scholarly journals A study of prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women from rural areas attending to Obstetric Department in Akash Hospital, Karnataka, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2845
Author(s):  
Rohini N. S. ◽  
Ravishankar S. N. ◽  
Kala K. ◽  
Rakshith N. R.
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Gram Staining ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in pregnancy is a significant risk factor for developing upper urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis which is associated with significant maternal and fetal risks. The aim of this study was to know the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy, to identify the organisms and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns and to formulate a single or combined rapid screening method as an acceptable alternative to urine culture.Methods: A total of 375 pregnant women aged between 18 to 45 years were included in this study. Clean catch mid-stream urine samples were collected. Screening tests done were gram staining of uncentrifuged urine, pus cell count, nitrite test and leukocyte esterase test. Identification of pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed as per standard urine culture and sensitivity methods.Results: Out of the 375 pregnant women, 31 (8.4%) had significant bacteriuria. High percentage of women with ASB were primigravidas (51.38%) and in 2nd trimester (43.86%). The most common organism isolated was E.coli (56.14%). In screening tests, gram staining of uncentrifuged urine had a sensitivity of 85.71%. Sensitivity of 71.42% was found in Nitrite and leucocyte esterase tests. However, the combination of these two tests, with either test positive, showed sensitivity and negative predictive value of 90.47% and 99.09% respectively.Conclusions: Early detection and treatment of ASB in pregnancy can prevent complications. ASB can be identified by simple and combined rapid screening methods and urine culture along with antibiogram. Therefore, screening and treatment of ASB may be incorporated as routine antenatal care for safe motherhood and healthy newborn.

scholarly journals A comparative study of various screening tests of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Antenatal Outpatient Department’

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 170-175
Author(s):  
Dr. Savitha B Hiremath ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Outpatient Department ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Urine Microscopy

Introduction: Urinary tract infections are the most common bacterial infections in pregnancy.Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) refers to the presence of bacteria in the urine of an individualwithout symptoms of urinary tract infection. ASB which occurs in 2-11% of pregnancies is a majorpredisposition to the development of pyelonephritis. Aims and objectives: The aims and objectivesof the study were to: Study the effectiveness of various screening tests: urine microscopy, gramstain, catalase test, leukocyte esterase test and nitrite test and to compare their sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Materials and Methods: Thestudy included 500 pregnant women attending the outpatient department over 18 months. The urinesamples collected in sterile containers were screened for urine microscopy, gram stain, catalase test,leukocyte esterase test and nitrite test. The samples were processed on CLED (Cysteine lactoseelectrolyte deficient) agar as the standard against which other screening tests are identified.Results: Gram’s stain (89.34%) was the most sensitive of all and the least reliable test was thecatalase test among the methods of screening tests. Conclusion: Urine culture is considered to bethe gold standard in detecting ASB in pregnant women. Gram’s stain of urine is a good screeningtest when compared to other screening methods. Screening for bacteria in all trimesters isnecessary to prevent the dangerous complications associated with ASB.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i® flow cytometer as a screening method for asymptomatic bacteriuria and detection of Group B Streptococcus in pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-199
Author(s):  
Itziar Angulo López ◽  
Mikel Urrutikoetxea- Gutiérrez ◽  
Julia Aragón-Díez ◽  
Mercedes Fraca Padilla ◽  
José Luis Díaz de Tuesta Del Arco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Flow Cytometer ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
Microbial Count ◽  
Group B

Objectives. Nowadays, the use of flow-cytometry for the screening of urine samples is extended, but appropriate cut-off points for each population group are yet to be established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Sysmex UF-1000i® cytometer as a screening method for detection of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) and Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in pregnant women. Material and methods. Urine samples obtained during pregnancy between January-July 2019 were both processed with the Sysmex UF-1000i® and also cultured. Demographic data, flow-cytometry parameters and the result of the urine culture were collected. To assess the performance of the flow-cytometer for detection of AB and GBS, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the BACT/μL variable were applied. Results. A total of 33,687 urine samples were received, among which 1,443 (4.3%) belonged to pregnant women. Urine culture was positive in 82 (5.7%) samples, 1,295 (89.7%) were negative and 66 (4.6%) were considered contaminated. GBS was isolated in 69 (4.8%) patients and 46 (66.7%) with a microbial count below 10E4 CFU/mL. For AB detection, the cut-off point of 550 BACT/μL yielded a sensitivity of 91.5%, a negative predictive value of 99.3% and could avoid culturing 74.1% of the samples. No cut-off value could be established for GBS detection. Conclusions. Although the Sysmex UF-1000i® system is a valid screening method for the AB detection in pregnant population, it is not useful for the identification of GBS bacteriuria in our area. Therefore, the conventional urine culture is still required during pregnancy.

