scholarly journals Fulfillment of civil rights of extramarital children and its effect on social dimensions

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-252
Author(s):  
Alfian Qodri Azizi ◽  
Ali Imron ◽  
Bagas Heradhyaksa
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Moral Responsibility ◽  
Social Condition ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Social Dimensions ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Library Research

This article examines the fulfillment of the civil rights of extramarital children which has become a controversy since the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision no. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, which is considered as a progressive and responsive measure to guarantee children's rights. However, the content of this decision is considered to violate Islamic norms in giving family lineage to extramarital children for it will create a stigma that one does not need a sacred marriage institution if he only wants to establish a civil or lineage relationship with his biological father; instead, it only requires evidence based on science and technology or others in court. This article answers the questions of how to interpret the concept of the civil rights of extramarital children to avoid conflicts with Islamic norms and what are the philosophical and sociological benefits of fulfilling civil rights for extramarital children. This study is qualitative in nature. It is focused more on conceptual ideas based on library research using conceptual and case approaches. It was found that (1) the civil rights of extramarital children are not a lineage right but compensation from their biological father as a form of moral responsibility; (2) philosophically, the civil rights of extramarital children are to fulfill the value of social justice which is distributive and, sociologically, these rights create a prosperous social condition for society by fulfilling the civil rights of the next generation of the nation covering their physical, mental, spiritual, and intellectual needs.

scholarly journals Anak Luar Nikah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Berkaitan Dengan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Keperdataan Anak Di Luar Perkawinan

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhan Asyhadi
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010, yang merubah/menambah norma hukum Pasal 43 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan adalah salah satu bukti nyata akan peran lembaga Pengadilan dalam memikirkan nasib dan masa depan anak yang lahir diluar perkawinan itu terhadap laki-laki sebagai ayah biologisnya, maka dengan norma hukum baru itu, Hakim-hakim pengadilan Agama sesuai dengan kewenangannya diharapkan mampu menjabarkan hak-hak keperdataan anak luar nikah dalam putusan-putusannya, agar kedepan hak-hak keperdataan anak seperti itu terhadap laki-laki sebagai ayah biologisnya terjamin sehingga dapat menjalani kehidupannya dengan wajar sebagaimana mestinya tanpa diskriminasi. Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Perkawinan Children Married Outside After The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 Relating To Protection Against Civil Rights Child Outside Of Marriage Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, which modified / legal norm of Article 43 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage is one of the first concrete evidence of the role of the Court in thinking about the fate and future of children born outside the marriage of a man as the biological father, then the norms of the new law, judges court religion in accordance with the authority is expected to describe the civil rights of children out of wedlock in its decisions, that future civil rights to children as against men as the biological father assured so as to live it to the fair as it should without discrimination. Keywords: The Constitutional Court, Marriage

scholarly journals The Right of a Child Outside the Legal Marriage of a Biological Father: The Analysis of Ḥifẓ Al-Nafs as Law `Illat

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Ali Abubakar ◽  
Juliana Juliana ◽  
Maisyarah Rahmi Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
The Right ◽  
Biological Fathers ◽  
Legal Marriage ◽  
Protection Of Life

This article aims to analyze the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) as the law reason (`illat) of the rights of children outside of legal marriage (ALPS) of biological fathers. Ḥifẓ al-nafs is assumed to be `illat emerging from many neglected ALPS phenomena and resulting in negative stigma and discrimination. This research is a study of Islamic law using the theory of `illat in analyzing the problem of children's rights outside of legal marriage. The research concludes that the presence of the 2010 Constitutional Court decision regarding the civil rights of ALPS with biological fathers reveals new spaces in seeing the nature of ALPS rights. This is different from the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council and classical fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) arguments, which tend to only link the child to the mother. Based on the Constitutional Court decision, the essence of ALPS rights from biological fathers is limited to civil rights. The responsibility of the biological father to ALPS is in the form of physical and mental support, while denying other rights such as guardianship of marriage; ALPS rights today have been largely abandoned. Thus, the protection/care is necessary. `Illat (the reason of law) in ḥifẓ al-nafs (protection of the life) is real and can be juxtaposed with `illat ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of heredity). Ḥifẓ al-nasl does not completely fulfill the real requirements of an `illat which can abolish the abandonment of ALPS.

scholarly journals THE BIOLOGICAL FATHERS HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS WITH EVIDENCE AND CONVICTION OF THEIR CHILDREN

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Anwar Hafidzi ◽  
Nadiyah Khalid ◽  
Rina Septiani
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Comparative Aspect ◽  
Biological Children ◽  
Biological Fathers ◽  
Correct Data

This paper aims to prove that Biological Children can provide Civil Relations with their fathers if they have an apparent legal force. This study differs from other researchers in the comparative aspect of normative Law and Islamic Law. This difference lies in the Constitutional Court decision results, which states that children produced outside of marriage have a civil relationship with the mother and family of their mother, father, and family of their biological father, which can be proven by DNA testing between them. Meanwhile, according to Islamic Law, children outside of marriage (Zina) only have a civil relationship or blood relationship with the mother and the mother's family. The method used in this research is a literature review with a normative approach to the Constitutional Court decision and the Scholar's opinion on children outside of marriage (Siri). This research found that children can biologically provide civil relations with their parents if done in marriage and proven by clear legalities such as witnesses and marriage documents. The presence of a decision of the Constitutional Court is a legal assurance or defense of the human rights of a citizen, whether they have the correct data and facts to their civil relations.

