scholarly journals Coronavirus disease 2019 in neonates

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 773
Author(s):  
Jade Irene Linardi

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic has become a major burden especially in the health care system and economy. COVID-19 has clinical presentations ranging from remain asymptomatic to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death. All age groups are susceptible to this virus, but it seems that children with COVID-19 have milder symptoms than adults. Neonates, however, have been reported to have more severe cases compared to older children. There is also a possibility of vertical transmission from mothers to their neonates which could not be ignored. This review provides current knowledge of COVID-19 in neonates.   

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anamaria J. Robles ◽  
Lucy Z. Kornblith ◽  
Carolyn M. Hendrickson ◽  
Benjamin M. Howard ◽  
Amanda S. Conroy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 204589402096535
Author(s):  
Pratap Karki ◽  
Konstantin G. Birukov ◽  
Anna A. Birukova

Extracellular histones released from injured or dying cells following trauma and other severe insults can act as potent damage-associated molecular patterns. In fact, elevated levels of histones are present in human circulation in hyperinflammatory states such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis. The molecular mechanisms owing to histone-induced pathologies are at the very beginning of elucidating. However, neutralization of histones with antibodies, histone-binding or histone-degrading proteins, and heparan sulfates have shown promising therapeutic effects in pre-clinical acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis models. Various cell types undergoing necrosis and apoptosis or activated neutrophils forming neutrophil extracellular traps have been implicated in excessive release of histones which further augments tissue injury and may culminate in multiple organ failure. At the molecular level, an uncontrolled inflammatory cascade has been considered as the major event; however, histone-activated coagulation and thrombosis represent additional pathologic events reflecting coagulopathy. Furthermore, epigenetic regulation and chemical modifications of circulating histones appear to be critically important in their biological functions as evidenced by increased cytotoxicity associated with citrullinated histone. Herein, we will briefly review the current knowledge on the role of histones in acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis, and discuss the future potential of anti-histone therapy for treatment of these life-threatening disorders.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2146-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Tomizawa ◽  
Akiko Moriya Saito ◽  
Takashi Taga ◽  
Souichi Adachi ◽  
Hideki Nakayama ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2146 Background: Infants (age <1 year) with AML are naturally vulnerable to intensive cytotoxic therapy, however, usually treated with the same protocol as older children with or without dose modification. We report here the unexpected high treatment-related mortality (TRM) mainly due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) observed among this age subgroup in the JPLSG AML-05 study. Patients & Methods: AML-05 study, registered at http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ as UMIN000000511, opened on 11/1/2006 for children (age ≤18 years) with de novo AML excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia and myeloid leukemia associated with Down syndrome. The study stratifies patients by the specific cytogenetic characters and treatment response into 3 risk groups. All patients receive two common induction courses; the first induction course (Ind-1), “ECM,” is based on the predecessor trial AML99, consisted of etoposide (150 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 5), Ara-C (200 mg/m2 for 12-hour i.v. on days 6 to 12), mitoxantrone (5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 6 to 10), and a single dose of triple IT on day 6. For patients <2 years old, drug dosages are reduced by calculating on body weight basis. TRM among infants in AML99 was as low as 7.4% (2/27). Nine early deaths (= deaths of any cause before initiating the second induction course) were reported among the first 275 patients enrolled on AML-05, and mortality was exceptionally high in infants (7/32, 21.8%). This prompted suspension of the protocol accrual for this age subgroup on 4/2/2009 and comprehensive review of induction adverse events (AEs) were carried out. Results: Among the 7 early deaths in infants, 4 deaths occurred during Ind-1 phase, and the other 3 after being off protocol therapy due to severe Ind-1 AEs. The causes of deaths were as follows; one of resistant disease, 4 of ARDS, one of interstitial pneumonia, and one of bacterial sepsis after receiving haploidentical stem cell transplant because of prolonged pancytopenia. Among the 4 ARDS cases, two had preceding RS virus infection, and the other 2 developed ARDS during marrow recovery with G-CSF use. We also evaluated grade 3 and 4 AEs in all age groups, of which 248/275 cases were evaluable. When comparing the infant group (N=27) and the older age group (≥ 1 year, N=221), there were no difference in hematological toxicities, however, non-hematological toxicities, such as renal, cardiac, pulmonary, neurological complications, and tumor lysis syndrome were significantly more common in the infant group. Conclusions: Early death rate among infants in AML-05 study was unacceptably high, and we decided to make the following changes to the AML-05: 1) additional dose reduction by 33% in Ind-1 for infants; 2) enhancing supportive care guidelines regarding infection prevention; 3) close prospective monitoring of induction toxic death. The enrollment of infants was re-opened on 8/11/2009, and no fatal cases are observed since then. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2022 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2254-55
Author(s):  
Seema Shafiq ◽  
Asim Riaz