scholarly journals Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (192) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achala Thakur ◽  
Ratna Baral ◽  
Pritha Basnet ◽  
Rubina Rai ◽  
Ajay Agrawal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Acinetobacter Species ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Culture Sensitivity ◽  
Pregnancy Urine ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
In Pregnancy

Introduction: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is the significant presence of bacteria in urine of an individual without symptoms. The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence of asymptomaticbacteriuria in pregnant women. Methods: This study was a prospective study conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. The duration of the study was six monthsfrom January to June 2012. A total of 600 pregnant women were enrolled. All women were clinically identified to have no signs and symptoms of UTI. Clean catch midstream urine sample was collectedfrom each patient into a sterile vial. The urine samples were examined for microscopic and culture sensitivity test. Results: Out of 600 pregnant women, 52 were positive for significant bacteriuria with a prevalence rate of 8.7%. There was a significant difference in prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria withrespect to trimester (p=0.005). Age did not show any significant difference in the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (p=0.807). There was not any significant difference in the prevalence ofasymptomatic bacteriuria with respect to parity (p=0.864) and booking status (p=0.397). Escherichia coli (35%), Acinetobacter species (15%), Enterococcus species (12%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%)were the common isolates. Most of the isolates were sensitive either to Nitrofurantoin, Norfloxacin or Amikacin. Conclusions: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common in pregnancy. Urine culture sensitivity should be carried out routinely on all pregnant patients in order to prevent the dangerous complicationsassociated with it. Keywords: asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy; urine culture and sensitivity.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Ligation-Mediated PCR and Spoligotyping as Screening Methods for Genotyping ofMycobacterium tuberculosis Strains

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 3118-3123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Bonora ◽  
M. Cristina Gutierrez ◽  
Giovanni Di Perri ◽  
Francesca Brunello ◽  
Benedetta Allegranzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Rflp Analysis ◽  
Step Test ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Typing Method ◽  
Low Prevalence ◽  
Discriminatory Index

Spoligotyping has been suggested as a screening test in multistep genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Relying on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis with IS6110 (IS6110 RFLP analysis) as a “gold standard,” we performed a comparative evaluation of spoligotyping and ligation-mediated PCR (LMPCR), a recently described PCR-based typing method, as rapid screening tests for fingerprinting of 158 M. tuberculosis strains collected in Verona, Italy. LMPCR seemed to be comparable to spoligotyping in terms both of feasibility with rapidly extracted DNA and of generation of software-analyzable images. Moreover, LMPCR grouped considerably fewer strains than spoligotyping (38 versus 67%) and was found to reduce the cluster overestimation rate (26.3 versus 58%) and to give a better discriminatory index (0.992 versus 0.970) compared to spoligotyping. In our geographical region, where there was no evidence of clustered strains carrying fewer than six IS6110 copies, LMPCR was found to be more discriminatory than spoligotyping. We also evaluated two models of three-step typing strategies, involving the use of spoligotyping and LMPCR as screening methods and IS6110 RFLP analysis as a further supporting test. LMPCR proved to be a more effective first-step test than spoligotyping, significantly reducing the need for subtyping. LMPCR should be considered an alternative to spoligotyping as a rapid screening method for M. tuberculosis fingerprinting, particularly in areas with a low prevalence of M. tuberculosis strains carrying few copies of IS6110.

scholarly journals Role of routine urine culture in predicting asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy and the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women - Our experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-517
Author(s):  
Aparna Krishnamurthy ◽  
Shazia Khan ◽  
Tina Singh
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Culture Sensitivity ◽  
History Of ◽  
Sensitivity Standard ◽  
Or History ◽  
In Pregnancy

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in pregnancy can flare into frank pyelonephritis and sepsis if untreated due to the low immunity. Apart from causing morbidity in mothers it affects the foetus by increasing the incidence of prematurity and IUGR. The present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of ASB in the pregnant women attending Ante natal clinic and the significance of routine urine culture. : Total 310 pregnant women attending the antenatal OPD were enrolled in the study over a period of 10 months. Inclusion criteria included all pregnant women attending antenatal OPD without any urinary symptoms or history of fever. Exclusion criteria included frank UTI symptoms like fever, dysuria, increased frequency of urine, any history of intake of antibiotics, any urinary tract anomaly or renal calculi. Their midstream urine sampling was collected and subjected to both microscopy and culture sensitivity; standard microbiological method was used. The prevalence of ASB was found to be 11.29% and was maximum in second trimester (54.2%). The study revealed routine urine culture is a sensitive test to diagnose ASB. The commonest bacterium isolated was Escherichia coli (51.4% cases) and the most effective antibiotic was Nitrofurantoin. The neonatal outcomes are discussed in the text while no perinatal deaths were recorded during the period of study. No direct association of asymptomatic bacteriuria with anaemia and preeclampsia was found, but odds ratio was more than one. The study highlights that asymptomatic bacteriuria is a common occurrence in pregnant women, including urine culture as a part of routine investigation in antenatal patients can help diagnose this condition. Prompt treatment of ASB can prevent any obstetric complication arising from the flareup of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy and thus reduce maternal and foetal morbidity.

