scholarly journals Partographic analysis of labour by modified WHO partograph in tertiary care centre

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1920
Author(s):  
Prekshi Jain ◽  
Akshay C. Shah ◽  
Babulal S. Patel ◽  
Shashwat K. Jani
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Uterine Hyperstimulation ◽  
Study Population

Background: The partograph is a simple, inexpensive tool to provide a continuous pictorial overview of labor. The goal of this study is to use partograph to monitor labor, initiate uterine activity that is sufficient to produce cervical changes, fetal descent while avoiding uterine hyperstimulation, hypostimulation and fetal distress and provide timely surgical intervention where required. Methods: A hospital-based observational study involving prospective review of partographs for births that occurred in 2020 was conducted in 2 hospitals including SVP Hospital and V.S hospital Ahmedabad. A partographic analysis of labour was done in randomly selected 200 patients using modified WHO partogram. The study population was divided into Primigravida (96) and Multigravida (104) term patients. partograph recording were commenced at 4 cm dilatation. close maternal and fetal monitoring was done throughout the labour and partogram was plotted to detect any deviation from normal course.Results: Patients were grouped into primigravida and multigravida and based on partogram finding divided into mode of delivery. 22 of total 96 primigravida underwent caesarean section and 74 delivered vaginally. 8 of total 104 multigravida underwent caesarean section and 96 delivered vaginally. Out of 200 newborn only 11 had Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes.Conclusion: The WHO modified partograph is highly effective in reducing both maternal and neonatal morbidity. It aids in assessing the progress of labour and to identify when intervention is necessary. It is effective in preventing prolonged labour, obstructed labour, reducing operative intervention and improving neonatal outcome.

Study on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of women undergoing Caesarean Section using Nice Classification in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Rural Area of Central India - An Observational Prospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuchi M. Jain ◽  
Ketki. Thool ◽  
Manish A. Jain ◽  
Poonam V. Shivkumar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Central India ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Chi Square

Background : Caesarean section is often perceived to be safer than vaginal delivery for mothers and neonates, and thus has become increasingly common around the globe. However, it may actually be detrimental to maternal and neonatal health while consuming valuable resources. Objective : The objective of this study was to categorize the caesarean sections performed in our rural institute into various categories using NICE classification and to study the maternal and neonatal outcome in them. Method : This was a prospective study of all women who underwent caesarean section over a period of 18 months. Data was retrieved from the files of women for morbiditiy and mortality in mothers and babies. Data was entered in MS excel sheet and analyzed with percentages and chi square test using SPSS ver.17. Results: Caesarean section rate (CSR) was 36.88%. All CS were classified into four categories based on urgency as per NICE guidelines. There were 22.62% women in Category I, 38.61% in category II, 28.37% in category III and 10.40% in Category IV. Adhesions, extension of angle, lacerations in lower segment, scar dehiscence, atonic PPH and bladder injury were noted in (12.83%), 11.81%, 6.83%, 4.08% , 1.53% and 0.08% CS respectively. Caesarean hysterectomy was done in 0.24% cases. Postoperative morbidity was febrile morbidity (11.93%), postdural puncture headache (13.85%), paralytic ileus (11.49%), wound infection (8.83%), ARDS (0.70%), sepsis (0.78%), pulmonary edema (0.47%) and pulmonary embolism (0.03%). Maternal mortality was 0.03%. Neonates born were 2577 (29 were twin deliveries). 82.46% neonates were healthy, 16.80% had morbidities and 0.74% were still born. Apgar score of less than 7 was in 10%. 16.80% neonates were admitted in NICU during their hospital stay. Neonatal mortality was 1.47%. Conclusion : Intraoperative and post-operative complication were more in caesarean sections of category I and II as compared to category III and category IV. Neonatal morbidity, mortality and admissions to NICU were more in caesarean sections of category I and II as compared to category III and category IV. Thus though caesarean section is an emergency lifesaving procedure for mother and baby it may prove detrimental to their health.

scholarly journals Study of caesarean section at tertiary care centre: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 2138
Author(s):  
Varsha Kose ◽  
Kumari Sadhvi
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Failure Of Induction

