kell venni. Az új evidenciák terápiarezisztens NMOSD-ben is több lehetőséget kínálnak, és a MOGAD kezelési stratégiája is körvonalazódik.

2020 ◽  
Vol 237 (11) ◽  
pp. 1290-1305
Author(s):  
Brigitte Wildemann ◽  
Solveig Horstmann ◽  
Mirjam Korporal-Kuhnke ◽  
Andrea Viehöver ◽  
Sven Jarius

ZusammenfassungDie Optikusneuritis (ON) ist vielfach die erste Manifestation einer AQP4-Antikörper-vermittelten NMOSD (AQP4: Aquaporin-4, NMOSD: Neuromyelitis-optica-Spektrum-Erkrankung, Engl.: neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders) oder einer Myelin-Oligodendrozyten-Glykoprotein-Antikörper-assoziierten Enzephalomyelitis (MOG-EM; auch MOG antibody associated disorders, MOGAD). Für beide Erkrankungen wurden in den vergangenen Jahren internationale Diagnosekriterien und Empfehlungen zu Indikation und Methodik der serologischen Testung vorgelegt. Seit Kurzem liegen zudem Ergebnisse aus 4 großen, internationalen Phase-III-Studien zur Behandlung der NMOSD vor. Mit dem den Komplementfaktor C5 blockierenden monoklonalen Antikörper Eculizumab wurde 2019 erstmalig ein Medikament zur Langzeitbehandlung der NMOSD, die bislang vornehmlich Off-Label mit Rituximab, Azathioprin und anderen Immunsuppressiva erfolgt, auf dem europäischen Markt zugelassen. Für die erst vor wenigen Jahren erstbeschriebene MOG-EM stehen inzwischen Daten aus mehreren retrospektiven Studien zur Verfügung, die eine Wirksamkeit von Rituximab und anderen Immunsuppressiva in der Schubprophylaxe auch in dieser Indikation nahelegen. Viele der zur Therapie der MS zugelassenen Medikamente sind entweder unwirksam oder können, wie z. B. Interferon-β, eine Verschlechterung des Krankheitsverlaufes bewirken. Beide Erkrankungen werden im Akutstadium mit hochdosierten Glukokortikoiden und Plasmapherese oder Immunadsorption behandelt. Diese Behandlung sollte möglichst rasch nach Symptombeginn eingeleitet werden. Insbesondere die MOG-EM ist durch eine oft ausgeprägte Steroidabhängigkeit gekennzeichnet, die ein langsames Ausschleichen der Steroidtherapie erfordert, und schließt viele Fälle der bislang meist als „idiopathisch“ klassifizierten „chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy“ (CRION) ein. Unbehandelt kann sowohl die NMOSD- als auch die MOG-EM-assoziierte ON zu schweren, persistierenden und oft bilateralen Visuseinschränkungen bis hin zur Erblindung führen. Beide Erkrankungen verlaufen meist relapsierend. Neben den Sehnerven sind häufig das Myelon sowie der Hirnstamm und, vor allem bei NMO-Patienten, das Dienzephalon betroffen; supratentorielle Hirnläsionen im kranialen MRT sind, anders als früher gedacht, kein Ausschlusskriterium, sondern häufig. In der vorliegenden Arbeit geben wir einen Überblick über Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie dieser beiden wichtigen Differenzialdiagnosen der MS-assoziierten und idiopathischen ON.


2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2021-326904
Author(s):  
Céline Louapre ◽  
Michella Ibrahim ◽  
Elisabeth Maillart ◽  
Basma Abdi ◽  
Caroline Papeix ◽  
...  

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 seroconversion rate after COVID-19 may be influenced by disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMO-SD).ObjectiveTo investigate the seroprevalence and the quantity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a cohort of patients with MS or NMO-SD.MethodsBlood samples were collected in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 19 February 2020 and 26 February 2021. SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity rates and Ig levels (anti-S IgG titre, anti-S IgA index, anti-N IgG index) were compared between DMTs groups. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to estimate the influence of DMTs and other confounding variables on SARS-CoV-2 serological outcomes.Results119 patients (115 MS, 4 NMO, mean age: 43.0 years) were analysed. Overall, seroconversion rate was 80.6% within 5.0 (SD 3.4) months after infection. 20/21 (95.2%) patients without DMT and 66/77 (85.7%) patients on DMTs other than anti-CD20 had at least one SARS-CoV-2 Ig positivity, while this rate decreased to only 10/21 (47.6%) for patients on anti-CD20 (p<0.001). Being on anti-CD20 was associated with a decreased odd of positive serology (OR, 0.07 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.69), p=0.02) independently from time to COVID-19, total IgG level, age, sex and COVID-19 severity. Time between last anti-CD20 infusion and COVID-19 was longer (mean (SD), 3.7 (2.0) months) in seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients (mean (SD), 1.9 (1.5) months, p=0.04).ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 antibody response was decreased in patients with MS or NMO-SD treated with anti-CD20 therapies. Monitoring long-term risk of reinfection and specific vaccination strategies in this population may be warranted.Trial registration numberNCT04568707.