The Status of Outside Marriage Children (The Study of Constitutional Court Regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 Based on the Fuqaha' Perspective)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-584
Author(s):  
Hamam Hamam
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right

Fornication is a kind of jarimah (felony) resulting in confusion of the biological father. However, nowadays, there is clarity on the status of the children out of marriage. The Constitutional Court issued a decision of regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 about the out wedlock children who have a civil relationship and the blood rapport with their biological father as long as it can be proven biologically. This regulation drives some criticisms from various parties; the pro-side of the Court Regulation will claim it in the term of the doer of the adultery, while the contra-side of the Court Regulation will review it in the term of legalized the adultery. Furthermore, the aims of this study are: First, to know the opinion of jurists' law (fuqaha‟) about the status of the out of wedlock children; Second, to find the legal implications of the out of wedlock children after the application of the Constitutional Court regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 based on the Fuqaha' perspective?. Moreover, this study uses the library research. The data are collected through the documentary of the primary and secondary data sources. The collected data are, then, analyzed qualitatively by using the content analysis. The results of this study are: Firstly, This according by the Shafi'i jurists' of four and the ad-Dzahiri the out of wedlock children (bastard) are not related to their biological father, but they are related to their biological mother and her family. Secondly, This according by some groups of Hanafi and Shaykh of Islam Ibn Taymiyah corroborated by ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah the wedlock children (bastard) are related to the men as their biological father and their father's family. Thirdly, the Constitutional Court (MK) regulations do not have any legal implications associated on the civil relationships of the out wedlock children (natural children) with their biological father. Moreover, the attitude of the biological father is classified as a jarimah (felony), and it is entitled to a penalty of the ta'zir; it is an obligation to provide the children, which the amount is considered to the fit and proper in accordance income of his; while the other civil rights includes the right of lineage, inheritance, and the rights of guardians. The ta'zir punishments in the provision of livelihood can be executed after the filing of a lawsuit and obtain an order from the Religion Court. The provision of the living is solely to satisfy the justice and legal protection for the interests of children's rights.

Implication Juridical Decision of The Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Concerning Wanprestasi In the Fiducia Agreement

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21
Author(s):  
Soleh Hasan Wahid ◽  
Harum Mudrikah Mahsun
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Security Holder ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Research Type

The purpose of this paper is to criticize the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019, which determines that the phrases "executorial power" and "are the same as court decisions having permanent legal force" in Article 15 paragraph (2) of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning The Fiduciary Guarantee contradicts the 1945 Constitution. From the norms contained in this article, there is a power of execution that the fiduciary security holder can carry out (creditors), which then causes many problems, both related to the constitutionality of norms and implementation. Thus, the authors question two things, first how is the juridical analysis of the Constitutional Court decision No. 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 regarding breach of contract in the fiduciary agreement? Second, what is the juridical implication of MK Decision No. fiduciary? The writer's research type is library research, a literature study (library research) with a descriptive qualitative research type. The data collection technique used was documentation techniques, and the approach method used in this study was juridical normative. The results of this study conclude that 1) The Constitutional Court's decision has not provided a sense of justice as in Article 27 paragraph (1) and Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, because in this Constitutional Court decision gives more exclusive rights to the debtor because in this case, the creditor does not get legal protection rights in the event of undesirable things (2) This decision has implications for various parties, namely the Court, which now often receives requests for execution and the process will be lengthy, for notaries must add and clarify default clauses in detail. For business people whose creditors (fiduciary recipients) cannot carry out unilateral execution of the object of fiduciary security but must submit a request for performance to the Court. There is a concern that lousy faith will occur from the community's debtor when the creditor is submitting a request for execution to the Court.

scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals Keadilan Bagi Anak Luar Kawin dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Ahmad Farahi ◽  
Ramadhita Ramadhita
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
The West ◽  
Personal Law