Dear Editor, It is indeed an honour for us to contribute towards the ongoing research regarding the latest contagion, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) leading to global pandemic with variable clinical outcomes. COVID-19 positive individuals present with a variety of signs and symptoms as sore throat, cough, fever, dyspnoea, headache, myalgia, nausea, and vomiting whereas, some develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome with a fatality rate of about 10%.1 Possible oral findings include xerostomia, hypogeusia, and chemosensory alterations. Common routes of transmission being person-to-person via direct sneeze, cough, and droplet inhalation or by contact through mucosa of eyes, nose and saliva.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Krisna Yuarno Phatama ◽  
Sholahuddin Rhatomy, MD ◽  
Asep Santoso ◽  
Nicolaas C. Budhiparama

At the end of 2019, we faced a new variant of the coronavirus that can cause pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome-like symptoms. It started in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, and spread quickly to the whole world.This new virus is called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and can manifest as a disease called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). On March 13th, 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic, and the story of frightening pandemic begin.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-382
Author(s):  
R.V. Aravinda ◽  
◽  
Priyanka Mahendra Tater ◽  
Harsha Huliyappa ◽  
Christy Joseph Manual ◽  
...  

In the midst of the global pandemic of COVID-19 and its significant morbidity and mortality reported across the world due to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), it has always been posing a new set of complications each passing day. As we are still in the process of understanding about the complications related to COVID-19, we are encountered with complications related to immunization for COVID-19. We are reporting a case of facial onset Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in the patient who received first dose of COVISHIELD vaccine a couple of weeks prior to the onset of his illness.


Author(s):  
Inna Krynytska ◽  
Mariya Marushchak ◽  
Inna Birchenko ◽  
Alina Dovgalyuk ◽  
Oleksandr Tokarskyy

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavi- rus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), led to the ongoing global public health crisis. Existing clinical data suggest that COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have worse outcomes and increased risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The rapid increase in the numbers of patients requiring ICU care may imply a sudden and major challenge for affected health care systems. In this narrative review, we aim to summarize current knowledge of pathophysiology, clinical and morphological characteristics of COVID-19-associated ARDS and ARDS caused by other factors (classical ARDS) as defined by Berlin criteria, and therefore to elucidate the differences, which can affect clinical management of COVID-19-as- sociated ARDS. Fully understanding the characteristics of COVID-19-associated ARDS will help identify its early progres- sion and tailor the treatment, leading to improved prognosis in severe cases and reduced mortality. The notable mechanisms of COVID-19-associated ARDS include severe pulmonary infiltration/edema and inflammation, leading to impaired alveolar homeostasis, alteration of pulmonary physiology resulting in pulmonary fibrosis, endothelial inflammation and vascular thrombosis. Despite some distinct differences between COVID-19-associated ARDS and classical ARDS as defined by Ber- lin criteria, general treatment principles, such as lung-protective ventilation and rehabilitation concepts should be applied whenever possible. At the same time, ventilatory settings for COVID-19-associated ARDS require to be adapted in individ- ual cases, depending on respiratory mechanics, recruitability and presentation timing.  


Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan-Mu Chen ◽  
Hsiao-Ching Lu ◽  
Yu-Tang Tung ◽  
Wei Chen

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and devastating syndrome that contributes to serious morbidities and mortality in critically ill patients. No known pharmacologic therapy is beneficial in the treatment of ARDS, and the only effective management is through a protective lung strategy. Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of ARDS, and antiplatelet therapy may be a potential medication for ARDS. In this review, we introduce the overall pathogenesis of ARDS, and then focus on platelet-related mechanisms underlying the development of ARDS, including platelet adhesion to the injured vessel wall, platelet-leukocyte-endothelium interactions, platelet-related lipid mediators, and neutrophil extracellular traps. We further summarize antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, and P2Y12 inhibitors for ARDS in experimental and clinical studies and a meta-analysis. Novel aspirin-derived agents, aspirin-triggered lipoxin, and aspirin-triggered resolvin D1 are also described here. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge of the role of platelets in the pathogenesis of ARDS, and the potential benefits of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention and treatment of ARDS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document