2021 ◽  
pp. 44-47
Author(s):  
Cecilia Zivelonghi ◽  
Andrew McKeon

A 12-year-old girl sought care for subacute onset of cramping back pain, along with paresthesias in her lower limbs up to the waistline, both hands, upper back, and chest, followed by rapidly progressive (over a few hours) painful vision loss affecting initially the right eye with subsequent involvement of the left eye. She underwent neuroophthalmologic evaluation and was diagnosed with bilateral optic neuritis. A positive Lhermitte sign was also present. The patient was tested for aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G autoantibodies, which were positive in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid. A diagnosis of aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G–positive neuromyelitis optica was made. The patient was treated with rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) and became episode-free, with no further accumulation of disability. The discovery of aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G in 2004 has permitted the distinction of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from other inflammatory central nervous system disorders. Aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G represents a highly specific biomarker for neuromyelitis optica (almost 100% using molecular-based techniques), with sensitivity of approximately 80%. According to the most recent diagnostic criteria published in 2015, a diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder can also be made for patients who are aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G seronegative by any testing method, regardless of assay sensitivity, provided that more stringent clinical and radiologic requirements are met. Serial testing is recommended for these patients because late seroconversion has been described up to 4 years after the first episode.


2018 ◽  
Vol 235 (05) ◽  
pp. 553-561
Author(s):  
Karoline Walscheid ◽  
Uwe Pleyer ◽  
Arnd Heiligenhaus

ZusammenfassungBiologika stellen eine hochwirksame Therapieoption für verschiedene nicht infektiöse Uveitisformen dar. Einziges zugelassenes Biologikum ist der TNF-α-Inhibitor Adalimumab, alle anderen Präparate müssen im Rahmen einer Off-Label-Therapie gegeben werden. Die Indikation zur Therapieinitiierung mit einem Biologikum besteht, wenn die Erkrankung nicht ausreichend anspricht auf eine Behandlung mit systemischen Steroiden und/oder csDMARDs (konventionell-synthetischen disease modifying antirheumatic drugs) oder diese aufgrund von unerwünschten Wirkungen nicht gegeben werden können. Derzeit in der klinischen Anwendung befindliche biologische DMARD-Präparate wirken über zytokinspezifische Mechanismen (TNF-α-Inhibition, Interferone, Hemmung der Signaltransduktion von Interleukin-1 [IL-1], IL-6 und IL-17) sowie Hemmung der T-Zell-Kostimulation (CTLA-4-Fusionsprotein), oder B-Zell-Depletion (Anti-CD20). Alle Präparate müssen parenteral verabreicht werden. Die Einleitung einer Biologikatherapie sollte nach interdisziplinärer Abstimmung und Ausschluss von Kontraindikationen erfolgen. Ein regelmäßiges klinisches und laborchemisches Monitoring unter der Therapie ist erforderlich.