Background: Caesarean section (C-section) is one of the most widely performed surgical procedure in obstetrics worldwide. The WHO guidelines revised in 1994 states that the proportion of C-section birth should range between 5-15% but both in developed and developing countries C-section rate is on the rise. This study was conducted to analyse the frequency and indications for C-section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period from January 2018 to May 2019 at the department of obstetrics and gynecology, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Hingna, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-section in our hospital during the defined study period were studied and statistically analysed according to various parameters namely, the frequency of caesarean section, its indications, age, parity and gestational age of the patient.Results: The total number of women delivered over the study period were 2811. Out of which C-sections were done in 1461 women (51.97%). Previous C-section was the leading indication in 35.72% women followed by fetal distress 14.09%, failure of induction 12.93%, arrest of labour 7.93%, PIH 7.18%, oligo/IUGR 6.50%, breech 4.44%, refusal of vaginal birth 4.24%, CPD 1.71%, bad obstetrics history (BOH) 1.43%, malpresentation 1.30%, prematurity 1.23%,  and multifetal gestation in 1.09% women. Two women had classical C-section 0.07. 14.09% women had various complications. There was no maternal mortality.Conclusions: A high rate of caesarean deliveries was observed. Individualization of the indication and careful evaluation, following standardized guidelines can help us to limit C-section. Audit and feedback are the best way to judge clinical practice and to reduce the frequency of caesarean section in any tertiary setup.

MATERNALAND PERINATAL OUTCOMES WITH COVID-19: A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-32
Author(s):  
Sweety Sinha ◽  
Anjana Sinha ◽  
Ankita Ankita
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Neonatal Infection ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Background: With the exponential increase in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) worldwide, an increasing proportion of pregnant women are now infected during their pregnancy. The knowledge gained from previous human coronavirus outbreaks suggests that pregnant women and their fetuses are particularly susceptible to poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to summarize the maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women infected with COVID-19 during their pregnancy. Methods:Eligibility criteria included pregnant women positive for COVID-19 as detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Atotal of 40 pregnant women positive for COVID-19 as conrmed by RT-PCR, were included in the study. 5% cases had preterm deliveries and LSCS was the preferred mode of delivery in 28 of 40 i.e., 70% cases. There was a tendency for low Apgar score at birth, higher rates of fetal distress, meconium, NICU admissions. There was one IUD only in this study. The treatment patterns of COVID-19 infection among pregnant women during their pregnancy or following delivery was mostly supportive in the form of oxygen and antibiotic therapy. Conclusions: Although the majority of mothers were discharged without any major complications, severe maternal morbidity as a result of COVID-19 were reported. Vertical transmission of the COVID-19 could not be ruled out. Pregnant infected women had different symptoms, and they were given mostly supportive treatments than the general infected population. Careful monitoring of pregnancies with COVID-19 and measures to prevent neonatal infection are warranted.

scholarly journals Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Caesarean Section for Breech Presentation - Experience in Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH)

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Mahe Jabeen ◽  
Sabiha Shimul ◽  
Ummay Salma ◽  
Jebunnesa
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Compared with a fetus with cephalic presentation, a breech fetus faces increased risk during labour and delivery of asphyxia from cord compression and of traumatic injury during delivery of the shoulders and head. Caesarean section avoids most of this risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of vaginal delivery of uncomplicated singleton breech presentation by evaluating early neonatal morbidity and mortality as well as maternal morbidity following vaginal and caesarean delivery for breech presentation. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional comparative study.104 women with singleton breech presentation at term in labour were included consequetively in labour ward of Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH). Informed consent was taken from them. Neonatal and maternal outcome were recorded and statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22. Results: APGAR at 5 min and Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU) admission were not affected by mode of delivery. Long term neonatal outcome is similar in either mode of delivery. Maternal morbidity and duration of hospital stay is increased in caesarean births. Conclusion: Neonatal outcome did not depend on mode of delivery though maternal morbidity and cost of care is increased following Caesarean Section. Proper selection of cases and by improving skill & confidence in new generation obstetrician, vaginal delivery of singleton fetuses in breech presentation at term remains a safe option that can be offered to a woman in a tertiary care centre. Medicine Today 2019 Vol.31(1): 23-26

scholarly journals THE RATE AND INDICATION OF CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Urvashi Kumawat ◽  
Neeta Natu
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Age ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Cesarean Births ◽  
History Of