Rapid Screening Methods for Bleeding Disorders. A Three Year Survey

1964 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A Lovric ◽  
J Margolis
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Capillary Blood ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Bleeding Disorders ◽  
Routine Laboratory ◽  
Clotting Time ◽  
Kaolin Clotting Time ◽  
In Infants And Children

SummaryAn adaptation of “kaolin clotting time” and prothrombin time for use on haemolysed capillary blood provided simple and sensitive screening tests suitable for use in infants and children. A survey of three year’s experience shows that these are reliable routine laboratory tests for detection of latent coagulation disorders.

scholarly journals A Critical Review of Rapid Screening Tests for The Detection of Group B Streptococcus in Pregnancy 1212

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Janet Bodley ◽  
Rose Kung ◽  
Arne Ohlsson ◽  
Gary Foster ◽  
Kofi Amankwah
Keyword(s):  
Critical Review ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Group B ◽  
In Pregnancy

A New Screening Approach For Fast And Accurate Prediction Of Positive And Negative Urine Cultures By SediMAX Compared With The Standard Urine Culture

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-55
Author(s):  
Massimo Pieri ◽  
Flaminia Tomassetti ◽  
Paola Cerini ◽  
Roberta Felicetti ◽  
Lucia Ceccaroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Cell ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Bacterial Count ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Urine Sediment ◽  
Tract Infections

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most frequent bacterial infections, and the detection of infection in urine samples is expensive and time-consuming. Also, in laboratories a significant proportion of samples processed yield negative results. For this, screening methods represent an important improvement towards the final UTI diagnosis. SediMAX is an automated microscopy, easier to use in laboratories due to its basic procedure and it is widely used for urine sediment analysis. In our study, we evaluated the performance of SediMAX, applying some screening parameters, compared with the gold standard methods, urine culture, to identify all the positive cases for UTI. We analysed 1185 urine samples from our daily laboratory routine. The basis of our screening model was to establish a cut-off for bacterial count (BACT), as 300 bacteria/µL in order to avoid missing positive cases. However, the sensitivity and the specificity achieved were not enough to identify all UTI infection in urine samples. So, in addition to BACT we have considered other parameters, such as White Blood Cell (WBC), Red Blood Cell (RBC), Yeasts (YEST), Age and Nitrates (NIT). The second screening method reached a sensitivity of 100%, that could be reliably employed in detect of UTIs.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Characterization of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from 14 Cities in China

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 3642-3649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjia Sun ◽  
Hongbin Chen ◽  
Yudong Liu ◽  
Chunjiang Zhao ◽  
Wright W. Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Population Analysis ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Brain Heart Infusion ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Screening Cascade

ABSTRACT The prevalence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) among 1,012 vancomycin-susceptible methicillin (meticillin)-resistant S. aureus isolates collected from 14 cities in China from 2005 to 2007 was 13 to 16%, as determined by a combination of (i) measurement by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve method (PAP-AUC) and (ii) estimation from the measured sensitivity and specificity of a screening method. Two hundred isolates from blood were chosen as a subset for measurement of the sensitivities and the specificities of several previously described screening methods by using the results of PAP-AUC as the reference. During this testing, one isolate was found to be a vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain so was not used in the evaluation of the screening tests. Of the other 199 isolates, 26 (13.1%) were hVISA, as assessed by PAP-AUC. A screening cascade of culturing the isolates on brain heart infusion agar containing teicoplanin (5 mg/liter) and then subjecting the positive isolates to a macro-Etest method was applied to the 812 non-blood isolates, yielding 149 positive results. From these results and by adjusting for sensitivity (0.423) and specificity (0.861), the prevalence was estimated to be 15.7%. The precision of that estimate was assessed by reapplying the screening cascade to 120 randomly selected isolates from the 812 non-blood isolates and simultaneously determining their heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate susceptibility status by PAP-AUC. Because PAP-AUC is impractical for use with large numbers of isolates, the screening-based estimation method is useful as a first approximation of the prevalence of hVISA. Of the 27 VISA or hVISA isolates from blood, 22.2% and 74.1% were staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec types II and III, respectively, while 77.8% and 22.2% were agr type 1 and agr type 2, respectively; the MIC ranges were 0.5 to 4 mg/liter for vancomycin and 0.25 to 1 mg/liter for daptomycin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document