2021 ◽  
pp. 135245852110497
Author(s):  
Edouard Januel ◽  
Jérôme De Seze ◽  
Patrick Vermersch ◽  
Elisabeth Maillart ◽  
Bertrand Bourre ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recent studies suggested that anti-CD20 and fingolimod may be associated with lower anti-spike protein-based immunoglobulin-G response following COVID-19 vaccination. We evaluated if COVID-19 occurred despite vaccination among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica (NMO), using the COVISEP registry. Case series: We report 18 cases of COVID-19 after two doses of BNT162b2-vaccination, 13 of which treated with anti-CD20 and four with fingolimod. COVID-19 severity was mild. Discussion: These results reinforce the recommendation for a third COVID-19 vaccine dose among anti-CD20 treated patients and stress the need for a prospective clinical and biological study on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy among MS and NMO patients.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2742-2742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Raisa M. Pinto ◽  
Chan Yoon Cheah ◽  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
Francesco Turturro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) can develop chemoresistance and most relapse following standard therapy. Lenalidomide activates NK cells ± T cells and leads to in vivo expansion of immune effector cells in NHL models. In preclinical studies, we have shown the synergistic anti-tumor effect of combining lenalidomide with anti-CD20 molecules. (Wang 2007) The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R2) in relapsed and untreated iNHL is highly active. (Fowler 2014) We hypothesize these responses are related to augmentation of immune response and ADCC through alteration of immune cell subsets in tumor and peripheral blood. Obinutuzumab is a glycosylated type II anti-CD20 molecule with enhanced affinity for the FcγRIIIa receptors leading to improved ADCC. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide and obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL. Methods: Patients with relapsed SLL, marginal zone, and follicular lymphoma (gr 1-3a) were eligible. Patients enrolled in three predefined dose cohorts of lenalidomide (10mg,15mg, 20mg) given on days 2-22 of a 28 day cycle. Obinutuzumab was given at a fixed dose (1000mg) IV on days 1,8,15 and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles. All patients received prophylactic steroids prior to obinutuzumab. In the absence of toxicity or progression, the combination was continued for up to 12 cycles. The standard '3+3' design was used with dose limiting toxicities (DLT) assessed during cycle 1. Patients attaining ≥partial response continued obinutuzumab every 2 months for up to 24 months. Prophylactic growth factors were not used. Adverse events were graded using CTCAE version 4.03. Results: 15 patients ( 9 during dose escalation, 6 during dose expansion at target dose) were enrolled; all were evaluated for safety and efficacy (all having had at least 1 post-baseline response assessment). The median age was 60 (36-82) years, and 7 (47%) were male. 21% of patients with follicular lymphoma had low, 29% intermediate, and 50% high FLIPI scores at study entry, 1 patient had SLL. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. The most common grade 1-2 non-hematologic toxicities were fatigue 12/15 (80%), constipation 9/15 (60%), diarrhea 7/15 (47%), dyspnea 7/15 (47%), and myalgia 7/15 (47%). Grade ≥ 3 events included neutropenia (n=3, 20%), infection (n=2, 13%),thrombocytopenia (n=1, 6%), and two infusion related reactions (13%), both occurring during the first infusion of obinutuzumab. With a median follow up of 8.2 (4.1-14 mo), the overall response rate was 93% with 27% (4/15) achieving a complete response and 67% (10/15) with a partial response, all responding patients remain on active therapy. One patient progressed after 8 months and was withdrawn from study. Conclusion: The combination of 20 mg of lenalidomide and 1000mg obinatuzumab is safe and effective in patients with relapsed iNHL. Adverse events appeared similar to our prior experience with lenalidomide and rituximab. Overall response rates were high, with complete responses increasing with prolonged duration of therapy. Correlative efforts are ongoing to study the immunomodulatory potential of the combination and to identify biomarkers of response. The phase II portion of this study is currently enrolling with dose expansions in relapsed iNHL. Disclosures Off Label Use: Lenalidomide off label in low grade lymphoma Obinutuzumab off label in low grade lymphoma. Fanale:Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Nastoupil:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (03) ◽  
pp. 193-196
Author(s):  
Markus Breu ◽  
Sarah Glatter ◽  
Romana Höftberger ◽  
Michael Freilinger ◽  
Karl Kircher ◽  
...  

AbstractB cell depletion with the anti-CD20-antibody rituximab is widely considered treatment of choice for long-term immunotherapy in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-antibody positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, up to 30% of patients suffer from relapses despite complete B cell depletion. In these cases, the IL6 (interleukin-6)-receptor blocking antibody tocilizumab has been suggested as an alternative. We report two female adolescents with AQP4-antibody positive NMOSD who relapsed under rituximab treatment and clinically stabilized after switching to monthly administrations of tocilizumab. Our data suggest that early escalation of therapy with tocilizumab may lead to stabilization of disease activity in pediatric NMOSD patients who relapse under B cell depletion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1519-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Zecca ◽  
Francesca Bovis ◽  
Giovanni Novi ◽  
Marco Capobianco ◽  
Roberta Lanzillo ◽  
...  

Background: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody leading to B lymphocyte depletion, is increasingly used as an off-label treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in relapsing–remitting (RR) and progressive MS. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study on consecutive MS patients treated off-label with rituximab in 22 Italian and 1 Swiss MS centers. Relapse rate, time to first relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, incidence of adverse events, and radiological outcomes from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed. Results: A total of 355/451 enrolled subjects had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Annualized relapse rate significantly decreases after rituximab initiation versus the pre-rituximab start year in RRMS (from 0.86 to 0.09, p < .0001) and in secondary-progressive (SP) MS (from 0.34 to 0.06, p < .0001) and had a slight decrease in primary-progressive (PP) MS patients (from 0.12 to 0.07, p = 0.45). After 3 years from rituximab start, the proportion of patients with a confirmed EDSS progression was 14.6% in the RRMS group, 24.7% in the SPMS group, and 41.5% in the PPMS group. No major safety concerns arose. Conclusion: Consistently with other observational studies, our data show effectiveness of rituximab in reducing disease activity in patients with MS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document