Method: The rate of caesarean section was only slightly higher than recommended by the WHO. Most of caesarean sections were emergency caesarean sections. Data on all live births were collected, including type of delivery, and indication was recorded if cesarean section was done. Total, primary, & repeat cesarean section rates were calculated for each year. The cesarean rate was calculated as the number of cesarean births divided by total live births. The rate for each indication was calculated annually as the number of cesarean births performed for each indication per 1,000 live births.   Result: These two groups constituted nearly 87.7% of total C-Sections. Only 3.4% of the cases belonged to the elderly age group of above 35 years. Maximum no. of caesarean sections was in multiparous females (54.3%).  Out of 550 caesarean deliveries 76.7% were from urban area. Also, result showed that only 68.7% were booked for antenatal care. Conclusion: The rate of cesarean section has increased with time with primary and repeat cesareans both showing an increase. In the primary CS rate, indications like labor arrest disorders & fetal distress show an increase more than the objective indications like malpresentation. In repeat CS, history of 02 or more previous sections & scar tenderness contributed more than the fetal distress. Keywords: Indication, Caesarean

scholarly journals CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1537-1545
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ikram ◽  
Amna Javed ◽  
Shafqat Mukhtar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Labour Room

Introduction: The cardiotocography (CTG) is more commonly knows aselectronic fetal monitoring (EFM). A cardiotocography measures the fetal heart and the frequencyof uterine contractions. Using two separate disc shaped transducers. Objectives: The objectiveof this study is to co-relate the intrapartum cardiotocography monitoring with fetomaternaloutcome. Study Design: Cross sectional analytical study. Setting: Department of Obstetricsand Gynaecology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Period: From September 2012 toMarch 2013 (Six Months). Patient & Method: Total 60 patients (pregnant females) fulfilling theinclusion criteria were selected for this study, who were admitted in labour room in early andactive labour. In group A normal CTG monitoring and in Group B women with abnormal CTGmonitoring. Maternal outcomes in terms of mode of delivery and fetal outcome (APGAR Score,neonatal seizures, admission to nursery and time of neonatal discharge were seen). Result: Themean age in group A was 26.13+3.90 years and in group B was 26.53+4.17 years. The meangestational age in group A was 38.40+1.50 weeks and in group B was 36.60+1.59 weeks. Ingroup A, 25 (83.3%) woman were delivered through spontaneous vaginal birth and 4(13.4%)women, who were delivered by caesarean section (for all indication except fetal distress), 1(3.3%) woman by assisted vaginal birth (for all other indications). In group B there were 7(23.8%)women who delivered through spontaneous vaginal birth. 3(10%) women by assisted vaginalbirth (for abnormal CTG monitoring) and 20(66.7%) women by caesarean section (for abnormalCTG). In group A, there were 7(23.3%) neonates who were admitted in nursery, while in groupB, there were 19(63.3%) neonates, who were admitted in nursery. Conclusion: Intrapartumexternal fetal cardiotocography is not a single indicator of fetal distress. An increased caesareansection rate in babies with a pathological cardiotocography stresses on the need for additionaltests to differentiate hypoxic fetuses from non-hypoxic.

scholarly journals A comparative study of perinatal outcome in primary caesarean in multiparous women to that in nulliparous women

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 3265
Author(s):  
Surabhi Kokate ◽  
Abhishek Kokate
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multiparous Women ◽  
Primiparous Women

Background: To compare indication, incidence, complication, fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality in primary caesarean section in multiparous women and nulliparous women. Objective of this study was to compare perinatal outcome of caesarean section in multiparous women to that in nulliparous women.Methods: It is a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care centre during April 2017 to April 2018. All patients who delivered vaginally and abdominally were noted during study period. All patients undergoing primary caesarean section were noted. Their indication, incidence and complication throughout stay were noted. Statistics were calculated separately for multiparous women and primiparous women. Statistical analysis was done using chi square test.Results: Total 150 primary caesarean section in primiparous women and 100 primary caesarean section in multiparous women were done.  Fetal distress and meconium stained amniotic fluid forms the most common indication in study. Birth weight of babies was more in multiparous women. Need of blood and blood products was more in multiparous women compared to nulliparous women. Complications like postpartum fever and wound gape was more in multiparous women.Conclusions: In the study population significant difference was seen between the indication and complication between multiparous and nulliparous women.

scholarly journals Relaparotomy after Caesarean Section - An Obstetrician’s Ordeal

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (52) ◽  
pp. 3126-3130
Author(s):  
Sandhyarani Behera ◽  
Sony Nanda ◽  
Puspanjali Khuntia ◽  
Jayashree Rout
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postpartum Haemorrhage ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Total Incidence