This article intents to examine the civil rights of children outside of married arising from Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 review by justice aspects. This article is normative juridical research with a qualitative approach to the primary legal materials, namely Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the constitutional Court Decision No.46 / PUU-VIII / 2010. While the secondary legal materials such as books, journals, research related to children outside of married. Before the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 was issued, children outside of marriage do not get the personal law rights, both the principles of Islamic justice and the West, as well as human rights perspective. After the emergence of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, children outside married have the same status as a legitimate child, with the requirement to have medical evidence.<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji hak-hak keperdataan anak luar kawin yang muncul akibat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ditinjau dari aspek keadilan. Artikel ini merupkan hasil penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan bahan hukum primer yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, jurnal, penelitian terkait anak luar kawin. Sebelum putusan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dikeluarkan, anak luar kawin tidak mendapatkan hak-hak keperdataannya secara adil. Baik menurut prinsip keadilan Islam, Barat, maupun perspektif HAM. Pasca munculnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak luar kawin memiliki kedudukan yang sama dengan anak sah, dengan syarat memiliki bukti medis.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
S.H.S Ulil Albab ◽  
Trinah Asi Islam
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Systematic Exposition

Abstract: The problem of resolving Sharia banking disputes arises after the issue of Law Number 8 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, precisely in Article 55 paragraph (2). Article 55 paragraph (2) legally reduces Law No. 3/2006 concerning Religious Courts which gives authority to the Religious Courts in resolving Islamic economic disputes. resulting in a dualism of the authority of the Court, namely the Religious Courts and General Courts. In the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 states that Article 55 Paragraph (2) of the Islamic Banking Law, causes legal uncertainty that is contrary to Article 28D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution concerning legal certainty. This research uses the library research method, namely research that studies and examines theories, and ideas, with a normative approach that aims to provide a systematic exposition of the rule of law. This study analyzes the settlement of Sharia Banking disputes Post Constitutional Court Ruling Number: 93 / PUU-X / 2012 and its legal implications. The decision of the Constitutional Court was that the settlement of sharia banking was settled in the Religious Courts and Arbitration Institutions so that there was no longer dualism in resolving Sharia Banking disputes. Keywords: Juridical Analysis, Sharia Banking Disputes, Constitutional Court Decision Number: 93 / PUU-X / 2012   Abstrak: Masalah penyelesaian sengketa perbankan Syariah muncul setelah lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah, tepatnya pada Pasal 55 ayat (2). Pasal 55 ayat (2) tersebut secara yuridis mereduksi UU Nomor 3 tahun 2006 tentang Peradilan Agama yang memberikan kewenangan kepada Peradilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah. sehingga menimbulkan dualisme kewenangan Pengadilan yaitu Peradilan Agama dan Peradialn Umum. Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 menyebutkan bahwa Pasal 55 Ayat (2) UU Perbankan Syariah, menyebabkan ketidak pastian hukum yang bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D Ayat (1) UUD 1945 tentang kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode penelitian kepustakaan (library research) yaitu penelitian yang mengkaji dan menelaah tentang teori, dan gagasan, dengan pendekatan  normatif yang bertujuan untuk memberikan eksposisi yang bersifat sistematis mengenai aturan hukum. Penelitian ini menganalisi tetang penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 dan implikasi hukumnya. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut memutuskan penyelesaian perbankan syariah diselesaikan di Pengadilan Agama dan lembaga Arbitase sehingga tidak ada lagi dualisme penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Kata Kunci:   Analisis Yuridis, Sengketa Perbankan Syariah, Putusan Mahkamah                                          Konstitusi Nomor: 93/PUU-X/2012

scholarly journals Civil Relationship of Children Born without Marriage with Biological Father based on Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Cok Gede Mega Putra
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Relationship Of

The purpose of this study is to analyze the civil relationship between the children born without marriage with his biological father and the arrangement about the civil relationship between the children whose mothers did not have marriage. This study is a normative juridical which is the approach used in this is is the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The legal material comes from document studies. This study is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study showed that the children born outside marriage initially have only a civil relationship with their mother and mother's family according to Article 43 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage on what is meant by a child outside of marriage but with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/ 2010, then a child born outside marriage can have a civil relationship with father and his father's family. The father and mother have rights and obligations to the born, even if the child is born outside of marriage. In this study, it can be concluded that children born without marriage have civil relations with their biological father as stipulated in Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010. The arrangement of civic relationships between children whose mothers are not married as in Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, but by Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the child has a civil relationship with his mother and father.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI TERHADAP PENGUJIAN KETETAPAN MPR/MPRS PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM RANGKA MENGAWAL TEGAKNYA KONSTITUSI NEGARA

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-122
Author(s):  
Tomi Agustian
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law

This study aims: first, the decision of the Constitutional Court adjudicates and does not accept the testing of the MPR Decree, secondly, the implications of testing the MPR's Decree after the decision of the Constitutional Court. The method used in this study is normative research or library research. The results of the study obtained first, the basis of the Constitutional Court Decision according to the 1945 Constitution of 24C paragraph (1) that the Constitutional Court only has the authority to test the Law on the Basic Law and the MPR / S Decree is not included in the Constitutional Court's authority. Secondly, the implication is that there is no mechanism for testing. MPR provisions cause a legal vacuum as well as the absence of an authorized institution to test the MPR Decree (tetraa incognita)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document