scholarly journals Comparative study on efficacy of fistulotomy and Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure in management of fistula-in-ano

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 3406
Author(s):  
Vinay G. ◽  
Balasubrahmanya K. S.

Background: Fistula-in-ano is one of the most common benign anal conditions in daily surgical practice. Present study aims at comparing the efficacy of open fistulotomy and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure based on its post-operative outcomes.Methods: A comparative study was carried out among 50 subjects attending Department of Surgery, K. R. Hospital, Mysuru over a period of 10 months. Subjects of either sex diagnosed with anal fistula were included in the study. Patients with recurrent fistulas, Crohn’s disease, anal or distal rectal cancers were excluded from the study. Descriptive statistics, unpaired t-test, Fischer exact chi-square test were used to analyse the results.Results: The mean age group of the study subjects was 44.6±8.34 and 41.3±9.71 years among fistulotomy and LIFT procedure group respectively. The gender distribution showed a higher number of males (38) as compared to females (12). There was 23 inter-sphincteric, 2 trans-sphincteric fistula in fistulotomy group and 22 inter-sphincteric, 3 trans-sphincteric fistula in LIFT group. The average operative time for fistulotomy was significantly shorter at 19.6 minutes, compared with 28.4 minutes for LIFT procedure. Wound infection detected in 1 (4%) and 2 (8%) subjects in fistulotomy and LIFT groups, respectively. 1 (4%) subject among fistulotomy group developed anal incontinence. The average healing time for fistulotomy was 8 weeks compared to 3 weeks for LIFT procedure. Total 3 (12%) subjects developed recurrence in LIFT procedure, but no recurrence was observed in fistulotomy group.Conclusions: LIFT procedure is effective and sphincter saving technique for fistula in ano with shorter healing time and lower incidence of postoperative anal incontinence, as compared to open fistulotomy. 

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3257-3260
Author(s):  
Muhammad Najam Iqbal ◽  
Ashfaq Nasir

Background: Fistula in ano is a common disease which has high recurrence rate and high fecal incontinence rate after surgery. We compared modified LIFT (Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) through lateral approach ) with cutting seton for transphincteric fistula. Aim: This study is aimed at which procedure is better with respect to postoperative complications Study design: It was a prospective comparative study. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study from 01-01-2019 to 30-06-2021 which was conducted on 50 patients who presented with transsphincteric fistula in ano (FIA) in surgical ward of Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Patients were divided into two groups .Patients of Group A underwent modified lift procedure and patients of group B underwent cutting seton procedure. Data was collected on a proforma which included patients’ name ,age ,sex, age group, comorbid disease like diabetes mellitus ,chronic liver disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic renal failure, fistula tract involving less than 50% or more than 50% external sphincter ,procedure done, healing time of wound, complications like recurrence and incontinence. Patients were followed for 6 months for healing rate ,recurrence and incontinence. Data was analysed on spss 22 version Results: In Group A, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 20 patients (80%) out of 25. There was no case of anal incontinence after the procedure. 5 (20%) patients experienced recurrence in 6 months . In Group B, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 21 patients (84%), in 6 months follow up . 4(16%) patients were diagnosed as a case of anal incontinence. There were 4 (16%) patients with recurrence. Conclusion: Modified LIFT is better in terms of incontinence where as cutting seton is better in terms of recurrence.it is suggested that for high lying fistula modified LIFT is better procedure and for low lying fistula involving less than 50% sphincter cutting seton is better procedure.. Keywords: Modified LIFT (ligation of ineter sphincteric fistula tract) ,Cutting seton , transphincteric fistula.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 968
Author(s):  
Pradeep Panwar ◽  
Richa Jain ◽  
Mohit Jain ◽  
Rajendra Bagree ◽  
Hetish M. Reddy ◽  
...  

Background: Fistula-in-ano is a very common condition encountered in proctology OPD. The treatment of fistula-in-ano is difficult due to potential risk of recurrence and fecal incontinence. Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistulous Tract is new modality of treatment for the condition. LIFT is a sphincter preserving surgery, aim of our study to evaluate the effectiveness of LIFT surgery.Methods: We did LIFT surgery in 35 cases of intersphincteric and transsphincteric types of fistula-in-ano during the period of December 2019 to July 2020. Standard investigation protocol was followed in all cases. Evaluation of effectiveness of procedure done in terms of anal incontinence, wound healing time, recurrence rate and wound infection rate.Results: 35 patients (23 men, 12 women) were included with mean age of 40 SD 10.38 years. Most of study population have Inter sphincteric fistula (62.9%), and 37.1% participants have trans sphincteric fistula. Healing time was 10-15 days (42.9%) and mean healing time is 17 SD 4.25 days. We didn’t see a single case of anal incontinence with LIFT in our study. 6 cases of recurrence were seen.Conclusions: Result from our study showed that LIFT surgery is effective modality and fulfilling the outcome of sphincter preservation.