BACKGROUND The term "Relaparotomy" (RL) refers to operations performed within 60 days in association with the initial surgery. The aim of current study was to investigate the indications, risk factors, procedures undertaken during relaparotomy after caesarean section (CS). METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study in all patients undergoing relaparotomy after caesarean section, at a tertiary care centre in Odisha over a period of 2 years from January 2017 to December 2018. RESULTS The total incidence of relaparotomies was 0.7 % and the incidence among the sections conducted in our hospital alone was 0.2 %. Obstructed labour (20 %), oligohydramnios with fetal distress (20 %) are major indications of caesarean section. Most of the surgeries (60 %) took place within the first 24 hours of the primary surgery. Most common indication of relaparotomy in our study was postpartum haemorrhage (63.3 %). All women were in the age group of 20 - 35 years and most of them were multiparous (60 %). Pre-existing anaemia is the major (50 %) comorbid factor associated with atonic postpartum haemorrhage which leads to relaparotomy. Major indication of relaparotomy in the present study was haemorrhage (76.5 %). CONCLUSIONS Undertaking proper precautions to ensure proper haemostasis and asepsis, taking calculative decision before embarking a hasty decision is important in decreasing the incidence of relaparotomy. KEYWORDS Relaparotomy, Caesarean Section, Postpartum Haemorrhage, Asepsis

scholarly journals Preferences of pregnant women regarding mode of delivery: a questionnaire based study

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poojan Dogra ◽  
Reena Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Antenatal Clinic ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude

<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rising rate of caesarean section is the subject of concern worldwide. The aim of our study was to know the knowledge, attitude and preferences of pregnant women towards the mode of delivery in a tertiary care centre and hence to see weather this is a contributing factor towards rinsing trend of caesarean delivery or not.  </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective questionnaire study conducted on 100 antenatal women in third trimester who attended the antenatal clinic in SLBS GMC Mandi at Nerchowk from 1<sup>st</sup> June, 2017 to 1<sup>st</sup> September 2017.The information regarding socio-demographic profile, obstetric history, knowledge and attitude statements towards vaginal delivery and caesarean section was collected and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 100 women was interviewed in our study. Out of these, majority (85%) had received education up to High school and above. Majority of the women (90%) had the positive attitude towards vaginal delivery. The most frequently mentioned source of information about the mode of delivery was relatives and friends. Almost half of women agreed to the statement that vaginal delivery creates a more affectionate mother and baby relationship.  Majority of women co-relate that caesarean section was associated with more complications and not good in long term outcome. Economic factors did not play an important role in deciding caesarean birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Majority of pregnant women interviewed were interested to deliver vaginally, while some women were indecisive due to lack of knowledge and some due to apprehension of labor pains during vaginal delivery wanted to undergo a caesarean section. Appropriate counselling of pregnant women and their partners will help in changing their outlook and make them a better judge while choosing their preferences.</p>

scholarly journals An audit of the decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its effect on neonatal outcome

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 4202
Author(s):  
Anuradha G. ◽  
Nirupama V. ◽  
Shirley George
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Emergency Caesarean

Background: Emergency caesarean section (CS) is divided into four categories based on the degree of urgency by RCOG and NICE guidelines. It is recommended that the decision to delivery interval (DDI) in emergency CS should be within 30 minutes in category 1 and within 75 minutes in category 2. Our Primary objective was to study the incidence and indications of emergency CS and audit the DDI in emergency CS at tertiary care hospital. Our secondary objective was to study the effect of DDI on neonatal outcome.Methods: Descriptive study was carried out among 409 women who underwent emergency CS from August 2018 to December 2018 at St. John's medical college hospital, Bangalore. Relevant data was collected by chart review. Emergency CS were categorised according to RCOG guidelines based on the degree of urgency and further classified based on DDI as <30 minutes, 30-75 minutes and >75 minutes.Results: We had 409 cases of emergency CS. Category 1 had 113 (27.63%) cases, category 2 had 126 (30.81%) cases and category 3 had 170 (41.56%) cases. DDI of <30 minutes was achieved in 19.5% in category 1, DDI of <75 minutes was achieved in 93.65% in category 2. Fetal distress was the leading cause of emergency CS in category 1 and 2. There was a high incidence of low APGAR in babies delivered in <30 minutes and lower APGAR was significantly associated with <30 minutes of DDI (p<0.0001).Conclusions: Fetal distress was the leading cause of emergency CS. DDI interval of <30 minutes was not always associated with good neonatal outcome; Category of CS has a significant effect on neonatal outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document