Author(s):  
Carlos Placer-Galán ◽  
Jose Mª Enriquez-Navascués ◽  
Tania Pastor-Bonel ◽  
Ignacio Aguirre-Allende ◽  
Yolanda Saralegui-Ansorena

Abstract Background There is still controversy over the usefulness of seton placement prior to the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) surgery in the management of anal fistula. Objective To evaluate the impact of preoperative seton placement on the outcomes of LIFT surgery for the management of fistula-in-ano. Design systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources A search was performed on the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases. Study Selection Original studies without language restriction reporting the primary healing rates with and without seton placement as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery were included. Intervention The intervention assessed was the LIFT with and without prior seton placement. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome was defined as the primary healing rate with and without the use of seton as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery. Results Ten studies met the criteria for systematic review, all retrospective, with a pooled study population of 772 patients. There were no significant differences in the percentages of recurrence between patients with and without seton placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–1.43: p = 0.35). The I2 value was 9%, which shows the homogeneity of the results among the analyzed studies. The 10 included studies demonstrated a weighted average overall recurrence of 38% (interquartile range [IQR] 27–42.7%), recurrence with the use of seton was 40% (IQR 26.6–51.2%), and without its use, the recurrence rate was 51.3% (IQR 31.3–51.3%) Limitations The levels of evidence found in the available literature were relatively fair, as indicated after qualitative evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS) evidence levels. Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that the placement of seton as a bridge treatment prior to LIFT surgery does not significantly improve long-term anal fistula healing outcomes. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract surgery can be performed safely and effectively with no previous seton placement.International prospective register of systematic reviews—PROSPERO registration number: CDR42020149173.


Author(s):  
Ke WEN ◽  
Yun-Fei GU ◽  
Xue-Liang SUN ◽  
Xiao-Peng WANG ◽  
Shuai YAN ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: It is important but difficult to treat complex fistula-in-ano due to the high recurrent rate and following incontinence. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), a novel surgical procedure with the advantage of avoiding anal incontinence, has a variable success rate of 57-94.4 %. Aim: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of modified LIFT operative procedure - ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract - to treat complex fistula-in-ano. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 62 cases of complex fistula-in-ano. The group was treated with the modified approach of LIFT (curved incision was made in the anal canal skin; purse-string suture was performed around the fistula; the residual fistulas were removed in a tunnel-based way) and had a follow-up time of more than one year. Patient´s preoperative general condition, postoperative efficacy and their anal function were compared. Results: The median age of the participants was 34, and 43 (69.4%) cases were male. Forty-one (66.1%) cases were of high transsphincteric fistula, four (6.5%) cases of high intrasphincter fistula, and 17 (27.4%) cases of anterior anal fistula in female. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 (range, 12-51) months. The success rate in the end of follow-up was 83.9% (52/62). The anorectal pressure and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) evaluated three months before and after the operation did not find apparent changes. Conclusions: Compared with LIFT, the modified LIFT remarkably reduces postoperative failure and the recurrence rate of complex fistula with acceptable long-term outcomes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Y. Liu ◽  
Armen Aboulian ◽  
Amy H. Kaji ◽  
Ravin R. Kumar

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 398-432
Author(s):  
Shawbo Shamsaldeen Sulayman ◽  
Thiqa Ali Abdulwahid

The objective of the research was to evaluate the performance of the teaching staff of the Baghdad and Salahaddin University-Erbil from the point of view of the heads of their departments in a number of different colleges as a comparative study. The research community was (247) individuals from the heads of departments in the above universities, and a sample size was chosen randomly was(197) unit, and (134) individuals from the department heads at the University of Baghdad, and (63) unit from the department heads at Salahaddin University-Erbil. To achieve the research objectives, a (closed — open) questionnaire was prepared consisting of (49) paragraphs distributed into six specific fields of alternatives. To answer it and one open question in the questionnaire, the validity and reliability of the questionnaire was verified. The data was analyzed using the (weighted mean equation, the percentage weight equation and the chi-square test). The results showed there was no differences between the responses of department heads in evaluating the teaching performance of faculty members in the research sample in two universities. In addition, a number of proposals were presented to develop the performance of faculty members from the point of view of department heads in both universities. The two researchers made a number of recommendations as well, as well as a number of proposals to conduct future research for researchers in this field.


2002 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 823-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio C. Furlan ◽  
Lenine G. Brandão ◽  
Alberto R. Ferraz

An anatomical study of 50 fresh adult human cadavers was performed in order to verify prevalence of Galen’s anastomosis (GA) and to evaluate whether factors such as gender, ethnicity, side of the neck, and individual stature may interfere with GA prevalence. The results were analysed using the Chi-square test, Student t-test, and F-Snedecor test. GA was observed in 87 of 100 dissections. There was no statistically significant difference regarding GA prevalence between groups separated by ethnicity (p = 0.853), gender (p = 0.198), side of the neck (p = 0.766), or individual height (p = 0.199). Therefore, the GA was a frequent anatomical finding, and this result was not influenced by any studied factor. Comparing our data with previous studies, we also concluded that the GA seems to play an important role in the innervation of the larynx, even though its function remains unclear. Also, it is reasonable to consider GA a constant anatomical constituent.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Bharti

This is a cross-sectional comparative study with the aim to compare two patient groups of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and their respective caregivers with the objectives to quantify and compare the burden in caregivers of person with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and to study the relationship between them. In this study, 40 patients schizophrenia, 40 patients of schizoaffective disorder, along with their 80 respective caregivers were taken on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were assessed using Socio-demographic and clinical sheet &BAS. Appropriate statistics such as mean, standard deviation, chi-square test, unpaired t test, Pearson’s correlation were applied to analyze the data. The results of the study revealed considerable burden of care in families of the patients and a significantly greater burden of care in caregivers of patients with schizoaffective especially in the following domains: spouse related, caregivers’ routine, physical and mental health, taking responsibility, patient’s behaviour and caregiver’s strategy. Some of the demographic variables like age and education etc. were also found to have significant correlation with burden of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document